Upcoming Events |
Oct. 12 - Presiding Judges, Office of Court Adminsitration, 205 W. 14th St., Ste. 600, Austin
Oct. 30 - Texas Urban Court Administrators Group, Office of Court Adminsitration, 205 W. 14th St., Ste. 600, Austin |
|
|
News
At the Office of Court Administration (OCA) |
|
Texas Judicial Council Selects Priorities for Legislative Session |
At its September 7 meeting (link to video archive), the Texas Judicial Council adopted ten priorities for further consideration as the 83rd Legislative Session nears. Those ten priorities are detailed below:
- A resolution advocating for adequate funding for the courts
- A resolution supporting adequate funding for the court eFiling system
- A resolution encouraging full funding by the state of the increased cost of indigent defense since the passage of the Fair Defense Act
- A resolution supporting the Children's Commission and its proposals to better advise indigent parents of their right to counsel and related amendments, as well as support for amendments that would strengthen the consideration of the educational needs of children in the foster care system
- A resolution supporting the clarification of the state's vexatious litigant statute
- A resolution supporting the collection of court costs and fines beyond the period of community supervision
- A resolution supporting the simplification of the criminal court cost structure in Texas
- A resolution supporting adequate compensation of Texas' judges
- A resolution supporting the Juvenile Justice Committee's recommendations for addressing school disciplinary actions referred to the juvenile justice court system, parity between criminal and civil juvenile justice courts and probation, identifying criteria for data collection and also encouraging more use of best practices
- A resolution supporting modification of the responsibility of clerks to notify the Attorney General when a state statute is being challenged as unconstitutional.
The Judicial Council staff will be working over the next two months to develop resolutions that will go along with these ideas. The Council will consider those resolutions at its November 9 meeting. If you would like more information on any of the proposals, please review the Judicial Council meeting archive (http://tinyurl.com/8ns4wn3) where each proposal is explained. If you have any questions or suggestions in these areas, please feel free to contact us by replying to this email. |
Texas Supreme Court Justice Dale Wainwright announces resignation |
Justice Dale Wainwright, who joined the Texas Supreme Court in January 2003, announced (http://tinyurl.com/8ztdnll) on September 19 his intent to resign from the Supreme Court effective September 30 to join the Austin office of Bracewell & Guiliani LLP. Justice Wainwright is the third longest-serving justice on the Court. Governor Rick Perry will appoint a replacement, subject to Senate confirmation in next year's session, to serve the remainder of Justice Wainwright's term, which ends in 2014. |
Judicial Compensation Commission meets and decides to recommend increase in compensation for Texas judges |
The Judicial Compensation Commission met on September 14 to discuss its recommendation to the Legislature regarding judicial compensation. Commission members heard that Texas' judges have gone the longest of any judges in the nation without an increase in compensation and that the judges' salaries are now below 1991 levels (when inflation is considered). After hearing from its Data Committee, Public Comments Committee and Legislative Committee, the Commission members unanimously agreed that an increase in compensation for Texas judges is warranted. The Commission directed OCA staff to provide various scenarios of increased compensation to the members. The Commission will meet again later this fall to decide what level of increase to recommend to the Legislature. |
Guardianship Certification Board
Annual Reporting Required from County Clerks |
Background
The Guardianship Certification Board (GCB) was created during the 79th Legislature in 2005 and was administratively attached to the Office of Court Administration (OCA). Certain individuals who provide guardianship services, including private professional guardians (PPGs), must be certified by the GCB, effective September 1, 2007.
Since September 1, 1993, Probate Code §697 has required PPGs to register with the county clerk of each county in which they are appointed or could be appointed as guardian, and to renew that registration annually. The same legislation that created the GCB added a duty for county clerks: they must report to the GCB on PPGs registered for each calendar year.
Who Needs to Register?
At one time, local guardianship programs and the Texas Department of Aging and Disability Services (DADS) Guardianship Program were required to report certain information to the clerks; these requirements no longer apply. Only PPGs must apply annually for a certificate of registration.
What is a Private Professional Guardian?
According to Government Code §111.001(9) and Probate Code §601(24), a PPG is as an individual, other than an attorney or a corporate fiduciary, who is engaged in the business of providing guardianship services. Most PPGs are self-employed individuals, but some operate as a limited liability corporation, some have a D/B/A, some have employees who work for them. The model under which the PPG conducts business does not affect the requirement to register.
PPG vs. Guardianship Program
Some confusion remains about the difference between a guardianship program and a PPG, particularly when the PPG is not simply a self-employed individual. A PPG is defined above. A guardianship program is defined by Government Code §111.001(6) and Probate Code §601(13) as a local, county or regional program that provides guardianship and related services to incapacitated persons. Most local guardianship programs are non-profits, and two counties, Harris and Galveston, each have a guardianship program. Typically, the program will be appointed as guardian, and its employees will provide the actual guardianship services. A list of programs, as supplied to the OCA by the Health and Human Services Commission, will be posted on the GCB website as a reference to assist the clerks in reporting for calendar year 2012.
What to Look for When Registering a PPG
The statute says a PPG must "apply annually" for a certificate of registration. What must be included in the application is set out in Probate Code Section 697(a). In particular, clerks should be sure the application includes:
- The name of each person who will provide services to the PPG's wards on behalf of the PPG.
- The certification or provisional certification number for the PPG and each person described above.
What To Report (and What Not to Report) to the GCB
Some clerks have told the GCB staff, "We don't have any PPGs in our county; I have nothing to report." The GCB needs each county to submit a report in order to have accurate, complete information on guardians throughout the state. Reports are due to the GCB by January 31 for the preceding calendar year.
DO report the name and business address of PPGs who have satisfied the registration requirements.
DO submit a report even if there are no PPGs registered in your county. There is a box on the reporting form to check for counties with no registered PPGs.
DO NOT report any information on DADS; the requirement for DADS to report to county clerks was eliminated effective September 1, 2007.
DO NOT provide any information on local guardianship programs. As of September 1, 2009, programs submit a copy of their reports to the GCB to the clerks of the counties in which they operate. Do NOT send a copy to the GCB; we have the original.
The GCB's website (www.txcourts.gov/gcb) is updated each December with new forms to use and to reflect any changes to the laws regarding reporting requirements. Each county clerk will receive a reminder letter the first week in January. Please contact Lesley Ondrechen, Guardianship Certification Program Director, at lesley.ondrechen@txcourts.gov or 512/475-2873 if you have any questions about this reporting requirement. |
Automated Registry Ending in October
|
During the 80th Legislative Session, OCA received funding to create and maintain an automated registry system to coordinate the sharing of information from various state agency databases and the judicial system. The purpose of the registry was to allow judges to access data from various locations in one place to allow for more informed decisions.
After a few years of service and significant marketing, the system is still sparingly used. Due to budgetary constraints and limited usage, OCA has determined that it is necessary to discontinue the service effective October 31. For more information, visit www.txcourts.gov/OCA/registry/reghome.asp.
|
Common Problems with Data Submissions |
Judicial Information has identified common problems with the Texas Judicial Council Justice Court and Municipal Court Monthly Court activity reports that have occurred since the changes went into effect on September 1, 2011. To find out more about the common reporting errors, review the report on the Reporting Requirements page on the OCA website (here). |
TAMES |
Congratulations to the 5th Court of Appeals in Dallas! They recently converted to the new appellate case management system (called "TAMES"). This new case management system streamlines the appellate process from start to finish. Filings, Clerks and Reporters records can all be filed electronically. Paper documents can be scanned directly into the system. Justices can vote on motions, opinions and orders with a click of the mouse. All of the public information generated from the system can be made available via the courts' website. You can search both cases and documents across all the appellate courts once completed.
The 5th Court of Appeals joins the Supreme Court, 1st Court of Appeals (Houston) and the 14th Court of Appeals (Houston) in using the new system. In October, the 9th Court of Appeals (Beaumont) and 4th Court of Appeals (San Antonio) will convert to the new system. In November, we will convert the 12th Court of Appeals (Tyler) and the 6th Court of Appeals (Beaumont). The rest of the appellate courts will be completed in early 2013. |
NICS Record Improvement Project
|
OCA received notification from the Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice, that we have been awarded second-year grant funding in the amount of $488,841 to continue the NICS Record Improvement Project. OCA staff members funded through this grant will continue to provide assistance to county and district clerks with researching their case records for all eligible historical mental health and other cases required to be entered into the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS). This information is used in background checks performed by the FBI to determine whether a person is disqualified from possessing or receiving a firearm.
For further information on the national effort to make more mental health records available to NICS, see the United States Government Accountability Office's recently released report which highlights OCA's program entitled, "Gun Control - Sharing Promising Practices and Assessing Incentives Could Better Position Justice to Assist States in Providing Records for Background Checks," at http://gao.gov/assets/600/592452.pdf.
|
Children's Commission Grants
|
OCA was awarded four grants from the Children's Commission. The first grant funds various technology projects, including building the Commission's education website, enhancing the Child Protection Courts Case Management System (CPCMS), and developing statewide websites to improve access to information concerning both individual child protection cases and collective child welfare data. The second grant continues funding for training for the Child Protection Court judges and staff. The third grant funds strategic planning for the Child Protection Courts program. With this grant, OCA will collect data and work with the Presiding Judges to redefine the program's mission, plan short-term responses to various legislative funding scenarios, and plan long-term direction for the Child Protection Courts. In addition, the Commission has also funded a part-time position to provide remote court interpreter services for child abuse and neglect hearings.
|
New Appointments to the Judicial Committee on Information Technology |
Chief Justice Wallace Jefferson appointed (Misc. Docket 12-9146.pdf) and reappointed several members and advisory members to the Judicial Committee on Information Technology earlier this month. The new members appointed to the committee are State Representative Sarah Davis (Houston), David Escamilla, Travis County Attorney and Dean Stanzione, Lubbock County Director of Court Administration. Barbara Adamick, Montgomery County District Clerk and David Slayton, Administrative Director of the Office of Court Administration, were appointed as new liaison committee members. JCIT is the statutorily-created judicial committee responsible for establishing standards and guidelines for the systematic implementation and integration of information technology into the trial and appellate courts in Texas. The committee is chaired by Justice Rebecca Simmons, 4th Court of Appeals (San Antonio). |
New Appointment to the Process Server Review Board | The Supreme Court recently appointed (Misc. Docket 12-9152.pdf) Eric Johnson (Rosharon) to the Process Server Review Board to fulfill the unexpired term of Gary L. Thornton, which expires July 1, 2013. The Board is responsible for improving the standards for persons authorized to serve process and to reduce the disparity among Texas civil courts for approving persons to serve process, by making recommendations to the Supreme Court of Texas on the certification of individuals and the approval of courses. |
|
Real-time Technology |
This resource was suggested by a reader on how to best utilize real-time technology to improve court administration:
|
About the OCA
OCA is a state agency in the judicial branch that operates under the direction and supervision of the Supreme Court of Texas and the chief justice and is governed primarily byChapter 72 of the Texas Government Code. www.txcourts.gov
If you are interested in following us on Facebook, please take the opportunity to "Like" us on the button in the left column. |
|
|