Pristine Newsletter - 16 August 2013  
QUICK LINKS
FURTWÄNGLER Fidelio
HALF PRICE DOWNLOADS
 
Save
50%!


BEETHOVEN
Fidelio
Toscanini, 1944/45

All downloads half price for a week of Toscanini's live December 1944 Fidelio

PACO 077

Jan Peerce (tenor) - Florestano
Rose Bampton (soprano) - Leonora
Nicola Moscona (bass) - Don Fernando
Herbert Janssen (bass) - Don Pizarro
Sidor Belarsky (bass) -
Rocco
Eleanor Steber (soprano) - Marcellina
Joseph Laderoute (tenor) - Giacchino


NBC Symphony Orchestra
Chorus Director Peter Wilhousky

Arturo Toscanini conductor



Act 1 transmitted 10th December 1944
Act 2 transmitted 17th December 1944
NBC Studio 8H, New York City

Abscheulicher recorded 14 June 1945
Carnegie Hall, New York City 


Offer Expires:
Friday 23rd August
REVIEW
Audiophile Audition

Stokowski, A Renaissance and Baroque Concert

15 August 2013
by
Gary Lemco (1st)
& John Sunier (2nd)


"I would definitely recommend anyone getting Pristine remasterings from original mono sources go for the ambient stereo option when available" 
 

    

From studio recordings made 1950-1952, producer and restoration engineer Mark Obert-Thorn has spliced two distinct RCA albums by Leopold Stokowski (LM 1133 and LM 1721) that indulged his penchant for orchestral transcriptions of ancient music, of which those by J.S. Bach stood pre-eminent, with some forty from that master. While purists have and will continue to balk at the lush orchestrations and their essentially Romantic ethos, the Stokowski transcriptions continue to fascinate the music-lover and connoisseur of rich orchestral technique, and the restored sound will certainly add to the luster and mesmeric aura these inscriptions already possess.

The opening Siciliano from Bach's C Minor Violin Sonata, BWV 1017, establishes the grand line and sensuous cantilena that suffuses these selections. Mein Jesu, BWV 487 projects an introspective, darkly chromatic passion which exploits first the low strings and then, most piquant, the baritone strings. The last of the 1950 sessions, the Passacaglia and Fugue in C Minor - much of which may imitate the contrapuntal style Bach admired in Buxtehude - builds upon an ostinati bass theme some twenty-one variations, arranged as seven groups of three that each open with a quote in the Lutheran chorale style. Stokowski, typically, arranges his orchestral choirs in the manner of the organ's diapason, using free bowing to assure a seamless transition through the variants while they create a thick fabric of stretti.  But beyond the immensely cerebral contrapunctus, the lyricism of the transcription proves quite compelling, especially as the music crescendos into brass, and the bass tones assume their rightful organ ground swell.

The second "large" work, Vivaldi's D Minor Concerto Grosso from L'Estro Armonico, begins the sessions recorded between late February and early April 1952. Stylistically, this thickly lush treatment of the otherwise transparent score seems totally misplaced except as an orchestral or acoustical etude representing a definite aesthetic viewpoint. Stokowski at several points in the outer movements converts the concerto into a woodwind serenade concertino against the larger string ripieno. When the texture thickens, we feel as if we were auditing luminous Elgar or Reger. The sighing effects of the Largo, decidedly histrionic, do have their effect, much (given the flute and oboe solos) in the manner of Gluck's Orfeo.

Cesti's 1668 Tu mancavi. . .Stokowski transcribed for strings and harp, so the passionate result might be likened to those illuminated religious paintings by Matthias Gruenewald. For the Adoramus Te, Christe attributed to Palestrina, Stokowski employs an a capella chorus to the same layered effect, with only the absence of bassi profundi to prevent its sounding like a Russian doxology.  The sacred motet O Bone Jesu, Miserere nobis, long attributed to Palestrina now has its creation ascribed to Ingegneri. The two Gabrieli pieces indulge the Venetian brass principle and its resonant antiphons: the 1597 Canzon is scored for three contrasting five-part choirs mostly in E Major but descending into the lachrymose D Minor.  In Ecclesiis (1615) is a motet for fourteen voices, which Stokowski opens with thundering bass organ chords in pedal, played by Charles Courboin. The voice parts represent the epitome of the Gabrieli style, indulging in plagal cadences and incorporating filigree endemic to the Renaissance-the seven-bar Allelluia treatment-and early Baroque. The brass parts surge forward, an Annunciation worthy of the highest cherubim. As Gerard Souzay commented in an interview regarding Stokowski's mounting of Monteverdi's Orfeo in Paris, "We expected any number of 'romantic' indulgences from Stokowski, but we were pleasantly surprised, if not shocked, by the chastity of means Stokowski could evince when he wanted to maintain his notion of an 'authentic' sound." Producer Obert-Thorn supplies an informative note about the work-intensive restoration of this particular cut from LM 1721, which suffered any number of technical problems, here corrected in glorious sound.

The remaining 'profane' works by Lully and Frescobaldi provide an immediate contrast, beginning with the light though sensuous strains of the Nocturne from Lully's 1681 ballet Le Triomphe de l'Amour, after Moliere. The brief March from Lully's 1673 opera Thesee brings ceremonial pomp and pride to the fore, a motive of which any British composer would be glad to claim. Frescobaldi's 1627 Gagliarda projects a somber dignity much in keeping with the solemn dignity of the 'sacred' compositions, close in spirit to Dido's Lament from Purcell.

-Gary Lemco




I had thought I would be covering a high-res version of the above reissue, as I did with the Pristine Debussy Preludes, but it turns out that all the Pristine remasterings that originate from Mark Obert-Thorn are only 16-bit, not 24-bit, so I burned this download to a standard CD as FLAC files for my Oppo deck. However, the above is probably standard mono, while I selected the Ambient Stereo option on my download.

Was hoping I had one of the two original RCA mono LPs, or at least a cassette dub I had made of it in the past. Unfortunately I couldn't locate either one, but I do recall not only the thin sonics of the LP, but also the considerable surface noise.  The noise is entirely gone here, though the bass end is still a bit sparse.  It's a pleasure to hear the musical details of Stoky's arrangements as described by Gary above.  I found the short March by Lully to be the highlight of the two albums; It really swings in Stoky's rich orchestration.

I hadn't previously compared the ambient stereo Pristine material with the mono equivalent before, but that was easy to do on my Integra preamp since I read that the particular patented software process is entirely compatible to mono reproduction. Switching back and forth I was quite surprised that there was no difference in the perceived reverberation on either, yet the ambient stereo playback had much more depth and a more three-dimensional feeling to it. So there is no playing around with phase which would cancel out and sound poor when combined back to mono. There were no wandering instruments as one sometimes gets with previous pseudo-stereo processing. I found that when run thru my ProLogic IIz height channel setting, the ambient stereo creates a fine pseudo-surround field. And for headphone playback there is not only great depth but less of a "hole in the middle" effect than with most actual stereo recordings.  I would definitely recommend anyone getting Pristine remasterings from original mono sources go for the ambient stereo option when available.

-John Sunier

 

  


PASC391 (75:40)

 

Join Our Mailing List
CONTENTS
This Week   Ambient Stereo - what's it all about?
Fidelio         Furtw�ngler's 1953 studio recording
PADA            More exclusives coming soon

Ambient Stereo - positive evolution in sound

Why I'd always choose the Ambient Stereo option 



This week's new release 
Furtw�ngler

Beginning work on
this week's new release, Furtw�ngler's 1953 studio recording of Beethoven's Fidelio, brought me a few moments of happy anticipation. It isn't every recording that says to me immediately "this is going to sound so much better by the time I've finished", but Fidelio was one of those rare instances when I simply knew I couldn't go wrong.

The original recording, made over a period of several days in October 1953, was essentially very well made. The balance between the Vienna Philharmonic Orchestra and the various soloists and chorus was excellent. Tape hiss levels were low. Dynamic range and frequency range were as good as they got in those days. And the frequency response of the microphones was just what I wanted to hear: uneven, unbalanced, giving an  overall sound that was just a little hard, not quite natural, and as a result perfect for XR remastering!

Before long everything was slotting perfectly into place. The correction of the tonal balance did everything I wanted and more, bringing with it the natural and full sound of the orchestra I'd wanted to hear, together with a clarity and richness that had been hidden behind that hard sound of old. Vocals too, often the very best indicator of a successful remastering as we're so naturally tuned to the sound of the human voice, came through just as I'd anticipated.

It's a recording which cries out for the Ambient Stereo treatment too - such a large body of musicians surely needs a little room to breathe, without denying that this is of course a mono recording, and that's what Ambient Stereo processing has given it. Definitely worth a couple of hours of your time!
 

 


Ambient Stereo - and why I prefer it

Early this morning I set off for one of my regular cycle rides over the gently rolling hills, passing through the sunflower fields, woodlands and vineyards that make living in this part of the world so special. The warmth was just coming into the sun, the sky a deep, clear blue: what better way to start the day than an hour or so experiencing the sights and sounds of this wonderful countryside?

I usually cycle with music playing, and this morning was no exception. A random selection of music stored on my Samsung smartphone is beamed by a wireless Bluetooth connection to my Sennheiser sports earphones, and I never know what I'm going to hear next.

About halfway around this morning's route Oscar Peterson began playing How High The Moon in a live recording that was unforgivingly, relentlessly mono. The piano, drums and double-bass were lodged firmly and tightly in a very small spot located slap bang in the middle of my head, squeezed so tightly together that listening to them was somewhat uncomfortable. Bizarrely, at the end of the performance, which had been captured live, the audience responded with claps and cheers in broad, wide stereo! It all sounded and felt so wrong...

As I listened and pedalled along, all I could think of was how much Peterson's trio would have benefited from an Ambient Stereo treatment. Not the fake stereo of old, but using the existing ambience of the recording to create some breathing room around them when listened to with two ears.

As the musical selections moved on, and back into stereo, I resolved to write a little about Ambient Stereo when I returned to the studio for this week's newsletter. Some of you may well be au fait with the sound of Ambient Stereo recordings - they are by far our most popular download format - so forgive me if you've heard all this before. But it's one of the most comment questions in my e-mail in-box: which version should I choose?

My usual response is this: try both and see what you prefer, because it's a personal choice and I'm not going to impose my preferences on you - but I wouldn't be offering Ambient Stereo recordings if I didn't prefer them myself.

For those with long memories, the dark days of "Electronically Processed Stereo" and other such wording on the cover of an LP is perhaps something we'd all like to forget. Any number of systems were used by record companies small and large in their efforts to sell mono records to a stereo-owning public.

The majority used some kind of frequency-splitting filter to create an artificial spread. At its simplest this put the bass on one side and the treble on the other. How anyone could find this comfortable to listen to I really don't know! More complex systems put alternating frequency bands to left and right, making a kind of sonic splurge across the two speakers. Occasionally someone would claim to have been able to isolate instruments and put them into some kind of position, but it never really worked - as any examination of the harmonic complexity of an ensemble recording would quickly demonstrate.

The broadcasters hated fake stereo more than most. All that frequency splitting introduced phase errors in the recording. You don't hear them on two speakers, but put them together back to mono and you will. Some frequencies start to cancel themselves out, at times you near odd phasing effects reminiscent of psychedelic rock music, and there was nothing you could do about this. The records weren't mono-compatible (essential when so many listeners use small, portable mono receivers) and so were pretty much banned from any radio studio worth its salt.

Ambient Stereo exhibits none of these problems, partly because it doesn't try to create a false stereo image. Instead, the processor at the heart of it all aims to extract ambience from a recording - the sound of the room or hall if you like - and spread just this around the musicians. The degree of spread and depth can be controlled by the remastering engineer, and the effect is entirely mono-compatible - play it on a mono radio speaker and you'll hear precisely the sound of the recording before Ambient Stereo processing was applied. The ambient stereo sound cancels itself out and disappears when the left and right channels are added together into mono.

The musicians remain central to the sound-stage, just as they are in the original mono recording, but with Ambient Stereo the overall sound isn't crammed into a tiny dot in the middle. Instead it has a sense of air, or ambience, around it, just as you'd hear from a single singer or instrumentalist playing right in front of you in a room.

A further refinement has been the development of real-space (known as "convolution") reverberation. By accurately mapping the reverberant response of a concert hall, recital room, studio, church, or wherever is appropriate, an entirely natural recreation of that space can now be evoked in the studio.

As with the Ambient Stereo processing, the effect - when applied sensitively and carefully, is a natural enhancement of a recording, especially when applied to some of the very dry acoustics heard in older recordings - NBC's Studio 8H being a classic case in point.

The best orchestras in the world sound disembodied if they play in an anechoic chamber, but sound glorious in a space which complements their sound - which is one reason why concert hall acoustics have for so long been considered a very important factor in architectural design. This isn't just about "adding some echo" - different frequencies reflect and resonate in different ways and decay at different rates specific to a physical space, and concert halls tend to have very different characteristics to, for example, opera houses, each designed to suit the style of music performed therein.

When you use this technique on older recordings, the effect can be quite magical, as a recent reviewer for Classical Recordings Quarterly observed: "Studio 8-H is transformed into a free, open space, as beautifully atmospheric as the originals were dead..."

Put the two techniques together, as I often do, and you get what I believe is the very best available sound from a mono recording. Perhaps one day we will develop a system to separate instruments out of a mono recording and recreate genuine stereo - but right now that's about as easy as unbaking a cake to recover the flour, butter, eggs and sugar that went into it. Personally I'd rather have my cake - and eat it!


For a second opinion on Ambient Stereo - and I honestly wasn't aware of this when writing this piece today - have a read of John Sunier's Audiophile Audition review of Stokowski in the left column of this week's newsletter.

 

Andrew Rose
16 August 2013  

Go Digital

Furtw�ngler's brilliant 1953 studio recording of Beethoven's Fidelio


 
The glory of this performance is in the orchestral playing under Furtw�ngler" - The Gramophone

 

  

Beethoven
Fidelio, Op. 72    
 
 Leonore - Martha M�dl
Florestan - Wolfgang Windgassen
Don Pizarro - Otto Edelmann
Rocco - Gottlob Frick
Marzelline - Sena Jurinac
Jacquino - Rudolf Schock
Don Fernando - Alfred Poell
First Prisoner - Alwin Hendricks
Second Prisoner - Franz Bierbach

Vienna Phiharmonic Orchestra
Wilhelm Furtw�ngler    conductor 

  

Recorded 1953                                                      

Producer and Audio Restoration Engineer: 

Andrew Rose                  

    

   

 

Web page: PACO 095     

    

  

  

  

Notes On this recording   

         

Furtw�ngler's only studio recording of Beethoven's only opera, Fidelio, took place in Vienna's Musikvereinsaaal between 13th and 17th October 1953, and followed a performance on 12th October in the Theater an der Wien with almost the same cast (Alwin Hedricks replaced Hermann Gallos for the recording).

The recording was certainly well made for its era, though it's no surprise to find most of the dialogue absent in a studio recording of its time. Remastering it has, however, brought far more musicality out of the performance than was previously apparent. In addition to curing some small pitch anomalies (early tape machines frequently drifted up and down in speed), I've used XR remastering techniques to completely open up the sound, with a far more even frequency response than could be captured at the time generating a much more natural tone across both instruments and voices. The lower end is fuller and richer, the top end clear and brighter, whilst the latest digital noise reduction techniques have helped reduce tape hiss without damaging the clarity of the sound.

Ambient Stereo processing has worked wonders to bring our the natural acoustic of the recording venue, and is highly recommended for this recording.

  

Andrew Rose      

     

  

  

Review UK LP Issue  

  

So here it is at last, a complete recording of Fidelio with the dialogue omitted except in the "melodrama" of Act 2 and the brief sentences for Jaquino and Rocco after the second of the trumpet calls in this act. The omission cannot be regretted except between the quartet and duet, also in this act, when Florestan says to his wife " what must you have not suffered for my sake ? " and she replies " Nothing, my Florestan. In spirit I was always near you ". No one who heard Lotte Lehmann say " Nichts, mein Florestan " in a voice stifled with emotion, after Leonora's heroic effort to save her husband, is ever likely to forget it: and these words are really needed here to drive the point home.

The glory of this performance is in the orchestral playing under Furtw�ngler, whose reading of the score is as superb, and as well recorded, as it was in Tristan.

That becomes evident at once in the Overture, in which the great conductor gives an interpretation which shows us (as it seems to me) the two sides of Leonora's character, heroic resolution and feminine tenderness and how enchanting is his treatment of a secondary theme that has so strong a flavour of Czech music.

Schock and Jurinac are a perfectly matched pair in the duet with which the opera begins-so surprisingly modelled on the French composer Gaveaux's Lionore, ou I'amour conjugal, but sounding very Mozart-ean. Jurinac's firm and beautifully moulded vocal line is a tower of strength in the opera, though it might be objected that she is rather too mature a Marcelline and has not the sparkle in her voice that Elizabeth Schumann brought to the part. One should not have the feeling that Jurinac might have been an admirable Leonora! The exquisite canon-quartet-static only in the heavenly manner of the Meistersinger quintet-brings Leonora on the scene, but not yet as an outstanding character. After this lovely quartet-it is very well sung and balanced-we have Rocco's conventional aria which draws attention to the excellent portrayal of the part by Gottlob Frick. Later in the opera we find him really acting with his voice and giving a most convincing presentation of his part.

In the Trio that follows the two sopranos have a high passage descending in thirds in which, when repeated, they change parts; this comes out very well, but elsewhere in the Trio Martha M�dl sometimes uses a strangled kind of tone that is evidence of tiredness and makes one anxious for what will happen later on. Edelmann, as Pizzaro, remains the conventional villain, and in the duet with Rocco, when he suggests the murder of Florestan, he could have been much more sinister and malicious.

Now comes Leonora's great recitative and aria and in this M�dl is disappointing. There is no real fire in her singing of "Abscheulichen", a focal point of the opera, and her cautious negotiation of the florid portions of the aria rob it of its dramatic force. She sounds, in fact, tired and uncomfortable and seems unable to keep her tone centred. She was more at ease, in fact, in her recent Telefunken recording of the scena (TM68003).

Now the publicity "hand-out" tells us that this recording of the opera was made immediately after the last performance of Herbert Graf's new production in Vienna, October, 1953. This statement presumably means the day after, which perhaps for Miss M�dl was at least a day too soon. Her performance in the production was rated as good, if not outstanding, and it is bad luck that she was not in her best form for the recording.

The prisoners' chorus, which follows, carries my mind back to the unforgettable production of the opera at Salzburg-was it by Reinhardt?-in which Lotte Lehmann, Elizabeth Schumann and Richard Mayr sang and Schalk conducted. The prisoners were mostly very old and could not have been politically dangerous, but there was a pathos in their singing which I miss in that of the excellent Munich chorus who sound, quite rightly, much younger.

The ensemble of soloists and chorus in this finale is well balanced and the end, when the prisoners return to their cells, has the moving quality I missed at the start of the finale. Furtw�ngler gives a marvellous and spine-chilling interpretation of the introduction to Act 2 and Windgassen catches the mood exactly in his opening recitative and, if not yet a Patzak, sings the aria very well. The atmosphere of deadly cold and darkness in the dungeons is well maintained by M�dl and Frick in the melodrama (speech punctuated by expressive phrases for the orchestra) but when we reach the great quartet, one of the finest dramatic pieces in opera, it does not, except in the orchestra, quite convey the thrilling excitement of the old H.M.V. disc (DB4417) that was only available on special order, and probably remained known to few. Leonora's great cry "First kill his wife" (which, of course, reveals her identity to Florestan), made its full effect on that disc and the singer's gasp, as the trumpet suddenly sounded on the battlements, was most telling. I know her name, only as the label gives it, H. Gottlieb.

If M�dl cannot quite rise to the height of the drama her tender repetitions of her husband's name in the duet "O namenlose Freudi" are really moving and so is her singing of the great phrase in the finale of the act "O Gott! welch' ein Augenblick", words which Pizzaro has used so differently in his Act 1 aria, except that he says Ha instead of Gott!

If this is not a superlative vocal performance of the opera it is by no means a negligible one, and it would certainly be hard to assemble a better cast for it to-day. (The other two recordings, available in America, give one confidence in this respect.) Orchestrally one could not want anything grander or more noble than Furtw�ngler's conception of the sublime score, whose "chastity" (as Berlioz said) hindered the success of the music in France.

The recording, as such, is extremely good and vital. It should be added that a very fine performance of Leonora No. 3 Overture divides the two scenes of Act 2. In that position it is, of course, an anti-climax, and it is equally out of place if played before Act 2. As, however, a groove separates it from what follows one can play it as an independent piece but omit it in a playing of the complete opera. This should satisfy everyone.
 
A.R., The Gramophone, May 1954
Review of HMV LP issue

    

  

  

MP3 Sample  Overture, Nos. 1 & 2     

Listen  

  

       

Purchase links and all other information:

PACO 095 - webpage at Pristine Classical