eNews_HHlogo_Large
In This Issue
Young People Are Flocking to the Cities
The Ripple Effect of Home Buying
ProCom Files Lawsuit Against GHP Group


Young People Are Flocking to the Cities

NEW YORK, NEW YORK

 

From CNBC  


"How ya gonna keep 'em down on the farm,

After they've seen Paree?"

- Lyrics by Andrew Bird


Young people shunning the suburbs in favor of the hustle and bustle of city life are leading the charge in the "re-urbanization of America," real estate mogul Sam Zell told CNBC.

"You're drawing all the young people in America to these 24/7 cities. The last thing they want to do is live in the suburbs," Zell said in a "Squawk Box" interview. "In that respect, you're increasing demand for housing in the urban markets."

The demand for the suburban lifestyle had been driven mainly by safety and schools, he said. "If you wanted to see the end of suburbia, all you would need to do is make the school systems in the cities Triple-A, then why would anybody live in the suburbs?" said Zell.

One of the byproducts of people moving to cities is soaring demand for apartments. "We are seeing 96 percent occupancy," said Zell, who is chairman of the real estate investment trust (REIT) Equity Residential, one of the largest apartment groups in the country. Of the 18,000 units the REIT manages in New York City, Zell estimated 45 percent are occupied by just one person.

"It's probably going to happen here in New York first," he said. "You're going to see 300 sq. ft. apartments, directly related to that one person wanting to live alone - and saying, 'I'll give up space for privacy.'"

- Matthew J. Belvedere

The Ripple Effect of Home Buying

WASHINGTON, D.C.

 

From Builder Pulse

Using the Consumer Expenditure Survey (CES) data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), National Association of Home Builders (NAHB) Economics research shows that a home purchase triggers additional spending on appliances, furnishings and remodeling. Such spending typically exceeds that of non-moving homeowners and persists for two years after moving.

The NAHB analysis compares spending behavior among three groups of single-family detached homeowners: buyers of new homes, buyers of existing homes and non-moving owners. During the first two years after closing on the house, homebuyers tend to spend on appliances, furnishings and property alterations considerably more compared to non-moving owners.

However, homebuyers tend to be larger households with children, and on average wealthier, with higher levels of education and concentrated in urban areas. Any of these factors could potentially explain higher spending on appliances, furnishings and remodeling by home buyers.

Thus, the NAHB analysis controls for the impact of household characteristics on expenditures and, nevertheless, finds that a home purchase alters the spending behavior of homeowners and that otherwise similar homeowners spend more across all three categories compared to non-moving owners during the first two years after moving.



Looking at spending patterns of new homebuyers and identical households that do not move, the differences are largest on furnishings. A typical new homebuyer who buys a new home is estimated to spend in excess of $3,000 more on furnishings than an identical household that stays put in a house they already own. The elevated level of spending persists into the second year as new homebuyers spend an additional $2,000 over their typical budget on furnishings.

Similarly, moving into a new home triggers higher levels of spending on appliances. A typical new homebuyer who moves into a new home is estimated to spend $1,005 more on appliances during the first year compared to a non-moving owner. The difference shrinks to $348 during the second year and goes away after that.

In the case of property repairs and alterations the differences are less striking, $740, and last only one year, which is not surprising considering that most households would not want to spend years in a house with ongoing remodeling projects.

Buying an older home also triggers additional spending. The typical buyer of an existing home tends to spend close to $4,000 more on remodeling, furnishings and appliances compared to otherwise identical homeowners who do not move. However, in case of buying an older home, most of this extra spending goes to remodeling projects, more than $2,000, and occurs during the first year after closing on the house. Only the additional spending on furnishings tends to persist beyond the first year.



The statistical analysis further shows that this higher level of spending on furnishings, appliances and property alterations is not paid by cutting spending on other items, such as entertainment, transportations, travel, food at home, restaurant meals, etc. This confirms that homebuying indeed generates a wave of additional spending and activity not accounted for in the purchase price of the home alone.

In summary, the NAHB analysis shows that during the first two years after closing on the house a typical buyer of a new single-family detached home tends to spend on average $7,400 more than a similar homeowner who does not move, including $4,900 in the first year after purchase.

Likewise, a buyer of an existing single-family detached home tends to spend about $4,000 more than a similar non-moving homeowner, including $3,600 during the first year. The overall ripple effect of homebuying does not stop here, as producers of appliances, furnishings and remodelers spend their additional income paid by homebuyers and trigger further waves of economic activity.

Visit the website.
ProCom Files Lawsuit
Against GHP Group

BREA, CALIFORNIA

 

On Sept. 30, 2013, ProCom Heating, a California-based manufacturer of heating products and dual fuel fireplace systems, filed a lawsuit against GHP Group in United States District Court (Western District of Kentucky) alleging infringement of seven patents, false designation of origin under the Lanham Act, false advertising under the Lanham Act and unfair competition under Kentucky Common Law.

In the lawsuit, ProCom has asserted seven patents that cover broad areas of dual fuel, vent-free proprietary technology. ProCom has further asserted violations of the Lanham Act, stating that GHP has inappropriately marked foreign-made goods as "Made in the U.S.A." in violation of U.S. law.  

The complaint has been filed in connection with the "Pleasant Hearth" labeled Dual-Fuel Vent-Free products marketed by GHP Group. This lawsuit has been filed to protect ProCom's substantial investments in product innovation and development as well as to safeguard ProCom's intellectual property rights.

ProCom Heating's Dual Fuel Technology has been successfully defended  in three previous patent infringement lawsuits.

Visit the website.
null