American Exceptionalism: An Inquiry
Harry T. Cook

By Harry T. Cook
7/3/15
 

 

 

 

Americans are about to celebrate the 239th anniversary of the Declaration of Independence and, by extension, the invention of the United States, which was accomplished by their foreparents over the following decade.

 

That invention was celebrated by Alexis de Tocqueville in his 1835-1840 work Democracy in America, in which he said, "The position of the Americans is ... quite exceptional." He traced that exceptionalism to their "strictly Puritanical origin, their exclusively commercial habits" along with what he called our predecessors' "neglect of the arts" unlike their European counterparts.

 

Later on, American exceptionalism took on the concept of "manifest destiny," which was used as an excuse to deprive native populations of their land so that the United States could expand. Not so long after came talk of America being "God's country."

 

Such ideas are what aided and abetted the country's entry into the conflict known as the Spanish-American war, later into the Korean war in 1950, the Vietnam war a few years on and finally the 2003 preemptive invasion of Iraq, then a sovereign nation with which the United States was not at war. We knew then and know now that bald-faced lies in high places were given as the casus belli for the latter.

 

What lay at the base of the invasion of Iraq was the unacknowledged loss of the Vietnam war with its specter of evacuations by helicopter through the roof of an embassy annex. For those who became known as neo-cons, America's withdrawal left a bitter taste that had somehow to be eradicated.

 

That process began in June 1997, when a document known as the "Statement of Principles" of an organization called "The Project for a New American Century" was issued. One of its principles introduced strategies for the shaping of "a new century favorable to American interests ... to challenge regimes hostile to [American] interests ... to preserve "an international order friendly to our security and our prosperity."

 

The signatories of that document included John Ellis (Jeb) Bush, Dick Cheney, Steve Forbes, I. Lewis (Scooter) Libby, Dan Quayle, Donald Rumsfeld and Paul Wolfowitz -- Cheney, Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz in particular being the authors of the massively stupid war with and in Iraq, its neverending aftermath being one of the globe's great destabilizers. And they called that war a sterling example of "American exceptionalism." It was, in fact, nationalism.

 

The definition of nationalism is "a strong belief that the interests of a particular nation are of primary importance with respect to those of other nations." Nationalism tends to be xenophobic, ethnocentric and defensive.

 

The key word in the definition is "belief." The truth is that one can believe anything he or she chooses to believe, but no one can "know" something except by the hard work of examining data relevant to the piece of knowledge that is sought.

 

Here are some of the things we actually "know" about America:

 

+ It was conceived in revolution and born in the framing of its Constitution and Bill of Rights. If one were a Caucasian male landowner, the early years of the country were found favorable but not so much by unmarried women, Native Americans and African slaves;

 

+ Many of our founding parents owned slaves;

 

+ Native Americans were demonized and persecuted (see the Trail of Tears);

 

+ In a frenzy of building, vast forests were felled, leaving behind thousand of

square miles of ruined landscape;

 

+ In greed to grow and sell wheat, the Great Plains were denuded of prairie grass setting  the stage for the ruinous Dust Bowl of the 1930s;

 

+ It has evolved a tax code that favors the already wealthy at the expense of a failing

middle class and the hopeless poor;

 

+ Too many of its governments at the state level are bound and determined to suppress voting by racial minorities and youths for the sake of political gain and to deny women their constitutionally protected reproductive rights.

 

Some of these are unhappy thoughts to send out on the eve of the Fourth of July, when public attention at its best turns to Old Glory and the land of the free and the home of the brave. No one wants more than I to be able to amass sufficient knowledge to permit belief in a morally exceptional America.

 

Better thoughts, though: With Beethoven's Freude, sch�ner G�tterfunken playing in my head, I cheered mightily the U.S. Supreme Court's two majorities in rulings last week: the first that secured for millions of Americans the right to have government-subsidized health care, the second that recognized the legitimacy of what we have come to call "gay marriage."

 

It was a great week, though overshadowed by the funerals of the nine African-Americans shot to death in South Carolina church. But as if to offer a measure of redemption to the grieving, the nation's First Choral Director led a congregation of 6,000 in a rousing stanza of "Amazing Grace."

 

That's the America I will celebrate through tears on the Fourth of July 2015.

 

* * * * * 

 

POSTSCRIPT: I Did It and I'm Glad

 

The 5-4 U.S. Supreme Court ruling on marriage last week brought me a quiet, inner peace as I remembered a day almost 47 years ago. I was a young assisting priest serving an urban parish that even then was home to all sorts and conditions of people. One of them was a man then probably in his late 60s or early 70s.

 

He was a regular at the 8 a.m. liturgy, sat by himself in a rear pew of the chapel and spoke only when spoken to. I spoke to him the first day I saw him and discovered a most interesting person. He had played a series of character roles on Broadway and elsewhere. He'd been stranded in Detroit when his theater company was dissolved in mid-tour, leaving him with no train fare back to New York.

 

He'd met the man whom he would come to love and with whom he would live in a small apartment a short block from the church for the next 30 years. When his partner became mortally ill, he approached me after church one Sunday to ask if I would bless their union.

 

I could neither refuse nor even think of asking the rector's permission, much less that of the bishop. So on a rainy Saturday morning with no one else but the sexton in the building, I ushered in the two men, lighted the candles on the altar of St. Michael's Chapel, donned my vestments and, using a hastily crafted text, heard their vows and made the sign of the Cross over them.

 

The sick man died within weeks of my departure from the parish, and all these years along I have no idea what happened to the former actor. I was wondering about him last week and hoped the last days with his partner were as happy as circumstances allowed in the knowledge that a not so brave priest of his church broke the rules and did in virtual secret what should have done in the open with cake and champagne to follow.


Copyright 2015 Harry T. Cook. All rights reserved. This article may not be used or reproduced without proper credit.
 


Readers Write
Re essay of 6/26/15 I'm Stickin' to the Union
 

 

 

Alfred Williams, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania:

It is the rare columnist who takes on what you took on in your essay today. A friend supplies them to me via Facebook. I wish members of Congress could be made to read them. Thank you for your candor and forthrighteness.

 

Dewey Barton, New Smyrna Beach, Florida:

Great essay. The best.

 

Franklin Carlson, St. Paul, Minnesota:

Unions made our lives better as kids in the 1950s, made our Dads more than laborers and improved many lives. Thank you for recognizing them in such a good article.

 

Blythe Townsend, Madison, Wisconsin:

It wouldn't do a bit of good, but I'd like to hand deliver your essay of June 26 to the governor of this state - not that he would give it a minute of his precious time. I wish you would come here and write a book about us the way Thomas Franks wrote about his fellow Kansans. What IS the matter with Wisconsin anyway? We used to be a progressive state. Your words are balm to an injured soul.

 

Hannah Provence Donigan, Commerce, Michigan:

I'm stickin' with you since I realize one of the goals of the extreme Right is to kill unions.  Two other main goals are weaken or destroy public schools and take away a woman's right to choose.

 

Tracey Martin, Southfield, Michigan:

Since we do not particularly care much for the ethical Jesus, perhaps, in the interests of a rational assessment of human character, we should rewrite scripture to reflect instead the realities of accumulated power: To those who have much, more should be given; for those with little, let them struggle to prevent having less. Sarcastic cynicism borne of my witness to the implacable diminution of counter-balancing union influence, it reflects the peonage we drift toward economically as the franchise itself is suffering assault. Absolute power is being deposited on the front porch of corporate domination. But what else is to be expected of a nation half of which did not merely practice human slavery race based but actually celebrated it as white Christian entitlement. The other half of the Union so indifferent to such subjugation that Lincoln was forced to deny elimination of the scourge as in any way the purpose of his call for troops to suppress rebellion. Similar to yourself, I became a unionist when I helped establish a local of the American Federation of Teachers. I remained pro-union when I served the interests of school management and lament to this day the calculating suppression of effective union participation in the eco-political direction of the Republic for which I still stand (not under any god and with my hand at my side). For my political comfort, I must glance backward rather than peer forward, trembling as events continue to deny vitality and viability to a strong middle class.

 

Fred Fenton, Concord, California: 
You write "collective bargaining is the cornerstone of the economics of American democracy." Right wing propaganda has obscured this truth for many Americans, who do not know how much they benefit from union efforts in the past. Union failure to block TPA means more lost jobs for workers in America. It also means overseas work paying abysmally low wages will only increase. We need strong unions and public support for collective bargaining, but will we get it? The popularity with Republicans of the union-bashing governor of Wisconsin is a worrisome sign for the future of labor relations in America. 

What do you think?
I'd like to hear from you. E-mail your comments to me at revharrytcook@aol.com.