 |
Events in and around Beaufort
|
Contents
Proposed "Youth City Council" Launches Pilot
Cast a Vote for our Very Special Hunting Island State Park
Juggling Taxes and, in this case business licenses, suggest the Legislature sees
"no lesson in the second kick of a mule"
Adding Insult to Injury
A Walmart on Ladys Island?
Proposed Veteran's Count
Hats off to North Myrtle Beach
So Many Good Causes to Support through Spring Activities
And A Lot Happening around Town
|
"Youth City Council) Launches Pilot Program * * (working name until students design program and name)
In previous newsletters I have laid out my dream of organizing a Youth Leadership initiative in the City of Beaufort. After months of planning, research and seeking collaboration from a strong team and dedicated team of educators, we are off and running. Thanks in large part to retired educator and Beaufort resident Noel Tillman, and the leadership of middle school liaisons from each of our north of the Broad River Middle Schools,including the Charters and Beaufort Academy, last week we launched a pilot leadership program for seventh and eighth graders. The ultimate goal is to challenge these students through the pilot program to design and create a program for their fellow students in future years. Running from 9:30 am to 1:00 pm, the program started with a number of "ice breaker" exercises to help the students, 7th and 8th graders from different schools, loosen up to a new experience and get to know students from schools other than their own. Following an introduction to the project, the students toured City Hall offices including building codes and permitting, planning and development, human resources, and finance ending up outside of the City Council Chamber. At that point I took my Mayor's seat in the Chamber and one by one the students marched to the podium where they introduced themselves to the Mayor, something most Beaufortonians unfortunately never do though they are encouraged to attend and participate in our twice a month meetings and three times a month work sessions. I led the group through a typical agenda starting with the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag, followed by public comment where citizens are encouraged to come to the podium and share views on non agenda items. And then through a review of the minutes of past meetings and new and old business where the public is also encouraged to participate. And finally adjournment. Returning back to our class room on the first floor of city hall, we had snacks and were led into an activity of creating ideas for a logo for t-shirts we will get for each student who participates. (Thanks to me and Councilman Stephen Murray's New South Shirts at Kazoobie Kazoos.) Breaking into small groups, using the City's logo, as a starter teams of four drew potential logos which will be judged with a recommendation from the art teachers from the participating schools. The day ended with chatter and feed back from students, a lunch provided by the Boundary Street Cafe and the plan for the next session where students from Whale Branch middle school will host the second meeting. We have a lot to pack into future sessions, not the least of which will be visits to the police and courts departments and, of course many students' favorite, the fire department, which most students already know as the fire department often visits schools to promote fire prevention and safety. And finally, taking what we have learned between now and the final sessions, the students will work collaboratively develop to a plan for next year which could include students conducting public hearings so other students can make their voices heard about life in Beaufort for young people, hopefully a plan for a day of service, attendance at City Council meetings and many other activities related to leadership. If anyone would like to help me with this worthy project, we can use your help paying for the t-shirts, printed materials and lunches. Just send me a note and I will followup. billyk@islc.net Following are photos exhibiting the students at work and hopefully having fun learning about government and leadership. 
|
City Business Licenses
Once again the SC General Assembly seems to be
rearranging the chairs on the decks of the Titanic
If one studies the State House of Representatives, as I have as a former members of that august body, I see an obsession with taxes and literally dozens of proposed changes to the tax laws to bail out a government that has not faced the reality of maintaining cost.
It seems that cutting taxes is the answer to all problems. Accordingly, while there a multitude of proposals to raise one tax there is the notion that one has to balance it out by lowering another tax at the same refusing to repeals sales tax exemptions to special interests.
With the ongoing consideration, by the SC General Assembly, of either doing away with or capping local business licenses, there is a lot of misinformation flowing through the mail and emails between citizens and their representatives.
This is a good discussion as long as the facts are correct and the conversation is civil. Furthermore, business licenses fees, applications and use of revenues should from time to time be reviewed and possibly modified if necessary. But this must be done at the local level and not by legislators in Columbia.
Having been a State Representative, I know that many of these well meaning people, myself included when I served, do not have experience at the local level where the rubber hits the road and where citizens expect services. And they expect them quickly.
Many or these Legislators don't know what citizens go through when their storm water system fails, their roads have potholes that knock their car wheels out of alignment or need paving, and the rights of ways in front of their homes need to be cleaned. Most of those assets are owned by the state, but not taken care of by the state. So local governments squeeze nickles and dimes from our budget to maintain state assets they will not fix. And now they want us to take over their substandard roads, rights of way and storm water systems many of which are broken. And also remove up to 25-50% of the revenue generated by local government.
I may be missing something, but I think business licenses and property taxes, from small businesses and struggling homeowners, are better managed by local governments and not the state. We are in daily contact with our constituents, understand their needs and because we are here on the ground,and seem to handle projects more efficiently and in a less costly manner than Columbia, are in a better position to make these decisions.
A former boss for whom I worked in Washington often told me there is no education in the second kick of the mule"
.
An example, obsessed by cutting taxes at the direction of their pollsters, the legislature continues to enact measures without understanding the on the ground consequences.
Remember Act 388 which was to replace property taxes on owner occupied homes with a penny sales tax? Again while I am sure well meaning, this measure, which they refuse to revisit, has done damage to schools, to businesses and to the state's general fund.
According to the Greenville News, since 2006, school funding from that penny sales tax fell about $1 Billion short of what the legislature projected and the funds are made up through the general fund which takes money from other programs. And then there was the unintended consequence of leaving the 6% assessment on rental units and businesses making renting more expensive and adding a huge cost to small and large businesses alike. And I am told there are more second homes and rental properties on the market than ever before because of the unintended tax increase.
Anyway, as you read about the proposal to cap or do away with business licenses, I wanted to answer some of the basic questions about business licenses that are clearly being misrepresented by Rep Rick Quinn, the author of the measure that would cap or cut business licenses. Unfortunately Rep Quinn cannot see beyond the hallowed halls of the state capital and appears to have not idea of the consequences his measure could bring.
While there is no elected official who likes taxes, in the name of helping those who were damaged by the unintended consequences of Act 388, some of our legislators believe taking away 25-50% of local revenue is going to repair the damage. They are wrong.
Business Licensing FAQs
Why is there a business license tax?
- Businesses locate in cities because of the concentration of commercial activity centered in a city. This commercial activity is supported by city services including police services, fire services, zoning, street lights, sidewalks and many others that can't be paid for on an individual usage basis.
- Most public services such as police, fire, zoning, permitting, economic development activities, sidewalk upkeep and street lights cannot be billed based on consumption. Through a business license tax, businesses together help pay for the city services that all businesses benefit from receiving. If our cities, towns and state are going to thrive, public services must be delivered, and the public must cover the cost to provide those services.
How important is the business license tax to city services?
- No one likes to pay taxes, but funding is necessary to provide the services that businesses need to be successful. Each city council makes a determination, based on local priorities, regarding how to fund its local services. By eliminating the business license tax, cities will face a 25 to 50 percent reduction in funding that will gut their ability to provide services. There is not a city or private business that can lose that percentage of revenue and not cut services.
- There is no alternative revenue stream for cities to use to replace the gap that would be created if cities were to lose a quarter to a half of their funding. City leaders have little flexibility in raising revenue because of Act 388's millage and reassessment caps and restrictions on the use of other revenue sources such as hospitality and accommodations taxes. This is in addition to the shrinking allocation from the Local Government Fund.
- A city's ability to finance equipment or projects will be devastated since lenders require a city to prove it has reliable, uninterrupted revenues that are sufficient to pay back a loan. Cities with existing debt risk default since they counted on business license revenue to help them pay back their loans.
How is the current municipal business license tax calculated for a specific business?
- Using the Municipal Association's model business license ordinance, every business type as defined by the North American Industrial Classification System is placed in a rate classification system. The rate class that a business is placed in depends on the average profitability of that type of business based on IRS income data. Business types with a high profitability history are placed in the highest rate classes. Business types with a low profitability history are placed in lower rate classes.
- Cities determine their own rates for each class based on the council's budgeting priorities and how they may raise revenue based on the profile of their individual community.
- The City of Beaufort has had the same Business License rates for over 7 years as follows:
- A business license tax is calculated by multiplying the rate assigned to the class for that business type by the gross receipts of that business that operates within that city. Gross receipts is used as a general predictor of volume of a business and its dependence on city services.
- o For example, all fast-food restaurants are placed in the same rate class and charged the same business license rate. The difference in what two fast-food restaurants pay in a business license tax is, therefore, the difference in the volume of business of each as measured by gross receipts.
- Historically, over the past 7 years, the City's Business License Tax collections represent an average of 0.2% of the gross sales generated within the City limits.
|
Walmart Coming to Ladys Island?
Since newspapers hit people's front porches announcing that, after abandoning plans several years ago, Walmart is again planning to build a store on Ladys Island at Airport Junction parcel, my phone has been ringing and emails have flowed into my email inbox.
I thought the best way to I explain what I know would be to share the following letter from a Ladys Island resident followed by my reply.
Email Letter from Ladys Island Resident
Dear Billy,
I am a concerned tax payer, who lives on Lady's Island, asking for your guidance on who to contact or the means by which Walmart may be stopped from building here?
The negative economic impact on the businesses that are already here, some homegrown and tremendous assets to Lady's Island and the surrounding communities, is a huge concern to me. I am also concerned about the crime that may following (i.e. the parking lot crime, drug dealing that takes place at our other Walmart) and the impact on our beautiful environment, which will not be just on the area where Walmart will build, but also on our roads when the big Walmart trucks come rolling in and all the traffic that may add to the already congested intersection of 21 and 802.
I will greatly appreciate any advice you are able to give to me.
Best regards
Ladys Island Resident
And My Response
Dear Ladys Island Resident;
I hear your concern and share some of it which is why the city invested several years in court, at a huge taxpayer expense, trying to stop it when the issue surfaced several years ago. Unfortunately, a three judge panel of arbitrators, as required for dispute resolution in development agreements, unanimously found in favor of the property owner. I have asked myself again and again, should we spend more taxpayer dollars to fight a fight we have lost and attorneys say we will lose again. And I have concluded the answer is no. Rather we should focus our energies on enforcing the agreement as to building placement, buffers, storm water and other requirements.
The property was created under a Planned Unit Development (PUD) by Beaufort County Council. When the property was annexed into the City, the rights and responsibilities of the PUD and the corresponding development agreement came with the property. At some point the City renewed the agreement post annexation. ( I think before my time on Council.)
The PUD and development agreement had images of "what might be built" (which I think the county and city expected could be built). They also had verbiage which committed to number of square feet of development allowed on the property but did not dictate the size of placement of buildings.
The judges agreed unanimously that the property owner had rights determined by the words in the agreement and not the images which were simply "illustrative."
Once the City lost, however, the land owner graciously agreed to concessions including a requirement that a building not be more than 150,000 sf and that if built it would located to the rear of the property facing the airport and not highway 21. He also agreed that parking for such a building would also be set to the rear between the building and the airport. And he also agreed to maximum sizes of buildings on outparcels facing highway 21 and to a large landscaped buffer along highway 21.
I understand that some businesses could suffer loss of business by the competition of a Walmart as businesses on Hilton Head Island have lost to big boxes in Bluffton and businesses in downtown Beaufort, Burton and Port Royal lost business to the Walmart on highway 170.
That said, it is not within the purview of a city to pick winners and losers. The market determines what works for businesses and not the government. Retailers and other developers make decisions, based on scientific research, about where their markets are: how many houses, the demographics characteristics of the people who live in the market area and so on. Apparently since they are making such a huge investment, due to land cost, changing the elevation of the property to meet codes and costs associated with traffic control, they must see a market for a successful business.
Again, based on the past history where the city went to the mat, spent a large amount of taxpayer dollars fighting the last proposal and our attorneys say there is no way to win, I have to tell you that I believe there is little the city can do other than to make sure the developer abides by the rules for setbacks, environmental protection related to storm water management and SCDOT and County traffic requirements. Based on the one discussion I have had with the developer, I have no reason to believe they will not.
I wish I could give you the answer you want, but I have to be as forthright as possible in sharing my knowledge and analysis of the situation.
Best Wishes
Billyk
|
Adding Insult to Injury
If you want to better understand what appears to be a faltering relationship between local government and you may want to read the following from The Post and Courier.
House approves bill that streamlines local governments' funds
I would love to be able to work more closely with State Legislators as I am confident I can learn from them and they can better understand local government. This just does not seem to happen which is unfortunate and the taxpayers pay a high price for this breakdown in communication and the absence of collaboration.
|
Military and Veterans Service Alliance
of The Lowcountry, South Carolina
www.mavsasc.org
For Immediate Release
The Honorable Duffie Stone, Solicitor for the 14th Judicial Circuit, will speak about a new initiative, a Veterans' Court, on Tuesday, March 17th, at AMVETS Post 70, 1831 Ribaut Road, Port Royal.
The meeting will start at 11 a.m.
NBC News recently featured a story about the establishment of veterans' courts by district attorneys and solicitors in various locations. The South Carolina Judicial Department Solicitors bring matters not only to judicial courts but also manage administrative and diversion programs to assist individuals and families.
A veterans' court integrates community services and mentors to specifically focus on the needs of veterans.
The bimonthly general membership meetings gather representatives from MAVSA organizations to network and to become aware of the full range of services available locally. The members highlight areas where they have found that veterans need assistance.
Representatives of veterans organizations, planning to attend, should notify MAVSA through its website, www.mavsasc.org. Veterans and their family members are welcome to attend.
- 30 -
For further information, please call Jim Moore 384-2071.
|
It's one thing to be opposed to off shore seismic testing and drilling for oil and gas.
It is another to be showing an alternative.
Hats off to North Myrtle Beach
North Myrtle Beach & Wind - Bold, Radical, Transformation
by Phil Noble
When such words as 'bold, transformational, radical, game changing' are used, North Myrtle Beach doesn't exactly spring to mind. Until now, the city has been best known as the home of Vanna White, the lovely and talented letter turner on the TV game show Wheel of Fortune. But this is getting ready to change as all these words can accurately be used to describe their newly announced wind energy initiative.
First the background: as regular readers of this space know, we're big on the wind energy possibilities for South Carolina. God has blessed us with the potential to become the Saudi Arabia of wind. Just off our coast are winds that can power shallow water windmills that can not only provide energy but can create a whole wind energy economic cluster that can drive innovation, power high tech research and create thousands of jobs for the people of our state.
And North Myrtle Beach just took a huge leapfrog jump that will move us closer to these goals. What they have done is truly astounding.
Four years ago, with virtually no notice, the North Strand Coastal Wind Team was formed to begin working on this issue and to create North Myrtle Beach as a "demonstration city in the area of alternative energy." As reported by CleanEnergy.org, The Team Wind grew to become a broad and diverse grassroots coalition of organizations, businesses and individuals in and around North Myrtle Beach, implementing numerous innovative education and advocacy efforts to promote wind energy development.
The Team includes folks from Clemson and Coastal Carolina Universities, Grand Strand SCORE, the Jim Caudle Reef Foundation, Myrtle Beach Regional Economic Development Corporation, North Myrtle Beach Energy Office, North Myrtle Beach Sea Turtle Patrol, North Myrtle Beach Chamber of Commerce, Orangeburg-Calhoun Technical College, Santee Cooper, Savannah River National Laboratory, SC Sea Grant Consortium and the City of North Myrtle Beach.
In mid-November, the City of North Myrtle Beach issued a proclamation officially becoming a "wind powered economic zone" with the radically audacious goal of being "able to provide the equivalent of 100% of its power usage from a nearby offshore wind farm in the not too distant future."
This is a stunning example of visionary public policy leadership - it's bold, clearly defined, with a specific goal and time-table, and a road map of how they will do it.
There are a number of aspects of this initiative that are really innovative and important as examples of what can be done in our state.
First, it's about jobs. The development plan aims to lead to the creation of many new businesses with new stable jobs that cannot be outsourced to China. The wind is here and the economic development spin-off companies and benefits will stay right here in South Carolina. And these are quality jobs, not minimum wage seasonal jobs that have been the hallmark of the Grand Strand tourism-based economy.
Second, it creates renewable energy goals that are attractive to quality companies. All over the world, businesses are increasingly realizing that our world's economic health is dependent on our world's environmental health. Sustainable development is not just some tree hugging environmentalist's latest catchphrase - it's a viable and profitable business strategy and regions that understand this attract these quality companies.
Third, the business structure is bold and innovative. The initiative is creating a for-profit stock company that will invest in the transmission cables that will bring the power to shore from the wind farm. The stock company will seek investment from not only financial institutions but also from the City of North Myrtle Beach and the citizens themselves. Thus, with this investment cash in hand, wind farm developers will be able to move faster and more effectively to get the windmills and transmission facilities up and running quickly.
Fourth, this initiative can be an important new development to change and enhance the global perception and image of who we are as a state. In the globally connected economy and information environment of the Digital Age, branding is hugely important. This is true for companies, for colleges and universities, and for nations and states. It would be a mild understatement to say that South Carolina's brand is suffering in the global marketplace.
While we are justifiably proud of such world class assets as BMW, Boeing, Spoleto Festival, etc., most of the world still thinks of us in terms of the stereotypes of the Dukes of Hazards or, more recently, of our former Governor's affinity for the Appalachian Trail.
This is truly a potentially transformational development in our state. It is a bold, market-based initiative that will provide good jobs, reliable energy and launch South Carolina on the road to staking a claim to being a global leader in an increasingly important economic sector of the future.
And the fact that it came from North Myrtle Beach should inspire others. All areas of our state need to look at themselves differently, find the hidden assets, build creative partnerships and most of all dream big.
This is how South Carolina can become world class and globally connected.
Phil Noble is a businessman in Charleston and is President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Renowned Beaufort Artist Rebecca Davenport Exhibits at USCB Center for the Arts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|