11th September 2012

                                                                                                         

Issue 35/2012

PMA Australia logo

      Newsline

GST Back In The Headlines 

How many years has PMA been "banging on" about the inequity of the current $1000 threshold on imports?


I will not bore you with the details:


Of hundreds of emails, in the time spent in  pressure groups formed with initially PICA, then COSBOA,then the  Fair Imports Alliance and now The Australian Retailers Association,


In the numerous submissions to individual ministers, then the Productivity Commission then the Low Value imports enquiry.


Then to have major retailers have the issue "blow up in their face" with poorly directed  press statements prior to last Xmas .


This issue seemed to be getting nowhere....
 
HOWEVER, last Friday morning there was some great news. 

 

The NSW Treasurer, Mike Baird proposes a dramatic lowering of the GST free threshold, in order to raise hundreds of millions of dollars for a cash strapped State budget.
 
This is the first time a Senior State Govt official has backed the inequity of the current system (or is it the sniff of some cash being available?).
 
Now let's see if The Feds will agree!   

 

 

Kind Regards

Peter Rose

Director of Australian Activities

 

In This Issue
The Age Article on GST
Low Value Parcel Processing Report
An interesting way of looking at Taxes
Everything old is new again - By Andrew Mason
Upcoming Events

Your PMA Australia Executive

 National Chairperson

Phil Gresham
philip@fotofast.com.au

 

Eastern Region TVP

and NSW Chairperson

John Ralph

jrcamerahouse@bigpond.com

 

WA, SA, NT, QLD TVP

and QLD Chairperson

Andrew Mason 

print@photocontinental.com.au

 

 TAS Chairperson

Tim Jones

 tim@perfectprints.com.au

 

VIC Chairperson

Jeff Crowley

jeff.crowley@fujifilm.com.au

 

SA Chairperson

Paul Atkins

paul@atkins.com.au

 

WA Chairperson

Murray Gibbs

murray@ggch.com.au

 

Director of Australian Activities

Peter Rose

prose@pmai.org

  

Australian Directors for PMA

John Paxton

jpaxton@paxtons.com.au 

Len Sandler

len.sandler@starshots.com.au

 

PPFA Chairperson

Bob Smith

bob@classicframing.com.au

 

APCI Chairperson

Paul Atkins

paul@atkins.com.au

 

PSPA Chairperson

Paul Dawson

pd@hydrophotographics.com.au

 

PIEA Chairperson

Earle Bridger

e.bridger@griffith.edu.au

 

PMA Australia Office

02 9454 2444

pmaaustralia@pmai.org


Editor

Glynn Lavender

pmaaustralia@pmai.org

 

The Age article on GST threshold

With GST the talking point in NSW at the moment here is another timely article from The Age.

 

 

Deborah Gough
Published: September 9, 2012 - 3:00AM

 

 

A GOODS and services tax on overseas online purchases will make Australian retailers only slightly more competitive, and will not be the adrenalin shot needed to revive local shopping, analysts and retailers say.

 

A federal taskforce study has given support to lowering the $1000 threshold on GST on imported goods, saying the cost of collecting the revenue may not be as high as previously suggested by a Productivity Commission report.

 

But, said Deakin University lecturer in consumer marketing Michael Callaghan, shoppers who bought from overseas websites would not be deterred by a 10 per cent rise through the GST, because they often saved up to 50 per cent.

 

''It is not going to alter shopping behaviour, that will just continue,'' Mr Callaghan said. ''If they do their sums, if it was 10 per cent less they [consumers] would probably go to the local shops for it, but anything more and they will continue to go where it is cheapest.''

 

A National Australia Bank study released this month showed international online sales made up only 28 per cent of total online sales; the rest were from domestic retailers.

 

In the year to June, the NAB Online Retail Sales Index found, traditional retail spending was at $220 billion while online retail spending was at $11.7 billion.

 

Australian Retailers Association chief executive officer Russell Zimmerman agreed that lowering the GST threshold was only part of the problem for local retailers.

 

''It is not the silver bullet, there are three or four other barriers to more competitive pricing for Australian retailers,'' Mr Zimmerman said.

 

Wage rates for local shop assistants that were higher than in other countries and the cost of retail space were two of the factors that most affected the price of goods in shops, he said.

 

Mr Zimmerman pointed to Morgan Stanley research released in July that showed retailers paid up to three times more per square metre in rent than for comparable space in the United States.

 

The study into the GST threshold by the Low Value Parcel Processing Taskforce was released last week by the Assistant Treasurer, David Bradbury.

 

The taskforce estimated that if the threshold was lowered to $500, it would cost $20 to collect $60 in GST revenue per item, on average.

 

If the threshold was lowered to zero, the cost would be $12 for a $7 GST return per item.

 

The government has not responded to the recommendations but told the ABC that any change would affect Customs and Australia Post and freight companies.

 

''Even if we pass a law and say you have to register for GST, the difficulty we have is when they thumb their nose at us and say, 'Well, we're not going to','' Mr Bradbury said.

 

''At that point we have an enforcement issue''.

Low Value Parcel Processing Task Force Report

 

Retailers welcome viable recommendations to reduce GST threshold

- Low Value Parcel Processing Taskforce final report released TODAY

 

·         Recommendations emphasise GST equality, economic advantage, community benefit

 

·         $272 million in potential revenue for states and territories in 2014

 

·         Equal trading environment for traditional, online & multichannel retailers in Australia

 

Peak retail industry body the Australian Retailers Association (ARA) today welcomed the Low Value Parcel Processing Taskforce's final report and said it outlined a comprehensive and economically propitious plan towards achieving a level playing field for online, traditional and multichannel Australian retailers alike.


Get access to the full ARA Press Release here

You can access the full Government report here

GST has certainly become a hot topic again!

 

 

An interesting way of looking at Taxes!

Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for all ten comes to $100.

If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this: The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing. The fifth would pay $1. The sixth would pay $3. The seventh would pay $7. The eighth would pay $12. The ninth would pay $18. The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59. So, that's what they decided to do.

The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve. 'Since you are all such good customers, he said, 'I'm going to reduce the cost of your daily beer by $20. Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.

The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes so the first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free. But what about the other six men - the paying customers? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair share?'

They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtracted that from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man would each end up being paid to drink his beer.

So, the bar owner suggested that it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the same amount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay. And so: The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings). The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33%savings). The seventh now pay $5 instead of $7 (28%savings). The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings). The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings). The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings). Each of the six was better off than before. And the first four continued to drink for free.

But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings. 'I only got a dollar out of the $20,'declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man,' but he got $10!' 'Yeah, that's right,' exclaimed the fifth man. 'I only saved a dollar, too. It's unfair that he got ten times more than I!' 'That's true!!' shouted the seventh man. 'Why should he get $10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!'

'Wait a minute,' yelled the first four men in unison. 'We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!'

The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.

The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine sat down and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn't have enough money between all of them for even half of the bill!

And that is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just may not show up anymore.
  

 

 Thanks to Ormond Williams for sending this through.

  

Everything old is new again... Or is the Kodak Box Brownie the new Lomography Camera - by Andrew Mason

According to the Wikipedia web page most Lomographic cameras are designed to produce photographic effects such as over-saturated colors, extreme optical distortion, off kilter exposures, blurring and alternative film processing. All things in today's digital world that are usually considered bad in photography. In fact the Lomography motto is "Don't think just shoot"

 

With the very large numbers of films from these cameras that we develop and print here in the laboratory this is most certainly the case. Technically these cameras are deliberately low - fidelity and constructed to ensure their mechanics are not too technical; some even make use of light leaks.

At Photocontinental we are seeing an ever increasing number of young photographers taking this concept one step further by using cameras from the Kodak Box Brownie range and many other old cameras to achieve similar wacky results.

They are buying them through second hand stores, on eBay, car boot sales, flea markets etc, but the most interesting and exciting area and one that has generated a lot of interest is that of Kodak Box Brownie cameras that were purchased by family members.

In fact a couple of years ago I shot off some 127 size rolls through a camera my late Step Father had with him in Syria during WW2.

It gave me great pleasure to put two prints in my album taken on the same camera over 60 years apart, sure there was a little light fogging, and the lens was not the sharpest but it was a satisfying experience.

Just a couple of weeks ago we had a customer that wanted to photograph his Mother on the occasion of her 80thbirthday using her Kodak 620 Box Brownie camera. I managed to purchase a second hand 620 spool and loaded a roll of black & white film for this exercise.

He will bring the film to us for processing and all of us in the lab are looking forward to seeing the results.

The Kodak Box Brownie camera range was launched over a century ago in February 1900 it started it s life as basically a box with a hole in, Eastman Kodak went on to sell millions and millions of them all over the world.

So for those keen young photographers who wish to get on the Kodak Box Brownie band wagon there are many thousands out there to buy. We also have a range of Holga Cameras. Click here to view the range.

If you have any questions re the processing of films from the Kodak Box Brownie range or any films in general, just contact us at print@photocontinental.com.au

Andrew Mason

  Box Brownie

 

  

 

 

PMA Calendar  2012

Tuesday 18th September                    PMA QLD Meeting

                                                        Pig N' Whistle Riverside

                                                        Brisbane