Guns Galore      

 

Harry T. Cook
Harry T. Cook

By Harry T. Cook
5/2/14

 

 

"A gun for your vote, my good man," saith the aspirant campaigner, hoping to win a seat in the U.S. Congress or in one of the legislative houses of his own state. "Here's a nifty assault rifle for you. Shoot up a storm, and remember to vote for me."

 

The paragraph just above may sound like a draft for a Saturday Night Live script. Alas and also alack, it is what one can hear on the campaign trail in this election year.

 

And speaking of SNL, you can imagine one of its writers pondering a wickedly sardonic commentary about the man who went to the Jewish center in Kansas to kill Jews yet managed only to kill Christians. It would tax common credulity to make up a story like that.

 

But, yes, several candidates, with the blessing of the National Rifle Association and its fawning politicos, are trying to buy votes with gun-giveaways as if the Newtown massacre and its mutant cousins had not blown away far too many innocent lives already.

 

A guy who helped run Mitt Romney's 2012 presidential bid told the New York Times recently that giving away guns "could get you a couple extra thousand votes you didn't otherwise know about."

 

Yet another fellow with the name Lee Bright, which seems counterintuitive when you hear what he has to say, is a Republican challenging another Republican for a U.S. Senate seat. By way of explaining his gun-related campaign strategy, Bright -- John Bunyan would call him "Dim" -- said, "We're as strong Second Amendmentists as they come, and we wanted to reach out to like-minded folks." Amendmentists? What is this, a religion?

 

I almost hate to put into print what my late father -- a day laborer, a florist, a factory worker, a lawyer, a prosecuting attorney and a judge in that chronological order across his 75 years -- would say were he to learn about what I have just written. "JESUS H. CHRIST!" would be merely the overture of his commentary.

 

Whilst spouting a stream of profanity in tones worthy of a first-class Shakespearean actor, Dad would wonder if the world had gone nuts overnight. I tell you that if a candidate for any office had been exchanging firearms for votes in his jurisdiction, you can bet Dad would have confronted whom he would've called "the dumb son of a bitch" doing the giving and demand that he cease and desist.

 

If the gun-giver had invoked the Second Amendment, Dad would have taken him by his lapels and said something like this: "Listen, buddy, the Second Amendment has to do with militia, not with people like you pandering to voters by giving away guns. We got plenty of militia, and they've got plenty of guns. Now put those things back in the trunk of your car."

 

Dad had a rather mordant sense of humor, and I can imagine him campaigning in that same election cycle by ordering a couple of thousand plastic squirt guns, giving them away to those whose votes he solicited: "Here, fill this thing with water and squirt it at the guy who tries to give you a real gun in exchange for your vote. An election is not a turkey shoot."

 

Dad was elected to eight two-year terms and one four-year term as prosecuting attorney of his county. While in that office, he prosecuted two popular so-called "public servants" who'd actually served themselves. For his trouble, by some Dad was vilified for it. Toward the end of his life, he donned the robe of a judge and whilst on the bench did not suffer fools gladly.

 

He was elected village president only after being importuned to run. He ran, but only on the promise that he would see to it that the town could no longer use the river that ran through it as a sewer. He pressed for the construction of a modern sewage disposal system and succeeded. Several of the village fathers -- whom privately he called the "village idiots" -- fought him every step of the way. Today he would be thought a hero.

 

Where is that kind of politician today? None of them gives away guns that squirt water. Some of them, however, are giving away guns that shoot bullets that kill people. The expletive "JESUS H. CHRIST," however profane, in reaction to such an outrage becomes the classic understatement.


Copyright 2014 Harry T. Cook. All rights reserved. This article may not be used or reproduced without proper credit.
 

Readers Write 
Essay 4/25/14: A Puzzle Unsolved  

 

J. Edward Putnam, Providence, RI: 
I have read you essay with delight and envy. We have searched for such a setting [as you described] in which to find welcome and open minds. We have settled for "good enough" only to discover a growing restlessness.

Tracey Morgan, Southfield, MI: 
What a disappointing piece this week's is. Not in regard to the intellectual content to which it merrily exposes us. Merely the fact that the pew in which you weekly sit is not in a Unitarian church. A friend does the Sunday New York Times puzzle in pen. I could never do it at all. But I am willing to pen into that "dog-eared crossword" a two-letter answer to ancient bewilderments: Is there any evidence that human affairs are in any way dictated, or even influenced, by a deity of any kind. No. To the extent we pretend they are, we introduce intellectual/moral toxicity into decisions that thereby corrupt our future.

Rox Lucan, Philadelphia, PA:

Your experience mirrors mine, which led me to join the local Catholic church. It's a well-educated community, with Jesuit-trained leaders. I tested their patience, I'm sure, but they did not resort to rigamarole. I got a big laugh out of some of their skeptical answers. However, when I tried the local Catholics when living down South, it was back to the 1600s. The priest was ranting about local 'Masons' who were Satanic and said he always stuck the communion wafer on people's tongues to prevent them sneaking it away in their hands to use for evil purpose.


Danny Belrose, Independence, MO:

Once again you've made my day. "A Puzzle Solved" stirred me. My first response was, Gee, I didn't know Harry visited my congregation (Walnut Gardens Community of Christ, Independence, MO.). I think you would find yourself at home there. It's an accepting, progressive church with a heavily weighted mix of liberal Christians in community with traditional believers. We have no paid pastor but have several retired clergy who along with ordained and non-ordained volunteers plan and lead worship. Every homily does not fan my agnostic Christian soul but none are offensive and all are embraced by a shared willingness to listen with love. We're not all on the same page but our sense of sacred community says i
f we cannot be on the same page, can we be on different pages in the same book? If we cannot be in the same book-can we be on the same shelf or in the same section in the same library? And, if not the same book, same section, or same library, can we at least celebrate that we have been penned into existence by the same author? As it goes, we live in the 'Grand Puzzle,' try to find the odd fitting piece, but never quite get the picture right.

Tamara Sullivan, Chicago, IL:

Thanks for finding that sentence in the book review and making the best of it. I love the idea of the 2,500 year crossword puzzle -- unsolved? You betcha. Thanks for using the pencil. Your kind of thinking is just what we need.
 Michael Vaughan, Olathe, KS:Your essay about the unsolved puzzle puzzles me. I would think that as a man of the cloth you would vend straight answers, not too-cute questions. How did your congregation put up with you all those years? You should have taught in a college rather than preached from a pulpit.

Richard Jackson, Ann Arbor, MI:

Where were you when I was growing up? All I got was answers from my various priests. Now you come along and say that questions are the thing, even fundamental questions. And now you're retired. I cling to your essays like a man overboard clings to his capsized boat. Keep writing. It gives me hope.


Nina Feenstra, Portland, OR:

Lucky you, fellow agnostic, to find a church where you can go and not have your IQ insulted. When I moved here recently, I looked for one such. Still looking. A friend got me on to your writings, so I subsist on them for religious commonsense. I thank you very much.

Fred Fenton, Concord, CA: 
The challenge for Christianity today is to fill in the blanks in the "dog-eared crossword puzzle" of religious beliefs with all we know of the historical Jesus, those sayings and parables that provide shafts of light in a sin-darkened world.


What do you think?
I'd like to hear from you. E-mail your comments to me at [email protected].