|
|
|
Find Solutions & Strategies February 18, 2014 |
|
 OMFS vs. Usual and Customary Charges
A recent WCAB split panel decision says Official Medical Fee Schedule applies whether injury accepted or denied |
|
A Note From the Editor |

Dear Work Comp Community:
Join our eNewsletter community today to gain valuable insights into the dynamic California workers' compensation system.
LexisNexis Legal & Professional Operations
|

|
BULLET PROOF MEDICAL EVIDENCE AND THE DOCTOR'S REPORT
Includes current MT & UR regs
Judge Colleen Casey
Dr. Steve Feinberg
Robert G. Rassp
David Skaggs
April 5, 2014
West Los Angeles
6 MCLEs
$299 Member Price
Register today |
|
| Order here
Enter Promo Code JCM164146 to receive 20% discount
"Monitoring the constant wave of legislative activity across this nation is one thing. Making it clear and understandable is quite another. Lexis has done an excellent job of both with the 'Workers' Compensation Emerging Issues Analysis'. Their choice of local experts is superb, and they provide both clear recap and commentary, giving clarity to what was, legislatively, a very tumultuous year."
-Robert H. Wilson, President & CEO, WorkersCompensation.com, LLC |
|
WCRI Conference |

2014 WCRI Annual Issues & Research Conference
March 12-13, 2014
Boston Park Plaza Hotel & Towers
Boston, MA
VIEW THE AGENDA |
|
|
official medical fee schedule |
Writ denied decisions have held that a health care provider is not bound by the Official Medical Fee Schedule when the injured employee's claim has been denied. See CNA Insurance Companies v. WCAB (Valdez) 62 Cal. Comp. Cases 1145 (writ den.). Thus, many doctors say the Fee Schedule doesn't apply to them, citing Valdez. A new WCAB split panel decision in Rodiguez, however, repudiates Valdez. (Caveat: Commissioner Moresi concurred in Rodriguez; however, his term expires soon and he will not seek reappointment.) This noteworthy panel decision will soon be added to the LexisNexis Services.
Liens; Medical Treatment; Official Medical Fee Schedule. WCAB, rescinding WCJ's order in split panel opinion, held that Official Medical Fee Schedule rates were applicable to treatment charges incurred by lien claimant Permanente Medical Group/Kaiser Foundation Hospitals for treatment provided to applicant/assistant sales manager while applicant's 3/24/2009 claim for industrial injuries to his low back and in form of left inguinal hernia and femoral entrapment neuropathy was denied by defendant, when WCAB found that...read more. |
 |
2014 rand report: permanently disabled workers with disproportionate earnings losses for supplemental payments |
CHSWC has posted under its February 2014 Reports the 2014 RAND report on "Identifying Permanently Disabled Workers With Disporportionate Earnings Losses for Supplemental Payments." Read it.
|
W.C.A.B. rules expedited hearing available remedy to enforce mpn during 90 day delay |
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board has issued its first published decision of 2014 with a significant panel decision* in the case of Eun Jae Kim v. B.C.D. Tofu House; Cypress Insurance Company. In this decision the WCAB addresses the question of whether an expedited hearing pursuant to Labor Code § 5502(b) can be held to compel an injured worker to treat within the employer's Medical Provider Network during the period of treatment being provided pursuant to Labor Code § 5402(b) (90 day investigation period)...read more.
|
 |
review of workers' compensation index, 10th edition (2014) |
By James T. Stewart, Author of Work Comp Index, 1st-9th Editions
I have reviewed this newly published Workers' Compensation Index, 10th Edition (2014) (LexisNexis) and am pleased to report Richard Montarbo has done an excellent job updating it with case law and of course the continuing SB-863 updates and other legislation since my earlier 9th edition. I have known Richard for over 20 years and have found him to be very knowledgeable about workers' compensation claims in Calif., i.e., applicable case law, codes and regs, but also have found he understands the various "sides" of issues, rather than just the defense viewpoint. This makes him a more effective advocate, but also helps him fairly summarize case law and legislation...read more.
|
 |
ATTN: DWC CONFERENCE ATTENDEES
SAVE 20% THROUGH MARCH 14, 2014 |
All Los Angeles and Oakland attendees can take advantage of special conference discounts through March 14, 2014. Whether you want print or ebook, we've got your research solutions:
*Herlick, Calif. Workers' Comp. Handbook (2014 Ed.)
*Workers' Comp. Laws of Calif. (2014 Ed.)
*Workers' Compensation Index (2014 Ed.)
*Rassp & Herlick, California Workers' Compensation Law
*Hanna, Calif. Law of Employee Injuries & Workers' Comp.
*Lawyer's Guide to AMA Guides & Calif. WC (2014 Ed.)
*Calif. Workers' Compensation Medicare Set-Asides (2014)
*Complete Guide to MSP Compliance (2013 Ed.)
*Workers' Compensation Emerging Issues Analysis (2013)
To take advantage of this offer, contact Christine Hyatt:
Direct: 937-247-8166
Email: Christine.E.Hyatt@lexisnexis.com |
|
 |
 |
NOTICE OF CORRECTION |
The DWC has brought to our attention an error in Table 1, Present Value of Permanent Disability, in Workers' Comp Laws of California, 2014 Edition. Access a corrected table here. We apologize for the error and inconvenience. |
california compensation cases |
Black Mold Aggravates Applicant's Pre-existing Asthma: February Advanced Postings. Lexis.com and Lexis Advance subscribers can read it.
|
california news headlines |
|
 |
OMFS, cont. |
...statutory basis for line of cases, including CNA Insurance Companies v. W.C.A.B. (Valdez) (1997) 62 Cal. Comp. Cases 1145 (writ denied), holding that medical provider is not limited to Official Medical Fee Schedule billing where injured employee's claim has been denied has changed such that minimum fee schedule has been replaced with Official Medical Fee Schedule establishing reasonable maximum fees, that 8 Cal. Code Reg. § 9792(c) now sets forth specific circumstances under which medical provider may recover more than amount in Official Medical Fee Schedule, that in order to recover treatment fees in excess of Official Medical Fee Schedule, lien claimant must justify excess fees in accordance with 8 Cal. Code Reg. § 9792(c) and principles in Kunz v. Patterson Floor Coverings, Inc. (2002) 67 Cal. Comp. Cases 1588 (Appeals Board en banc opinion) and Tapia v. Skill Masters Staffing (2008) 73 Cal. Comp. Cases 1338 (Appeals Board en banc opinion), and that, although applicant testified that he suffered from chronic pain and received physical therapy and psychological treatment, lien claimant did not demonstrate that any extraordinary circumstances existed at time it provided treatment to applicant. See Rodriguez panel decision. |
 |
LexisNexis and the Knowledge Burst logo are registered trademarks of Reed Elsevier Properties Inc., used under license. Other products or services may be trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies.
Privacy & Security Copyright © 2014 LexisNexis, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
|
|
|