New Women's Health Program Rules Adopted
Last week, the Texas Health and Human Services Commission adopted new rules for the Texas Women's Health Program (TWHP). After strong opposition from the Texas Medical Association (TMA) and other physician groups, the proposed "gag order" -- a rule that would have barred a participating provider from discussing abortion with a patient -- was dropped. The new rules allow doctors and other providers to provide non-directive counseling and neutral, factual information (including information about abortion providers).
This change, among others, was hailed by TMA President, Michael Speer, MD, as a significant improvement. "It is very important that patients are able to trust that their doctor is giving the best medical advice for them - based on their medical needs and nothing else," he said.
The rules for the new state-only funded TWHP, which go into effect on November 1, continue to exclude Planned Parenthood clinics or other "affiliates" of abortion providers. Planned Parenthood has sued the state in federal court to block their exclusion from TWHP. However, the revised rules have a new "poison pill" provision that ends the entire program if Planned Parenthood prevails.
Planned Parenthood clinics have provided the care for about half of the program's more than 100,000 patients, and there is widespread concern that other providers will not be able to meet the need. A George Washington University study found that tens of thousands of women would be unable to get care because other providers lack the capacity needed.
Funding for the new state-only TWHP is also a concern. Because it is not consistent with the federal Medicaid statute, excluding Planned Parenthood clinics from the program means loss of the 9-to-1 federal match that provided about $35 million per year.
Members and friends of the Healthy Futures Alliance are concerned about the loss of access to needed preventive healthcare for thousands of low-income Texas women. TWHP provides screening for breast and cervical cancer and other problems, as well as family planning counseling and a birth control method (not abortion). Not having enough active providers -- or losing the entire program -- would mean more unplanned pregnancies with high risks for prematurity; poor child health; abuse and neglect; low educational achievement; and abortion.
|