Many of the current candidates running for President have suggested that the best solution to oppose Obama and his fellow Democrats plans to bring thousands of Syrian "refugees" to the Untied States is "safe zones." To be established (and mostly paid for by U.S. taxpayers) and located in the Middle East. Republican candidate Dr. Carson has apparently signed on to this idea after visiting refugee camps in Jordan.

For security and many other reasons, we certainly cannot bring these so called "refugees" to the U.S. Security is far more important than compassion (except for liberal and left leaning politicians who will always use this issue as a campaign strategy) under the current circumstances because there is no way these "refugees" can be vetted well enough to know who they are, where they originally came from or what their motivations are. Sadly we have seen examples of small children and women being strapped into explosive vests and killing and injuring hundreds of people around them. Do we want to bring that here? So, women and children may be far fewer in numbers but are really no less dangerous than ISIS fighters who may be scattered among them.

Besides, why would we spend billions of $$ to establish "safe zones" in the Middle East for people who will not stand and fight for their own country, when billions of our dollars can't even establish safe zones on the border with Mexico and in Chicago, Los Angeles, Detroit, Baltimore, Ferguson and many other inner city neighborhoods!