Logo

American Institute for Technology  

& Science Education Newsletter



November, 2012 

Like us on FacebookFollow me on Twitter DonatetoAITSEView my profile on LinkedInView our videos on YouTube
Greetings!

Consortium 
Some Members of the AITSE Consortium
The election is over--for better or worse. Now we will find out if President Obama's pre-election promises were the truth or just empty words. Presumably those who voted are hoping that all the newly elected and appointed politicians have the country's best interests at heart. And, most likely, some of them do. But, it is well-understood that some politicians are in it for the power trip or financial gain.

Not so the AITSE consortium.This group of highly qualified physicians, scientists and engineers are providing you with 

bunk-free information simply to enhance scientific understanding and integrity. They do not stand to gain anything from their efforts: AITSE does not pay them and they definitely do not find that their careers benefit from their involvement (which is why about half of the AITSE consortium members are anonymous). And, in contrast to some in the White House, their efforts really do make a positive difference. Information found in AITSE articles has saved people from making financial investments into bunk science, has kept people from being confused by pseudoscientific claims about their faith, and has even saved lives.

AITSE does what it promises: provides the public with good science, based on impartial evaluation of evidence, not financial, political, or philosophical expediency. And we provide it for free. However, as the end of the year approaches, it is important to be aware that our work does cost. And, frankly, we are quickly running out of funds. We cannot continue without your help--and we cannot expand our work without your generous help. If you find the work of AITSE beneficial, please consider partnering with us either by monthly donations or by a one-time contribution. Checks can be sent to PO Box 15938, Newport Beach, CA 92659, you can donate through our website, or you can just click on the dollar sign! Thank you in advance.   DonatetoAITSE
Nopalea
Image from www.nopalea.com

Nopalea           

A Great Example of Bunk Science    

   

Do you suffer from allergies, heart problems, fibromyalgia, bloating, joint pain, breathing difficulties, fatigue or just unhealthy cells? If so, look no further. Trivita has the answer for you: Nopalea. But, before you buy (after all just doing the "free trial" properly costs ~$300), let's run Nopalea through the AITSE bunk-detection test.  

 

1. Check if the author claims that something has been proven or declares something to be a fact.

According to the home page of the Nopalea website, Nopalea contains bioflavenoids and "These bioflavonoids have been scientifically proven to help the body detoxify itself and reduce inflammation." Never mind the spelling error and the scientific problems with the statement itself. Just note that they claim scientific proof-which is an oxymoron in itself. Science does not claim proof; math does. Principle 1: FAILED

2. Check if the author makes claims to have accomplished something that is beyond what has actually been done or is even possible to do.

The Trivita Chief Scientific Officer is reasonably careful about doing this-and with good reason. Brazos Minshew was involved with a case where the Federal Trade Commission found Medlab Inc. guilty of making false claims about miracle-working diet pills.  Once bitten; twice shy?

But the Nopalea website does claim that "Nopalea contains nutrients that are proven to help the body reduce inflammation." This statement is much too general to qualify as good science. The body? Which part of the body? Which cells? Reduces inflammation? Inflammation is a pretty broad process, involving many, many cells and chemicals. Exactly which chemicals in which cells are affected? These are questions that have not been answered, neither by the website nor by the alleged publications.

Another website advertising Nopalea claims that "the use of Nopalea will help improve breathing for those who suffer from allergies or asthma." Note, not "may help," but "will help." This is a very dangerous statement. After all, untreated asthma can be deadly. If one has an asthma attack it is important to seek medical help, not drink Nopalea. Principle 2: FAILED Read more. 

Donate to AITSE


Crocker

Interview of Dr. Crocker 

Podcast by Solid Reasons

  

On November 5 Dr. Crocker was interviewed by Philip Alexander, president of Solid Reasons about her book Free to Think and how her experiences as an expelled professor led to starting the American Institute for Technology and Science Education. The link is here. Don't miss it!  

 Like us on Facebook 

Sleeping man Sleeping Pills 
Blessed Relief or a Recipe for Disaster? 

  

Did you know that 48% of Americans suffer from regular bouts of insomnia and that this number is rising? In fact, prescription of sleeping pills has gone up by 60% since the year 2000. It is thought that the market for sleeping pills may further increase to $3.8 billion in the near future. After all, when tossing and turning in the middle of the night, popping a pill seems like a great idea. But is it?

Perhaps not. Although the pharmaceutical industry would like us to believe that these medications are perfectly safe, more balanced research indicates that they are not. (The "odds ratio for finding results favorable to industry in industry-sponsored trials was 3.6 times as high as in non-industry-sponsored studies.")

So, let's consider the two most commonly prescribed classes of sleep-inducing drugs: benzodiazepines and non-benzodiazepines. Anti-histamines are also used for treatment of insomnia, but won't be covered here.

Benzodiazepines are prescribed for both anxiety and insomnia. They include drugs such as Xanax, Klonopin, Valium, Lorazepam, Temazepam and Ativan; four of these are in the top 100 of commonly prescribed medications. At least 11-15% of Americans have used benzodiazepines in the recent past and the drugs are considered "safe," despite the fact that they are well known to be addictive. Moreover, benzodiazepines can cause amnesia, depression, disinhibition, and possibly even cancer. Are these acceptable risks for treatment of short-term insomnia? You decide.

But, the problem is that insomnia is often not a short-term ailment; about 2% of our population have used these drugs for years. Therefore, a recent prospective study indicating that benzodiazepines can increase risk of dementia in the elderly by 50% should be of great concern. Admittedly, effects on younger people were not studied, but, make no mistake, the chemicals in the brains of the elderly and the rest of the population are essentially identical. Old people are not a different species. Therefore, it would stand to reason that the risks of sustained use of benzodiazepines in younger people may be similar to what occurs in the elderly. The fact that it appears that the adverse effects of benzodiazepines on cognition may not even be reversible makes sleepless nights seem preferable to use of these medications.  


So, let's consider the non-benzodiazepines, which are more targeted and are only prescribed for insomnia. These include medications such as Ambien, Lunesta, Sonata and Imovane. They do not appear to be as addictive as the benzodiazepines (some users would disagree), but can have very serious side effects. For example, Ambien has been shown to be associated with strange behaviors such as sleep-walking, sleep-eating, and sleep-driving.  When this is combined with the total amnesia that sets in about 10 minutes after taking the drug, the consequences can be devastating. You do things you would rather not do and do not remember that you did them. The patient safety sheet also warns about side effects such as depression (more than doubles the risk
), decreasing cognitive performance, and reductions in coordination. Ambien has not yet been evaluated for long-term use, so it is recommended that it be used for less than ten days at a time. But, the fact is that many patients have been on non-benzodiazepines for years. Could permanent damage result? It seems likely.

This hypothesis appears to be supported by a recent paper published by the British Journal of Medicine showing that regular use of sleeping pills, whether benzodiazepines, non-benzodiazepines, or just anti-histamines, is associated with a fourfold increase in risk of death. Now, we know that association does not equal causation. After all, as some speculate, it may be that the insomnia is a symptom of a serious ailment that is being masked by use of sleeping pills. However, the authors took care to balance the study participants for health, age, and background, so it is highly unlikely that it is only their health, and not the sleeping pills in themselves, that is causing the increase in death rate.

As is often the case, it seems that, if at all possible, the pill-free regimen is best. Sleep hygienists recommend that, if a person suffers from insomnia, a physician should evaluate them for causative conditions. Then, they should follow these simple steps. 1) Be sure that their bed and bedroom are only used for sleeping. 2) Avoid caffeine. 3) Decide not to worry while in bed. It may help to write the worries down. 4) Eat right and exercise. 5) Don't nap and don't go to bed when not tired.

Finally, if you suffer from insomnia, remember that eventually you will go to sleep. And you will wake up with less amnesia, depression, dementia, cancer and regrets than if you had popped that pill.  

Note: AITSE provides information only. For medical advice, see your physician.    

 Follow us on Twitter
Coffee Coffee

A Wonder Drug?  

  

Here is some potential bunk science that most of us would like to believe. The first evidence of coffee drinking comes from Yemen in the 15th century. Since then, a taste for this delicious beverage spread all over the world and it remains a favorite to this day. In fact, in America we consume 4.2 kg coffee/capita/year.   

 

Now, an article in the New England Journal of Medicine suggests that coffee not only tastes good, it does you good. In fact, this study showed an association between coffee consumption and reduced risk of death. (Aside: And here we were thinking that all of us have a 100% risk of death.) Of course, the authors point out that association does not equal causation, giving us confidence that the scientific claims being made may not be entirely bunk.   

 

But then we have Brett Stetka, MD's speculation that coffee is a "wonder drug." In fact, according to the Medscape slides, coffee is helpful in ameliorating heart disease, diabetes II, gout, infections, dry eyes, cancer, depression, dementia, Parkinson's disease, stroke, and hepatitis. Ok, that sounds like a clear violation of Bunk Detecting Principle #4. It is definitely a grandiose claim and makes coffee sound suspiciously like snake oil--a cure for all ills.

Having said that, the slides seem pretty reasonable. Dr. Stetka does mention the fact that coffee has some effects detrimental to health: increases in blood pressure, anxiety, and tremor. And, he backs up all the positive claims re coffee with references to peer-reviewed research. (Note: Dr. Stetka does not reference the peer-reviewed studies that say coffee has also been shown to increase the risk of developing at least some of the conditions he suggests it protects against.)  But, he makes no obvious scientific mistakes, does not disparage those who disagree with him, does not claim false qualifications himself, does not claim to have proven anything, and apprently has no financial interest in coffee--those are big ones.

In fact, the only other Bunk Detecting Principle that is violated is #10--calling coffee a "wonder drug." This is definitely invalid extrapolation. After all, the peer-reviewed research has not yet come to a consensus on the benefits of coffee. If it had, you can be sure that our physicians would be advising us to drink more, not less.

So, is the Stetka article an example of "bunk science?" No, not entirely. But, is coffee a wonder drug? Maybe/ maybe not. I sure hope so!

 Like us on Facebook 

Quote of the Month   Discovery

  

"At the end of the day...it really doesn't matter much where you fall on the political spectrum. What matters is that you maintain an open mind, support robust scientific debate, and are willing to follow the evidence wherever it leads." 

In an insightful article posted at Evolution News and Views, attorney Casey Luskin argues that people's views on origins are not split down party lines. That is, not all Republicans are ID advocates, Creationists and global warming skeptics and not all Democrats are Darwinists and climate change alarmists. You would think that would be obvious.
As Casey quotes from Berzow and Campbell, "science policy should be driven by data, not ideology," and, as AITSE says, scientific understanding should be driven by impartial evaluation of evidence, not politics, finances or even religion.               
Visit our blog 
Physician Opposing Obamacare  
 Loses Her Job
  Dr. Barbara Bellar
Dr. Barbara Bellar just had some difficult, if not entirely unpredictable, news. Her job as a physician at MetroSouth Medical Center in Chicago is over. Why? According to her, it is because she spoke up against Obamacare in a Youtube video that went viral.

In this case, her political views appear to have offended her employers (or maybe those who provide funding to her employers). So, the hospital lost a good and experienced physician, according to all the reports, presumably replacing her with someone who toes the political line.

Is this best for the patient? Or would it be preferable to be treated by someone who thinks based on  impartial evaluation of evidence, instead of the financial implications or career consequences of a decision? Of course, AITSE is not suggesting that Dr. Bellar, who was running for office, has no political or other motivations. But, it would be nice if people were not punished for exercising their right to free speech and their responsibility to think.     
             
  Like us on Facebook 
In closing, as always, thank you for your past gifts and support. It is a fact that AITSE cannot function in its efforts to educate to increase scientific understanding and integrity without contributions. Please consider helping us with a special donation or a commitment to give on a monthly basis. Please make checks payable to AITSE and send them to PO Box 15938, Newport Beach, CA 92659. Alternatively, you can donate on line through PayPal or credit card.

Sincerely,DonatetoAITSE
Signature
Caroline Crocker
American Institute for Technology and Science Education