CI Header
Sponsors
SPB+G 2013 logo



Cap Group

Editorial Board

Brad Cook
Sheehan Phinney
Bass + Green
  
Bruce Berke
Sheehan Phinney 
Capitol Group
 
Sheehan Phinney 
Capitol Group

 

Sheehan Phinney 
Capitol Group

 

Sheehan Phinney 
Capitol Group
  
Will Stewart 
Greater Manchester
Chamber of Commerce

Join Our Mailing List

Legislators study casino what-ifs

Henry Veilleux, Sheehan Phinney Capitol Group

 

Casino gambling continued to be under the spotlight at the State House this week. One subcommittee reviewed the likelihood of the state issuing a license within two years and obtaining the $80 million license fee to support the state's operating budget. While there was no definitive answer, the subcommittee heard from the Attorney General's office that they may need more time than the legislation currently provides to perform background checks of the principals submitting bids. The subcommittee also looked at the timing of the necessary local approvals such as planning and zoning and the timing of the State issuing the license. While an aggressive legislative schedule may be possible for a well advanced existing proposal in a community that has expressed support for a casino, it may not work for a new proposal in a community that has not really considered the idea of a casino.  Another piece the subcommittee considered is the time frame for the Lottery Commission to adopt procedures and rules for considering bidders, evaluating them, and selecting a winner.  They must also adopt regulations for the casino to operate under. 

 

Another subcommittee has been reviewing the impact a casino would have on the host and nearby communities. They heard concerns about "cannibalization"  from Tim Bechert, General Manager of the Verizon Wireless Arena in Manchester, and Tom Boucher, owner of the T-Bones, CJ's and Copper Door restaurants. Through Rep. Pat Long, D-Manchester, the Verizon provided an amendment that would protect it, limiting the casino's entertainment venue to 1,500 seats. But nonprofit entertainment venues like the Capitol Center for the Arts objected that such an amendment would not go far enough to protect them. Boucher raised concerns that the only kind of casino New Hampshire market could support would be a local convenience casino that caters to the local market and local customers, which he feared would potentially devastate the New Hampshire hospitality industry. 

 

The three subcommittees reviewing the casino legislation plan to come together next Thursday and report to the full Joint Committee their findings. It will then be up to the Joint Committee to decide what to do next. They could recommend passing the bill as is, passing it with amendments, keeping it in committee for further work, or killing it outright. Insiders say the number of representatives in the House who have made up their minds are pretty evenly split for and against it. It will come down to those who still haven't decided how to vote on the issue.    

Land use permitting process changes advance

Will Stewart, Greater Manchester Chamber of Commerce 

 

On Tuesday, the House Municipal and County Government Committee took steps to improve municipal planning matters by passing Senate Bills 49 and 50.

 

Sponsored by Sen. David Boutin, R-Hooksett, the bills aim to foster local development by improving local appeals processes and extending permit times.

 

SB 49 provides for appeals of planning board decisions concerning a subdivision or site plan to the board of adjustment prior to appeal to the superior court.

 

SB 50 ensures that variances and special exceptions will be valid for a full two years from the date of final approval by a local planning board. Currently, many planning boards across the state grant only one-year variances and special exceptions.

 

Both bills now head to the full House.

 

And on Wednesday, the House Resources, Recreation and Development Committee passed Senate Bill 124, which aims to establish  an integrated land development permit option that may be sought, at the discretion of the applicant, as an alternative to seeking multiple individual land development permits or approvals issued by the Department of Environmental Services, which requested the bill. 

 

Chamber remains neutral on potato bill

 

With the news yesterday that the Senate passed, and the governor has said she will sign, HB 535 making the white potato the official state vegetable, I'm sure many of you were asking yourselves: "Where was the Chamber on HB 535?"

 

I'm sad to report that the Chamber was not able to come to consensus on this critical issue. There were those who lobbied us in favor of the white potato, while others of equal zeal said the sweet potato was more delicious and thus more deserving. Then there were others still who argued that, strictly speaking, a potato of any variety is a starch, not a vegetable, and thus shouldn't even in the running for one of our state's top honors.

 

In the end, the Chamber thought it best to stay out of this contentious fight.