May 6, 2014 

Greetings!   

 

By the time you read this, the HVLA Board is likely to have met in Executive (i.e., closed) session to consider the accusations made in the letter originally sent as part of my May 4th eMessage, and which is reprinted below.
 
Although the offending 423-word "position paper" referred to in that legal notification was intended merely as a courtesy summary to my fellow Directors of what I said during the April 27th Community Forum, 

it is being cited as grounds for charging me with violating my "fiduciary duty" to serve the interests of the Community and the Hidden Valley Lake Association. 

  
 
The main charge - that I have circulated a position paper, dubbed "the Hartman Paper" in the legal notice, throughout the Community - is untrue. 
 
This single sheet of paper was NOT circulated to "all residents at Hidden Valley Lake" nor was it ever intended to be. Moreover, I have gone to great lengths to ensure that the few copies given out (almost all of which were handed to my fellow directors on the HVLA Board) have NOT been more widely distributed. If that "position paper" is ultimately circulated throughout the Community, it will have been through actions of the HVLA Board or its agents, not myself. 

Although the gist of summary paper's content is similar to the remarks I made during the April 27th Forum (which can be found 1 hour and 18 minutes from the beginning of the video recording of that event), 
it is the paper itself that appears to be at issue. Although the opinions expressed at the April 27th
Forum differed from those of some other HVLA Directors, no one on the Board expressed concern at the time, either publicly or in private about my spoken or written comments.
 
 
Today's hearing to consider the charges made in the Baydaline and Jacobsen legal notification conforms neither to due process (as delineated in California's civil code governing Home Owners Associations, Davis-Stirling), nor to accepted practices for dealing with so-called "rogue" Directors (as summarized on this website).
 

General practice is for WRITTEN notice to be given to the Director, requesting that the offending behavior cease, along with a written statement that the Board does not condone such behavior.

 

If - and only if - the Director continues with the offending behavior after such a written warning has been issued is censure by the Board considered warranted.

 

The Baydaline and Jacobsen letter is the first (and to date, only) written document indicating the Board's displeasure.

 

Moreover, due process, by which the offending Director is given an opportunity to prepare a defense against the charges made by the Board, has not been granted in this instance. 

 

The Baydaline and Jacobsen letter was delivered late on a Friday afternoon, making it difficult for the accused to secure any form of legal counsel until at least the following Monday, the day before the scheduled hearing. 

 

My request for rescheduling the hearing to a date that would comply with the 10-day notice rule was submitted to the Board on Sunday (via email) and hand-delivered to the HVLA Administrative Office early on Monday morning. Only at 5:35 PM that day was the Board's decision to deny my request communicated to me.

 
In the Baydaline and Jacobsen letter, it is stated that 

 

"As a Director, you owe the Association and its membership a fiduciary duty to act in good faith and in the best interests of all members."

 

Over the past five months I have indeed conformed to this directive, devoting approximately 600 hours, all as an unpaid volunteer, to serving as an HVLA Board Director. During an average week, forty hours of my time has been devoted to Association matters. When elected to the Board in November of last year, I willingly accepted the responsibility of serving as an HVLA Director, determined to perform the best possible job for the Community and Association.

 

I played a prominent role in the recruitment of our new General Manager, Cindy Spears, spending approximately 150 hours of my time on this endeavor alone. My fellow Directors appeared very pleased with my efforts on behalf of the Board and Association, and told me so. 

 

During a variety of other interactions with several of them (I serve on the Finance Committee with Susan Cameron and Bill Surber, who were also my colleagues on the GM recruitment sub-committee), their gratitude for my help on many Association matters was frequently expressed.

 

The Baydaline and Jacobsen letter then goes on to state that:

 
"This unmitigated duty of loyalty requires that you put the Associations interests ahead of your own personal interests and passions."

 

Indeed I have. I am not retired, and continue to help an educational company develop technology for improving how students learn foreign languages. As a consequence of serving as an HVLA Director, virtually all of my spare time has been devoted to Association activities, requiring me to put many of my usual personal interests and passions on hold.

 

The views I expressed at the April 27th Forum may differ from those of some of my fellow Directors, but does this mean that I have violated my "fiduciary duty to act in good faith and in the best interests of all members"?

 

It is my hope that we, as a Board and as a Community, can put this extremely unfortunate incident behind us and resume working together to make Hidden Valley Lake even better.

 

I'd like to thank everyone for their kind words of encouragement and support. It is truly appreciated.

 

Later today, I'll send a separate eMessage describing the agenda and topics of this Thursday evening's HVLA Board Meeting.

  

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

       Reprinted from my May 4, 2014 eMessage

Those parts of the letter addressing strictly the HVLA Board's legal concerns are reprinted here. Those components deemed by HVLA's legal counsel to be of potential damage to the Association have been omitted so as preclude their being disseminated throughout the Community and Membership. 

 

May 2, 2014

VIA CERTIFIED AND U.S. MAIL

Steven R. Greenberg

17270 Greenridge Road

Hidden Valley Lake, CA 95467-8264

JENNIFER M. JACOBSEN

jjacobsen@bayjaclaw.com

Re: Notification of Breach of Fiduciary Obligations as Director

Hidden Valley Lake Association

 

Dear Mr. Greenberg:

 

As you know, our firm serves as general corporate counsel to the Hidden Valley Lake Association (the "Association"). This letter is written at the request of your fellow Board Members to notify you of your actual and potential violations of your fiduciary obligations as an Association Director with respect to your unilateral and unauthorized decision to circulate your position paper (the "Hartman Paper") to all residents at Hidden Valley Lake.

 

As the events described herein give rise to personal liability on your part, you are hereby advised to seek legal counsel at your own cost and choosing to advise you on such matters.

 

As a Director, you owe the Association and its membership a fiduciary duty to act in good faith and in the best interests of all members. This unmitigated duty of loyalty requires that you put the Associations interests ahead of your own personal interests and passions. A director's failure to adhere to their fiduciary obligations can lead to personal liability for their unauthorized actions. More specifically, under California Civil Code section 5800, a volunteer officer and director of a community association is protected from personal liability only so as long as the director has adhered to all of the following requirements:

 

1. The act or omission was performed within the scope of the officer's or director's association duties.

2. The act or omission was performed in good faith.

3. The act or omission was not willful, wanton, or grossly negligent.

4. The association maintained and had in effect at the time the act or omission occurred general liability insurance and directors and officers insurance in minimum amounts which are prescribed by statute.

 

In accordance with Corporations Code sections 7210 and 7231, the board may delegate the management of the activities of the association, provided that the activities and affairs of the association shall at all times be managed and all association powers shall be exercised under the ultimate direction of the board.

 

Turning to the Hartmann Paper itself, you open the portended communiqué with the following salvo:

 

.......... (omitted for the reasons stated above)

 

You then go on to describe ..... 

(omitted for the reasons stated above)

 

Although you are not licensed to practice law in the State of California according to the official State Bar website (http://calbar.ca.gov) you then go on to provide your

misplaced and misleading personal "legal opinion":

.....

(omitted for the reasons stated above)

 

Finally, even though the new manager has not even arrived for her first day on the job you provide the following veiled threat as to what you apparently view at the litmus test as to the success of the expectation of her future performance of her duties:

 

........ (omitted for the reasons stated above)

 

It is without question that this diatribe was sent out by you, unilaterally and without authorization of your fellow Board Members. The acerbic and bitter discourse with which you choose to express your readily apparent and personal displeasure with the path chosen by your fellow Board Members to date as to the review of the Hartmann Project is clearly intended to undermine and derail the success of the Project.

 

This attack was: (1) not performed within the scope of your duties as an officer or director; (2) not performed in good faith; and (3) was willful, wanton, or grossly negligent. As such, the Association will hold you personally responsible for any and all damages which flow from this breach of your fiduciary obligations to the Association.

 

As a further matter, the Board of Directors will be meeting in executive session next Tuesday, May 6th to discuss how to address the expected damage caused by your careless and unintelligent communication. Additionally, the Board will consider how you will be censured for your actions to date. The Board may choose to formally discipline or censure you, ask for your resignation or move for a formal recall of your Director position. Furthermore, to avoid future damage and liability the Board may choose to exclude you from all future executive session discussions on this and other matters until you vacate your seat on the Board as you are clearly unable and incapable of fulfilling your executive session and fiduciary obligations to the Association at this time. Although you may address the Board at this executive session should you so choose, the Board will exclude you from all discussions and deliberations as to your censure as you are a conflicted director within the meaning of Civil Code section 5350(b)(1).

 

If you hire legal counsel, please have them direct all future communications to the undersigned on behalf of the Association.

 

Very truly yours,

BAYDALINE & JACOBSEN LLP

~~

Jennifer M. Jacobsen

cc: Hidden Valley Lake Association Board of Directors

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Sincerely,
 
Steve Greenberg,
HVLA Director
 
[The views expressed in this eMessage are my own, and are not intended to represent those of the Hidden Valley Lake Association, its employees or its Board of Directors] 
Believe in Steve! For HVLA Director
Hidden Valley Lake, CA 95467

Copyright © 2013. All Rights Reserved.