CI Header
Sponsors
SPB+G 2013 logo



Cap Group

Editorial Board

Brad Cook
Sheehan Phinney
Bass + Green
  
Bruce Berke
Sheehan Phinney 
Capitol Group
 
Sheehan Phinney 
Capitol Group

 

Sheehan Phinney 
Capitol Group

 

Sheehan Phinney 
Capitol Group
  
Will Stewart 
Greater Manchester
Chamber of Commerce

Join Our Mailing List

Casino gambling front and center

Henry Veilleux, Sheehan Phinney Capitol Group

 

The House Finance and House Ways & Means committees are meeting jointly to review Senate Bill 152, which would authorize a casino in New Hampshire. They heard several hours of testimony this past Tuesday. Proponents said the State could use the $80 million license fee to fund highway projects, higher education, and North Country economic development.

 

Manchester Senator Lou D'Allesandro called it a "job creation, economic recovery package."  Proponents also argue that New Hampshire gamblers will flock to Massachusetts once casinos open up down there, so we're better off opening our own casino to prevent New Hampshire gambling dollars from flowing to Massachusetts State coffers. Opponents argue that a casino will hurt existing businesses by cannibalizing discretionary spending, will create more problem gamblers, and will proliferate every time the state needs more revenue. They also argue the time rames in the bill are too optimistic for the State to issue a license within this budget cycle and that we can't count on the $80 million license fee for this budget. 

 

The House joint committee has formed three subcommittees to review the bill in detail. A "Regulation" subcommittee will focus on the bidding process, regulations, oversight, accountability, and enforcement. A "Revenue" subcommittee will address all issues related to revenue generation and loss, specification of casino size, and composition to achieve maximum revenue, and allocation of revenues designated for specific purposes. A "Community Impact" subcommittee will explore impacts on municipalities, counties and the state including job creation, impact on existing businesses, traffic and highway maintenance, public safety and other social costs. 

 

These subcommittees will meet over the next couple of weeks, inviting experts in to provide them information on these topic areas. The subcommittees will report back to the full joint committee by mid-May. The Joint Committee will then vote on a recommendation for the full House, which will vote on it by late May. 

 

Both sides to the issue have been calling and meeting with House members and are trying to win their votes. One thing both sides can agree upon is that this vote is going to be very close.  

Leveling the playing field between dealers and manufacturers

Will Stewart, Greater Manchester Chamber of Commerce 

 

On Tuesday, the Greater Manchester Chamber of Commerce joined the Nashua and Rochester chambers in testifying in support of Senate Bill 126.

 

SB 126 seeks to amend the state's existing Dealer Bill of Rights to further protect New Hampshire consumers and franchised car, truck, equipment and motorcycle dealers.

 

Automobile manufacturers control nearly every aspect of a dealer's livelihood. At the beginning of the relationship and at renewals, a dealer must sign a unilateral contract drafted by the manufacturer and must do so without any negotiation. During the relationship, the factory exercises further control through of allocation of vehicles, pricing of vehicles, and various other methods. Like all other states, New Hampshire has a Dealer Bill of Rights which provides some balance to this one-sided relationship. 

 

While the Chamber rarely gets involved in legislative disputes between businesses, we felt an exception was warranted in this case.

 

As Government Affairs Committee Chairman and attorney John Weaver notes,"States have a long history of regulating the relationships between dealers and manufacturers, and this legislation is consistent with that history. 

 

"Manufacturers have a strong negotiating position with their dealers, holding all control over expensive inventory and valuable branding. This limits the actual freedom of contract between the two parties, as the two are rarely negotiating from equal positions of power. The nature of car sales distinguishes dealers from franchisees in other sectors. 

 

"For example, although trading in your current vehicle is a standard part of buying a new car, no one comes into McDonalds looking to trade in an old cheeseburger to help defray the cost of a new cheeseburger. But the auto dealer is on the hook for the cost of the trade-in until the older vehicle can be sold, providing further leverage to the manufacturers.

 

"One of the reasons state legislatures have been so eager to help dealers is that dealers are important parts of local economies. They occupy large parcels of non-tax exempt property, directly create jobs on their lots, indirectly create jobs through auto maintenance and support industries, and provide charitable dollars to the community. By helping dealers, state legislatures also help municipalities, employment, and local charities. Likewise, this bill would allow dealers to use local vendors when purchasing materials, tools, and supplies. Additionally, dealers will be able to exercise greater control of their facilities, permitting them to adjust to local economic conditions."

 

State of the State/State of the City video recording online

 

Did you miss the Chamber's State of the State/State of the City event with Gov. Maggie Hassan and Mayor Ted Gatsas last week? If so, you can view it online courtesy of our friends at Manchester Public Television.