Studio Insights by

 

  

 

www.GovernanceStudio.ca

Greetings!

 

Believe it or not, today I have a scathing commentary. Okay, those of you who know me well, know that I am really a mild mannered, shy girl without an opinion on anything... Ha Ha!!!! Just kidding.

 

You all know that when I am outraged, I tend to share. Check out the editorial opinion below if you don't yet believe me.

 

Cheers,

Sylvia

 

 

I'm Mad as H E Double Hockey Sticks and I'm Not Going to Keep Quiet
In Tuesday's Globe and Mail there was a report on Jana Partners and their interactions with Agrium. Guess what!?! It kind of got my blood boiling.

 

Here's the gist of it. The hedge fund, Jana, is nominating four directors to Agrium's board. Nothing a true blue corporate ever wants to hear, but nothing too untoward there.

 

Jana wants to give those four directors compensation tied to share returns over the next several years in addition to the compensation they will receive from Agrium for acting as directors. It almost sounds reasonable for the first nanosecond after you read it. Just after that, it sunk in for me and I was appalled by the thought and even more appalled by Jana's response to concerns over the very real conflict of interest this creates.

 

Jana's view, as reported, is that there is no conflict of interest because "there is no such thing as being 'too aligned' with shareholders". I agree completely IF you are talking about being aligned to the best interests of all shareholders. HOWEVER (and it really is a big however not just because I typed it in all capitals) that is nowhere near the case in this instance.

 

Here are the problems - Jana's supplementary compensation scheme creates a two-tiered, divided board and a de facto majority shareholder. A deadly combination for the interests of other shareholders - not to mention, the best interests of the corporation (from the true Canadian perspective).

 

I get especially annoyed by holier than thou hedge funds that try to pass themselves off as staunch supporters of good governance while denying the mere existence of their own significant and unpalatable conflicts of interest.

 

Puhlease!!! This "golden leash" undeniably obligates those four directors to Jana and its best interests.

 

Cheers,

Sylvia

 

PS As always, I'm happy to hear from you whether you agree or disagree - so let me know what you think.

  

PPS To read the full article follow the link:

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/globe-investor/janas-agrium-pay-scheme-draws-fire/article9256064/

 

 please email me your feedback.

Questions? 

Send me an email at sylvia@governancestudio.ca if you have a question about a governance practice or a corporate secretarial procedure.

  
I will reply to you privately. With your permission, I will share the question and answer (but not your name or organization) in an upcoming newsletter.

 

SGHeadShot 

Coming Events

The Canadian Society of Corporate Secretaries

Upcoming Workshops:  

Board & Committee Minutes:
A Hands-on Workshop

 

Location: Calgary, AB

Date: March 18, 2013
Venue: The Ranchmen's Club
  
Location: Vancouver, BC
Date: March 20, 2013
Venue: Terminal City Club
  
Check out all the details and to sign up visit Corporate Secretary Magazine.

Get your friends to sign up for FREE quick tips!

For every new person who joins our mailing list we'll be sending them a FREE list of "Quick Tips" from AAA+ Minutes™. 

 

Every Friday we'll also be tweeting a quick tip from the book. Make sure to follow us for updates and to get your free quick tips!

Shout 0uts

A big shout out to

to Sarah Wilson at Manifest  for her immediate and resounding support of Diversity One.
We will have more information on the initiative coming with the next newsletter!

 

Follow us online

View our profile on LinkedIn

Follow us on Twitter