A Selection of Recent Evaluation and Methods Publications
Spring 2014
A Method to Screen U.S. Environmental Biomonitoring Data for Race/Ethnicity and Income-related Disparities
Anna Belova, Susan Greco, Anne Riederer, Lauren Olsho, Mark Corrales 
Article

 

This study, published in Environmental Health, screened U.S. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2001-2008 biomonitoring data for 228 chemicals for race/ethnicity and income-related disparity. Defining six subgroups by race/ethnicity and income, the study assessed disparity by comparing the central tendency (geometric mean [GM]) of the biomonitoring concentrations of each subgroup to that of the reference subgroup (non-Hispanic white/High Income), adjusting for multiple comparisons using the Holm-Bonferroni procedure.


Estimating a Model of Excess Demand for Public Housing
Judy Geyer, Holger Sieg
Article

The purpose of this paper, published in Quantitative Economics, is to develop and estimate a new equilibrium model of public housing that acknowledges the fact that the demand for public housing may exceed the available supply. The study shows that ignoring these supply side restrictions leads to an inconsistent estimator of household preferences. The study outlines a number of findings about demand for public housing, like the fact that for each family that leaves public housing there are, on average, 3.8 families that would like to move into the vacated unit. 


Evaluation of HIV Prevention Interventions for People who Inject Drugs in Low- and Middle-income Countries
Theodore Hammett
Editorial

Inter-related epidemics of HIV and injection drug use occur globally but are especially prevalent and expanding in low and middle-income countries (LMIC). The uptake and coverage of harm reduction interventions in LMIC remain at low levels. This editorial examines the current and future state of the art in evaluation of these interventions and makes recommendations to fill in the gaps in evaluation and enhance the evidence.
New Directions in Social Experiments:
What can U.S. and international evaluators learn from each other?
Stephen Bell, Michael Kremer, Rebecca Maynard, Abhijit Banerjee
Video | Panel Discussion

Abt Associates began a celebration of its 50-year anniversary with an in-depth panel discussion on the latest in social experiments in the U.S. and around the world. The March 11 discussion at MIT included some of the top minds in evaluation science who explored the challenges and successes in gathering reliable evidence on whether a program works.

Join APPAM and Abt Associates for an Institutional Member Forum
Social Experiments in Practice:
The Why, When, Where, & How of Experimental Design & Analysis
April 24, 2014 | Washington, D.C.
 

The federal government increasingly is looking for strategies to identify promising social programs for broad-scale rollout. This day-long forum will explore social experiments in practice and how recent methodological advances can address real-world realities in the United States and abroad.

Learn more or RSVP.



Abt Associates is a mission-driven, global leader in research and program implementation in the fields of health, social and environmental policy, and international development. Known for its rigorous approach to solving complex challenges, Abt Associates is regularly ranked as one of the top 20 global research firms and one of the top 40 international development innovators.  The company has multiple offices in the U.S. and program offices in more than 40 countries.

Like us on Facebook     Follow us on Twitter     View our profile on LinkedIn     View our videos on YouTube




Copyright 2013. All Rights Reserved.