Client Legal Brief: Student Enrollment Risks and Requirements

Lex-is School Law Services

Client Legal Brief:

Student Enrollment Risks and Requirements

Specializing in

Charter School Law

Legal Counsel

Retainer Plans

Board Policies

Contract Preparation

Start-up Assistance

Governance Documents

501c3 Preparation

Charter Applications

Agency Advocacy

Board-Staff Training

Dear Lex-is Charter School Clients,

I hope your school years have launched or are ready to launch successfully.

As charter counsel I receive a steady stream of legal questions from clients. Some are "standards," and some are new, unique and/or complex (which makes my practice so interesting.). So that all of our clients can benefit from our firm research and responses, I occasionally like to share a short legal question and answer (a "Legal Brief") arising from these client queries.

Today's Brief regarding a student enrollment dilemma is offered below for your general information, not as formal legal advice. If you need help with this or other questions, please contact me directly.

Best regards,

David Hostetler, Esq.

Director

919.308.4652 / hos@lex-is.com

Question

Does a charter school have to enroll an otherwise eligible student ("Applicant") who may pose a safety threat to the school community, if the Applicant has no criminal conviction (yet) or prior suspension or expulsion from another school?

Brief Answer

Probably yes, but with some options to reasonably address the safety concerns.

Brief Considerations

Charter schools must enroll any student who is eligible for enrollment in the local educational agency (LEA)
G.S. 115C-366 allows a school or school system to deny admission to an otherwise eligible student if, among other things, the student has been convicted of a felony, or if the student has been suspended or expelled from another school, or engaged in conduct that would warrant suspension or expulsion in the respective LEA. For the latter two reasons, the charter school may deny admission for only as long as the suspension would be in effect. Furthermore, boards must allow a prospective student a hearing if being denied admission for a prior suspension.
Unless these statutory enrollment exceptions apply, the charter school probably must admit the student.
Because of the potential risk to others, the school has, in my opinion, several options whose viability depend on such factors as the severity of the risk, the kind and degree of evidence available, and other relevant facts.
Options include admitting the student under one or more of the following actions:

Careful monitoring and/or reasonable student restrictions;
Disciplining or suspending the student if the student violates any restrictions;
Immediate short-term or long-term suspending the student pending further investigation (as necessary or, e.g., pending the outcome of a criminal investigation or proceeding if one exists). A long-term suspension warrants a board hearing.

Option 3, above, is not something I have seen or heard of being used. Nevertheless, as I read the statutes, I believe it would be technically permissible (though other attorneys may disagree). Because it would be an especially serious action, it should be used only if necessary, if the risk is significant, and grounds and evidence for upholding such action exist.

As always, involve legal counsel in addressing specific scenarios like this.

Contact Information:

Lex-is School Law Services

1289 Fordham Blvd, #251

Chapel Hill, NC 27514

Main Phone: 919.442.8593

Email: Services@Lex-is.com

David Hostetler: 919-308-4652 / hos@Lex-is.com