Top
 In This Issue:  
 

Featured Article

 

Newsletter Archive

 

In The Spotlight 

 

Seminars & Events 

 

What our Clients say... 

Quick Links:   

 

 
 
 
 

PCFS Solutions

 
 
 

Contact Us 

 Spotlight

IN THE SPOTLIGHT

  

Jessica L. Conn
Jessica L. Conn, Esq.

Jessica practices business law with a focus on commercial lending and government guaranteed lending. In that capacity, she represents banks, credit unions and certified development companies in closing and funding loans. Jessica has extensive experience in reviewing due diligence and drafting and negotiating loan documents for the finance of a variety of transactions including construction, asset purchases, stock purchases, refinance, working capital, equipment purchases and real estate purchases.  

  

ADMISSIONS:

  

  • Pennsylvania
  • New Jersey
  • New York

 

To read more about Jessica, click here

  




CONNECT WITH US:

Find us on Facebook!

 

Like us on Facebook

 

Become our fan on Facebook to receive updates, articles and news pertaining to SBA and lending related topics.  

Starfield & Smith, PC is on Twitter!

 

Follow me on Twitter

 

Follow us for links to our most recent news and articles.

 

Starfield & Smith, PC is on LinkedIn!

 

View my profile on LinkedIn 

 

Link yourself to Starfield & Smith to receive updates, articles and news pertaining to SBA and lending related topics.  

FeatureArticle 
FEATURED ARTICLE 

Best Practices:  Another Way "Use of Proceeds" Matters:  Franchisees and Area Developers

 

By: Greg T. Kupniewski, Esquire  

  

Greg T. Kupniewski
Greg T. Kupniewski, Esquire

  

The SBA has made it abundantly clear that a proposed loan to a franchise area developer is ineligible.  The SBA specifically characterizes franchise area development deals as "inherently speculative" and "passive investments" in SOP 50 10 5 (F).

 

In many cases, however, an entity may be both an area developer and a franchisee at the same time.  The SBA recognizes that simply having area development rights should not automatically make a borrower ineligible.  The SOP states that a borrower can be eligible, even if its agreement contains area development rights, as long as the franchise portion of the agreement complies with the applicable SOP franchise regulations.  In other words, a borrower can be eligible if its contract with the franchisor grants the borrower area development rights and also permits the borrower to operate one or more franchises.

 

The closer question is what happens when a borrower has both a franchise agreement and a separate area development agreement.  The borrower could be eligible as a franchisee, but the existence of the area development agreement could potentially make the borrower ineligible. This scenario is not addressed in the SOP, yet it is the circumstance that arises most frequently.

 

Although this scenario is functionally the same as the scenario where the franchisor grants area development and franchisee rights under the same document, the language of the SOP is sufficiently specific that it can be relied upon where the rights are granted in the same agreement but should not be relied upon when there are separate agreements.

 

The risk of simply pushing forward in the two contracts scenario is substantial for the lender.  If the loan defaults, the SBA could find that the borrower was ineligible.  That finding would result in a fairly swift denial of the SBA guaranty.  Eligibility is an "all or nothing" issue for the SBA and prudent lenders should avoid taking such chances whenever possible.

 

One way a lender can get more comfortable making a loan to a borrower in the two contract context is to make clear that it is lending to the borrower in its capacity as a franchisee and not as an area developer.  The easiest way to do this is through the use of proceeds in the SBA authorization.  If the loan is being used to finance the purchase of equipment, to make leasehold improvements to the franchise location, or to purchase inventory, the lender can make a clear case that the proposed loan is financing the franchise and not financing area development activities.  The lender could make a strong case that the proposed loan is eligible because it would solely fund eligible activities.

 

But uses of proceeds are rarely that straightforward.  For example, working capital could be used to fund both franchise operations and area development activity.  In that context, the lender is still enmeshed in an eligibility gray area. Thorough documentation of the use of proceeds to ensure an eligible purpose is paramount in such situations.  Until the SBA clarifies the language of the SOP to address the two contract scenario, lenders should thoroughly document their files and consider either submitting such loans through general processing and seeking specific guidance from SBA franchise counsel.

 

For more information about Use of Proceeds and Franchise Area Developers, please contact Greg at 215-390-1023 or at [email protected].

 

  

Back to Top

EVENTS & SEMINARS Events

 

*** NEXT WEEK ***

Presented By:  NAGGL
Date:  June 5, 2014
Webinar Time:  1:00 pm EST
Instructor: David W. Starfield

For more information about this event and/or to register, click here.

Presented By:  CTAGGL
Date:  August 18 - 20, 2014
Location:  Westin Riverwalk, San Antonio, Texas

For more information about this event and/or to register, click here


Jeff Aiello / President / American Coil, Inc.

 

You and your firm will be my go-to source for legal counsel on business matters from now on. You have earned my trust with your integrity, drive and common-sense approach to complex matters.  

 

                                          
OUR PRACTICE AREAS

 

SBA Compliance Audits  |  SBA Guaranty Purchase Reviews & Recovery

SBA Franchise Reviews |  SBA Lender Training

Regulatory Compliance & Lender Oversight |  Loan Documentation & Closing

Commercial Litigation |  SBA Portfolio Management

SBA & Conventional Creditors' Rights 

 

Contact
Starfield & Smith, PC
  
 
Pennsylvania Office:
1300 Virginia Drive | Suite 325 | Ft. Washington, PA 19034
phone: 215.542.7070 | fax: 215.542.0723
  
Philadelphia Office:
2000 Market Street | Suite 500 | Philadelphia, PA 19103
phone: 215.542.7070 | fax: 215.542.0723
  
Florida Office:
1101  North Lake Destiny Road | Suite 105 | Maitland, FL 32751
phone: 407.667.8811 | fax: 407.667.0020
 
 
This email is an advertisement from Starfield & Smith, P.C. and is subject to this disclaimer.
 � 2009-2014 Starfield & Smith, P.C. All Rights Reserved