Northern Pass inspires a slew of troubling bills
Will Stewart, Greater Manchester Chamber of Commerce If you know anyone on the House Science, Technology and Energy Committee, give them a hug. For the past two weeks, members of this committee have had to endure hours upon hours upon hours of public testimony - not to mention getting bombarded with phone calls and emails - on a slew of bills that have attracted interested parties from across the state. The reason? In short: Northern Pass. The specifics of each bill are varied, but the result of each is the same: stopping Northern Pass. Regardless of your view of the Northern Pass Project (the Chamber supports it), such bills should be troublesome for a number of reasons, not the least of which is that by targeting a specific project, they send a strong anti-business message to developers and others who want to do business in New Hampshire. Legislators should not want, nor is it their role, to vote on specific projects. Their role is to establish a rigorous review process that developers can abide by and in which the public has confidence. Other concerns include: Turning back the clock of deregulation: The following bills look to essentially repeal a deregulation process that it took the state more than a decade ago to enact. Deregulation served to introduce competition to the electric industry in an effort to bring down costs for customers. Deregulation was intended to incentivize private development and elective projects, yet these bills single out elective projects and subject them to new, costly mandates and increased bureaucracy: - HB 166
- HB 449
- HB 569
- HB 568
- SB 99
Lack of stakeholder participation: While local concerns with regard to a project are certainly important, so, too, are concerns from those in other parts of the state. On projects that have a statewide impact, affected stakeholders from across New Hampshire should have the opportunity to contribute their opinions, too. These bills, however, ignore or diminish the greater good for the state and region in favor of hyper-local and personal interests: Minimizing Economic Impact: Major energy projects carry with them significant economic benefits like reduced energy costs, energy diversity, jobs and new tax revenue. The following bills undercut those benefits by a) requiring costly mandates that drive up project costs or b) diminishing the ability for regulators to consider economic impact as a core benefit of a project. - HB166
- HB 569
- HB 580
- HB 586
- HB 568
- SB 99
|