Reames Financial

Difference Between Wealthy Americans and Working Americans

No BS Weekly Update  10/22/2012

In This Issue
Looking in the Mirror
Cool Stuff
Secret Lives of Links
Good Eats

QOTD

 

"Never appeal to a man's 'better nature.' He may not have one. Invoking his self-interest gives you more leverage." -Robert A. Heinlein, The Notebooks of Lazarus Long

 

Like us on Facebook

 

Follow us on Twitter

 

View our profile on LinkedIn 

 

Dear  ,

 

Difference Between Wealthy Americans and Working Americans


Years ago one of my mentors asked me a question.  "What is the difference between the way wealthy Americans invest and the way working Americans invest?".  Being smart enough to know that my mentor had a point he was trying to make I simply asked "What?".  He went on to give me a lesson that has become one of the cornerstones of our investment philosophy and I'd like to share it with you.

 
My mentor said that the main difference is that the wealthy focus on not losing money first, then they worry about rate of return.  That doesn't mean that they never lose money.  It simply means that they focus on controlling their risk first, as much as possible.  By doing so they can reduce the chance of loss to their principal.  Then after controlling for risk they look to get a fair return for the amount risk they are taking.  To use a baseball analogy, they are happy to sit there and hit singles all day long.  They don't need home runs to try to make up for the losses of excess risk.  Make sense?


For those of you who are already clients, you've heard this before because this is one of the foundations of our investment philosophy.  It's kind of a turtle and the hare thing.  Slow and Steady.  Like watching paint dry.  Boring.  So why do the wealthy do it this way?  Because it works.


Beating the Show Offs

 

I ran across an article today that I'd like to share with you.  It's called Beating the Show Offs by Joshua M. Brown who runs the ReformedBroker.com website.  He is an advisor to high net worth individuals in NYC and is also a regular contributor to magazines like Forbes, etc.  Here is an excerpt to give you a flavor of the article.

 

rb
(Click to read article)

"I talk to a lot of potential investors about their portfolios and about some of the ways in which our managed assets might be of service to them. I'm not in the Greatest Trade Ever biz and you'll never see VRNG or PCLN in one of our models. Upon explaining our approach, I'll sometimes hear "That's it?" I suppose there's an assumption that because I'm on TV and stuff that I must manage money like a wannabe hedge fund manager or an aggressive trader.

 

In reality, I run retirement assets in such a way that my wealthy clients will be able to make it through to the end without compromising on their quality of life. This requires discipline, of the behavioral and emotional sort, way more than it requires any kind of overly acrobatic equity disco."


Equity disco!  That gave me a chuckle.  Josh has a great way of making a point.  And while he and I may differ in our approaches to accomplish that goal, I think we both are ultimately saying the same thing, control risk first.

 
Speaking of the Equity Disco!

 

Now let's compare that approach to the approach of many others in the industry.  I know that many people are seeing the stock markets appreciate and they feel like they are getting left behind.  Missing out on the Equity Disco if you will.

As an example of this group I'm going to take a quote from Barry Ritholtz who you all know I respect.  Several times in the past I have recommended his website.  I stop by his site a couple of times a day and I would recommend that you do the same.  www.ritholtz.com


Here is what Barry said in an article posted today called "Timing the Market?".

 

rb
(Click to read article)

"Under normal circumstances, I would have been aggressively pulling back equity exposure since, well last year. The wild card that has prevented me from doing that has been the Fed's program of QE. Having made riskless assets much less attractive, the Fed's liquidity fire hose has forced managers into equities beyond what is normally prudent." 
 

Think about what he is saying there.  Normally he would already be out of this thing but because of the games the Fed is playing he is still invested.  The Fed "has forced managers into equities beyond what is normally prudent.".


Prudent.  There's an interesting word.  Isn't that one of the ways we are taught to judge the risks we take?  Would a prudent person take that risk?  Now just so we are all on the same page, let's take a look at the definition of prudent.

 
prudent
1. wise or judicious in practical affairs; sagacious; discreet or circumspect; sober.
2. careful in providing for the future; provident: a prudent decision.

 
So we have a money manager, Barry Ritholtz, telling us that he has his client's money more invested in the Equity Disco than would normally be wise.  That's quite an admission isn't it?  Would you want your money manager doing that with your retirement money?  But let's look at what else he says.

 
"Today, we are equal weight equities (we came into the year overweight equities).


The Fed's impact on asset prices will eventually attenuate. Those of you who are playing along at home, make sure you have some set of parameters to alert you to evidence of when the Fed's punchbowl has gone non-alcoholic so you can reduce your equity exposure substantially.


We continue to get closer to that point, but we are not quite there yet . . ."

 


So he is playing a game of trying to outguess the Fed.  If he guesses right it will pay off for his clients big time, but what if he's wrong?  What if he misses the signs?  What if that big Equity Disco comes crashing down again?

 
Does that really seem like a "prudent" strategy to you?

 
Equity Disco or Invest Like the Wealthy-You Choose!

 

As they say folks, there's more than one way to skin a cat.  (I've always wondered where that phrase came from.  I mean come on, who goes around skinning cats?)  I've just shown you a couple of different strategies and I'm not saying one is right and one is wrong.  That is for each individual investor to decide.
 
What I am saying is that you have to decide which strategy will help you meet your goals best.  If your goal is to work steadily towards your financial goals while still being able to sleep at night then I think the choice is obvious.
 
If on the other hand you miss the excitement of the ups and downs of markets.  The thrill of making a ton and then losing it back again then maybe the Equity Disco is the better choice for you.
 
Is It Closing Time At The Equity Disco?

Nobody knows for sure but here is last week's Chart of the Day from chartoftheday.com.
cod
(www.chartoftheday.com)
If you're not sure what that could mean for your money, you might want to give us a call or send us an email at preames@reamesfinancial.com.

 

Until next week , Protect Your Wealth! 

 

Sincerely,
Phil's signature in blue

 

 

 

 

Like us on FacebookFollow us on TwitterView our profile on LinkedIn

Week In Review
Each $1 from bonds to cost schools $18(Sacramento Bee)

RF: Remember all of that "new math" stuff they have been teaching over the years? Well here are the results of that math. Whole school districts that can't do simple math!

The Big Picture Conference: See What Caused the Fuss!(The Big Picture)

RF: I'm gonna have to put this on my list of conferences to attend next year.

Pimco: US Will Be Downgraded Again Amid Fiscal 'Theater'(Bloomberg)

RF: Looks like my theater analogy is catching on. I've been writing about "bailout Kabuki" for quite a while now.

Laughter

cartoon  

COD
(www.chartoftheday.com)

Growth 

'The Gift of Failure' Inspirational Stories
'The Gift of Failure' Inspirational Stories

Link  
 
Dare to take the mystery link challenge? 

 

We can't be held responsible for the time you waste or the knowledge you gain by clicking this link!

 

CLICK HERE IF YOU DARE!

Good Eats
I started with this recipe and then made some changes.  First I used angel hair pasta.  Second I used 2 cloves garlic, 2 1/2 tablespoons butter instead of olive oil, 3 ounces of prosciutto, and 1/2 cup freshly shaved parmigiano cheese.  In addition I used some red and yellow bell pepper for color.  The final ingredient change is 1/2 cup cream or half and half.  (You can also use 1/4 cup milk and 1/4 cup soft cream cheese blended together)
The other change I made was in the preperation.  If you have never used prosciutto you will find that because it is so thin it doesn't slice well.  You end up with little wads of prosciutto.  That's ok. 

Saute the garlic, peppers, and prosciutto in the butter while the pasta is cooking.  2-3 minutes.  Now add the shaved parmigiano cheese and the cream while stirring or whisking.  Now just serve over the pasta. 
recippe
(Click for rest of recipe and to print)

If we're worth reading we're worth recommending.

That's no BS.

Please let others know about us!

 

Like us on FacebookFollow us on TwitterView our profile on LinkedIn

Securities offered through Foothill Securities, Inc.  Member FINRA/SIPC
Reames Financial is not an affiliate of Foothill Securities, Inc.

Investing involves risk including the potential loss of principal. No investment strategy can guarantee a profit or protect against loss in periods of declining values.

The Standard & Poor's 500 (S&P 500) is an unmanaged group of securities considered to be representative of the stock market in general.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average is a price-weighted average of 30 significant stocks traded on the New York Stock Exchange and the Nasdaq. The DJIA was invented by Charles Dow back in 1896.

The MSCI EAFE Index was created by Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) that serves as a benchmark of the performance in major international equity markets as represented by 21 major MSCI indexes from Europe, Australia and Southeast Asia.
 
The 10-year Treasury Note represents debt owed by the United States Treasury to the public. Since the U.S. Government is seen as a risk-free borrower, investors use the 10-year Treasury Note as a benchmark for the long-term bond market.

Google Finance is the source for any reference to the performance of an index between two specific periods.
Opinions expressed are subject to change without notice and are not intended as investment advice or to predict future performance.

Past performance does not guarantee future results.

You cannot invest directly in an index.

Consult your financial professional before making any investment decision.

Fixed income investments are subject to various risks including changes in interest rates, credit quality, inflation risk, market valuations, prepayments, corporate events, tax ramifications and other factors.

These are the views of Reames Financial and not necessarily those of Foothill Securities, Inc., and should not be construed as investment advice. Neither Phil Reames, Reames Financial, nor Foothill Securities, Inc. gives tax or legal advice. All information is believed to be from reliable sources; however, we make no representation as to its completeness or accuracy. Please consult your financial advisor for further information.

By clicking on these links in the No BS Weekly Update, you will leave our server as they are located on another server. We have not independently verified the information available through this link. The link is provided to you as a matter of interest.

Phil Reames

Reames Financial

1856 Skyler Dr.

Kalamazoo, MI 49008

269-349-3966

preames@reamesfinancial.com