A Dread Parentage
Harry T. Cook


By Harry T. Cook
12/11/15
 
 
 
"Fear is the parent of cruelty," said James Anthony Froude, a 19th-century British historian. With politicians of all shades falling over themselves to deport, detain, expel and bar Syrian refugees from America, Froude is proven right.
 
There's nothing like an election campaign to engender fear in the strongest of hearts. There's a reason for that: most office-seekers panting for the attention of voters run on promises to go to war, to vaporize enemies foreign and domestic and to expose traitorous politicians on the other side.
 
The patron saint of the latter is the late Joe McCarthy, a one-time U.S. senator from Wisconsin in whose memory an era was named. The era and its bad behavior has come to life again, as if the Hon. Mr. Welch had not shut down McCarthy with these few terse words: "Have you left no sense of decency, sir, at long last? Have you left no sense of decency?" Civil fear of enemies under every bed did not die that day. That was 1954.
 
A decade or so earlier after the attack on Pearl Harbor, President Franklin D. Roosevelt was pressed by his fearful security and military advisers to imprison Japanese-Americans, many of them long-time U.S. citizens and adult children of such citizens. One of them was the founding priest of the parish I later served for 22 years -- almost twice as long as he, though they loved him twice as much as they loved me. It would have been laughable had anyone ever confessed fear of such a dear man as Father Paul Hiyama.
 
America next had black people to fear because they sought equality and demanded respect for their dignity. Following them came women -- uppity women -- who wanted liberation from the burden of stereotypical roles in which they found themselves trapped. They even wanted reproductive rights.
 
Then came the Vietnamese whose desire to run their own show the military might of America for all its megatons of bombs could not beat down. Fear. It was all about fear. It was Lyndon John's fear that he would be called "soft on Communism" if he didn't keep on pulling the trigger.
 
In due course, out from its dank cave oozed the National Rifle Association with a campaign to arm us all to the teeth. The argument was that one never knew if the other guy had a gun, so you should have one, too. That did a lot for the gun manufacturers and their stockholders, but has left in its wake dead people in movie theaters, schools, churches, a Planned Parenthood clinic and now an ordinary public building in San Bernadino. The engine of it all is the F word: fear.
 
Today we are in the grip of a national spasm of fear -- fear of Islam, of Muslims of members of the LGBT community and generally of other people who are not like us, whom we would rather not see or with whom have much to do. Some of them are immigrants or would-be immigrants.
 
He whose name I will neither speak nor write wants to build a thousand-mile wall along the Mexican border, put the mark of Cain on every Muslim and otherwise drive the country into mass hysteria of the kind that Daniel Goldhagen* saw behind pogroms against European Jews from 1933 to 1945.
 
The white folk who showed up on this continent in the 17th and 18th centuries were also afraid. They feared the ones they mistakenly called "Indians," who just happened to have been long-time residents here. They were feared so much that they were eventually driven farther and farther west and left to rot in reservations. They buried their hearts at Wounded Knee.
 
The Native Americans that early immigrants encountered were a people who revered the land on which they lived, thought of nature's phenomena as deities and tried to move through their surroundings like a fish through water or a bird through the air, leaving no sign of their presence and no detritus behind. What was to fear about that?
 
Had it not been for the needless fear of Native Americans and the resultant cruelty heaped upon them, white European immigrants and their successors might have adopted the caring ecology of the ones they feared and demonized. And had that happened, perhaps the Dust Bowl of the 1930s could have been avoided or at least mitigated. For one thing, we'd have a lot fewer casinos cluttering the landscape.
 
And let's be clear: The November 13 attacks in the City of Light were conducted to engender fear. It was not the invasion of a super power. It was a series of cowardly acts perpetrated by thugs driven by their own fear that the world had left them behind.
 
Most of the 298 people running for the Republican nomination for president are deliberately and cynically stoking fear that it could happen here. Maybe it could, but fear mongers are never good leaders, much less when they threaten reprisals against innocent refugees. And do they not know that such rhetoric has the effect of further alienating those who already feel alienated? Do they not get it?
 
Fear is our worst enemy. It comes to us from our animal ancestors on up the evolutionary path. Fear arises from deep down in our primal sub- or unconsciousness. Eventually our evolved brain processes the raw emotion into a narrative to explain the goose bumps, the increased heart rate, the perspiration and rapid breathing and, eventually anger and resentment.
 
The key is to manage the narrative so it does not turn into a vengeance tragedy of paranoid hatred that gives permission to strike out irrationally. The ancient Greeks turned such narratives into myths. We should give that a try.
 
*Hitler's Willing Executioners. New York, NY. Alfred P. Knopf. 1996


Copyright 2015 Harry T. Cook. All rights reserved. This article may not be used or reproduced without proper credit.
 


Readers Write
Re essay of 12/4/15 Tell Me What the Difference Is
 

Art Rutter, Fort Smith, Arkansas:
You helped my then-girlfriend and me many years ago with a very tough decision we had to make when the law did not permit us to make it. Only recently was I made aware of your online publications, and I very much appreciated this week's post. Sure, a lot of people will think you've gone too far in your comparisons. I don't agree with them.
 
David N. Stewart, Huntington Woods, Michigan:
I strongly disagree with the premise in your first paragraph.
["In a longer view and deeper consideration of present crises, it is possible to see similarities among 1) the lack of will to limit the fatal consequences of burning fossil fuels, 2) the perfervid determination on the part of too many politicians to destroy the Affordable Care Act as in the intention of the new governor of Kentucky to curtail the short-lived opportunity for the poor of his state to obtain basic health care through the federally funded expansion of Medicaid, 3) the political movement to reduce food stamps for those families that need them most and 4) the all-too-recent history best known for the sites of base human cruelty: Auschwitz, Bergen Belsen and Dachau."] You distort the truth.
 
Clifford Donaldson, Savannah, Georgia:
An acquaintance of mine forwarded an essay of yours to me to give me a good laugh. I didn't laugh. It made me mad. To call members of Congress Hitler's people because they are trying to pay down the national debt run up by bleeding heart liberals like you by giving people free food for doing no work is offensive. Count me as one of the people you hoped to hear from.
 
Joel Pugh, Dallas, Texas:
You listed 4 topics; the first three are 60% of the pillars of Paul Ryan's of last budget proposal, add reduction of Federal support for education. Add reduction of benefits for veterans, and you have list all the magic that makes Ryan's budget balance.
 
Rt. Rev. R Stewart Wood, Episcopal Bishop of Michigan, ret., Hanover, New Hampshire:  
Well said. Belatedly I want to commend you on the essay on immigration and the migration of so many from places of horror. That one was a masterpiece!
 
Ellen Baldwin, Lincoln, Nebraska:
Really, sir. You need to take a pill. America is not Nazi Germany and those who are trying to manage a runaway government are not Hitler types. This was way over the top.
 
Jim High, Tupelo, Mississippi:
Not sure if this is the difference, but surely it is the cause. We are seeing the various cultures, religions and races of people come together as never before. We are rubbing up against those who are the other. People not like us who don't believe what we believe and many people, usually the less well informed, can't seem to handle or accept that very well. But we must all learn to change. Everything in nature changes and adapts. That is how the human animal evolved, and the only way we will continue to evolve. Religions could have a real role to play as the world comes together, but sadly they have been the least likely to change their beliefs.    
Blayney Colmore, La Jolla, California:  
There is no argument that demeaning and diminishing each other is at the heart of the cruelties that are so often passed off as mere political differences. Though I have never gotten all the way through Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged, the part I have always amazes me with its seeming lack of empathy for anyone who isn't flourishing. The most recent attack against a party for people with various differences that make it hard for them to navigate a competitive world, seemed to focus the lack of empathy. I wish I knew why some seem to have empathy built in, while others find it nearly impossible to imagine what goes on in another person. Call it naive, I think being able to emotionally, psychically, walk the mile in another person's shoes, is not only going to be willing to make some sacrifices on that person's behalf, but is going to enjoy the day. But what is the source of that empathy? Some days the search for it strikes me as essential for our species as curbing carbon emissions and ceasing warfare.
 
Fred Fenton, Concord, California:
There is little difference between the four examples you give of the violation of human dignity. In fact, the first three -- refusing to take strong action against the burning of fossil fuels, voting to destroy the Affordable Care Act, and reducing Food Stamps -- are oft-repeated stands of Republican lawmakers and presidential candidates. They signify the determination of rich conservatives to give themselves every advantage while ignoring environmental concerns and the needs of the poor. We must return to the democratic socialism of FDR and Lyndon Johnson. Human dignity does not ultimately rest on the Constitution. It depends on the good will of the American people. 
 
Dewey Barton, New Smyrna Beach, Florida:
Great essay. I'm with you all the way.
 
J.R. Demijohn, Bay City, Michigan:  
I have been reading your essays for some time now. They make all sorts of sense until you start on the "climate change" thing. Nobody really cares. If you paid me, I would not support this climate change thesis. This is a religious essay; whom are you trying to scare? I wonder what your agenda is? I started studying geology in the '70s. We are leaving the Pleistocene ice age; the temps will gradually become warmer, very slowly. Why are there 300 mil. people in the U.S., and only 30 mil. in Canada? One word.......COLD. CO2 is not a poison gas. It is necessary for life to exist. Greenhouse growers buy CO2 generators to increase plant growth. If this is so bad, why are they not arrested? The air we breathe contains only .04% CO2; that's 4/100's of one percent. How low would it be taken? I was drawn to you because you made sense in your inquiries regarding the bible. I will join you, in beating the climate change drum, only if you pay me handsomely. The man I follow for climate change info has a doctorate in ecology. He is to climate change what you are to religion. You mention climate change too often. As Shakespeare said, "The lady (gentleman) doth protest too much, methinks." You are on the wrong side of the fence, to support anthropomorphic climate change.
 
Nicholas Molinari. Brick, New Jersey:
The difference is not the fundamental cruelty permeating and nurturing hatred for the planet; disdain for the poor -- sick or hungry or simply of wrong color; making scapegoats of convenient targets; worshiping guns, the more deadly the better; etc. The difference is our hypocrisy in claiming this to be a Christian nation while perverting legislatively everything a Christian nation should stand for: feeding the hungry; giving drink to the thirsty; clothing the naked, comforting the sick; visiting the imprisoned; protecting the innocent from harm. Hand in hand with this hypocrisy is our politicians' cleverness [and possibly our own] in convincing themselves and ourselves that denying the basics of survival to "unworthy people" is proper, even what Jesus Christ intended for his kingdom on earth. Christianity has been hijacked and reverse-baptized as Capitalism, the true religion of this nation. Greed is its greatest virtue, perhaps its only virtue. Thus spake the Lord! Remember the harm done to the common good and to common citizens by the 5 Conservative Justices who call themselves "Catholic." Supposedly, Catholics are Christians. Where's the evidence? "All praise and glory to money and to guns!" so decides this Court. This is not the only period in which the Catholic Church and its Sister Churches have gone to bed with Fascism! The Republicans are tripping over each other in the rush to display their neo-conservative credentials. If one were to study the rants of Franco, Mussolini and Hitler in the early 20th Century, it would seem like a deja vu in reverse. This brand of neo-conservatism might better be named neo-fascism. Donald Trump is very popular precisely because he reflects the fundamental cruelty upon which American neo-fascism stands. He is certainly not the only Republican spewing such toxicity. When all is said and done, it must be said that We the People have failed our own purpose, by succumbing to ignorance, machismo, intolerance, violence, avoidance of civic duties, and hatred. When a small portion of eligible voters puts into office politicians who plan to overturn the rights and benefits of those very voters, a rational person could bid farewell to Democracy. Moron nation, perhaps, marching in lockstep?
 

What do you think?
I'd like to hear from you. E-mail your comments to me at revharrytcook@aol.com.