VDUK Logo  
VDUK Header
Newsletter 16

                                    30th May 2014

Practical Considerations 

  

A couple of years ago I had a conversation with Hal Stone about why Voice Dialogue was not more widely known - after all he and his wife, Sidra, had published their first book Embracing Our Selves back in 1989. "Well", he said, "Voice Dialogue is never going to be a thousand-people-in-an-auditorium movement because people need to personally  experience or witness a session to really get what it is."

 

This was certainly what happened to me. I first heard about Voice Dialogue from a friend and it sounded to me much like Gestalt or Psychosynthesis or Transactional Analysis. Like many people, I have a very strong rational mind that likes to categorise and label things. So I put it in a "the same as" box. Sorted.

 

Then one day I went to a demonstration event and watched a session. Still it seemed remarkably similar to these other modalities; but there was something about the process that I couldn't quite figure out. It wasn't till I signed up for my first session and experienced what it felt like to embody my Pleaser, separate from him and then embody and separate from the part of me that is more selfish and self-serving, that I really got it. Sitting in the space between these two opposite energies I began to understand on a visceral level what the aware ego process is all about and what makes Voice Dialogue different. I'm reminded of the old saying: I hear and I forget; I see and I remember; I do and I understand!

 

Senior Voice Dialogue practitioner J'aime ona Pangaia writes about this in her article Talk Doesn't Cook the Rice. And in Who's Dressing You? I describe my struggle to establish an aware ego process between my Conservative and Exhibitionist selves!

 

In the foreword to my book Selves in Action Hal and Sidra write: 'We happily invite newcomers to experience the great "turning on of the lights" ceremony when they make that first wonderful discovery: "Oh my god - I never knew that was a self!"' If you've never experienced or witnessed a Voice Dialogue session I invite you to come along to one of my Demonstration Evenings where I will not only talk about Voice Dialogue, the Psychology of Selves and the Aware Ego Process, but also facilitate a session. 

 

Very best wishes to all your selves!

John

 

To read previous newsletters click here.



john@voicedialogue.org.uk                                 Like us on Facebook  Follow us on Twitter  View our videos on YouTube  View our profile on LinkedIn

 

"Talk Doesn't Cook the Rice" (old Chinese proverb) 
 

Talking about psycho-spiritual matters and actively engaging in psycho-spiritual practice come from two different kinds of inner voices. One is intellectual, the other, practical.  Each in their own way and time can be helpful.

How do you cook rice? Here's one method. Put one cup of rinsed rice in two cups of water, turn on the heat, slow boil until the water level is just below the top of the rice, turn the heat off, cover and let the remaining water be absorbed over the next  10 -15 minutes. Serve.

Now you have information, instructions. But do you have cooked rice? No. Talking doesn't cook the rice. Understanding how rice is cooked, doesn't cook the rice. We have to actually do the activity of cooking the rice. Only then do we have the direct experience of cooked rice.

How do we develop the capacity for an aware ego process?  There are many ideas that can describe both the territory (selves, consciousness, energy, ego, compassionate awareness) and methods. But does that talk lead to 'self' awareness, 'self' acceptance or the energetic dis-identification from selves? No. We still have only ideas - talk, not the experience of an aware ego process. The aware ego process is a direct experience; it isn't an idea, it isn't a new and improved self. Words and ideas point. They can also misdirect, if they are not based on actual experience. To use another metaphor, no matter how technical or poetic you are at describing a rose - its color, its form, its scent, its beauty, you only have fancy or beautifully impressive words. You still don't have a rose.

If we stay within the bounds of talk, we may feel knowledgeable and for some, knowledge of ideas is a way to feel important ("Look at how smart or wise I am!"), or safe ("Confusion is scary or painful.") However, we have limited knowledge at best, since our 'knowledge' is based on a limited understanding of information and ideas, not on experience. We delude ourselves to believe that information leads to direct experience. We delude ourselves if we think that talking about our ideas of consciousness process is consciousness process.

Talk or thinking ideas can point in a direction. It can create a kind of 'map' that can inspire us to enter into the experience. And having a map of the territory can be quite helpful for orienting ourselves to practice. However, the map is not the actual territory, it's a concept. Concepts can certainly help, but not if we talk about the map and believe that talking / thinking about the map is the transformative, alchemical 'cooking.' Practical experience - in the case of Voice Dialogue, getting facilitated, engaging in dream process, feeling into and separating from bonding patterns - confirms, improves and/or expands any knowledge or thoughts that we hold. Practical experience will also correct ideas that were misunderstood. The one who 'understands' information before direct experience is different from the one who understands information after direct experience. Same words, different understanding. Initially, ideas help give us a provisional understanding of experience and experience gives us a clearer understanding of the ideas. In the end, clear understanding of ideas is not the goal. 'Cooked rice,'  transformative experience is the goal.

This holds true for spiritual paths in general and other forms of practice. Talk, our thoughts, are no substitute for cooking the rice (our direct process). Telling ourselves to love and accept ourselves is just words, not the process. Telling ourselves or each other not to judge is just words that sound good or spiritual, but words and ideas are not the experience. Engaging in the actual energetic experience of separating from selves is what 'cooks the rice' (our process). Describing meditation doesn't give the experience of meditation. Describing prayer, even the words of a prayer, isn't the same as the energetic feeling / action of prayer.

By themselves, talking and thinking about the aware ego process, bonding patterns, etc, does not activate the aware ego process, nor do they transform soul. Cultivate the words you speak from what emerges of your direct experience. Listen to the words of those who actively engage in the experience they speak of. Cook your rice, otherwise, you eat words. 

 

 

J'aime ona Pangaia © 2014

VoiceDialogueWork.com

 

author of:

An Introduction to Voice Dialogue, Finding the Benefit of People Who Bug You

 

     
 
Who's Dressing You?
   

I have a cartoon in front of me. It shows a character in a dressing gown commenting as she looks through her wardrobe, trying to decide what to wear to go to work that day. "Incredible new dress, but I can't find any shoes to go with it.... Ah! Perfect shoes, but no matching skirt.... Hmm. Wonderful skirt, but no matching blouse..... Oh! Great blouse, but no matching slacks, dress, shoes, jewellery or belt...!"

In the final scene she is sitting on the bed phoning her boss: "The individual parts of me are all prepared to come to work Mr Jones, but as a group we won't be able to make it."

I had a similar crisis the other morning getting ready to teach a one-day workshop. At least two different parts were trying to dress me. It was a warm day and I knew the participants would be dressed casually. The atmosphere would be relaxed and everyone would be expecting to have fun. Even so, my Conservative self thought I should wear a newly pressed pair of chinos, polished leather shoes and a smart shirt. As far as that part of me was concerned, as the trainer I should project an image of professionalism. Otherwise my status would be undermined and I wouldn't be taken seriously.

My Conservative self remembers with embarrassment an incident some years ago when I was teaching a one-week seminar in Japan. The participants were all senior managers and I wore a suit and tie every day. Halfway through the week I wanted to get some feedback from my Japanese colleague who had organised the programme. I waited until we were sitting naked in the communal hot bath. For Japanese this is a situation where the requisite Polite and Pleasing selves can be put to one side and one can be open and reveal one's true feelings or "honne."

"So, Iwasa-san, how do you think the seminar is going?" I asked. My own sense was that all was going well, so I was quite taken aback when he hesitated, drew breath and said, "Maybe there is a problem, Kento-san." A problem? What could it be? My mind raced through various possibilities. Perhaps they didn't like the content. Maybe my English was too difficult for them. Or had I inadvertently been culturally insensitive? "Please tell me Iwasa-san, so that I can fix it," I said.

"Well, Kento-san, it's your shirts," he replied. My Shirts?! I didn't understand. I wore a clean, pressed shirt every day. They weren't loud or over-styled. "Please explain," I urged. "You wore a blue shirt on Monday and a red striped one Tuesday and a grey one today. They don't understand why," he answered. Now I was really puzzled. He continued, "As the "sensei", or teacher, you have to be sincere, calm and consistent in order for them to trust you and receive your teaching. Wearing a different coloured shirt every day is not showing consistency and this is confusing to them."

The lesson was learnt and ever since, my Conservative self has had a heightened sensitivity to my appearance and especially how my clothes might impact a group in a negative way. With this memory in mind the message was clear - I should play safe and not be controversial. I reached for my chinos. But even as I took them out of the cupboard another voice intervened. 

It was my Exhibitionist self, a part of me that loves to be provocative. Allied with a Rebel self, this is a part of me that delights in shocking people, and one way to do that is to have me wear unusual or unconventional clothes. He once had me buy a T-shirt that said: "F_CK, all I want is U"! Needless to say, my Conservative self made sure that it languished in a bottom drawer, buried beneath what it considered to be more "decent and respectable" clothing.

One look at the chinos and my Exhibitionist rebelled. No way was he going to let me wear such "non-descript and boring" clothes! As I scanned my wardrobe his eyes settled on a blue T-shirt. Printed in big letters on the front were the words: "Just another sexy bald bloke." That would do nicely. I put it on and then pulled on a pair of Levi's. A brassy cowboy belt and an old pair of trainers and the outfit was complete. I looked in the mirror. He was satisfied.

It wasn't more than a few seconds before the voice of my Conservative self bellowed in my head, "Are you seriously going to stand in front of a group of complete strangers wearing such inappropriate clothing!?" And so the to and fro between these two selves began. I took the jeans and T-shirt off and replaced them with the chinos and shirt. I looked in the mirror. My Exhibitionist gave his frank opinion, "Dull, drab and dreary!!"

Phoning in and cancelling the workshop like the cartoon character was not an option. I needed to sit with these two opposing selves and find a solution. I changed back into my pyjamas and went downstairs to have breakfast. As I sat munching my toast I listened to their arguments. I knew that whatever I chose to wear, one of them would be upset.... Finally, as I sipped the last of my coffee I decided. I went upstairs made my selection, dressed myself and left for the workshop.

So who won? Which self turned up to teach my workshop - my Conservative or my Exhibitionist? With a nod to both I chose to wear the jeans with a conventional belt, the trainers, and a neutral coloured shirt. That way both selves could be present to inform my work. I could be professional and casual. Sitting over breakfast and listening to the voices of both my opposing selves enabled me to take charge of them rather than have either one take charge over me!

The 'war of the wardrobe' can offer wonderful insights both for facilitator and client in a Voice Dialogue session. On one occasion for example, a lady who for several sessions had worn unobtrusive pastel colours, arrived in a bright red dress. That day her Sexual Rebel spoke out. "Did you dress her this morning," I asked. "You bet!" she said feistily, "It's about time she listened to me!!" Or the tolerant, new-age mother who turned up one day in a dark top with a wide, pristine white collar. Her inner Puritan who railed against her easy going attitude to raising her children wanted his presence to be noted and his voice heard: "Spare the rod and spoil the child!" was his message.

So, take a moment to observe what you are wearing right now and ask yourself "who dressed me today?" Maybe this will clue you in to a particular self that is trying to get your attention and appreciation.

  
  

 

 
Voce Dialogue Facilitator Training
 
Couple Talking

Overview

This training is for therapists, counsellors, coaches, health care practitioners and anyone working in the area of personal growth and development. It provides a comprehensive grounding in the theory and practice of Voice Dialogue, The Psychology of Selves and the Aware Ego Process. At the end of the training participants will have a powerful new tool that will complement their practice and enhance their ability to help clients achieve more balance in their lives.

 

Structure

The training includes 4 workshops spaced over 9 months (total 10 days). Each workshop will focus on the theory and practice of Voice Dialogue and its application to a range of client issues.

 

In addition, over the course of the training, participants will have a total of 6 personal 90-minute facilitations from the trainer (face to face or via skype), and will be expected to complete and document ongoing practice sessions with other members of the group.

 

Participants will receive a comprehensive self-study pack of readings, videos and exercises covering every aspect of the work.

 

Certificates of attendance are available for CPD.

 

Maximum group size 4 participants

 

Places are still available for the course beginning the weekend of 13th - 14th September 2014

 

For more information click here.

 

 

 
In This Issue
Talk Doesn't Cook the Rice
Who's Dressing You?
Facilitator Training



Quick Links
 
 










Workshops,
Trainings & Events



This e-learning program is now available for you to study at any time to suit you.
 
 
26 July
 
 
19 June
 
 
27-28 Sept
 
 

 
 

Private Sessions
Face-to-face or via skype

email: John

 

or call:

+44 (0)7941141377
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
by John Kent

Book cover

How different parts of us inform and influence our daily lives.

Foreword by Drs Hal and Sidra Stone


 























 

 



































































































































Free copy of John's book

Get a free, signed copy of John's book Selves in Action when you book a private Voice Dialogue session with him, face to face or via skype, before 30th June 2014.
 
To take advantage of this offer, please contact John: