November 2015

In This Edition

Items Plan Sponsors Should Consider When Evaluating Third Party Administratorstpa
Often, plan sponsors consider if it would be beneficial to change Third Party Administrators (TPAs), and then struggle to determine what criteria should be used to evaluate the options. The following items should be considered:
  • Service - Ask the TPA for references to help evaluate the quality of the TPA's service.  Inquire of other plan sponsors which TPAs they are using and whether they are satisfied or not. Plan sponsors should gain an understanding of how large the TPA is. Find out how many plans it administers, what are the total assets under management, and how many staff work in the plan administration department.   Keep in mind that bigger is not always better.
  • Fees - Gain an understanding of all the fees that each TPA charges.  Some TPAs net fees against investment income and some charge fees to process loans and distributions. So, it is important to understand all the fees that will be associated with your specific plan.
  • Reports - TPAs generate reports in different formats.  You should ask the TPAs to provide sample reports for both management and participants.  Management needs to have good reports to review how the plan is performing and make sure the plan is complying with regulations as part of its fiduciary responsibility.  Participants need to have easy-to-read reports that show how their investments are performing.
  • Website - TPAs have websites that allow plan sponsors to review the plan activity. Review the website to make sure it is easy to navigate and provides the information that you want to access. Websites should also be reviewed from a participant standpoint to make sure it is easy to use, thus preventing frustrations.
  • Education - Plan sponsors need to understand what form of education TPAs will provide to participants.   Some TPAs will send representatives on site to meet with employees in person to go over the retirement plan features and explain investment options. Determine what education material and mediums would work best for your employees.
If you need help evaluating a TPA, our employee benefit plan team is available to help. Please contact us. 
  
Author: Abe Leis, CPA
608.793.3131
aleis@hawkinsashcpas.com
SAVE THE DATE: November 19 Educational Webinarwebinar
Please join us for a complimentary, 30-minute webinar: Understanding Your Fiduciary Responsibilities. During this presentation, you'll learn:
  • Who is a fiduciary over a retirement plan?
  • What are the responsibilities of a fiduciary?
  • Best practices for fiduciaries.

About the Presenter

Randy Juedes, CPA, Partner

 

Randy joined Hawkins Ash CPAs in 2001, and became a firm partner in 2015. He has extensive experience providing audit services to employee benefit plans and tax and audit services to commercial entities. As leader of the Employee Benefit Plan Service Committee for Hawkins Ash CPAs, Randy remains up to date with the latest from ERISA and other laws affecting employee benefit plans. 
 

Avoiding Operational Failure with Respect to Plan Compensationfailure
Operational Failure. Corrective contributions. Voluntary correction programs. Excess deferral distributions. These all sound like strong, negative terms that an employee benefit plan would want to avoid. Yet, while they seem complicated, they can potentially be avoided if procedures are put into place to ensure the definition of plan compensation is being followed as set forth in the plan sponsor's plan document or adoption agreement (in the case of a pre-approved plan). 

Using the improper compensation amount in the calculation and subsequent withholding of participant deferrals and in the employer match or discretionary deferrals is a common plan error. This can lead to a lot of work at extra costs to ensure the errors are corrected properly.  Plan compensation should be clearly defined in the plan document or adoption agreement.  There can be different compensation definitions for the different types of calculations as well. For example, employee deferrals may include bonuses as eligible compensation while employer discretionary contributions may exclude them from the definition.

Improperly including or excluding bonuses or fringe benefits as plan compensation is a common error we see as plan auditors.  If the plan sponsor wants the eligible compensation to be a certain way, it needs to be reflected in the plan document. For example, if you want bonuses to be excluded from eligible compensation, the compensation definition needs to state that. 

Errors often occur in this area and when the plan sponsors use a third party administrator to process payroll and benefits.  The third party is not always made aware of the plan compensation definition or amendments to the plan document are not properly communicated to the third party.  Sometimes the payroll systems are not updated to reflect amendments.

It is important that plan sponsors work with their third party administrators of their plans to ensure the definition is set up how the sponsors want it to be designed. Plan sponsors should also communicate with their payroll processors or external payroll providers to ensure that all deferrals are calculated in accordance with the definition.  Amendments are permissible in setting up the plan how you want it.

If errors do occur, the plan sponsor will have to do corrections using Internal Revenue Service (IRS) correction programs.  Distributions of elective deferrals will need to occur if the employee deferred on too much compensation, and the excess employer deferrals will need to be forfeited back to the plan and used in accordance with the criteria set forth in the plan document.  In cases where the deferral was not high enough based on excluding some eligible compensation, the plan sponsor is usually obligated to make up 50% of what would have been the participants' deferral, 100% of what the employer match or discretionary contributions were in addition to earnings through the correction date.  If any of these corrective measures are required, please be sure to consult with your third party administrator or your auditor to ensure the IRS requirements are followed properly in correcting these issues and to avoid potential penalties.

Procedures should be put into place to monitor these items.  Assign someone to do internal checks on the deferrals and test payrolls that have unique situations (such as bonus pay or reimbursements) to ensure the calculations are proper.  After all, a little work up front making sure the plan is set up properly and testing calculations timely will be a lot easier than making the required corrections.

Author: Erica Knerzer, CPA
608.793.3113
eknerzer@hawkinsashcpas.com
IRS Revised Determination Letter Processdetermination
In Announcement 2015-19, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) will make significant changes to individually designed retirement plan determination letters.  The IRS uses these letters to express opinions on the status of plan documents to the tax code.  Plans restate their determination letter to comply with all recent tax law changes.  The IRS issues a list (referred to as the "Cumulative List") each year detailing the changes to the tax law that must be reflected in plan documents. 

Prior to this announcement, plan sponsors were placed into a filing cycle (Cycle A-E) based on the last digit of the plan sponsor's employee identification number (EIN).  Plan sponsors were then allowed to retroactively adopt required amendments to their plan documents in order to comply with new law requirements.  Generally, plan sponsors would apply for new determination letters during the last year of the remedial amendment cycle. 

Effective January 1, 2017, the IRS announced the elimination of the five year remedial amendment cycle which means the IRS will no longer accept determination letter filings in each remedial amendment cycle.  However, plans that are eligible to file in Cycle A (plan sponsor with last digit of EIN ending in zero or six) are allowed to submit a determination letter during February 1, 2016, to January 31, 2017.  In addition, the IRS will only allow determination letters for initial plans, plan terminations, and in other certain circumstances not yet determined by the IRS and the Department of Treasury.  Also, effective July 21, 2015, the IRS will no longer accept off-cycle determination letters.

The announcement stated that the IRS and the Department of Treasury are exploring techniques to make it easier for plan sponsors to comply with the document requirements for qualified plans.  The IRS intends to release additional guidance and changes to the determination letter program.  This could include:
  1. Providing model amendments.
  2. Not demanding plans to adopt provisions that are not relevant to the plan.
  3. Expanding the ability to include qualification requirements by reference.
Although this announcement is not comparable to a law or regulation that has been passed, it proves that the IRS is looking for more efficient methods to improve the determination letter process for both the IRS and plan sponsors. 
 
Author: Jaclyn Noeldner
608.793.3073
jnoeldner@hawkinsashcpas.com