NAUDL Logo
Urban Debate Teams Debate Transportation Funding in Washington, DC

    

On January 16th, urban debate teams from Baltimore and New York City debated the 2012 policy resolution on transportation infrastructure investment for an audience of transportation industry experts at the Transportation Research Board's 92nd Annual Meeting in Washington, DC.

 

Urban debate teams from Baltimore and New York
 listen to the judges panel
 

The NAUDL Public Debate took place at the Transportation Research Board's 92nd Annual Meeting in Washington, DC. Arguing the affirmative case were Raiesa Fraser and Avril Gordon Joseph of the Achievement First Brooklyn High School, New York City Urban Debate League and on the negative case, Darius Adejo-Liely and Jabree Gordon of Knowledge and Success Academy, Baltimore Urban Debate League.

 

The Transportation Research Board event was part of the NAUDL Public Debate program to promote urban debate leagues nationally. "We are thrilled to offer these young urban debaters a chance to present their arguments - and the results of their hard work on this important topic - to this audience of transportation experts," said Mark Norman, Director of the Technical Activities Division of the TRB.  

 

The NAUDL and staff of the Transportation Research Board (TRB) assembled an impressive panel of VIP judges from the transportation policy sector: Dorval Carter, Chief Counsel at the Federal Transit Administration (FTA); Julie Cunningham, President and CEO of the Conference of Minority Transportation Officials (COMTO); Susan Kurland, Assistant Secretary for Aviation and International Affairs of the U.S. Department of Transportation (U.S DOT); Shirley McCall, Director of the TransTech Academy at Cardozo Senior High School; Lucy Priddy, Research Civil Engineer, U.S. Army and incoming chair for TRB's Young Members Council; Jeffrey Shane, partner at Hogan Lovells and former Under Secretary of Policy at U.S. DOT under George W. Bush; and Charles Wright, Executive Director for the James E. Clyburn University Transportation Center at South Carolina State University.

 

The debaters presented arguments for and against federal government investment in transportation infrastructure, including evidence from their own experiences as commuter students in New York and Baltimore. Members of the audience and the judges were impressed not only with the teams excellent debate skills, but with their preparedness and poise before an audience of transportation leaders.

 

Also in the audience were students from the TransTech Academy of Cardozo Senior High School in Washington, DC. The students voted along with the judges. The affirmative team from NYCUDL won in a close vote. Following the debate, audience members participated in a lively Q&A session with the debaters.

 

Your support helps ensure that more young people have access to urban debate programs.
 
Please join the NAUDL in its goal to triple the number of urban debaters!
 

  
Winners Raiesa Fraser and Avril Gordon Joseph, NYCUDL
   In Their Own Words: 
  

"Taking this opportunity was a new experience to me because it is different unlike any other typical high school policy debate. This debate not only engaged me with new people that work in various aspects of the TRB, but it also helped me consider what I wanted to pursue in college and as a career. The amount of research on transportation policies and crucial issues drives me to be a well-aware, engaged American. I am constantly learning new aspects of our nation everyday."

Raiesa Fraser

Achievement First Brooklyn HS

 

 

"I knew that debate was full of wonders but I would have never thought it would have led me to the once in a lifetime opportunity of speaking in front of such powerful people. After going to this debate I have decided to consider continuing debating next year in college."

Avril Gordon Joseph

Achievement First Brooklyn HS

Like us on FacebookView our profile on LinkedIn
National Association for Urban Debate Leagues
332 South Michigan Avenue, Suite 500
Chicago, Illinois 60604