AMAZING VISIBLE EVIDENCE PROVING THE BOOK OF ENOCH. By Simon Brown.
AMAZING VISIBLE EVIDENCE PROVING
 THE BOOK OF ENOCH.
By Simon Brown.

Dear friends as you may know I recently presented evidence of: THE BOOK OF ENOCH.

Well, how about this VISIBLE evidence for the many Bible believers who refuse to believe the prophet of GOD, Enoch was considered as the original author of the famous BOOK OF ENOCH, who was the son of Jared (Genesis 5:19-21), the father of Methuselah, and the great-grandfather of Noah.

I always like to remind people regarding the accuracy of Jesus teachings when He said: SEEK AND YOU WILL FIND. Matthew7:7.

Well, I keep seeking and I keep finding.

In this weeks research I decided to see if there was any VISIBLE EVIDENCE OF THE BOOK OF ENOCH. 

Please may I remind you about a small part written in: THE BOOK OF ENOCH regarding a fallen group of angels called the Watchers?

[Chapter 6]
1 And it came to pass when the children of men had multiplied that in those days were born unto 2 them beautiful and comely daughters. And the angels, the children of the heaven, saw and lusted after them, and said to one another: 'Come, let us choose us wives from among the children of men 3 and beget us children.' And Semjaza, who was their leader, said unto them: 'I fear ye will not 4 indeed agree to do this deed, and I alone shall have to pay the penalty of a great sin.' And they all answered him and said: 'Let us all swear an oath, and all bind ourselves by mutual imprecations 5 not to abandon this plan but to do this thing.' Then sware they all together and bound themselves 6 by mutual imprecations upon it. 

And they were in all two hundred; who descended in the days of Jared on the summit of
Mount Hermon,
and they called it 
Mount Hermon,
 because they had sworn 
7 and bound themselves by mutual imprecations upon it. And these are the names of their leaders: Samlazaz, their leader, Araklba, Rameel, Kokablel, Tamlel, Ramlel, Danel, Ezeqeel, Baraqijal, 8 Asael, Armaros, Batarel, Ananel, Zaq1el, Samsapeel, Satarel, Turel, Jomjael, Sariel. These are their chiefs of tens.

As we have read above in: THE BOOK OF ENOCH.
Enoch describes a Mounting called: Mount Hermon.
And it is on this very mounting where Enoch describes in his book an event took place that changed history. 
And it was on this very Mountain where an angel of GOD Semj�z�, who was one of the leaders of the Watchers all agreed to swear an oath together and decided to disobey GOD and leave there positions.

The question that comes to mind.
Could there be any proof confirming the stories written in THE BOOK OF ENOCH?
Evidence proves things to be true, and seeing is believing, so surely if the BOOK OF ENOCH has any truth, there would be proof to still see today and we could still find a place called Mount Hermon as told by in THE BOOK OF ENOCH.

Thank GOD for the good side of the Internet, as a simple 10 second search by typing in Mount Hermon brought me to a real place that truly does exist called Mount Hermon.

And even better evidence supporting THE BOOK OF ENOCH is the fact that the word: Mount Hermon means ("Mountain of the Chief")

AMAZING VISIBLE EVIDENCE PROVING THE BOOK OF ENOCH. By Simon Brown.
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AGolan_Heights_relief_v2.png
By Golan_Heights_relief_v1.jpg: Kbh3rd derivative work: Night w (Golan_Heights_relief_v1.jpg) [CC BY-SA 3.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0) or GFDL (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/fdl.html)], via Wikimedia Commons

Mount Hermon's summit straddles the border between Lebanon and Syria.
Location Syria (southern slopes are located in the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights) Lebanon Parent range Anti-Lebanon mountain range

Wow, so as we see Mount Hermon is translated as the person who was the ("Mountain of the Chief") 
who was as we have read the leader of the Watchers who is Semj�z�.

I have added some more info about the Mount Hermon below from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 

Mount Hermon (Arabic: جبل الشيخ or جبل حرمون / ALA-LC: Jabal al-Shaykh ("Mountain of the Chief") or Jabal Haramun; Hebrew: הר חרמון, Har Hermon, "Mount Hermon") is a mountain cluster constituting the southern end of the Anti-Lebanon mountain range. Its summit straddles the border between Syria and Lebanon[1] and, at 2,814 m (9,232 ft) above sea level, is the highest point in Syria.[2] On the top, in the United Nations buffer zone between Syria and Israeli-occupied territory, is the highest permanently manned UN position in the world, known as "Hermon Hotel". The southern slopes of Mount Hermon extend to the Israeli-occupied portion of the Golan Heights, where the Mount Hermon ski resort is located. A peak in this area rising to 2,236 m (7,336 ft) is the highest elevation in Israeli-controlled territory.

Epigraphy, archaeology and references in religious texts
In the Book of Enoch, Mount Hermon is the place where the Watcher class of fallen angels descended to Earth. They swear upon the mountain that they would take wives among the daughters of men and take mutual imprecation for their sin (Enoch 6). The mountain or summit is referred to as Saphon in Ugaritic texts where the palace of Baal is located in a myth about Attar.[5][6] The Book of Chronicles also mentions Mount Hermon as a place where Epher, Ishi, Eliel, Azriel, Jeremiah, Hodaviah and Jahdiel were the heads of their families.[7] R.T. France, in his book on the Gospel of Matthew, noted that Mount Hermon was a possible location of the Transfiguration of Jesus.[8]

Various Temples of Mount Hermon can be found in villages on the slopes. There is a sacred building made of hewn blocks of stone on the summit of Mount Hermon. Known as Qasr Antar, it is the highest temple of the ancient world and was documented by Sir Charles Warren in 1869. An inscription on a limestone stele recovered by Warren from Qasr Antar was translated by George Nickelsburg to read "According to the command of the greatest a (nd) Holy God, those who take an oath (proceed) from here." Nickelsburg connected the inscription with oath taken by the angels under Semjaza who took an oath together, bound by a curse in order to take wives in the Book of Enoch (1 Enoch 6:6). Hermon was said to have become known as "the mountain of oath" by Charles Simon Clermont-Ganneau. The name of God was supposed to be a Hellenized version of Baʿal or Hadad and Nickelsburg connected it with the place name of Baal-Hermon (Lord of Hermon) and the deity given by Enoch as "The Great Holy One".[9] The mountain was said to have become known as "the mountain of oath" by Charles Simon Clermont-Ganneau. Eusebius recognized the religious importance of Hermon in his work Onomasticon, saying "Until today, the mount in front of Panias and Lebanon is known as Hermon and it is respected by nations as a sanctuary". It has been related to the Arabic term al-haram, which means "sacred enclosure".[10] Another Greek inscription found in a large temple at Deir El Aachayer on the northern slopes notes the year that a bench was installed "in the year 242, under Beeliabos, also called Diototos, son of Abedanos, high priest of the gods of Kiboreia". The era of the gods of Kiboreia is not certain, nor is their location which is not conclusively to be identified with Deir al-Achayer, but was possibly the Roman sanctuary or the name of a settlement in the area.[11]

In Song of Songs 4:8, Hermon is an instance of an exotic locale, and the Song of Ascents as well as Psalm 133:3 make specific reference to the abundant dew formation upon Mount Hermon. See link to full article below.

I believe this is overwhelming proof that adds to the authenticity of THE BOOK OF ENOCH.

Why do so many Bible believers reject the Book of Enoch?

Certain Unitarians.
Well, from my research which I recently talked about here, although certain Unitarians agree with the part of Enoch not believing Jesus was the SUPREME GOD, it seems they reject the book of Enoch because they believe Jesus did not exist before being born by Mary, and was not a real physical person, but was just a plan in GODS mind.

Well, Enoch in his book proves their theory wrong by saying: the
Son of Man, BEFORE COMING DOWN ON THIS EARTH TO BRING SALVATION TO MANKIND, HAD WALKED THROUGH THE COURTS OF HEAVENLY GLORY WITH HIS FATHER, THE FATHER OF ALL; AND THAT HE HAD TURNED HIS BACK UPON ALL THIS GRANDEUR AND GLORY TO COME DOWN ON EARTH TO PROCLAIM SALVATION TO NEEDY MORTALS.
And these certain Unitarians also believe in the doctrine of soul sleep which I will explain the meaning of below.

Jehovah Witnesses.
We then have the Jehovah Witnesses who are very nice people and kindly come to my home weekly who I have been debating for some time, who also reject what's written in the Book of Enoch.

Why?
Because I believe one of the main reasons is the Jehovah Witnesses also believe in the doctrine of soul sleep, which is the belief that when we die we are dead and are just a memory in GODS mind, and there is no spiritual prison called Hades, which they believe is a grave.

The fact is, Enoch wrote in great detail about death and about the soul, by saying the body and soul were TWO separate parts, and the soul in the human body survived the physical death which is perfectly in line with what Jesus taught in the story of Lazarus and the rich man in Luke 16:19. 
You are welcome to have your say by leaving a comment on my popular film here.

And what is written in the book of ENOCH also confirms with what Jesus taught in Matthew 10:28 when He said: 
And do not fear those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather fear him who can destroy both soul and body in hell.
When Jesus came 1000's of years later He confirmed exactly with what Enoch had already stated that the souls of humans do not die except the body.

In the book of Enoch and THE GREEK TEXT OF THE 7Q ENOCH FRAGMENTS, found with the Dead Sea Scrolls, there is a terrifying statement by ENOCH, which reads:
And the spirits of you who have died in righteousness shall live and rejoice, And their spirits shall not perish, nor their memorial from before the face of the Great One unto all the generations of the world: wherefore no longer fear their contumely.
17.5. And you, dead sinners.
19.7. You yourselves know that they will drag down your souls to Hades, and they will remain there in great anguish 7. Know ye, that their souls will be made to descend into Sheol and they shall be wretched in their great tribulation.
You are welcome to read the full article here.

The Jehovah Witnesses also believe Jesus is Michael the (Archangel).
Again the Book of Enoch makes no mention of Jesus being Michael the (Archangel). But instead says Michael was one of the angels who was sent by GOD to make judgement of the associates of Samyaza which is described below.

And the Lord said unto Michael: "Go, bind Semj�z� and his associates who have united themselves with women so as to have defiled themselves with them in all their uncleanness. And when their sons have slain one another, and they have seen the destruction of their beloved ones, bind them fast for seventy generations in the valleys of the earth, till the day of their judgement and of their consummation, till the judgement that is for ever and ever is consummated. In those days they shall be led off to the abyss of fire:〈and〉to the torment and the prison in which they shall be confined for ever. And whosoever shall be condemned and destroyed will from thenceforth be bound together with them to the end of all generations ..." (Enoch 10:11-14)

After the destruction of the Giants, God caused the Great Flood (Noah's flood) to wipe out the humans who had become corrupted.

And Jesus in The Book of Enoch was the second greatest figure after GOD, as Enoch called Jesus the messiah, the righteous one, "the chosen one" and the son of man making it impossible for Jesus to be Michael the (archangel).

Although Jehovah Witnesses agree with the part of Enoch not believing Jesus was the SUPREME GOD, I am fairly confident the soul sleep doctrine and the fact Enoch proves Jesus and Michael are not one and the same person reveals to me at least the reason why Jehovah Witnesses have rejected and taken a disliking to the book of Enoch.

But why was The Book of Enoch not included in either the Hebrew or most Christian biblical canons, but was considered a sacred text by others, If it is the inspired writings of Enoch you may be thinking?

It is interesting to note that when the first Trinitarians views were being established from Ignatius of Antioch from what I have read, were the first to support the Trinity in about 110 ad.
The arguments and debates regarding the nature of God the Father and the Son, continued for around another 300 years, leading to the end of the 4th century.

Well, what a coincidence.
I also read It just happens to be that it was in this time frame: 
Of the second century A.D. that the Book of Enoch was pronounced a curse upon those who believed it (Delitzsch, p. 223). So the book was denounced, banned, cursed, no doubt burned and shredded - and last but not least, lost (and conveniently forgotten) for a thousand years. But with an uncanny persistence, the Book of Enoch found its way back into circulation two centuries ago. Reff, Author: David Chariot.

This seems to make sense to why the first ever Trinitarians did not like what Enoch had written and revealed.

Remember the first ever Trinitarians where very busy arguing and debating the nature of God the Father and the Son, and posed people to believe in the Trinity, and the ones who would not believe and follow the Trinity were exiled to Illyria, in addition to being excommunicated. The works of Arius were ordered to be confiscated and consigned to the flames while all persons found possessing them were to be executed.

We know as a fact the first ever Trinitarians must have read the book of Enoch because Christians once accepted the words of this Book of Enoch as authentic scripture, and it was known to the apostles of Christ, and many of the early church fathers supported the Enochian writings.

And how about this?
In an article called: Who Decided What went into the Bible? On the website of http://www.biblestudytools.com.

It reads the following.
The church developed its list of canonical books. The following are guidelines for accepting a book into the New Testament:

1.     Was the book written by a prophet of God?

My answer is yes, Enoch was the son of Jared (Genesis 5:19-21),

2.     Was the writer confirmed by acts of God?

My answer is yes, reluctant-messenger.com writes:
There is abundant proof that Christ approved of the Book of Enoch. Over a hundred phrases in the New Testament find precedents in the Book of Enoch.

3.     Does the message tell the truth about God?

My answer is yes, the book of Enoch completely agrees with Genesis 6:4. 
English Standard Version.
The Nephilim were on the earth in those days, and also afterward, when the sons of God came in to the daughters of man and they bore children to them. These were the mighty men who were of old, the men of renown.

The story of the nephilim is further elaborated in the Book of Enoch. The Greek, Aramaic, and main Ge'ez manuscripts of 1 Enoch and Jubilees obtained in the 19th century and held in the British Museum and Vatican Library, connect the origin of the nephilim with the fallen angels, and in particular with the egrḗgoroi (watchers). Samyaza, an angel of high rank, is described as leading a rebel sect of angels in a descent to earth to have sexual intercourse with human females: From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 

4.     Did it come with the power of God?

My answer is yes.
These recount how Enoch was taken up to Heaven and was appointed guardian of all the celestial treasures, chief of the archangels, and the immediate attendant on God's throne. He was subsequently taught all secrets and mysteries and, with all the angels at his back, fulfils of his own accord whatever comes out of the mouth of God, executing His decrees. Much esoteric literature like the 3rd Book of Enoch identifies Enoch as the Metatron, the angel which communicates God's word. In consequence, Enoch was seen, by this literature, and the Rabbinic kabbala of Jewish mysticism, as having been the one which communicated God's revelation to Moses, in particular, the dictator of the Book of Jubilees.

5. Was it accepted by God's people?

My answer is yes, as we have read above by Christians who once accepted the words of this Book of Enoch as authentic scripture, and the apostles of Christ knew it, and many of the early church fathers supported the Enochian writings.


Initial acceptance by people to whom the work was addressed was crucial. What was the original audience's sense? Did they accept the book as an authoritative word from God? Daniel, who lived within a few years of Jeremiah, called Jeremiah's book "Scripture" in Daniel 9:2. Paul called the Gospel of Luke "Scripture" in 1 Timothy 5:18. Peter affirmed that Paul's letters were "Scripture" in 2 Peter 3:16.

So as we have read above, the following was a guideline for accepting a book into the New Testament. 

And yet as I have pointed out above, there were 5 guidelines that were used for accepting a book into the New Testament.
And the fact that a prophet of GOD confirmed and accepted a book as an authoritative.

Jude the half brother of Jesus.
And yet, Jude the half brother of Jesus gives a DIRECT REFERENCE to THE BOOK OF ENOCH, and writes below an identical statement WORD for WORD By saying in Jude 1:14-15
It was also about these that Enoch, the seventh from Adam, prophesied, saying, "Behold, the Lord comes with ten thousands of his holy ones, 15 to execute judgment on all and to convict all the ungodly of all their deeds of ungodliness that they have committed in such an ungodly way, and of all the harsh things that ungodly sinners have spoken against him."

THE QUOTE BY ENOCH'S BOOK,
Chapter 2:1
Behold, he comes with ten thousands of his saints, to execute judgment upon them, and destroy the wicked, and reprove all the carnal for everything which the sinful and ungodly have done, and committed against him. (2)
 Quoted by Jude, vss. 14, 15.

So what happened to THE BOOK OF ENOCH that fits every single guideline for accepting it as a book to be added into the New Testament?

Now it is starting to be very easy to understand why the first ever Trinitarians did not add the book of Enoch to Christian biblical canon.
Because Enoch also believed Jesus was the SON of GOD and NOT the ONE TRUE SUPREME GOD.

And as THE COUNCIL OF LAODICEA were the people who finely decided what was to be added in the Bible which proves they did not agree with it and must have been the same people to leave the book of Enoch out of Christian biblical canon.

So it is clear to me at least, the main culprits who first rejected Enoch's writings were at: THE COUNCIL OF LAODICEA in 364 A.D, who are the same people who finely put our Bible together, who are the same people who passed the Trinity doctrine. 

So it is obvious to me the first ever Trinitarians at THE COUNCIL OF LAODICEA rejected the book of Enoch because Enoch was NOT a Trinitarian but believed in a monotheistic religion and did not believe in a " tritheism" (three Gods) nor even two.

Enoch believes God is one, and that God is a single being just as it is strongly declared in the Bible.

Remember it was the First Council of Nicaea who were the same people that the main accomplishments were settlement of the Christological issue of the nature of the Son of God and his relationship to God the Father, the construction of the first part of the Creed of Nicaea, establishing uniform observance of the date of Easter, and promulgation of early canon law. Reff: 
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia, 

Finally I would like to leave you with this article by reluctant-messenger.

This and many other books became discredited after the Council of Laodicea.

THE COUNCIL OF LAODICEA IN PHRYGIA PACATIANA 364 A.D.
What are the lost books of the Bible? They were texts and letters suppressed by early "Church Fathers". There was an important historical event, back in the 4th century. It is called the Council of Laodicea. It changed history two significant ways. At this council they determined what would and would not be considered canon. They decided what would and would not be included in the Bible or read at church. (Canon #60.)
It gets interesting when you consider the second implication of what was published. They published, in total, 60 cannons at this council, thus codifying church doctrine. During the 2nd and 3rd centuries, Christians were in the habit of keeping both Saturday and Sunday. In fact Ethiopian Christians still do today. During that time, Christians rested on the Sabbath (in the Lord) and had communion or fellowship on Sundays. The Church fathers at the Council of Laodicea were not opposed to Sunday services but were opposed to Christians Judaizing the Sabbath (see 29th Canon), Judaizing is what they labled Christians resting on the Sabbath day. At the Coucil of Laodicea, they published as doctrine that the practice of staying at home and resting on the Sabbath was sinful and anathema to Christ.

Satan managed to deceive well intentioned men to ignore the most important day of all. The day of having God dwell in the hearts of men! The true meaning of the Sabbath! If you read The Epistle of Barnabus, Chapter 13, you will see why in light of the 29th Canon they had to ban the text from the New Testament. There are sources today that quote the Epistle of Barnabus to justify going to Church on Sunday, but they completely miss the fact the text explains why one shouldn't trust going to a building made of hands as part of Sabbath worship. That is not how to obey God and keep the Sabbath. (Lev 23:3, Sabbath is to be kept in one's dwelling) The Church Fathers couldn't ban Sabbath keeping and then allow a text to become canon that admonishes Christians on the proper way to keep the Sabbath!"

CANON XXIX.

CHRISTIANS must not judaize by resting on the Sabbath, but must work on that day, rather honouring the Lord's Day; and, if they can, resting then as Christians. But if any shall be found to be judaizers, let them be anathema from Christ.

CANON LX.

THESE are all the books of Old Testament appointed to be read: 1, Genesis of the world; 2, The Exodus from Egypt; 3, Leviticus; 4, Numbers; 5, Deuteronomy; 6, Joshua, the son of Nun; 7, Judges, Ruth; 8, Esther; 9, Of the Kings, First and Second; 10, Of the Kings, Third and Fourth; 11, Chronicles, First and Second; 12, Esdras, First and Second; 13, The Book of Psalms; 14, The Proverbs of Solomon; 15, Ecclesiastes; 16, The Song of Songs;17, Job; 18, The Twelve Prophets; 19, Isaiah; 20, Jeremiah, and Baruch, the Lamentations, and the Epistle; 21, Ezekiel; 22, Daniel.

And these are the books of the New Testament: Four Gospels, according to Matthew, Mark, Luke and John; The Acts of the Apostles; Seven Catholic Epistles, to wit, one of James, two of Peter, three of John, one of Jude; Fourteen Epistles of Paul, one to the Romans, two to the Corinthians, one to the Galatians, one to the Ephesians, one to the Philippians, one to the Colossians, two to the Thessalonians, one to the Hebrews, two to Timothy, one to Titus, and one to Philemon.

Books banned by the Council of Laodicea

Barnabas
I Clement
II Clement
Christ and Abgarus
The Apostles' Creed
I Hermas-Visions
II Hermas-Commands
III Hermas-Similitudes
Ephesians
I Infancy
II Infancy
Mary
Magnesians
Nicodemus
Paul and Seneca
Paul and Thecla
Philippians
Philadelphians
Polycarp
Romans
Trallians
Letters of Herod and Pilate
The First Book of Adam and Eve
The Second Book of Adam and Eve
The Secrets of Enoch
The Psalms of Solomon
The Odes of Solomon
The Fourth Book of Maccabees
The Story of Ahikar
The Testament of Reuben
Asher
Joseph
Simeon
Levi
Judah
Issachar
Zebulum
Dan
Naphtali
Gad
Benjamin
Source:The Lost Books of the Bible and the Forgotten Books of Eden. 
Published by World Bible Publishers, Inc 1926

We now come to the end, where I would like to thank you for reading my research. I do not always expect you to believe my research, but I do hope my research will encourage you to seek and find and do your own research, and remind you of the words of Jesus when He said: 
For everyone who asks receives, and the one who seeks finds, and to the one who knocks it will be opened. Matthew 7:8.

You do not have to believe me, but you do need to believe Jesus when He made it very clear in one single statement, by saying there is only 'ONE' true GOD, and never, ever said there were THREE GODS, as ONE or ONE GOD as THREE when He said: And this is LIFE ETERNAL, (A COMMANDMENT in Mark 12:29 that we must believe for LIFE ETERNAL) that they might know thee THE ONLY (ONE) TRUE GOD, (KNOW GOD IS A SINGLE GOD AND PERSON NOT THREE) and Jesus Christ, (AND KNOW AND BELIVE IN THE TEACHINGS OF GODS SON WHO IS ONE IN SUBSTANCE WITH GOD BUT NOT IN NUMBER) whom thou hast sent. (WHO GOD HAS SENT) John 17:3.

Notice how Jesus very clearly 'excludes Himself' from being the ONE AND ONLY TRUE GOD, by praying to His Father, that we may know Him: THE ONLY TRUE (ONE) GOD?
 
 
RELATED ARTICLES.
FACTS CONCERNING THE BOOK OF ENOCH.
Jesus in the Book of Enoch_ PROVES JESUS DIVINITY_ MERE MAN_ or GOD_ or NEITHER_ FIND OUT NOW.
Is Jesus God_
Is Soul Sleep Biblical_ By Simon Brown.

GOD IS ONE PERSON. NOT THREE. Malachi 2_10.
GOD IS ONE PERSON. NOT THREE. Malachi 2:10.


Let Me Reveal To You The NO 2, TRINITY Theory Is A Lunatic Theory? 


Luke 16_19_ The Rich Man and Lazarus