January 2013
  
State Law Required Custody
Are your Investment Assets Properly Custodied?

Wisconsin Statutes require both domestic and town mutual insurers to hold investment securities in their own name.  This means you are required to have the certificate that is issued by the entity in which you hold the investment - stock, bond, CD, mutual fund, etc. - registered in your name.  You should keep these certificates in a vault or safe deposit box.

 

The only exception to this requirement permits you to maintain investments under a custodial agreement with a bank or bank trust department.  In this situation, the bank is permitted to have the issuer list the bank's nominee as the owner of the investment on its records.  Your statement from the bank is adequate evidence of your ownership of such assets, and the physical safeguarding of the asset that you would otherwise accomplish by a vault is the bank's responsibility under its custody agreement.

 

It is important for you to note that an investment is NOT permitted to be maintained by a brokerage firm or mutual fund company under these rules.  In other words, your broker "advisor" cannot purchase a stock, bond or mutual fund for you and then hold it for you in an account with his/her brokerage firm. You also cannot open an account at a mutual fund company and have your mutual fund shares held in that account.  In these cases, the rules require either that you have the certificate representing your ownership delivered to you for you to hold or that your ownership is held for you by a bank.

 

These rules are designed to protect you and your policyholders.  If you hold the investments yourself, only you and your staff have access to them and you have operational protections in place to secure against misappropriation or malfeasance.  If your assets are held by a bank as custodian, banking rules require them to be held separate and apart from the bank's own assets.  Even if the bank ends up in trouble, your assets should still be intact for you in a facility separate from the bank.  Only you and authorized personnel of the bank - but importantly, NOT your advisor - have access to your assets.

 

Assets held by a brokerage firm or mutual fund company are part of that firm's own assets.  Their balance sheet shows your assets as assets of theirs and shows their account with you as a liability.  While this may seem like only an accounting issue, it has potentially significant consequences for you should the brokerage firm or mutual fund company end up in trouble.  You are simply a general creditor and will stand in line to collect your assets should there be a problem.  And if your "advisor" is an employee of the brokerage firm, he/she will have access to your assets. These risks, which are not part of permitted custody arrangements, are likely important reasons the requirements exist.

 

Admittedly some insurers are maintaining their assets in brokerage firm or mutual fund accounts and the OCI hasn't yet commented.  But that doesn't mean those arrangements are okay.  These rules are designed to protect you and your policyholders against some of the travesties that have occurred in some corners of the financial services world.  Hold all of your assets yourself or hold them under a qualified custodial arrangement with a bank or bank trust department.  Hold them separate from your advisor such that your advisor has no access to the account securities other than to initiate trades on your behalf.  This is safest for you and the best discharge of your fiduciary duty to your policyholders.

 News: Unlimited FDIC Insurance Expired
  

It has been a while since insurers have needed to pay attention to the balances in their checkbook.  One of the measures introduced to aid banks trying to recover from the Great Recession was unlimited FDIC insurance on non-interest-bearing bank deposits.  But alas, like other good things, this, too, came to an end - on December 31.  Effective January 1, 2013, the $250,000 FDIC limit is back for all bank deposits.

 

But please note the following:

 

1. Since both your interest-bearing and non-interest-bearing accounts are in the name of your company, the $250,000 limit applies to the combination of checking and money market deposits at any one bank.

 

2.  If you routinely maintain balances at your bank in excess of this limit, explore the possibility of a repo agreement.  Under such an arrangement, the bank give you a security interest in investment securities in its investment portfolio as recourse for your deposits in excess of FDIC insurance should the bank fail.  This arrangement is as safe, if not better than, FDIC insurance.

 

3.  The regulations state that only a town mutual's bank deposits fully insured by the FDIC are countable as Type 1 investments.  There is no exception provided for excess deposits secured by repo agreements and anecdotal evidence would indicate the OCI is not inclined to acknowledge such an exception.  In other words, if you are a town mutual that is close with your Type 1 minimum calculation and you are routinely running large bank balances, make sure you monitor the situation carefully.

 

 
When is a Fiduciary Not Really a Fiduciary?
 

It is often difficult to distinguish the services of one financial "advisor" from another.  The cynical among us would suggest that this is the result of calculated efforts to confuse the public mind on the issue.  We have those who function as nothing more than product salepersons calling themselves "advisors".  When you go into the Ford dealer to buy a car, you are well aware that they are trying to get you to buy a Ford whether they call their representative a salesperson, an advisor, a consultant, or whatever.  But when walk into a brokerage firm (the financial industry's version of a car dealer), we think someone with the title of "advisor" is actually objectively reviewing all alternatives and merely "advising" us on what is truly the best for us?

 

A big push over the past few years has been to educate the public on the difference between a "fiduciary advisor" - i.e., someone who truly IS objective and unbiased and owes you the obligation to guide you to what is best for you - and these salesperson "advisors".  However, now some of the salesperson "advisors" have structured themselves in a way to be able to claim they are providing "fiduciary" advice.  It is certainly not the same level of fiduciary advice as is provided by an independent fiduciary because of the rampant conflicts of interest between the product sales element of the brokerage firm and the advisory arm of the "fiduciary".  But it certainly effectively muddies the waters.

 

If you are confused about these differences, visit our website at www.financialfiduciariesllc.com.  We provide convenient and updated access there to information that will hopefully bring you to a clearer understanding on differences between financial services providers.  Also, keep an eye out for our upcoming video, "Faux Fiduciaries", which will provide a somewhat humorous - yet meaningful - take on these distinctions.

 
 
Website Links
(WI office of the Commissioner of Insurance - laws and regulations)
Fun Facts About Mutual Insurance Companies
History and Statistics

The Insurance Companies owned entirely by it's policyholders concept dates back to England in the late 17th Century.  The first in America was founded in 1752 and remains in business today.
  
Among the countries 10 largest property/casualty insurance agencies,
five (5) are mutual insurance companies serving 25 percent of the market.
  
In North America, the National Assocation of Mutual Insurance Companies (NAMIC), founded
 in 1895, is the sole representative of the U.S. and Canadian Mutual Insurance
Companies in the areas of advocacy and education.
 
Call us with any questions or concerns.
  
Sincerely,
  
Thomas W. Batterman
715-848-8110 ext. 302
  
Choose the Right Partner!

 
Like us on Facebook   Follow us on Twitter   View our profile on LinkedIn   Visit our blog   Find us on Google+