MPA banner 2
Compliance Update  
 December 3, 2013
...from MPA, your trusted compliance strategist 
Month Year

$48 Million Enforcement Against Therapy and Nursing Home Company - Lessons We Can Learn

 

The end of 2013 finds the OIG finishing the year with a flourish in the arena of its skilled nursing enforcements. A company that owns nursing homes and therapy companies recently settled a whistleblower case for $48 million, one of the largest nursing home Medicare recoveries in U.S. history. In the settlement, the company also agreed that each of the six involved facilities would be bound by the terms of a five-year corporate integrity agreement (CIA) with the Office of Inspector General. The CIA and the single, lump sum $48 million payment go toward settling claims of overbilling the government for unnecessary therapy services provided to Medicare patients.

 

The case includes claims for:

  • submitting false claims to the government for physical, occupational and speech therapy services provided to Medicare beneficiaries that were not medically necessary; 
  • providing therapy to patients whose conditions and diagnoses did not warrant it;
  • providing therapy to patients solely to increase reimbursement from Medicare; 
  • creating a corporate culture that improperly incentivized therapists and others to increase the amount of therapy provided to patients to meet planned targets for Medicare revenue;
  • setting therapy targets without regard to patients' individual therapy needs;
  • billing for inflated amounts of therapy it had not provided; and
  • keeping patients in facilities for periods of time exceeding what was medically necessary for treatment of their conditions. 

The lawsuit was originally filed in 2006 by two therapists under the whistleblower provisions of the False Claims Act.  It involves claims through August of 2011. The amount that the whistleblowers will receive has not been determined, but such awards can be as high as 25% of the recovery.

 About the settlement, the company's president and CEO indicated that the company has made, and will continue to make, significant investments in compliance. Additional costs associated with enhanced compliance activities, including monitoring expenses and other costs under the corporate integrity agreement, and interest expense on a portion of the settlement amount, will total approximately $2.5 million annually. No figure was given for the amount spent defending the case, but given that the lawsuit lasted for seven years from the time of filing, the legal costs would be expected to be significant.

 

The claims in this case are not new to us, and some of the lessons it presents have been covered on multiple occasions in the past; and yet, there are a number of pointers we can take away. For example, this case reminds us that the OIG enforces to get money. Therapy costs the government a lot of money, and where therapy is deemed useless or otherwise does not qualify for reimbursement, the OIG continues to use the false claims act to collect damages that are subject to significant multipliers. Keep in mind, the $48 million and the CIA represent a compromised agreement. The potential damages could have been much higher.

 

Also of note is that the claims settled involve corporate culture. In this case, the OIG's allegations about culture very specifically spell out that the company set targets to maximize reimbursements from Medicare. This enforcement involved claims from a time period prior to March 23, 2013, when compliance became mandatory in nursing homes. The Affordable Care Act made compliance mandatory in skilled nursing, and providers can be excluded for simply not having an effective compliance program. This may have the effect of lightening the burden of proof for the government. In other words, the government may not have to prove that the corporate culture caused fraud; it may only need to prove that the provider did not have a culture of compliance, or other compliance program components, in order to exclude the provider from participation in federal programs. But regardless of how and when the government enforces, a comprehensive and effective compliance program is not only mandatory under the ACA, it is also essential in preventing fraud and abuse, and in preparing for OIG surveillance.     

MPA can help

 

MPA helps long-term care and other providers to establish and implement effective compliance programs with a comprehensive range of services including auditing, monitoring, policy formation, and client- specific online training for staff and boards of directors. MPA's consulting services also include guidance in creation of a culture of corporate compliance which is required by the OIG guidelines. To learn more about enhancing your compliance culture or about how your compliance program can help you avoid penalties, please visit our website or give me a call at 314-434-4227 ext. 25.

 

                                 

        Elizabeth Parker 

        Associate Compliance Manager

 

MPA works with healthcare providers who want to meet the strict and ever-changing criteria for compliance programs.

 

 Subscribe to our Compliance
 Updates


About MPA

Shared Compliance Program

Shared Financial Reporting

Turnaround and Continuing Management

Certificate of Need

Market Assessment and Demand Analysis


MPA is uniquely qualified to manage every stage of compliance program development, implementation, and ongoing management.
 

Follow us on Twitter

View our profile on LinkedIn


 


MPA is not a law firm and neither MPA nor any of its employees provide legal advice or legal services. Receipt or use of this Compliance Update does not create or constitute an attorney-client relationship between the user and MPA or any of its employees. The information included in this Compliance Update should not be construed as legal advice or be applied to any specific factual situation without first obtaining the advice of your legal counsel.