Reames Financial

"What Morons!" We Rage As A Nation

No BS Weekly Update  12/102012

In This Issue
Looking in the Mirror
Cool Stuff
Secret Lives of Links
Good Eats



"Men occasionally stumble over the truth, but most of them pick themselves up and hurry off as if nothing ever happened." -Sir Winston Churchill 


Like us on Facebook


Follow us on Twitter


View our profile on LinkedIn 


Dear  ,


A Common Sense Look at the Fiscal Cliff


There has been a lot of talk going on about whether the Fiscal Cliff is a big deal or not. I'm not going to answer that question for you. What I am going to do is present some facts, ask some questions, and let you reach your own conclusions.


We want to cut through the BS and help you take a good old gut level common sense approach to this issue. Once you have reached your conclusion then you want to make sure that your investments are in line with your expectations. Make sense?



Let's go back to the start of the 2000s. We had a 3 year downturn in the stock market, 2000-2002. Three back to back to back losing years had not happened since the 70s. However even though the market had gone down, real estate was still going up year after year like crazy. So while people had lost money in the stock market they didn't feel especially poor because of the increased value of their homes. So what they couldn't afford to spend out of earnings and saving, they simply borrowed out of their homes in the form of home equity loans and spent the money that way. Sound familiar?


So as the decade progressed the mortgage lenders started coming up with ever more exotic mortgages. Option ARMs. Negative Amortization Loans. Sub Prime loans. No Doc loans. Interest Only loans. No Money Down loans, etc.


And How Did That Turn Out?


Not well did it? Looking back as we always do, we wonder how the banks could have been so stupid as to make those kinds of loans. We also wonder about how stupid those people were that took out those loans. "What morons!" we rage as a nation. But remember what the experts were saying at the time.


According to Wikipedia, here is what Alan Greenspan, former Fed Chairman, was saying at the time.

  • American consumers might benefit if lenders provided greater mortgage product alternatives to the traditional fixed-rate mortgage.
    • February 2004, in a speech praising the benefits of adjustable-rate mortgages.
  • While local economies may experience significant price imbalances, a national severe price distortion seems most unlikely in the United States, given its size and diversity.
  • Without calling the overall national issue a bubble, it's pretty clear that it's an unsustainable underlying pattern.
    • May 2005, Greenspan said in a speech that he did not believe there was a national housing bubble similar to the bubble in the stock market. But he said there was "froth" in housing and he called the pace of housing price increases unsustainable.
  • A decline in the national housing price level would need to be substantial to trigger a significant rise in foreclosures, because the vast majority of homeowners have built up substantial equity in their homes despite large mortgage-market financed withdrawals of home equity in recent years.
    • July 2005, in testimony to the House Financial Services Committee.
  • [There are] signs of froth in some local markets where home prices seem to have risen to unsustainable levels.
    • July 2005, in testimony to the House Financial Services Committee.
  • I was aware that the loosening of mortgage credit terms for subprime borrowers increased financial risk. But I believed then, as now, that the benefits of broadened home ownership are worth the risk.
    • September 2007, Greenspan's memoir The Age of Turbulence: Adventures in the New World.

Here are some quotes from current Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke during that same time period.


7/1/05  - Interview with CNBC

"We've never had a decline in house prices on a nationwide basis. So, what I think what is more likely is that house prices will slow, maybe stabilize, might slow consumption spending a bit. I don't think it's gonna drive the economy too far from its full employment path, though."


10/20/05 -  Testimony before the Joint Economic Committee

"House prices have risen by nearly 25 percent over the past two years. Although speculative activity has increased in some areas, at a national level these price increases largely reflect strong economic fundamentals."


2/15/06 - Hearing before the Committee on Financial Services

"Housing markets are cooling a bit. Our expectation is that the decline in activity or the slowing in activity will be moderate, that house prices will probably continue to rise."


2/15/07 -  Semiannual Monetary Policy Report to the Congress

"Despite the ongoing adjustments in the housing sector, overall economic prospects for households remain good. Household finances appear generally solid, and delinquency rates on most types of consumer loans and residential mortgages remain low."


3/28/07 -  Testimony before the Joint Economic Committee

"At this juncture, however, the impact on the broader economy and financial markets of the problems in the subprime market seems likely to be contained. In particular, mortgages to prime borrowers and fixed-rate mortgages to all classes of borrowers continue to perform well, with low rates of delinquency."


5/17/07 -  At the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago's 43rd Annual Conference on Bank Structure and Competition

"All that said, given the fundamental factors in place that should support the demand for housing, we believe the effect of the troubles in the subprime sector on the broader housing market will likely be limited, and we do not expect significant spillovers from the subprime market to the rest of the economy or to the financial system.  The vast majority of mortgages, including even subprime mortgages, continue to perform well.  Past gains in house prices have left most homeowners with significant amounts of home equity, and growth in jobs and incomes should help keep the financial obligations of most households manageable."


8/31/07 -  At the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City's Economic Symposium

"It is not the responsibility of the Federal Reserve-nor would it be appropriate-to protect lenders and investors from the consequences of their financial decisions."


6/10/08 -  Boston Federal Reserve's 52nd annual economic conference

"The risk that the economy has entered a substantial downturn appears to have diminished over the past month or so."

(Bernanke said this when we had already been in a recession for 6 months.  When he said this the Dow was stillover 12,280.  The Dow went on to lose another 45%+ after he made this statement)


OK So What's My Point?


I have two common sense points to make here.


Common Sense Point #1


If we see the same type of pattern, the same type of nonsense developing again, what type of outcome should we expect this time? According to it was Albert Einstein who said "the definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results".


Common Sense Point #2


This is related to number 1. If the experts are again telling us not to worry, it's no big deal, should we believe them?


But Are They Doing the Same Things?


They are and they aren't. Let me explain.


They aren't from the standpoint of homeowners taking the equity out of their homes to spend the money etc. That party is over. Over the last five years, on an individual level, people have had to learn to live within their means. However, governments have yet to learn that lesson.


While the consumer has had to severely pull back on their deficit spending, governments are just getting started. They are finding more and more creative ways to borrow money. Now is "creative" just another way of saying exotic like the loans that brought us down just 5 years ago? I'll let you decide. Take a look.


(Click to read article)

Here is just one of the examples in the article.


"Perhaps the best example of the CAB issue is suburban San Diego's Poway Unified School District, which borrowed a little more than $100 million. But "debt service will be almost $1 billion," Lockyer says. "So, over nine times amount of the borrowing. There are worse ones, but that's pretty bad.""


BTW, the Lockyer referred to in the paragraph above is California State Treasurer Bill Lockyer. Here is what he has to say about these types of loans.


""It's the school district equivalent of a payday loan or a balloon payment that you might obligate yourself for," Lockyer says."


The Final Common Sense Question


Here it is folks, the final question. The examples that I gave you above are far from unusual. If we have states and municipalities taking out crazy loans just like the consumers did before them, do you really expect this to turn out any better than it did the last time?


Then Plan Accordingly


Whatever your answer to that question is, you need to plan accordingly. If you aren't sure how to do that, feel free to give us a call or send us an email.




Last week we got one of the best responses we have ever receieved to one of our columns.  If you haven't read it yet you can find it here.


Until next week , Protect Your Wealth! 


Phil's signature in blue





Like us on FacebookFollow us on TwitterView our profile on LinkedIn

Week In Review
Made in America iMac: Tim Cook Confirms Apple to Build in USA(Newsmax)

RF: Well isn't this interesting? I just wrote about insourcing this past week in the No BS Weekly Update. Here we have another example of it.

NY Fed: America's Student Loan Bubble Is Expanding(Moneynews)

RF: Another bubble that we the taxpayers will be on the hook for.

Krugman: National default 'can't happen'(NetRightDaily)

RF: Really? He might want to read Rogoff and Reihart's book This Time Is Different: Eight Centuries of Financial Folly. For a Noble Prize winning economist this statement really makes me wonder about him. The main basis of his argument is that we can't default becasue we can always print more money. Really? I have two words. Weimar Republic. Just one of the most recent examples of a country that could and did print its own money that utlimately defaulted beack in the 1920s.





How to follow through / persist with your Goals? - Tony Robbins [part 1]
How to follow through / persist with your Goals? - Tony Robbins [part 1]

Dare to take the mystery link challenge? 


We can't be held responsible for the time you waste or the knowledge you gain by clicking this link!



Good Eats
Its that time of year for appetizer recipes for the Christmas Parties.  Well what could be better than an appetizer based on bacon?  Oh baby!!!
(Click for rest of recipe and to print)

If we're worth reading we're worth recommending.

That's no BS.

Please let others know about us!


Like us on FacebookFollow us on TwitterView our profile on LinkedIn

Securities offered through Foothill Securities, Inc.  Member FINRA/SIPC
Reames Financial is not an affiliate of Foothill Securities, Inc.

Investing involves risk including the potential loss of principal. No investment strategy can guarantee a profit or protect against loss in periods of declining values.

The Standard & Poor's 500 (S&P 500) is an unmanaged group of securities considered to be representative of the stock market in general.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average is a price-weighted average of 30 significant stocks traded on the New York Stock Exchange and the Nasdaq. The DJIA was invented by Charles Dow back in 1896.

The MSCI EAFE Index was created by Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) that serves as a benchmark of the performance in major international equity markets as represented by 21 major MSCI indexes from Europe, Australia and Southeast Asia.
The 10-year Treasury Note represents debt owed by the United States Treasury to the public. Since the U.S. Government is seen as a risk-free borrower, investors use the 10-year Treasury Note as a benchmark for the long-term bond market.

Google Finance is the source for any reference to the performance of an index between two specific periods.
Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice and are not intended as investment advice or to predict future performance.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

You cannot invest directly in an index.

Consult your financial professional before making any investment decision.

Fixed income investments are subject to various risks including changes in interest rates, credit quality, inflation risk, market valuations, prepayments, corporate events, tax ramifications and other factors.

These are the views of Reames Financial and not necessarily those of Foothill Securities, Inc., and should not be construed as investment advice. Neither Phil Reames, Reames Financial, nor Foothill Securities, Inc. gives tax or legal advice. All information is believed to be from reliable sources; however, we make no representation as to its completeness or accuracy. Please consult your financial advisor for further information.

By clicking on these links in the No BS Weekly Update, you will leave our server as they are located on another server. We have not independently verified the information available through this link. The link is provided to you as a matter of interest.

Phil Reames

Reames Financial

1856 Skyler Dr.

Kalamazoo, MI 49008