Everyone Agrees More Funding for Iowa's Highway Infrastructure Is Critical to Our Future
These alternatives are neither sustainable nor good public policy:
Alternative #1: Direct General Fund Money to Roads
Proposals to divert a percentage of the total general fund revenues do not generate sufficient funds to meet the Transportation 2020 Commission goal of $215 million per year. General fund dollars are not predictable for long term planning nor are they constitutionally protected to go for the purposes for which they were directed. This approach goes against the concept of user fees supporting roads.
Alternative #2: Abolish the Gas Tax and Replace with a Penny of New Sales Tax (Virginia Plan)
It would be foolish to eliminate a constitutionally protected source of road funds (gas tax) with a non-constitutionally protected source (sales tax). Sales taxes will likely be diverted for other programs than roads in future years. Recently Iowa voters mandated that 3/8th of the next penny of sales tax must go for the environment. The remaining 5/8th of a penny is an insufficient replacement of current gas taxes, much less meeting future critical highway needs.
Alternative #3: Bonding and Tolls
Tolling is a revenue source designed to finance bonds for highway construction or improvements. Bonding is not a prudent practice for highway maintenance projects. New corridors will not see sufficient toll revenues to support bond payments. Iowa's current grid system will allow traffic to avoid toll roads making the toll collection infrastructure irrelevant. Debt service for highway construction is not in the long-term interests of Iowa.
Alternative #4: Raise Other Vehicle Fees
In 2008, numerous registration fees were raised to begin a funding commitment to TIME 21. Because gas taxes were not raised at the same time, registration fees now outpace gas taxes in revenues to the Road Use Tax Fund. This ratio is reverse of what is should be.
Alternative #5: Replace Gas Tax with Vehicle Miles Traveled Tax
While this embraces a user fee concept, the United States is decades away from fully integrating every American vehicle with the technology to determine the appropriate tax or uniform collection. This approach will require large payments at a time for users, while the current tax system allows for periodic small payments (taxes) over the same time. We cannot wait decades for such a change to take place. Our infrastructure needs attention now.
Alternative #6: Doing Nothing
Not an option for Iowa's future.
Raising the Fuel User Fee: The Better and Fairer Approach
Why?
1. User Fee Concept
2. Gas taxes and motor vehicle fees are the only funds collected by
state government that are constitutionally protected to go for the
purposes in which collected, "construction, maintenance and
supervision of the public highways."
3. Supports Iowa's "pay as you go" construction philosophy.
4. Tax is easily collected and paid over time.
5. Gas taxes are also paid by out-of-state drivers (20 percent of
traffic) who use our system.
6. Has the least adverse economic impact on users over time
compared to tolls, fees, etc.
This information is courtesy of:
- Associated General Contractors of Iowa (founded 1923)
- Iowa Good Roads Association (founded 1946)
- Iowa Motor Truck Association (founded 1942)