joint logo

 

Pension provisions in H.R. 83, the Consolidated and Further Continuing Appropriations Act of 2015 (the CR-Omnibus bill) appear to have generated significant concern, as well as a bit of confusion. These provisions do not apply to public sector plans, and pertain primarily to private sector multiemployer plans, which are maintained under one or more collective bargaining agreements to which more than one private employer contributes, and which are covered under a unique program within the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC).

 

Among other things, the CR-Omnibus bill includes measures allowing deeply troubled multi employer pension plans to make certain benefit adjustments that avoid plan termination and result in benefit levels above what is guaranteed by PBGC. Under current law, benefits are adjusted only after a plan becomes insolvent and the payments are made subject to PBGC maximum guarantees. While a large bipartisan coalition of employers and labor unions supported the changes, it also was opposed by some trade unions, the AARP and the Pension Rights Center.

 

It is important to keep the following in mind with regard to the multiemployer changes:

  1. Only a "severely underfunded plan" would be permitted to propose adjusting vested benefits, and benefits could not be reduced to less than 110% of the benefit guaranteed by the PBGC.
  2. In general, the approval of any proposed benefit adjustments by plan participants would be required before the cuts could take effect.
  3. Disabled retirees and individuals age 80 and older would be exempt from any benefit reductions.
There has been  speculation regarding the precedent set by these ERISA changes, including potential affects on public pension benefit guarantees. Although state and local governments are not covered by ERISA anti-cutback rules, state and local pension benefit guarantees are provided through constitutional protections in some states and statutes and case laws that provide varying levels of contractual protections to accrued benefits and often future accruals, as well.

 

H.R. 83 has been passed by Congress and is expected to be signed by the President. The business and labor coalition that supported the pension changes in the measure will be seeking additional modifications next year as part of their  comprehensive plan to reform multiemployer plans, namely, policies to facilitate the creation of new shared risk, flexible plan designs. Reportedly, key members of Congress have indicated support for such new designs. It will likely be helpful to educate policymakers and others on the longstanding and emergent uses of risk-sharing features in state and local retirement plans.
   
Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or would like additional information.

Jeannine Markoe Raymond                                        Leigh Snell
NASRA Director of Federal Relations                       NCTR Federal Relations Director
e-mail; (202) 624-1417                                                e-mail; (540) 333-1015