Paul Was Right      


Harry T. Cook
Harry T. Cook


By Harry T. Cook
1/24/14

 

"Wretched one that I am, who shall deliver me from this body of death?"*

 

Thus did St. Paul, clearly in distress, pose that rhetorical question at the climax of his frustration at finding it next to impossible to do what he knew was right, and, instead, did wrong. He said he knew what the law was and how, perversely, it could be construed to appear to require its own disobedience. "Body of death," indeed.

 

It is not difficult to apply Paul's lamentation to the issue of personal failure. Which of us has never known such an inner conflict? On January 1, someone will resolve to end dependence on cigarettes because he or she knows their use is a sure gamble with lung cancer, which usually wins. But by January 10, it's back to smoking. The person knows what's good, but does the very opposite.

 

I want to apply Paul's dilemma collectively to national politics and culture as follows:

 

In a country that justifiably is proud of having Lady Liberty at the entrance to its most storied harbor, with Emma Lazarus' well-known sonnet carved into its pedestal, one would think that immigration would not have become the bitter issue that it is. Millions of American citizens today are separated from Ellis Island by no more than two or three generations. All my grandparents were immigrants as were several of my aunts and uncles on both sides. So was my mother.

 

What inner wiring of our civic self got crossed that makes so many Americans xenophobic about immigration? Can it be right to slam the door shut now that we are in? Has the Lazarus invitation been withdrawn?

 

In a country that prizes education -- or says it does -- how is it that state legislatures go to great ends to deprive their schools of the dollars they need to attract and pay the best to teach America's children? How can politicians sworn to do the best for their electorates do the worst by them? Is it possible that, while we know that America must compete in the world, our elected leaders knowingly and willingly shortchange our kids in order to punish teachers' unions. What is the fever that makes the educational enterprise appear to be the enemy?

 

Who shall deliver us from this body of death?

 

How, in a country that has made such great strides in the arena of scientific research, can it be possible that Congress would punish our National Institutes of Health by failing fully to fund its research that is vital to public health? Why do many angry members of Congress want to do away with the Environmental Protection Agency that is charged with a different aspect of public health? Why do political action groups push back so strenuously against regulatory bodies in their attempt to limit just such instances as the recent poisoning of the drinking water of 300,000 West Virginians?

 

How is it that every effort to curb the release of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere -- notably industrial and automotive effluents -- is met with obstruction from politicians at all levels? Can the Koch Brothers and their co-conspirators in the gas and oil lobby have so corrupted those who would rather be re-elected to public office than to enact laws that would improve public health, save lives now and the planet from irremediable damage later?

Who shall deliver us from this body of death?

 

Why does Congress and why do legislatures have such antipathy toward the Affordable Care Act and its implementation that, if encouraged and supported, could result in large numbers of Americans now without health care to have it? How can Americans want to deny such a basic value as decent health to other Americans?

 

How is it possible that the junior U.S. Senator from Michigan, Debbie Stabenow, can champion a farm bill that imperils basic nutrition for Americans who have to depend on food stamps to feed their families in a time of high unemployment and record corporate profits? Where have public ethics gone? Surely we know what is right to do, and what is wrong to omit doing.

 

Who shall deliver us from this body of death?

 

If it is common knowledge that the income disparities in this country are wider than ever and getting wider, and if we understand that not only does a prolonged economic oligarchy inevitably become the seed of revolution but that such a state of things is plainly unjust, why do we not work day and night to ameliorate the conditions that stand in the way of social and economic improvement in the lives of those living at the margins? Why do we tolerate broken schools, broken neighborhoods and broken promises?

 

Who shall deliver us from this body of death?

 

How, in a country that from its beginnings so elevated personal liberty to the top of the national agenda, can it be possible that powerful members of Congress and not a few state legislatures work overtime to deny the established freedom of women under Roe v. Wade to a measure of control over the reproductive process? What internal sickness is it that allows lawmakers to be so backward as on one day to create statutory prohibitions of teaching evolutionary biology and on the next deprive women by any means necessary of medically advisable abortions?

 

What has happened to the health of the body politic itself that barely concealed hatred of the president -- surely in part because he is black -- has spilled over into what should be an exacting process of making -- and obeying -- laws pro bono publico?

 

Who or what shall deliver us from this body of death?

 

*Epistle to the Romans 7:15-24

 


Copyright 2014 Harry T. Cook. All rights reserved. This article may not be used or reproduced without proper credit.
 

Readers Write 
Essay 1/17/14: Clergy Unfettered                     

Rabbi Larry Maher, Parrish, FL:

I couldn't agree more [with your essay "Clergy Unfettered"]. I had a 50+ year career as a Reform Rabbi, and heard frequently from members of my congregational boards -- "You can't say that rabbi." "Remember that our congregants pay dues, and those dues pay your salary." "You upset the congregation too often." In too many congregations, it was assumed that the rabbi's role was to placate the membership, to tell them what they wanted to hear, and the basics of Judaism and its teachings be damned.

   

Ronald Pickett, Columbia, SC:

I am one of those clergy about whom you wrote. I have, in fact, not used my real name but have vouchsafed it to you privately, because if what I have to say became public I would lose my pension. Organized religion in this country is the Rotary Club at lunch and Friday night football, complete with the "Star Spangled Banner" and much cheerleading. Fifty years ago I had dithered between law and the ministry. I dithered in the wrong direction. Thanks for your encouragement.

 

Joel Pugh, Dallas, TX:

Thanks for the new word. Had not heard of "bunkum." We use a different word here in Texas (a bovine reference).

 

Don Caley, Milford, MI:

A strange way to live a life, yes. But don't discount the myriad positive ways you've touched other lives. I personally know of several instances when you've expressed a thought, or put words to a feeling that a listener or reader had, but just couldn't articulate. It is liberating to suddenly realize that someone else on the planet is on the same wavelength as you are. 

 

Lois Bailey, St. Clair Shores, MI:
As I read your essay, I thought, "The more things change, the more they remain the same." Sixty years ago, while living in Romulus (Michigan), the pastor of the United Methodist Church in that town was trying to move a white church into acceptance of those who lived across the tracks. Did not work then, and probably does not work now. Another pastor of two churches in the Flint area, one a small country -- white -- church, and the other a black church in a black community in the north end of Flint -- and I guess the folks who make assignments thought after 60 years it would be easy. Well, guess what: the agony is the same. Acceptance does not exist in those churches. The pastor is a white man, trying to get acceptance between those two congregations, only to be met with anger and frustration, because of his messages -- acceptance, working to feed the poor, and the homeless, etc.-- the Gospel according to Jesus -- they want to keep looking backwards, over their shoulders, about how it used to be -- not that it was so great back then.


Brian McHugh, Silver City, NM:

It's i
nteresting to see one's life described on the Internet. Yep, disillusionment, certainly. But then, it was really my own fault. When I left the religious life, I wish I had known to strike out in a different way. I was never meant to be a parish priest, in the business of propping up institutions that are very difficult to prop up! However, I tried to do in parish ministry what I had done in my work as a monk. That is, to lead people to a deeper sense of faith, religion, and, in fact, beyond faith. To see how the world worked, how existence really was, and what was that great and immense mystery of life, which the word "god" barely touches. Yes, it turned out to be mostly comforting the comforted -- which meant that they could use Jesus to justify all of their prejudices and petty hatreds and self-delusions. Oh well. Water under the bridge. Now, I am taking this year to learn how to define myself, or perhaps present myself, as the person I am, shed of all of the "Rev." stuff. Just being me. Strangely, I am able to be much more the person I wanted to be, now that I have nothing to do with the institutional church. Life is full of mysteries. Two priest friends of mine, in their 70s, have both renounced their ordination vows. And both of them are much happier.

Elizabeth Oakes, Burke, VA:
Don't despair. There are many of us out there. I am one of them.


Fred Fenton, Concord, CA:  
Your "Clergy Unfettered" essay reveals a hidden source of energy and inspiration for institutional religion. Retired clergy with years of experience in the field could be valuable partners in reshaping church and synagogue for vital ministry today. Instead, they are largely left to themselves, as they were during their years of active ministry. It is assumed they are too old and desire to be left alone, and thus a valuable resource is wasted. Consider the example of Pope Francis. Arriving at the age he was required to retire as archbishop, he made arrangements to live in a retirement home for clergy. Friends said he appeared tired and depressed. Then, surprise, he found himself elected Pope. Big smiles lit up his face, his energy was restored, and he began a remarkable effort to revive and restore his church throughout the world.

Blayney Colmore, La Jolla, CA:

I would say he [your pastor] "humbles" more than shames me. I can only assume that -- in addition to his more Zen-like personality -- his "faith" exceeds mine. By that I mean his confidence in some inchoate eschatalogy that promises, as Dame Julian said, "All things shall be well; and all manner of things shall be well." I hugely admire your pastor for his patience and faithfulness in carrying on his good works fed by that conviction.

 

Phillip Dickson, Minneapolis, MN:

You speak for so many of us who have gone down the road you describe. I never became a scholar, but I knew what I believed and what was believable. I could not preach or teach that which was not believable. I had to drop out before it killed me. I took refuge -- don't laugh -- in the life insurance business, though I am long since out of that, too.

 

Mari Bonomi, Kilmarnock, VA:

Reading about the clergy who've retired from the pulpits, et al, because they refuse to speak "bunkum" reminded me of Our Jewish Community, the online arm of Congregation Beth Adam in I think it's Cincinnati. It's a humanist synagogue, co-led by two rabbis, one of them a young woman who went through elementary school with my daughter, Rabbi Laura Baum. I actually have been taken aback on occasion by how far from the traditional bunkum these two teachers have moved -- and I'm a secular humanist "cultural" Jew.   


What do you think?
I'd like to hear from you. E-mail your comments to me at revharrytcook@aol.com.