The Alabama Civil Justice Reform Committee (ACJRC) was established to help end the days of tort-hell in Alabama when runaway civil judgments crippled Alabama's ability to promote itself as a pro-business state, open for investment. Since those days, ACJRC has continued to monitor and promote legislation that continues to advance fair and balanced judicial actions.
As a founding member, the HBAA has been crucial to the success ACJRC has enjoyed. Even now, the HBAA works closely with other like-minded business and trade groups to protect the gains that have benefited Alabama businesses. Here is a look at a few of the bills ACJRC is monitoring:
SB113 (Ward) and SB270 (Williams) Deceptive Trade Practices Act:
Two measures have been introduced that will amend Alabama's DTPA. SB113, by Senator Ward, extends the statute of limitations to a flat 4 years. Currently, a suit must be brought within 1 year from when the claimant reasonably could have discovered the alleged prohibited act or practice, but in no event after 4 years. But, the bill also eliminates a provision that could extend the statute of limitations much longer for cases involving contracts or warranties lasting longer than 3 years. ACJRC continues to work with the Attorney General and we favor shortening the statute for private litigants from 4 to 2 years.
SB270, Senator Williams' bill, is intended to overcome a recent 11th Circuit opinion that held that despite Alabama's express prohibition that prohibits a private litigant from bringing a DTPA case as a class action, the federal rules of civil procedure provide otherwise. The 11th Circuit determined that federal procedural rules trumped the state law because the state law was a procedural provision. The proposed bill declares that the anti-class feature of the DTPA is a "substantive limitation" in an effort to provide an argument in future DTPA cases filed in federal court that the 11th Circuit opinion is no longer binding. Ultimately the 11th Circuit would also have to review the issue again if this law passed. The bill also adds a new requirement that private litigants must prove detrimental reliance in DTPA cases.
HB161 (Fridy) and SB158 (Ward) Extension of Daubert Standards:
In 2011 the Legislature adopted the "Daubert standard" for admitting expert testimony based on scientific principles and knowledge. This requires a far more rigorous standard for such expert opinions than the old law and was designed to weed out the major issue in civil litigation with respect to experts, so-called "junk science." This was one of ACJRC's 2011 tort reform initiatives. HB161 and SB158 extend Daubert to other areas of expert witness testimony and require the same standards to be met for introduction of all other opinion testimony. Both bills are pending in the Judiciary Committee of their respective chambers.
SB67 (Ward) Lawsuit Lending:
A bill to regulate lawsuit lending, "the practice of loaning funds to the plaintiff awaiting the outcome of a pending lawsuit," has been reintroduced again this session. It limits lawsuit lending finance charges to 10%. It passed out of Committee on February 17. Lawsuit lending is a problematic practice that the Alabama Court of Civil appeals has previously determined to be prohibited under Alabama law. In our opinion, this bill will now permit such loans, but very strictly limit and regulate the rate that can be charged.
SB234 (Orr) Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations (RICO):
ACJRC is also studying a bill being proposed by the state's District Attorneys that would create the Alabama RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) Act. The measure is patterned after the federal RICO law which was passed to attack organized crime providing that racketeering is a criminal offense and allows for the recovery of three times the actual damages, punitive damages, and attorneys' fees. Unfortunately, RICO statutes are often now used to recover civil damages rather than attack organized crime.