|
|
|
The Steamboater Whistle
Fall 2013
Volume 52, Issue 4
www.steamboaters.org
North Umpqua River, Oregon
|
Announcements and Club Events |
Steamboater, Nathanial P. Reed, receives Atlantic Salmon Federation award
In November of this year Nathanial (Nat) Reed was recognized by the Atlantic Salmon Federation for his ongoing work in the conservation and recovery of Atlantic salmon. Nat was one of the first to recognize that commercial fishing for wild Atlantic salmon that migrate to Greenland was devastating the salmon runs to North American rivers. He has been influential in getting stricter controls on this fishery and has been very involved toward improving the science behind the restoration efforts in Maine and throughout eastern Canada.
Nat was Assistant Secretary of Interior for Fish, Wildlife and Parks during the Nixon and Ford administrations. Many of the National Parks in Alaska were created during his administration. He is best known for his efforts to protect the Florida Everglades . Mr. Reed is the recipient of many national, state and environmental awards plus four honorary degrees. It is Frank Moore's opinion that Nat is the "greatest person the conservation/fishing community has ever known".
Thank you Nat Reed for being apart of the North Umpqua history!
Steamboaters Join McKenzie Lawsuit by Peter Tronquet
In the Spring 2013 edition of the Steamboater Whistle, I related the story of why the Steamboaters co-signed, at the request of the McKenzie Fly Fishers, a 60-day Notice of Intent to Sue the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife and the US Army Corps of Engineers. You remember the issue: The Mckenzie River has the only population of wild spring Chinook salmon in the Willamette basin; the population has declined to about 1000 wild fish. We contend that ODFW's hatchery program, that releases 800,000 Chinook smolts annually, is a major cause in the decline of the wild animals, which are listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act.
So we sent a settlement letter asking ODFW and the Corps to dramatically reduce the hatchery plants (to 100,000) and to write a Hatchery Genetic Management Plan (HGMP) and have it approved by NOAA Fisheries. The HGMP would set scientific guidelines for management of the ODFW/Corps hatchery program. The requirement for an HGMP has been in place since 2008.
ODFW responded by saying that hatchery fish are only a minor limiting factor and, by the way, the hatchery fish that are being used in the McKenzie program are no different genetically than the wild fish. Never mind that every scientific study has shown that the hatchery environment results in a genetic or behavioral change, which causes the hatchery fish to be different from the wild animal. Most recovery and conservation plans in Oregon specify management actions that attempt to minimize the interactions of hatchery and wild fish and recognize the potential negative impacts of hatchery fish on wild fish when the two spawn naturally.
It was hard to take ODFW's response seriously. It was clear that agency inertia would continue. So the Steamboaters Board voted unanimously to join the McKenzie Fly Fishers and file suit.
Perhaps the court won't require the agencies to reduce the hatchery smolt releases to 100,000, as we asked. What we can expect is that the court will end the procrastination and require the agencies to agree on a plan that will reverse the downward trajectory of wild McKenzie spring Chinook and abide by the requirements of the Endangered Species Act. All other Willamette basin wild Chinook are extinct. Now is the time to push aggressively for resolution of this crisis. It's not a stretch to think that a robust McKenzie Chinook recovery plan might codify management actions that sooner or later benefit wild fish in the Umpqua basin and elsewhere in the state.
|
|
| Kitchen Pool History by Frank Moore
| |
One of the most productive and easy to fish pools (in low water) in the
entire Umpqua system, is the Kitchen Pool. A person should always fish over the rim of the bed rock before standing and casting off of the ledge that forms the edge of the pool.
The "Kitchen Pool" derived its name because it was right in front of the original fishing camp on the Steamboat Flat that was run by Zeke Allen, and also was overlooked by the Dining Room of Clarence Gordon's North Umpqua Lodg when it was constructed.
I have enclosed a picture of both. The kitchen of the NU Lodge is in front of Delia Gordon, with the dining area to Delia's left, overlooking the river and the "Kitchen Pool"

|
|
President's Message by Lenny Volland
| |
The summer picnic in mid-August brought about 40 folks together at the Susan Creek day-use site. The current board of directors, as voted on during the meeting, are listed on the last page of this Whistle. During the business meeting Rich Grost showed photos of salmon and steelhead moving through the Soda Springs fish ladder. Hopefully some of these fish will make it up Fish Creek to spawn. Laura Jackson gave a summary of the Steamboat ladder reconstruction. An informational sign is being developed by ODFW which acknowledges, among other organizations, the contribution the Steamboaters made toward the ladder reconstruction. She also mentioned the placement of lamprey ramps at Winchester Dam to improve their passage upriver. The lake behind the dam was drawn down in early September to facilitate some repair work to the dam. The contractor installed sprinklers along the resulting backwater mud flat to reduce the mortality of the young lamprey (called ammocetes). Lamprey eel are on Oregon's sensitive species list and have been declining significantly on the North Umpqua. Finally Sierra Lewis, recent masters graduate in fisheries from Oregon State, summarized some of her thesis work related to the tracking of marine nitrogen in stream-side vegetation above and below Soda Springs dam. Salmon are thought to be transporters of this nitrogen isotope as they return to headwater streams to spawn. The relative strength of the marine nitrogen signal is thought to be based upon population abundance and salmon mortality rates across an entire river basin. Her research was to infer the historical distribution of salmon in the upper reaches of the North Umpqua based upon deposition patterns of this nitrogen isotope. Her results indicate that this technique may not be universally applicable as way to trace historical salmon distributions.
At this writing the McKenzie FlyFishers continue to press the ODFW on the introduction of hatchery spring Chinook into that river. The Steamboaters have joined with the McKenzie Fly Fishers in their Notice of Intent to Sue. As of early November both the McKenzie Flyfishers' Board and a majority of their membership have voted to go forward with the lawsuit.
Peter Tronquet, Joe Ferguson and Jeff Dose have been actively involved in various stakeholder meetings related to the Multi-species Coastal Conservation Plan (MCCP). The Steamboaters Board voted in late August to hire two fisheries scientist, Steve Cramer and Chuck Huntington, to review portions of the draft conservation plan. Steve will evaluate the plan's emphasis on hatchery production, the potential harvest of wild salmonids within the Umpqua River basin, the low escapement levels and the abundance/ dispersion assumptions for winter steelhead. Chuck will review the basins listed in the conservation plan as wild fish management areas. As part of this science panel review of the draft conservation plan, the Native Fish Society has also contracted with two fisheries scientists to review proposed hatchery programs. The intent of both organizations is to provide an external science review of the draft conservation plan with the hopes of affecting a change in proposals before the plan becomes a final document. As a minimum the science panel observations will provide a benchmark for further conservation efforts that may occur in the future.
Over the last several years there has been several discussions between various Steamboater members related to fishing regulations appropriate for the fly water section of the North Umpqua River, everything from closing a section to winter fishing to even more constraints of fishing gear. More recently, discussion during the MCCP stakeholder meetings have suggested a limited harvest of wild winter steelhead in the lower Umpqua River. Understandably discussions like these raise the hackles of some folks. Sometimes we need to get out of Dodge to put these discussions in perspective. I had two experiences this summer to hone down my perspective, one of over regulation and the other of under regulation. I was fishing off San Juan Island for humpback salmon coming in from the Strait of Juan de Fuca. Since I last fished there, about 2004, the WDFG has changed the regulations to one barbless hook per lure with all native fish being released while in the water. This is in a geographical area which sees salmon in the low millions passing through. The second experience was at the mouth of the Deschutes River in mid September after fishing upriver several days for steelhead. Everything we were catching was less than 10 pounds, and all natives. The fish biologist who checked us on leaving the river mentioned the Indian nets on the Columbia are tending to select out the larger fish. Last year the fish take was large enough in one night to force closing the anadromous fish season in northeast Oregon that year. On the Umpqua River we are dealing with a minuscule number of fish compared to the Deschutes or the San Juan Islands and we, at times, pride ourselves in thinking maybe we are over-regulating. Are we capable of sacrificing our immediate desires for some biological potential in the future, even if we may not reach that potential in our lifetime? In the counseling world they call it 'delayed gratification'. Contrary to the old adage, I'm suggesting a bird (fish in this case) in the hand isn't worth two in the bush when it comes to wild fish.
|
|
Soda Springs Fish Passage Update October 2013
|
|
After four years of design and three years of year-round construction, the new fish passage facilities at Soda Springs Dam were completed at the end of November 2012. The facilities were painstakingly designed to meet agency criteria for passing all native anadromous fish within the constraints imposed by the narrow canyon, steep topography, unstable slopes, and temperamental river.
Soda Springs Dam before (left) and after construction of fish passage facilities.
The facilities include a fish ladder about 800 feet long with 59 pools. It is a "half-Ice-Harbor" design with smooth, continuously sloped floor and smooth, rounded corners at all turning pools for smooth hydraulics and to facilitate fish and lamprey passage. At each pool, fish have the option of swimming through an 18-inch square opening along the bottom, or swimming / leaping over a 4-foot-wide weir at the top, either way gaining a 1-foot rise in elevation. A special video system was installed in February 2013 at the fish ladder counting station from which ODFW is documenting the number, size and species of adult salmon and steelhead using the ladder.
The fish screen, for protecting downstream-migrating fry, smolts, and adult steelhead kelts, is actually a series of three different screens over a length of about 400 feet. The primary screens are about 200 feet long by 19 feet tall; the secondary and finishing screens are smaller in area. All screen material is stainless steel wedgewire, with gaps less than 1.75 millimeters (<3/32 inch). Screen surfaces are cleaned by a combination of moving brushes and water jets to move sediment along the bottom and backwash the finishing screens. Most water passes through the screens into the penstock (and hence to the powerhouse a half-mile downstream) or into the fish ladder entrance to help attract fish and supply water to the river. The remaining water flow, about 25 cubic feet per second, carries the fish back to the river via a custom, super-smooth pipe system. When fish are being sampled, the fish flow will be routed into an evaluation building and further screened so that fish can be retained in a holding tank and examined for size, number, condition and species.
Soda Springs Dam and new fish passage facility, November 2012, with features color-coded. Blue lines indicate water flow toward the fish ladder, fish screen, spillway, and out the fish ladder bottom. Red lines indicate water flow to the original intake (used during high-flow events to protect the fish screens from collapse). Orange lines indicate the path of adult fish from the base of the dam up the fish ladder and into the reservoir. Green lines indicate the fish screen and path of juvenile fish moving downstream back into the river. Yellow box indicates the new spillway surface smoothed for improved fish passage.
Despite 30 days of rigorous testing and commissioning of the new facility in fall 2012, during which it passed a mid-November high flow event, a larger and faster high flow event early on Dec. 2, 2012, washed a slug of debris into the screen which, within about three minutes, plugged and severely damaged the primary fish screens. Review of this incident lead to several modifications of the fish screen structure and operational protocols which are being implemented now. Construction of the fish screen modifications is expected to be completed by the end of 2013 (completion was initially planned for October, but a manufacturing flaw in the screen material caused a delay of schedule). To accommodate this work safely, the USFS road to Soda Springs dam remains closed until the end of December 2013.
Fortunately, during 2013 there were not yet any smolts upstream of the dam to need fish screen protection. With the fish screen out-of-service, we opened the spillway from April through June 2013 to allow downstream passage for steelhead kelts that spawned above the dam.
Once repaired and improved, the fish screen and ladder facilities will undergo a rigorous performance evaluation during 2014 to tune the flows and ensure they are working properly. Beyond that, monitoring of fish movement through the ladder and screen, along with redd surveys and smolt trapping, is planned through 2038 (the entire current license period) to evaluate the overall benefit realized from restoring fish passage.
After so much study, discussion, design, and construction to provide fish passage, it is rewarding to now see the fish actually using it. Chinook salmon were observed moving into the fish ladder as soon as it was watered-up for testing in mid-October 2012, and several coho salmon redds were confirmed upstream of the dam during November and December 2012. During 2013, although fish ladder counts are incomplete, observations suggest that at least 60 winter steelhead and 200 Spring Chinook have spawned upstream of Soda Springs dam. Summer steelhead have also been observed upstream of the dam also, but will not spawn until winter and spring. Most fish observed above the dam are unclipped.
Beginning in 2013, the North Umpqua River is closed to fishing between the fly area boundary near Soda Springs powerhouse and Slide Cr dam, to protect the fish recolonizing this area.
Rich Grost hoists the decomposing carcass of a toothy wild Spring Chinook buck that spawned this October in the North Umpqua River about 2 miles upstream of Soda Springs dam, in one of the largest pool tailout spawning sites within that reach. Recent surveys indicate that somewhere between 200 and 400 Chinook voluntarily swam up the fish ladder and spawned upstream of Soda Springs dam during 2013, creating more than 200 redds (nests where eggs are buried) in the first year of access since 1951.
A wild hen and buck winter steelhead passing Soda Springs fish ladder window in March 2013. The window is video-monitored but is not open to the public due safety and security concerns in the confined space of the video room. ODFW analyzes the video to identify, measure, and count fish.
Rich Grost Aquatic Scientist North Umpqua Hydroelectric Project PacifiCorp Energy
|
|
| The Digitalis by Tim Goforth |
| |
Sometime in the late 80's, my wife and I were walking back to the car at last light having fished Caretaker. I looked off into the forest and saw this purple flower glowing amidst the trees. The next day I came back to see what the flower was, and discovered it was a foxglove, or Digitalis Purpurea. I tied the fly to mimic this effect. I primarily fish it on overcast days and dusk to dark. I've caught fish on it not only on the North, but in BC. Give it a try...the Digitalis will get your heart pumping!
Hook: 1/0 to 4
First, under wrap the hook shank with flat silver tensel or mylar Tag: 3 turns of oval silver French tinsel
Butt: 1/3 of the body chartreus floss Body: 2/3 of the body lavender wool yarn or floss. The body is wrapped from the hook bend forward with 5 turns of French oval silver tinsel
Hackle: Natural guinea 3 turns, too many turns of guinea will bunch and compact, thus not having movement in the water. Wing: Lavender polar bear
|
|
|
Climate Change Symposium / Umpqua Basin by Jeff Dose
|
| |
Notes from Gordie Reeves Presentation
October 30th, the local Climate Change Coalition hosted a symposium at the Douglas County Library. The symposium was well attended. The conclusions were (in my opinion) accurately documented in an article published in the local paper, the News Review. One of the presenters was Dr. Gordon Reeves from the Pacific Northwest Research Station of the US Forest Service. He focused on the Umpqua River basin, where he and other colleagues have conducted extensive research over the past 30 years. These are my impressions and do not, necessarily, reflect the opinions of Dr. Reeves.
There are numerous factors that will affect anadromous fish populations in the Umpqua River basin as a consequence of global climate change. These include: 1) reduced ocean productivity due to acidification impacts (from CO2 emissions) on food chains, the likely result would be smaller fish and/or reduced survival; 2) altered hydrologic regimes e.g., less snow, more rain; earlier snow melt = lower flows earlier in the season; 3) the amount of the basin with adverse water temperatures will increase and for longer periods; 4) winter storm intensity will increase (more scour); and 5) altered groundwater recharge. These effects will have impacts on our native aquatic systems, including anadromous fish.
Because the Umpqua is a large basin with several large geo-regions, the impacts will not be equal. Gordie thinks the worst impacts will occur in the surface-flow dominated watersheds, particularly in the small tributaries in upper reaches of watersheds e.g., Coast Range (main stem, Smith, Cow Creek (parts) and Western Cascades (South Umpqua (most) and North Umpqua (below Toketee). The ground-water dominated portions (upper North Umpqua) will be less impacted, but there will likely be impacts - just not as severe.
Of course there will be lots of annual variability, these are just long-term trends. With regard to ocean acidification, there are other factors that affect ocean productivity, some of which tend to be cyclic - such as El Nino/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and the Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO). One potentially adverse impact that Gordie is concerned about is a "double-whammy" that would occur with smaller fish size (from reduced ocean productivity) trying to spawn in a more dynamic, scour-induced stream system. Body size determines ability to dig deeper redds and in coarser substrate.
Finally, he gave a predicted vulnerability of our various species from these changes. As expected, those species that are most dependent on small streams at lower elevations will be most vulnerable. Coastal (searun) cutthroat are most vulnerable, followed by coho salmon. Spring Chinook (stream-type) were next followed by summer steelhead and then by fall Chinook (ocean-type). Least vulnerable were winter steelhead. Much of this vulnerability rating has to do with when and where they spawn as well as whether they have to over-summer in freshwater. Those species that spawn the latest (winter steelhead) or have no over-summering life history (fall Chinook) should fare the best. Gordie thought that some selective pressure may cause summer steelhead to become more like winter steelhead and spring Chinook might eventually revert to fall Chinook.
|
|
Notes from the Big Bend Pool by Lee Spencer
|
|
WHAT GETS THE ATTENTION OF THE STEELHEAD
IN BIG BEND POOL
This is my fifteenth season sitting here with the steelhead at Big Bend Pool. I have not drawn together this season's natural history notes yet because this season is not yet over and done with. By the end of last season I had spent 2,823 days with one or another of my dogs at the pool. While I certainly do not spend all my time watching the fish, I probably average about four or five hours a day doing so over the season. My calculator tells me that this means I have spent a minimum of 11,000 hours watching the fish and when this is multiplied times an average of, say, 250 steelhead that hold in the pool for a season this means I have spent at least 2.8 million steelhead days doing so.
The only significance of these ridiculous numbers is to show that I have spent a fair amount of time watching the fish over the seasons here at the pool. It is also important to note that probably 99.5% of these fish are and have been wild.
Having now presented my "bonifides," I feel that I can say with absolute accuracy that by far the largest majority of the summer steelhead that return to the North Umpqua River have absolutely no interest in any fly they may see during the course of their stay in the fly water. This is perhaps particularly true for fish that can be seen from the edge of the highway. If you have seen a steelhead that means that four other anglers have seen it too and thrown their fly box at them.
Also I am ignoring the flies that are swung into the face of a steelhead. When a steelhead takes a weighted fly, it is likely done for a different reason than a steelhead that shows an interest in a fly presented on the swing.
During my time on the pool, I have always paid attention to what the steelhead in the pool showed an interest in and these things have made it into my seasonal natural history notes [all of which may be examined on The North Umpqua Foundation web page]. So, over the last fourteen seasons I have documented a total of 2,538 approaches by steelhead to 1,200 items (see the table below). Note that more approaches than this have undoubtedly occurred; these are simply the ones that I observed and managed to write down over my time here.
These 2,538 steelhead actions are a very small proportion of all of the generic rises seen every season, just as the 1,200 items are clearly less than 0.0001% of the leaves, twigs, seeds, and other things that drift through the pool each season. In fact, these 1,200 items-only 22% of which are insects and crustaceans-make up far fewer than 0.001% of simply the insects that drift over the pool during the course of a season. I make this point because most rises are not for the purpose of approaching anything other than the surface and most approaches do not, in fact, make contact with the item approached.
The term approach is the general term used herein to identify any behavior that appears to be for the purpose of getting close to an item, and includes rises to items, mouthings or nudgings, swimming close to and turning away, approaching and taking and expelling, or approaching, taking and keeping items. Thus the juxtaposition of a steelhead with an item is not documented as an approach unless it appears to be for the purpose of positively approaching that item.
Now, my time with Sis and Maggie at the pool suggests unambiguously that by far most of the approaches I have documented represent curiosity on the part of the steelhead in question . . . whatever that means in steelhead terms. Finally, let me observe that, for the most part, these approach behaviors do not seem angry, fearful, or aggressive.
Do the steelhead in the pool approach items for the same reasons that the steelhead in the North Umpqua River fly zone approach flies? Who knows, probably even the steelhead don't, but I expect so. I have watched as my good friend Ed Kikumoto rose a steelhead to a waking stick and I have risen one to a pistachio shell.
In the table presented below, the first four rows of data represent those items that could be construed as food (Mayflies, Caddis Flies, Crawdads, and Other Arthropods). The remaining rows represent non-food items and include: Leaves, Plant Down (airborne seeds), Miscellaneous Items (these are listed below the table), and Unknown Items. Small Fish chases are separated from these previously listed data because they are different. The small fish are in the two to four-inch range and no steelhead pursuing one of these small fish has ever been seen to capture one; always, no matter how energetic the chase is at its start, the steelhead has appeared to turn away, giving up the pursuit.
Note that my appreciation for what I was seeing the steelhead in the pool do has increased over the time that Sis and Maggie and I have been on the pool. Indeed, when I first arrived in July of 1999, I thought that most of the rises and jumps observed were for the purpose of taking items. It took quite a while to realize that most of the rises were for the purpose of getting air for their air bladder or simply for seeing above the surface of the pool. Virtually all of the jumps are to see above the surface.
For anyone interested in frequency distributions, it is necessary to have some idea of how many times a particular fish actions occurs, but it is also important to know how many steelhead are present and potentially capable of carrying out a particular action. For example, four approaches to items when there are ten steelhead present is a different circumstance than four approaches when there are seven hundred fish in the pool.
2012 CE to 1999 CE
Note: when more than one fish approaches an item, that item is counted only once
ITEMS APPROACHED
|
MAY
|
JUNE
|
JULY
|
AUG
|
SEP
|
OCT
|
NOV
|
DEC
|
TOTAL
|
%
|
Mayflies*
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
21
|
26
|
5
|
60
|
5%
|
Caddis Flies
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
14
|
6
|
|
23
|
2%
|
Crawdads
|
|
1
|
|
8
|
5
|
4
|
|
|
18
|
2%
|
Other Arthropods
|
|
1
|
6
|
30
|
76
|
28
|
14
|
|
155
|
13%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leaves
|
7
|
4
|
11
|
36
|
149
|
192
|
13
|
4
|
416
|
35%
|
Plant Down
|
|
|
|
14
|
15
|
1
|
|
|
30
|
2%
|
Miscellaneous items
|
4
|
5
|
9
|
56
|
143
|
99
|
6
|
1
|
323
|
27%
|
Unknown items
|
35
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
16
|
15
|
2
|
|
73
|
6%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
46**
|
13
|
26
|
135
|
395
|
364
|
67
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Small 2 to 4-inch fish Chases***
|
|
|
|
14
|
30
|
56
|
1
|
1
|
102
|
8%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TOTAL
|
46
|
13
|
27
|
161
|
444
|
430
|
68
|
11
|
1,200
|
100%
|
%
|
4%
|
1%
|
2%
|
13%
|
37%
|
36%
|
6%
|
1%
|
100%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No. of Steelhead observed Approaching Items
|
46
|
15
|
45
|
317
|
1,093
|
921
|
85
|
16
|
2,538
|
|
- often more than one steelhead would approach the same item.
Miscellaneous items: feathers, area of a trout rise, otters, kingfisher, alder cones, mergansers, beavers, unknown plant parts, dead sticks, pieces of wood, bats, Styrofoam, bark, bubbles, fungus on a steelhead tail,fir needles, immature fir cones (reddish), sugar pine needle bundles, lichened sticks, cedar branchlets, lichens, leaf stems, blue-green algae, squirrel, stick with plant down attached, lichened bark, six-eight inch cutthroats, broad-leaved maple seeds, steelhead skin flap, parr with an autumn caddis, minnow carcass, six-inch ring-necked snake, racers and garter snakes, scales from a fir cone, alder catkins, large pink mushroom, spiders dragged by their airborne webs, water strider; the shadow of a waking insect projected onto the stream bed by the late afternoon sun
* 22 of these approaches occurred during November of 2002
** 43 of these approaches occurred during May of 2002 and they were carried out by two winter steelhead
*** these are chases only and they were first documented during 2002. The mature steelhead in question have always turned away before getting to the two to four-inch-long fish. No steelhead has yet been observed to take a small 2 to 4-inch fish. Forty-eight of these small fish chases occurred during 2002 & 2009.
# 10/10/09 2:35 PM & 9/18/12 12:14: the only two times I have seen a steelhead jump to take a flying insect out of the air during my now fourteen years at Big Bend Pool
10/17/13
|
|
Long Leaders by Lee Spencer
|
|
July 21st, 2012
|
Twenty-Nine Foot Leader Recipe
|
8 feet
|
40 lb.*
|
4 feet
|
30 lb.
|
4 feet
|
40 lb.
|
4 feet
|
30 lb.
|
3 feet
|
20 lb.
|
5 feet
|
15 lb.
|
5 feet
|
12 lb.
|
Without looking at my rod I wouldn't be able to tell you what number it is, I have never figured out the X-size system-if that is what it is?-of tippet material. Ask me about the Oncorhynchus genus or the prehistory of the people living in the northern Great Basin and I might be able to quote some info in an informed way. I am not a technology head when it comes to fly angling: I have never found it necessary. Most of the time I am just fooling around. Last summer I began to fool around with the length of my leader. I have always fished a long leader as is apparent in the first Leader Recipe above. For the last twenty years I have fished a leader longer than twenty feet and under thirty feet. I like the way these long leaders cast. Emphatically, I do not think it gives me any kind of an edge when it comes to luring a curious summer steelhead to my fly.
September 28th, 2012
|
Thirty-Four Foot Leader Recipe
|
8 feet
|
40 lb.
|
4 feet
|
30 lb.
|
4 feet
|
40 lb.
|
4 feet
|
30 lb.
|
4 feet
|
20 lb.
|
5 feet
|
15 lb.
|
5 feet
|
12 lb.
|
September 20th, 2013
|
Thirty-Eight Foot Leader Recipe
|
8 feet
|
50 lb.
|
4 feet
|
40 lb.
|
5 feet
|
50 lb.
|
5 feet
|
40 lb.
|
5 feet
|
30 lb.
|
4 feet
|
20 lb.
|
4 feet
|
15 lb.
|
4 feet
|
12 lb.
|
I guess I should also say that I have always tied up my leaders by gosh and by golly, not having read anything about how to do it that I have any memory of. This probably means there is a hell of a lot of leeway in any of the recipes I present in this piece. I have, however, always paid attention to something my good friend Joe Howell told me during my first stumbling years on the river: when you go from one size to another, be sure the two pieces of tippet material have close to the same flex so my loop-initiated when I stop my rod during the cast-passes cleanly along the length of the tippet.
Something else that is probably significant is that I fish limber a fifteen-foot rod that Joe got for me in 1998. It casts a longer leader sweetly. Finally, as you have no doubt seen in these leader recipes if you have jumped ahead of me, I have adopted a weight-forward way of tying my leaders and this was also begun long ago. Does it make laying out a long leader more of a sure thing? I believe so, but won't be surprised it doesn't really and is all in my head. When casting, I have found that a weight-forward leader seems to have more of a bounce or jerk when the leader has laid out.
Oh, and for what it is worth, I am tying these leaders with Ultragreen Maxima.
September 21st, 2013 A
|
Forty-Six Foot Leader Recipe
|
8 feet
|
50 lb.
|
6 feet
|
40 lb.
|
6 feet
|
50 lb.
|
6 feet
|
40 lb.
|
4 feet
|
30 lb.
|
4 feet
|
20 lb.
|
6 feet
|
15 lb.
|
6 feet
|
12 lb.
|
Because I enjoy testing assumptions that seem to have found a place in my consciousness and that do not appear to have a good rational foundation, last summer I began to lengthen my leaders out past thirty feet just to see what I could see. The first of the hitches I discovered in the process was that at approximately thirty feet, these leaders had difficulty turning over my standard sparse moose-hair Muddler when tied on a # 2 or #4 light-wire hook [I always cut the hook point cut off at the barb and smoothly round it with a ceramic stone]. So I dropped down in hook size to a #8 light wire hook. This turns over a small moose-hair Muddlers perfectly well on my thirty-foot-plus leaders. The dozen or so summer steelhead I have risen since late last fall testify that these fish-of course-do not give a hoot about fly size . . . or color, or pattern, or presentation on a swing . . . or water temperature . . . nor do they seem to care about whether there is sun on the water.
September 22nd, 2013 B
|
Thirty-Six Foot Leader Recipe
|
8 feet
|
50 lb.
|
6 feet
|
40 lb.
|
6 feet
|
50 lb.
|
6 feet
|
40 lb.
|
4 feet
|
30 lb.
|
4 feet
|
20 lb.
|
6 feet
|
15 lb.
|
8 feet
|
12 lb.
|
With a few exceptions, the recipes speak for themselves. All of them cast my fly well but one. The forty-six foot leader (9/21/13 A) cast so poorly that about a half hour of trying to make it work I cut out the weight-forward sections of fifty- and forty-pound test. The resulting thirty-six foot leader seemed to cast particularly sweetly. Because I have trained myself to prefer it, I retied the thirty-six foot length so it incorporates a weight-forward section.
If I was fishing with points on my flies, I probably would not be fishing flies tied on hooks smaller than, possibly, #4. I think that #8 and perhaps #6 hooks would catch too many fry and parr size fish. These smaller hooks can do terrible damage to these smaller fish.
September 22nd, 2013 C
|
Thirty-Six Foot Leader Recipe
|
8 feet
|
50 lb.
|
6 feet
|
40 lb.
|
4 feet
|
50 lb.
|
4 feet
|
40 lb.
|
4 feet
|
30 lb.
|
3 feet
|
20 lb.
|
3 feet
|
15 lb.
|
4 feet
|
12 lb.
|
Finally and firmly, I am not trying to wake up the rotting corpse of that lunatic sporting tradition of thinking you are a better angler if you catch a given fish with smaller hooks or lighter tippet. That belief fortunately tripped over its own feet and drowned in the North Umpqua and other Northwest Coast rivers at least twenty years ago.
I am simply having fun and mostly watching the leaves change on this gorgeous river where, now and then-often when I am feeling for my next cautious step downstream-a curious steelhead will come to my fly.
10/15/13
|
|
| About Us | |
Steamboaters
PO Box 41266
Eugene, Oregon 97404
The mission of the Steamboaters is to preserve, promote, and restore the unique aesthetic values, the natural production of wild fish populations, and the habitat that sustains these fish on the North Umpqua River.
The Steamboaters is a charter member club of the Fly Fishers, a member of Oregon Trout and the Pacific Rivers Council.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS ASSOCIATE DIRECTORS
2012-2013
Len Volland, President Dick Bauer
(541) 673-2246 (541) 688-4980
Josh Voynick, Vice President Joe Ferguson
(541) 496-0077 (541) 747-4917
Chuck Schnautz, Secretary Dale Greenley
(541) 496-0328 (541) 863-6213
Lee Lashway, Treasurer Tim Goforth
(541) 953-4796 (541) 496-0780
Pat McRae Charles Spooner
(541) 496-4222 (541) 496-0493
Peter Tronquet
(541) 774-9577
Jeff Dose
(541) 673-2665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|