CAIR: America's #1 National Security Threat
Dave Gaubatz Educational Newsletter 21 June 2012
Exclusive Article by WND on Dave Gaubatz's New Counter-terrorism Radio Show  Jack Ellison, Framinham, MA, will be my guest on 26 June 2012, at 11am est.  Ellison is one of hundreds of American Patriots who work endlessly to educate the public about the dangers of Islam.  He is an ACT for America leader and a friend.
If you are counting on our first-line defenders to protect you and your family from Islamic based terrorism then you are living in a world of false security and reality.  We have outstanding law enforcement at all levels, but due to the policies of our Islamic terrorist loving Commander In Chief (Obama), they are not being trained properly.  Obama and his czars do not allow the word Islam to factor into any terrorism related training.  Only a former coke head (Obama admitted to using cocaine) and ignoramus could possibly instruct our top level military and law enforcement to not use the word Islam in their terrorism training. How can our first-line defenders protect you and your family if they do not even know who the enemy is?  The answer is they can't.  God Bless America and if we have any hope of surviving as a country the voters in Nov 2012 must vote the ignoramus Islam loving fool out of office. Dave Gaubatz  
Anti-terrorism instructor fired over politically incorrect material
Law Enforcement Examiner

A top United States counterterrorism expert who taught a course that familiarized military officers with the U.S. war with radical Islamists was fired from the college and the course was removed from the curriculum, according to a U.S. police counterterrorism expert.

The police source told the Law Enforcement Examiner that he was informed the course materials would be revamped to exclude references to Islam and use terms such as extremists or militants.

While the Pentagon and most news media outlets did not name the instructor, the Law Enforcement Examiner source claims the fired instructor was Lt. Col. Matthew A. Dooley and that he was removed from the faculty permanently for telling students practitioners of Islam are responsible for terrorism.


"One can only wonder how much protection of Catholicism and Christianity would receive from this Administration and its media sycophants -- such as TV host Bill Maher -- when they verbally attack Christians," said former police commander and military officer Mike Snopes.

According to a source, Joint Forces Staff College courseincluded a slide-show that told students -- mostly battle-hardened officers -- that the U.S. is fighting a life and death battle with Islamists and that "we need to recognize that the U.S. and its allies are at war with Islam."

According to the American Forces Press Service's Jim Garamone, General Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, had ordered a thorough review of the course on Islam and military education in general after a Muslim soldier complained about the content of the course entitled "Perspectives on Islam and Islamite Radicalism" at the Joint Forces Staff College in Norfolk, Virginia.

JFSC educates military officers and other national security leaders in joint, multinational, and interagency operational-level planning and warfare, counterterrorism and other subjects.

"The study also recommends that the Staff College modify its processes for reviewing and approving course curricula while improving oversight of course electives," Garamone wrote.

The elective course relied on outside instructors who emphasized negative aspects of Islam. The review found that a lack of leadership on the course contributed to the problem, leading to an unbalanced approach to teaching the subject matter. The course is suspended and will not be offered again until changes are in place, officials said, and the military instructor has been relieved of instructor duties.

According to the Law Enforcement Examiner source, it's believed the complaining soldier, whose identity is being protected, may be a pawn of some of the Muslim groups such as the Council on American Islamic Relations (CAIR) or Muslim Advocates, who are currently suing the New York City Police Department.

A Pentagon spokesman stated earlier this year that Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta was deeply upset with a course that promulgates the notion the United States is at war with Islam.

"This politically correct nonsense would be laughed at if we had a reality check now and then. On the one hand, the majority of terrorist attacks worldwide are perpetrated by radical Muslims who actually apply the teachings of the Koran. Anyone who studies the history of Islam, especially within the last two hundred years will discover what America faces is not new," said the counterterrorism source.

"The CAIR group is considered by some to be a front-group for radical Islamists -- several of whom are currently in prison or deported -- and frequently supports certain Democratic politicians who do their bidding. Rep. John Conyers of Michigan is a perfect example," the counterterrorism source alleges.

Counterterrorism experts condemned by CAIR include Walid Phares, Robert Spencer, Bill Getz, Pam Geller and others who "refuse to sugarcoat the Islamic terrorism threat," said Mike Snopes.

An instructor at the JFSC was fired for not adhering to the Obama administration's politically-correct policy on terrorism.

Georgy Gounev - - June 8, 2012

Let's make it abundantly clear from the very beginning; what is absent from the intensifying election campaign of 2012 is a serious discussion on the numerous foreign policy challenges the country is facing. The only issue which both President Obama and Governor Romney are able to see eye-to-eye on is a silent consent to ignore the issues of foreign policy.

Most probably, the reason for this strange unanimity and the even stranger neglect is rooted in the belief that foreign policy challenges don't matter during the times of economic troubles.

This concept is deeply wrong. Even the most superficial glance at the relationship between foreign policy and the economy undoubtedly will show a powerful impact of the former over the later. The calamity inflicted by a terrorist network or an American military misadventure in the wrong place and the wrong time would have a devastating impact on the economy.

There are critically important issues involving the protection of the national interests and the national security of the United States that should enter the
perimeter of the discussion between both rivals. Given the immensity of this subject area let's concentrate on the most important challenges the United States is facing in the Middle East.

It could be argued that President Obama will wait for the post Labor Day final stage of the campaign before unleashing his big offensive related to foreign policy
and national security. Its magnitude most probably will enhance the positivity of the message sugar coated by the President's Hollywood friends. By the way,
currently they are in a hurry to make a movie showing the American people the brilliant operation of the Special Forces that ended with the elimination of Osama
bin Laden. Although not so directly, the movie will imply how brave and smart Mr. Obama was in approving such an important operation.

Undoubtedly, President Obama deserves credit for his decision to launch such a daring, high risk endeavor. He will also be right to point out that for a year his
drones wiped out almost the entire leadership of the Pakistani branch of Al Qaeda and also inflicted some casualties on the Yemeni jihadists.

What the President won't mention is the fact that his successes in the fight against the most dangerous enemy America has ever known are TACTICAL achievements. At the same time, as far as STRATEGY is concerned, President Obama's foreign policy in the most sensitive areas of national security so far could only be
described as a DISASTER.

Let's start with terminology. Mr. Obama's administration is afraid even to define the enemy by name. In the politically correct, but otherwise deceiving and incorrect vocabulary of the President, the seemingly endless conflict America is involved in is the "War on Terror," while the terrorists are just "extremists."

The very term terror is justifiable while describing the method the American enemies are using but doesn't have the capacity to identify them by name.
The only correct term defining the ideology of the terrorists the President has found absolutely impossible to pronounce is Islamic Fundamentalism, or Islamic

Mr. Obama's fear of using the right term is due to one of the many wrong premises of his foreign policy concept. According to him it is possible for the United States to find a peaceful alternative to the war with Islamic
Fundamentalism. As far as the conflict in Afghanistan is concerned, Mr. Obama's approach reminds us of the hopes of many European politicians of the 1930's ,
who were trying to find a common language with the Nazis for the sake of finding a peaceful solution to the European problems...

In today's world there is no hope to find a non-violent alternative to the dangerous hostilities by negotiating with murderous fanatics whose final goal is the establishment of an Islamo-totalitarian global tyranny bearing the exotic name of Caliphate...

Maybe at least some of those issues will be brought about after Labor Day by Governor Romney's campaign. Until then however the time factor requires a serious discussion over the issues of foreign policy and national security between the rivals for the White House. This necessity is determined by the potentially disastrous impact some wrong choices could have upon the national security of the country and ultimately upon the American economy.

For instance neither of the rivals has explained to the American people the consequences to the United States of an Israeli attack upon Iran. Let's mention just two of them. On the one hand the world is about to see an outbreak of anti-Americanism and anti-Semitism never seen since the times of Adolph Hitler. On the other hand, in the aftermath of such an attack the gas prices will soar and most probably will surpass the current European level of around $9 per gallon.
Actually the only beneficiary of an Israeli strike on Iran will be Russia which needs an oil price of between $115 and $117 per barrel just to balance its budget.

Another important question to both rivals would be what kind of strategy the winner of the 2012 elections will offer with regard to the Syrian crisis? The policy of the current administration so far has been wrong because of the
misrepresentation of the nature of the crisis by diplomats and the media. What is going on in Syria is a civil war between the Alawite minority from which the ruling
Assad clan came from, and a motley opposition ranging from secular democrats to hard core Islamic fundamentalists.

Similarly to the situation in Tunisia and Egypt, the best organized component of the opposition is the Islamist one; it has proven its ability to organize large scale
acts of terror. The question for the November winner would be: Will he be ready to support a military action against the Assad regime or rather would he consider
the danger of bringing the radical Islamists to power?

Finally, the situation in Egypt poses yet another very important question. Given that the Muslim Brotherhood has a real chance to assume the control over the
entire state organization, what will be the policy of the winner in 2012 with regard to the emergence of an Egyptian variation of the Algerian scenario from
the mid 1990's? In other words, what will be the reaction of the 2012 winner if the Egyptian Army turns against a Muslim Brotherhood government in order to
prevent the complete Islamification of the country?

All those issues represent just a small portion of the questions the rivals for the presidency should debate in front of the American people BEFORE November
2012. Do we have to remind ourselves that it will be too late to discuss them in December?

Gounev authored "The Dark Side of the Crescent Moon "- exploring in depth radical Islam. Also, he analyzed the wartime relationship between Roosevelt and

AdministrationPresident Obama admitted he had used cocaine. What a shame the only person the Democratic Party could pick as their example of a man our nation and children should respect is a coke-head and lover of terrorists like Bill Ayers. Americans should feel very unsafe having this immoral man as the one who determines what our brave law enforcement and military receive in their terrorism training.  Nov elections are only a few months away. Let's choose someone our children can respect and we can be proud of.