blogger collage
Controversial, Conservative, Courageous
The primary purpose of this blog is to explore the intellectual and moral basis of  political systems. But there is a lot more. Here marks the confluence of economics, politics, religion, biblical eschatology, reason, and evidence.
July 14, 2013 
Politics and Science: Part III (Homosexuality)

The basis of liberals' "compassion" for homosexuality is their understanding that they are born gay. Folks, this is really simple. There is NO evidence to support that claim. The burden of scientific proof is on them.They have been searching feverishlessly for a gay gene for years, and haven't found one. Wanna know why they haven't found one? THERE ISN'T ONE!


Like every one of their harmful ideas, the views of liberals are never based on TRUTH!

 

In the meantime, they are deliriously supporting a lifestyle that is devastating to those practicing homosexuality--and equally harmful to other members of society. While there are exceptions to the rule, the homosexual lifestyle is ravaging. Statistics show that homosexual behavior ON AVERAGE is marked by death, disease, disappointment, promiscuity, perversity, addiction, and misery. The real threat to persons in the homosexual lifestyle does not seem to be discrimination, but physical devastation. Here are a few statistics:

 

  • As best we know, the lifespan of the average homosexual is 20-30% shorter than the rest of the population.
  •  25% to 30% of homosexuals are alcoholics compared to 7% in the general population. 
  • Homosexual men have an HIV infection rate 60 times higher than the general public.
  • Homosexuals are 3 to 16 times more likely than heterosexuals to molest a child and 15 times more likely to murder. 
  • Various studies have shown that gays have somewhere between 10 and 110 different sex partners per year--again ON AVERAGE. Fidelity among even "married" gays is almost non-existent. Is this a loving lifestyle?

The pathology of homosexual practice gives the reasons for many of the ravages of this lifestyle, especially for gay men. In a 1991 paper, James Holsinger Jr, a physician nominated for the post of Surgeon General, explained that the structure and function of the male and female reproductive systems are fully complementary. But the rectum is incapable of mechanical protection against severe damage. Not only is the rectum not lubricated, but the anal sphincters are designed for only the outward passage of objects.

  

Holsinger stated, "From the perspective of pathology and pathophysiology, the varied sexual practices of homosexual men have resulted in a diverse and expanded concept of sexually transmitted disease and associated trauma." Among items in a long list of problems listed by Holsinger are these: enteric diseases (infections from a variety of viruses and bacteria including a very high incidence of amoebiasis, giardiasis, and hepatitis, etc.), trauma (fecal incontinence, anal fissure, rectosigmoid tears, chemical sinusitis, etc.), sexually trasmitted diseases (AIDS, gonorrhea, simplex infections, genital warts, scabies, etc.).

  

Can homosexuals change? Yes. In various studies, cure rates range from about 30% to 70%, which is about the same as the cure rate for alcoholism.

 

Now here is an unscientific study you can do on your own. Pay attention to what homosexuals say their relationship was with their father. If your observation matches mine, you will notice that overwhelmingly the homosexual will admit that his father was abusive, distant, or absent.  

Besides relational problems with their father, abuse as a child by someone else is often the root cause of homosexuality. 

 

Do we owe these people compassion? Yes. But is it compassionate to fail to warn someone that they are about to fall off a cliff?

 

Oh, and one more thing. To you "libertarian Christians" that support gay marriage: WHAT IN HEAVEN'S NAME ARE YOU THINKING?

  

For details, our Faith Facts site is perhaps the most comprehensive on the web:


Truth Matters



Sincerely and hopefully,

 
Charles Meek
Off Grid Blogger
 

*********************

The utopian perfectibility that liberals crave is detrimental to society--indeed, not even possible by government edict or by any human effort. Liberals are deceived in thinking they are working for good. The welfare state, while well-intentioned, institutionalizes indolence and poverty--and is thereby immoral. The result of the welfare state is not true charity; rather it is theft from one group to benefit another group in order to keep the latter on the dole for political votes. 

While a just society will seek equality of opportunity and appropriate assistance for the truly needy, liberal redistribution schemes ultimately hurt both the recipients and the contributors. Wealth redistribution forced by the heavy hand of the state distorts the moral arrangement between parties when charity is freely given. There is a difference between a hand-up and a hand-out.

Biblically ordered liberty is moral. But liberalism in any of its forms, properly understood, is tyrannical. All forms of utopian statism have as their root the need to control other people by edict rather than by conscience. Statism is inherently inefficient, produces little, takes resources from the productive economy, and is therefore detrimental to growth and the welfare of a society. 

 

Liberalism has everything turned on it head. It punishes achievement but rewards failure. Liberal thought is often opposed to objective moral values and is opposed to a moral authority above itself. Thus liberal thought says that rights come from government, rather the American ideal of unalienable rights from God. It is demonstrably true that little is sacred with liberalism outside of one's personal subjective feelings or political power--not the Bible, not the Constitution, not the Rule of Law, not natural law, nor even life itself. 

 

Thus liberalism is the least likely system to honor the inherent worth of the individual, and the most likely to harm the most vulnerable in society such as the expendable elderly and the innocent unborn. Liberals' profession of tolerance is hypocritical as liberals certainly do not tolerate opposition to their errant views. Liberals are tolerant until you disagree; then you become a racist hillbilly. Indeed, the further left a society progresses the more it is intolerant and destructive--a fact proven time and again by history.

 

While liberals may be moral and well-intentioned in their own lives, their views are not consistent with what is good. In actuality liberals are working to tear down or distort everything that is good and elevate what is evil--including in art, music, culture, business, politics, science, sexuality, education, truth, beauty, justice, morality, and logic. So ironically liberalism is neither moral, compassionate, tolerant, nor effective. Christian capitalism is the most moral, leads to the most freedom, and produces the most economic benefits for society.

 

"One of the greatest mistakes is to judge policies and programs by their intentions rather than their results."                                                                 --Milton Friedman


If the foundations are destroyed, what can the righteous do?  --Psalm 11:3

Redeem us, Oh Lord, from man's oppression. Make your enemies like whirling dust, like chaff before the wind.  --Psalms 83:13; 119:124

With his mouth the godless man would destroy his neighbor, but by knowledge the righteous are delivered.  --Proverbs 11:9

Stay Connected

 

 Also please visit my other websites:

 

Like us on Facebook




  
Foundation
The liberal agenda has as its center piece the twin goals of compassion and fairness. However noble these goals may be, the dirty little secret of liberalism is that behind this respectable front, liberal policies actually produce the opposite!
 
For liberals, America is a 200+ year-old mistake. What liberals really want is the destruction of institutions that promote true compassion and fairness--including the Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the Rule of Law, natural law, Biblical Christianity, frugal and responsible government, and traditional western values. Their unstated goals are control and cronyism--ultimately the obliteration of anything that gets in their way of their lust of power. 
 
Liberal politics by its nature is divisive and unfair, promoting envy and covetousness among groups of citizens. Its beneficiaries are largely arbitrary and may include young men in baggy pants with their hats on backwards (sitting in front of a TV all day)--as well as the single moms around town that these studs impregnated. But just as easily liberal cronyism will cull other groups for support including union bosses, abortionists, bankrupting solar executives, or guilt-ridden movie stars.
 
The "C" words for liberalism do not include compassion. But they do include control, confiscation, and covetousness!
 
Government intervention leads to dependency, which creates indolence, which produces economic stagnation. The absolute worst thing that public policy could do for an economy (or for the individuals involved--at EITHER end of the economic spectrum) is to reduce the incentive to work, but this is EXACTLY what liberal policies do! 
 
Liberals are mistaken in their idea that the economy is a pie to be divided up by government. The economy is a dynamic entity which grows by innovation and human effort. Only policies which promote growth ultimately benefit a society, including the poor.
 
           --Off Grid Blogger
Stay Connected

Facebook    Twitter    LinkedIn    Pinterest

Copyright © 20XX. All Rights Reserved.