New Century News
                                                                          Volume 3 ,  Issue 6

 
An Industry  News Service provided  by
New Century Consulting

      

 

April 2014

To our viewers:  

 

Our goal with New Century News is to help our clients, prospective clients and associates within the real estate development industry improve their bottom line by suggesting the use of better marketing and management techniques.

 

We use several local, regional and national media and government sources to assemble what we deem to be the most pertinent to our client consulting activities and the services we provide. We welcome your comments. 

 

to view our current and past projects including comments from many of our clients. 

 

Thanks for viewing.

 

Sincerely,
Bill Effinger
Principal
,
New Century Consulting
360-626-1624 office
760-736-3073 cell


  
 
 
 

New Century Consulting

 

 

What we do for our clients:  
New Century Consulting specializes in site selection, forward planning, entitlement processing, community outreach, marketing and project monitoring for builders, developers and investors. We maintain a particular focus on projects in San Diego, Riverside, San Bernardino & Imperial counties in California, and now Kitsap & King Counties in Washington state. Please visit our web site to view what our clients say about us at:

 

www.ncconsulting.net

 

The Case for Fast-Tracking Foreclosures of Vacant Properties

Lynn Effinger


Still one of the hottest topics in the default servicing industry today is the call by many field services providers for fast-tracking the foreclosure process on vacant, abandoned residential properties.

This subject is controversial because today any mention of "foreclosure," especially when combined with the phrase, "fast-tracking," evokes negative feelings. But action by municipalities and states to deal with the growing problems associated with vacant, abandoned properties should not be held hostage to terminology.

 

In Ohio, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, in addition to minimizing neighborhood blight, by fast-tracking the foreclosure process mortgage lenders could save between $24 million and $129 million a year.

 


Here's why investors are flooding into REO-to-rental
Makes good dollars and sense

Lynn Effinger 

 

In less than two years the REO-to-rental concept on a large scale has grown from what many real estate professionals and mortgage servicing industry experts believed would be at best a flash-in-the-pan fad or worse a crash-and-burn exercise in futility, to become a growing new asset class.

 

For many decades wealthy individuals invested in real estate as long-term rental properties. That tried and true model has morphed into a similar opportunity for institutional investors.

 

On Jan. 29 of this year, for example, HousingWire reported that the second major REO-to-rental deal would raise millions. The first such deal was put together by the investment giant Blackstone Group, which spent $7.5 billion to acquire 40,000 homes. But, although there is much to flush out about this new market sector, it is clear that it is here to stay, at least for a while.

 

Developer/Homeowner Transition: A Guide To Success 
 

A successful transition from developer control to owner control of a homeowners association or a condominium association is not necessarily a difficult process. However, it requires open lines of communication and information, common sense, perseverance, and a lot of smart, energetic people who aren't afraid of hard work.

 

When an association is developed, the builder/developer/declarant commits large amounts of resources and dollars to construction of the project and its infrastructure and amenities. In order to protect his investment, provisions are built into the association's legal documents which allow him to exercise control over the direction and processes of the community until a time certain either a firm date several years in the future, or when a certain percentage of units have been sold to homeowners. As you can see, that developer control period can last months or even years.

 

During that time, the developer's representatives serve as members of the Board of Directors, and, as such, they are bound to act as fiduciaries and in the best interest of the association. It is a fine line to walk, since some decisions which are right for the community may result in unanticipated expenses for the developer.

 

Also, during that time, there are usually benchmarks that give homeowners some limited participation in the affairs of the association. These benchmarks can include formation of an advisory committee to make recommendations to the Board, and/or phased-in appointment of homeowners to the Board of Directors.

At some point, however, the developer must turn over control of the association to the owners. A responsible developer will have encouraged homeowner involvement and training along the way, so that the owners are well prepared to assume the responsibility of directing association operations.

 

Transition is usually accomplished at a special meeting held for the purpose of electing homeowners to serve on the Board of Directors. Once the owners are in control, the real work begins! The only thing that ends at that meeting is the developer's control over the functioning of the association not his responsibility to it, and probably not his involvement and interest in it. He may still be selling homes and may still retain seats on the Board.

 

The newly elected owners now have a huge responsibility. They must insure that (1) the developer provides the association with any and all pertinent information; (2) the association reviews that information and questions the developer on any vague or ambiguous issues; and (3) the Board develops a strategic plan to go forward from that point.

 

One of the first steps a new Board should take is an audit of the association's financial situation. It is important for members of the Board, as well as all the owners, to satisfy themselves that while the developer was in control, all income and expenses were properly accounted for. That includes, but isn't limited to, the financial obligation of the developer himself, if any, and aggressive pursuit of delinquent accounts.

 

All association boards, but especially condominiums, should consider hiring a professional engineer to perform a comprehensive inspection of the property and its physical plant. This will serve two purposes: (1) it will determine if there are any warranty defects that may be the responsibility of the developer; and (2) it will serve as the basis for a repair and replacement reserve analysis. Such an analysis will estimate the useful life of a component, such as a building roof, the projected cost to replace it, and how much money needs to be set aside to ensure that special assessments are not necessary to maintain the association's assets into the future.

 

Good legal advice can also be important to the community. The association should retain independent counsel who is well versed in community association law, and who can ensure that the developer abides by his legal obligations and commitments.

 

 

  

We measure our success by your satisfaction.

Idea Corner

 

New-Home Warranties: The Basics 

Your clients may have legal recourse if their newly constructed home is faulty.
March 2009 | By Andrew Dick

 

Imagine that you represent a potential buyer who's looking at a large, newly constructed home in a beautiful location. The buyer asks you several questions about the builder's reputation and whether the home is well built.

 

Although you certainly don't want to give advice on construction quality - unless you're a general contractor yourself - you can add value for your client by knowing the basics of new-home warranties.

New-home warranties fall into three categories: 

 

Statutory. These are warranties specifically required by law. Some states, including Indiana, Louisiana, Maryland, Minnesota, Mississippi, New Jersey, New York, and Virginia, have passed new-home warranty acts that require builders to provide protections to home buyers. 

 

These warranties range from two years for the quality of workmanship and materials to 10 years for structural defects.

 

Implied.  

 

These are warranties inferred by legal precedent set in past lawsuits. Today, most states have case law that protects new-home buyers from faulty workmanship. One of the most common implied warranties is the implied warranty of habitability, which guarantees that the house will be free from defects that substantially impair its use and enjoyment. Such a warranty often covers significant defects in the plumbing, electrical, roofing materials, and structural systems such as the foundation.  

 

This warranty may also include a guarantee to the initial buyer that the materials, products, or fixtures that make up the home (such as the plywood or siding) are free from defects. 

 

Express.  

 

These are written warranties provided by the home builder. A builder may decide to provide express warranties about the home in the purchase contract, even in the absence of a law requiring it to do so. The express warranties might read something like: "The builder of this home hereby warrants the quality of the completed structure for two years from the date of completion." Specific express warranties often benefit a home builder because the builder may attempt to disclaim all implied warranties by providing specific ones. For example, if a builder provides an express warranty covering structural defects for a period of five years from the date the home is completed, it will probably try to disclaim implied warranties that cover the same defect for a period of seven years. However, most courts hold that a disclaimer of an implied warranty is void because it defeats the purpose of the warranty: to protect consumers from faulty workmanship.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Our Affiliate Organizations
 
 



 
 
 

 
  BIA Logo
 


 
 
 

Join Our Mailing List