The National Shooting Sports Foundation has launched a new Range Compliance Consulting Program to help shooting ranges deal with regulatory agencies such as the EPA and OSHA. The program provides education on regulatory requirements and helps ranges take corrective action and implement programs required by OSHA. NSSF covers 50 percent of the cost associated with this program, so an OSHA mock audit only costs the indoor range member $2,500. Keep in mind that $2,500 is the smallest fine you could potentially receive from OSHA, if or when they come knocking, and you're not prepared.
|
Advertising in
ON TARGET
reaches thousands of shooting enthusiasts a week |
Follow us!


|
Thought for the week
Perfection is achieved not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away
Antoine de Saint-Exupery
|
Bold Ideas Texas is offering two new CSR Colt Sporting Rifles, the CSR-1516 and CSR-1518, both chambered for 5.56 x 45mm NATO (.223 Rem-ington) and are designed to handle 50 grain to 77 grain bullets. The CSR-1516 weighs less than 6.5 pounds, has a quality 16-inch mid-weight barrel and measures 32.75 inches retracted and 36 inches extended. MSRP: $990. The CSR-1518 weighs less than 7 pounds, has an 18-inch mid-weight match-grade barrel, measures 34.75 inches retracted and 38 inches extended, and has a 6-position adjustable rifle stock with a wide ambidextrous cheek rest. MSRP: $1,049.
|
The Illinois State
Rifle Association
Protecting Illinois gun owners since 1903
Join today!
(815) 635-3198
|
Going on now through Monday morning, Facebook fans of ProGrade Ammunition have the chance win a $50 ProGrade Gift Certificate direct from the ammo manufacturer. All fans need to do is 'like' the ProGrade Facebook page, and enter the contest via the Giveaway tab on the page. Plus, the more fans share the contest with friends, the more opportunities they have to win. With more than 250 variations in the complete line of pistol and rifle ammunition, ProGrade has created nine grades of product: Defense Grade, Varmint Grade, Cowboy Grade, Hunter Grade, Bear Grade, Range Grade, Match Grade, Safari Grade and Tactical Grade.
|
Learn to shoot SAFER USA
Chicago's largest firearm training school offers over 35 group & private courses including beginner, advanced & personal protection.
www.saferusa.com (877) 954-3030 |
The new Easy Fit Tree Stand Skirt from Hunter's Specialties is made to fit most one- and two-person blinds on the market that are equipped with a shooting rail. Constructed of durable Realtree Xtra camo material with a black backing for added concealment, it comes in two sections that each measure 32" high x 50" long, with a center Velcro attachment for easy adjustment. It has tie straps on the top and bottom to quickly attach to your stand. There is an interior gear pocket to store accessories and keep them close at hand. The Tree Stand Skirt comes with a handy carrying bag which makes it easy to transport between home and your hunting location. MSRP: $24.99.
|
Senso Optics has introduced the VBS-80 - a novel electro-optical boresight for accurately aligning sights to guns. It is a user-friendly and accurate bore-sighting system that improves the hit probability of the gun. The VBS-80 allows one person to complete the aligning procedure by utilizing a video camera. The most accurate aiming occurs when an optical device is aligned to the weapon's bore centerline. Senso Optics designs and supplies both advanced laser and video bore sights. The new VBS-80 Video Boresight System is designed and dedicated for the calibration of Muzzle gun barrels.
|
On Target Newsletter On Target Newsletter is a free weekly industry newsletter focused on Second Amendment and firearm industry issues published by On Target Media Group. Copyright 2013, On Target Media Group. All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in part permitted with proper attribution to On Target Newsletter. Publisher & Editor-in-Chief David A. Lombardo Contributing Editor Gretchen Fritz Editorial Offices Tel: 815-744-5487 david@otmediagroup.com
|
|
|
|
Editorial
Illinois concealed carry training shows lack of understanding
David A. Lombardo
By now pretty much everyone knows that the Illinois State Police actually came out with their Illinois Concealed Carry instructor and course credentialing system a few days ahead of schedule. It makes one wonder if the Guv was out of town and oblivious to the ISP moving the concealed carry program forward in a timely manner-a tip of the hat to ISP Director Hiram Grau. Having said that, let's not tip the hat too far.
With all due respect to my friends who froth at the mouth when someone suggests there should be training associated with concealed carry, I think there should be. I believe with privilege comes responsibility; if you're going to carry a firearm, you should be trained.
I will readily admit there isn't a shred of evidence to refute the statistics that tell us that law-abiding citizens who carry guns without any training pose any threat to society above the statistical average for the general population. But I have to wonder if those statistics aren't skewed by the fact that precious few concealed carry holders are ever put in a situation where they feel the need to use their firearms. Would the statistics be less flattering if more concealed carry holders were forced to use their firearms? Which brings me to the point.
The Illinois Concealed Carry training requirement is poorly-thought-out to the point of being mind-numbing in its lack of creativity and understanding of what one needs to know to survive an actual encounter. It is rigid to the point of specifying the exact number of hours an instructor must spend on every subject-no consideration for creative teaching, student understanding or class size. For instance: everyone, whether they're the world's top shot or a novice, will get four hours of dry fire and live fire practice, period. How can you run a safe firing line when half the shooters are semi-comatose out of boredom?
And speaking of subjects, there is an inexplicable lack of serious information with respect to carrying a firearm in public for personal protection. Nowhere in the 16 hours do instructors get time to talk about the effect of the autonomic nervous system on one's ability to operate certain types of firearms or how to deal with sociopathic individuals or how to draw from a holster so you don't get the gun taken away from you. We have some remarkably creative and excellent instructors here in Illinois but the required curriculum is nothing more than planned mediocrity.
But then the ISP could give two hoots about how you're going to teach. They don't want to see your proposed curriculum; they just ask you to initial all the things they want covered and the amount of time they want you to spend. Initial a bunch of bullet points, and presto-you have a curriculum approval. But if that's inane approving who can teach the program is borderline criminal in my opinion.
If you have a clean criminal record, an NRA pistol instructor permit and can fog a mirror, brother, you have just become an Illinois Concealed Carry Instructor. It took me longer to write the address on the envelope than it took to fill out the instructor application itself. Seriously, we're going to let people who got an NRA basic instructor rating two weeks prior, who have no teaching experience and no practical experience, teach inexperienced shooters to carry a concealed firearm when they've never done it themselves? In my opinion, for the state to allow that borders on criminal negligence and it is inexplicable. Wait, on second thought, it's par for the course in a state whose our ex-governors make the license plates personally.
|
On Target Radio
This week's On Target Radio will be discussing the Illinois Concealed Carry training requirements and the Nobel Peace Prize.
Join WIND Radio hosts David Lombardo and Gretchen Fritz who'll be discussing these issues with Raquel Mitchell, Wheatland Township Trustee, and Steve Cammack, a law enforcement officer in the Chicagoland area.
All that and more, this Sunday evening from 9:00 to 10:00 p.m. on AM560 THE ANSWER.
|
Harvard study debunks anti-gun argument
According to Harvard University professors Don Kates and Gary Mauser, gun bans have no effect on curbing violent crime. In Would banning firearms reduce murder and suicide, the researchers reviewed a significant amount of evidence from a wide variety of international sources. They concluded there was not a positive correlation between gun ownership and criminal violence or suicide. What they did find is that countries with higher gun ownership often had lower murder rates. The research cites Russia which has very strict gun control and also has a very high murder rate -four times higher than the United States. The study also indicates that European countries with significant gun ownership such as Norway, Finland, Germany and France, have remarkably low murder rates. Contrast that with Luxembourg, "where handguns are totally banned and ownership of any kind of gun is minimal, which had a murder rate nine times higher than Germany." Kates and Mauser cite an older study done by Professor Brandon Centerwall of the University of Washington. It compared the more lax U.S. gun policy to Canada's very strict policy and found similar results. Centerwall wrote, "We did not begin this research with any intent to exonerate handguns, but there it is-a negative finding."
|
Ninth Circuit rules in Firearms Freedom Act case
The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals released its opinion in MSSA v. Holder, the lawsuit brought in federal court to validate the principles of the Montana Firearms Freedom Act. The MFFA, enacted by the Montana Legislature in 2009, says firearms made and retained in Montana are not subject to federal regulation under the U.S. Constitution's charge to "regulate commerce ... among the states." The suit is challenging federal commerce clause power. Plaintiffs in MSSA v. Holder are the Montana Shooting Sports Association (MSSA), the Second Amendment Foundation, and Gary Marbut, president of MSSA. To set up the legal challenge, Marbut determined to manufacture a youth-model, .22 caliber, bolt-action rifle called the Montana Buckaroo; BATF said its unlicensed manufacture would be illegal under federal law. The federal District Court ruled that the plaintiffs lacked "standing" to bring the lawsuit and dismissed it. MSSA appealed to the Ninth Circuit; it has weighed in, reversing the federal District Court on the standing issue, saying that Marbut has standing to bring the challenge but held that existing Supreme Court precedent was against plaintiffs on the merits of the lawsuit. Marbut commented, "This was about as good of a ruling as we could have expected from the Ninth Circuit. We must get to the U.S. Supreme Court to accomplish our goal of overturning 70 years of flawed Supreme Court rulings on the interstate commerce clause." [Source: AmmoLand Shooting Sports News]
|
SAFER USA COURSE SCHEDULE
NOTICE
Illinois Concealed Carry
coming in the next few weeks! Stay tuned!
We'll send out an email blast, post it on our Facebook pages
On Target Radio & SAFERUSA, & announce it on the radio
Home Protection & Concealed Carry (8 hours)
Saturday, September 14th - 8:00 AM - 4:00 PM
West Chicago, IL
Winchester Rifle Marksmanship Program (8 hours)
Sat Sep 14 & Sun Sep 15 - 10:00 AM - 2:00 PM
Aurora Sportsmen's Club - Waterman, IL
Sunday, September 15th - 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM
St. Charles, IL
Private classes for groups available Call 877-954-3030
|
Cuban agent-of-influence
wants more American gun control
The Council on Foreign Relations recently released a Policy Innovation Memorandum titled, "AStrategy to Reduce Gun Trafficking and Violence in the Americas." The memo was authored by the CFR's Senior Fellow for Latin American Studies, Julia Sweig, who said, "The policy that needs innovation is U.S. gun laws," and she explained all the people shooting one another in Latin America is because of the flow of "high-powered weaponry" from the United States to Latin America. "Although recent federal gun control measures have run aground on congressional opposition... the Obama administration can still take executive action to reduce the availability and trafficking of assault weapons and ammunition in the Americas," she wrote. In short Sweig believes, to foil Latin American criminals (many of whom cross the southern U.S. border essentially at will), the U.S. president should use every ounce of his executive power and privilege to further gut the constitutional self-defense rights of U.S. citizens. It turns out that Sweig's occupation is lobbying for Cuba, and her promotional services for the Castro regime reached a level where the U.S. Defense Intelligence Agency's top Cuba spy-catcher, Chris Simmons (now retired), named her a Cuban Agent of Influence.
|
|
Bill to ban hunting in California advances in Senate
Continuing to move forward, the California Senate Appropriations Committee moved to pass Assembly Bill 711, which will effectively ban hunting in California by banning traditional lead ammunition, the first statewide ban of its kind in the nation. The bill now moves to the California State Senate floor and is opposed by a large coalition, including every major hunting and sporting organization in California, as well as a coalition of Labor leaders and organizations concerned about the impact to their members. Proponents of the bill have argued that hunters could simply switch to non-lead ammunition, but alternative metals are classified as "armor piercing" by the federal government and require a special permission to make, sell or possess; thus far the federal government has refused to grant permission. Alternative ammunition would be exceedingly expensive, and supplies would not meet the demands of hunters. By eliminating hunting in California, the state would lose millions in conservation funding that depends upon ammunition and license fees paid by hunters. Despite the unavailability of alternative ammunitions, the committee passed the bill, although it was amended to delay implementation of the lead ban until 2019. There is no sound science to support the premise that lead ammunition adversely impacts wildlife populations. Supporters of the bill also knowingly falsely claim that using traditional ammunition poses a human health risk to hunters.
|
|
|
|