Wednesday November 5, 2014
|
 Table of Contents
|
Q: When the spot price of a metal goes down but the premium goes up. Who makes the profit from the increase in the premium? David Schectman's Answer: Our mark up (the retail dealer) remains the same. Our cost from the wholesaler rises. When the wholesaler has too much inventory, they lower the premium. When they don't have enough inventory, like now with junk bags and other silver items, they raise their bid to attract more inventory and pass the cost on to us - and then on to you. It is determined by supply and demand and is not arbitrary. Andy Hoffman has been detailing the rise in the premium on junk silver as the price is falling. Because of the low (too low) price of silver, fewer people are selling and the wholesalers have to raise their bids to attract inventory so they have product to sell. That is one of the interesting things that happen when the spot price of gold and silver falls too low. What good is silver spot at $8 if you have to pay $15 to buy coins and bars - which is exactly what happened in 2008?
Q: Can Obama give away the reserve currency status? Bill Holter's Answer: WOW! What a fun question! The answer of course legally no he can't. Now "practically," that's another story altogether. I suppose he could come out on national TV and tell the world "we don't have any gold left and we sold everyone's gold we were custodian for." That would do the trick right? Or how about if he woke up a 2 AM and decided to nuke the world, would the dollar ...or anything else for that matter be the reserve currency? Or what if he fired Yellen and Jack Lew, then decided not to nominate anyone to replace them. What would happen then? In my opinion, the man has spent the last 6 years "trying" to give the reserve status away with his actions and the world is near ready to take it from us, one way or another it will come to pass but it will not be the result of one man's actions. Q: Of all the coins minted in the US each month, what percent are purchased by US citizens? Andy Hoffman's Answer: Ah, the $64,000 question! The Mint, like any other retail business, doesn't release information about its clients - and thus, we can only speculate. However, it doesn't take rocket science to realize that since the U.S. bullion business - Miles Franklin included - has seen a significant slowdown during the 2013 and 2014 record years for U.S. Mint sales, that it wasn't U.S. customers buying them. Without having any "evidence" to support my views, I believe the vast majority of the recent growth has been from international customers - principally from the Eastern Hemisphere, where overall physical PM demand is at or near record highs. And if the Chinese are the largest buyers, I wouldn't be a bit surprised - as yet again, the U.S. government hands them the keys to global leadership on a silver platter.
|
 From David's Desk
|
 | David Schectman |
Deflation Is On Our Doorstep
November 5, 2014
I have been reading many articles that state deflation is on our doorstep and inflation is no longer a concern. Harry Dent is one of the strongest proponents of deflation. And the Elliott Wave crown has re-surfaced. They have logical arguments. Should that be of concern to our readers who have large positions in precious metals?
There is one thing I continue to focus on. It is our money supply and how the Fed will react to deflation, which implies falling asset prices - i.e. real estate, the stock market and of course the economy. If the economy implodes, the interest on our debt will become a serious problem for the Treasury since tax receipts will fall and more bonds will have to be issued. More than likely, the Fed will become the major buyer in this situation. That leads to currency debasement.
Jim Sinclair maintains that this is exactly what will happen and the (hyper) inflation that will follow will not be demand driven; it will be due to currency debasement.
I discussed this with my friend Trader David R. He is the most experienced and most talented trader of precious metals I know of. Here is his latest reply...
Something has to give on this chart and it's not $5 Trillion of money supply.
In other words, gold must rise because the money supply will not implode.
Japan has changed the entire dynamics of the game. They are exporting deflation (destroying the yen to increase their exports, which will be cheaper, which is deflationary.) That will put pressure on other Asian countries to weaken their currencies to stay competitive, which is deflationary. Our export industries will have to cut prices as well to stay competitive. All deflationary events.
I do not see how our stock market can thrive in this situation, or the real estate market either. Should the stock market tank, which is not an unreasonable expectation, and with interest rates being so low, gold will become an attractive asset. It's all very unsettling now. I expect things will become much clearer in the next few months.
_________________________
Quotes of the Day
Based upon the larger degree count, the majority of this 3+-year decline is just about completed, as we are left with a series of 4's and 5's, to be completed over the next two to three months. So, get your shopping lists in order, as the metals are now on sale. And, it is coming at a time when sentiment on metals is in the absolute toilet. Some sentiment matrices are even suggestive that it is worse now than at the 2008 lows, which would make sense from a wave perspective, as I am expecting a larger degree 3rd wave to begin off the lows we make in the metals over the next few months, which should last for many years to come.
As a warning, I want everyone who is serious about this market from a long term perspective to understand that even though I have been right about this decline, and have been right about the count, it does not mean that I will always be right. I can clearly be wrong, and the potential exists that the next lows we make MAY be the final lows in this long-term correction. While my count and expectations are still that we will see a wave IV rally before those final lows are made into the end of the year, I want anyone who is serious about the long term prospects of this market to begin scaling into long term positions. As I have said many times before on my daily Live Video, anyone that is not taking the opportunity to load up on silver when it is below $17 is not considering the long-term opportunity before them, at least in my humble opinion.
- Avi Gilburt, Elliott Wave Trader
With USD rates so low I don't get the gold price currently.... Just a real lack of liquidity and money is ruling FOR NOW.
Q3 GDP was all defense spending, so still no growth. The market is way too bearish and too short here, so I am getting friendly down here.
- Trader David R
The ongoing devastation in both WTI and Brent, which were trading at $76.70 and $82.50 at last check, both down almost 3% as the plan to use Saudi Arabia to crush Russia has instead backfired and the Saudi princes are now openly looking at destroying the US shale infrastructure, as we forecast in the worst, for Obama, scenario.
- Zero Hedge, November 4, 2014
As I sort of expected, there was another big sales report from the U.S. Mint to start off the new month. They sold 12,000 troy ounces of gold eagles---2,500 one-ounce 24K gold buffaloes---and 625,000 silver eagles. If I had to bet ten bucks, I'd bet on the fact that these sales were made on Friday, but were shoved into the new month. If they'd been included in October sales, they would have pushed silver eagles sales well over the 6 million mark---and further into record territory---and that would just never do, would it? - Ed Steer, Casey Research, November 4, 2014
Of course with both gold and silver this far below their respective 20, 50 and 200-day moving averages, the price could remain comatose for many weeks or months before the Managed Money traders are forced to cover as moving averages are penetrated to the upside. However, it could happen anytime for other reasons and, as always, the timing is unknown.
- Ed Steer, Casey Research, November 4, 2014
_________________________
Today's Featured Articles
Peak Prosperity (Chris Martenson Interviews Silver Analyst Ted Butler: Silver Nightmare will be over soon)
Sprott's Thoughts (Jim Rickards Exclusive Interview: The Fed Basically Still Uses LTCM�€™s Financial Models)
Zero Hedge (How The Petrodollar Quietly Died, And Nobody Noticed) (Where Is Swiss Gold? - Location, Location, Location) (China's Gold Strategy) (Bill Gross Warns, "Global Economy & Financial Markets Are Insecurely Grounded") (Saudi Arabia Raises Asia, Europe Prices; Cuts US Prices)
David Stockman (The BOJ Jumps The Monetary Shark--Now The Machines, Madmen And Morons Are Raging)
Gold Stock Analyst (GOLD BELOW $1,200/OZ FOR FOURTH TIME IN LAST 18 MONTHS. NOW WHAT?)
Sincerely,
David Schectman
|
 The Holter Report
|
 | Bill Holter
|
Has The West Been "Cornered?"
November 5, 2014
Has the West been cornered? It's an odd question isn't it? This can be interpreted in several different ways. "Cornered" as in financially? Militarily? Economically or even from a production standpoint. How about "morally" or even religiously? Or even intellectually? Let me explain with hopefully few side tracks.
I first thought about writing this because I believe the West has allowed itself to be "cornered" in both the gold and silver markets. You know by now that it's my belief the Chinese are the longs in the COMEX silver and have actually "carried" us along time wise so we would divest more and more of our gold. In order to keep the game going, China put forward 1,000+ tons of silver in their Shanghai inventory which has been 90% drawn down and more than likely used to keep the game going. But after thinking about this for a little bit, it occurred to me that it's not just the precious metals markets "we have let go of" ...it's pretty much everything!
Think about it, we have "cornered" ourselves within a $1.4 quadrillion (with a capital Q!) derivatives market. Like it or not, the U.S. is at the epicenter of this. (We didn't have to be but "rulers" like Alan Greenspan lobbied for it). We are now financially in a position where there is no way out because there must be a loser for every winner and when the loser is busted so badly and cannot make settlement ...even the winner becomes a loser. Without a huge explanation, we live in a "zero sum" financial casino where if someone wins, someone also must lose. This has become the "American way," the Chinese mindset is different as they believe in business as a "win, win" process. Maybe this is why China announced within the last year "they reserve the right for any state agency to default on any derivative"?
How about militarily? Are we cornered here? First, how many bases and how many different fronts can we afford? I don't know the answer but I do know the "direction," less. Finance and military are connected at the hip, in order to "reflate" the economy and markets, wars have always been started because they are "good for business." The problem is that over time, we actually had to start skirmishes in order to get wars started... but the world has wised up to this...and alliances are shifting. Maybe the word "cornered" is wrong in this instance, instead maybe it should be "isolated" as we have proposed for Russia.
Next, has the U.S. been cornered from an industrial or productive standpoint? What is it exactly that we make for export? Unfortunately the answer is "not much". We do however grow a lot of food and foodstuffs ...but much of this is of the GMO variety. What exactly will we be exporting if other countries decide they will not import GMO foods? What if foreigners decide to no longer accept dollars? How will we buy shoes or underwear? How about TV's, smartphones, computers and let's not forget our kids video games? Where will we get these from? How about simple things like wrenches, screwdrivers or even a saw or an ax? We don't make this stuff anymore...where will we get it from if we can't trade dollars for them and no one wants to accept GMO's in trade?
How about religiously? I'll bet you haven't thought much about this one. All over the world, Islamic populations are migrating to western nations with the intent of imposing Sharia law. Just look to Europe, Muslims can block a busy street in prayer with no consequences. Can you imagine were a group of Christians, Jews or Hindus to try this? They would all be hauled off for "disturbing the peace". Don't get me wrong, I am completely tolerant when it comes to religion, anyone has the right to pray to any God they choose but they do not have the right to impose their views, beliefs or laws on anyone else. Particularly if the country was not based on Islam at its creation. In this instance, religion, Europe in particular is being cornered, maybe a better term is "boxed in". As today is Election Day in the U.S., I might as well mention that "religion" is not a requirement to vote, however, what will happen if a single religion grows so populous that they "vote" to change the land's laws from top to bottom. Scary thought huh?
Speaking of Election Day, what about our "morals?" In my opinion, we have outright "cornered ourselves" from a moral standpoint which directly affects us from the financial standpoint, let me explain. We have become a nation that no longer believes in self-reliance. We are now at the point where half or more of our population receives some type of support or stipend from the government. Does anyone really believe that the "receivers" will ever vote to have their benefits "turned off"? I will give you my opinion on this and if you don't like it then "oh well." In my opinion, anyone under the age of 65 years old who receives any benefit whether it be for housing, food, medical or disability (other than military), should not be able to vote. Once you are 65 years old and receiving Social Security, theoretically this is the repayment of monies already deposited (even though we know the money was spent years ago). The only people who should be allowed to vote are those who "pay in" to the system. They should be the ones who have a say as to how it is spent. I am sure I will get all sorts of liberal pabulum telling me I'm not a nice guy for saying what is obvious and what most who think fairly are thinking. Bring it on!
As for my definition of "corner," I believe we have slowly put ourselves in a position where nearly no movement is possible. We chose this road years ago and it started out harmlessly enough when our prosperous post WWII parents wanted a better and "easier" life for their children. What happened is that this began to weaken the backbone of a once strong nation. Don't get me wrong, much damage has been done by "politicians" along the way always offering "free this and free that" but we should have known better. We should have known that nothing in life is free. The population of the U.S. will probably vote incumbents out of office like unwanted trespassers, it's not going to work and it's too late. We have a two party system of wolves in the same sheep's clothing. Voters can choose door number one or door number two but both corridors lead to very same corner we have allowed ourselves to be painted in.
The above was written prior to the election results. Americans stood up and "threw the bums out" as the Republicans have taken over the legislative process. I say "bravo" to Americans as they did the only thing they could do in protest. Unfortunately I believe this to be one last shrill of protest before collapse and chaos. As I said prior, we live in a two party system where each party serves the same master, there is no door number three. One can hope but "hope" is the vestige of fools. We can hope that America returns to that of a rule of law. One can hope we go back to strictly following The Constitution. One can hope for investigations into what has happened over the last six years (and prior administrations) to hold accountable all sorts of wrongs and outright crookedness. At least we can hope the new Congress will thwart a dictatorial executive branch and hold the Attorney General accountable for actions and the inaction of looking the other way. In my opinion it is now far (as in many years) too late. Changing Congress at this point is like flying in a new crew to the Titanic after hitting the iceberg. The damage has already been done in every way possible. We are taking on water quickly, a new crew, and a new captain, a new anything will not fix the gaping hole in our hull. Only a new ship (system and currency) will do. May God bless America, she needs it!
|
 Andy Hoffman's Daily Thoughts
|
 The Three "Death Trends" November 4, 2014 Ladies and Gentleman, a handful of sociopaths have declared war on the rest of the world. And no, they are not all collaborating in a single room in New York, London or Tokyo - but instead a handful of rooms in "reserve currency" capitals, whose "leaders" have the most to lose. In other words, the bankers controlling the printing presses and their "partners" in government have taken economic "can-kicking" to unprecedented levels - aided by the horrifying "financial weapons of mass destruction" invented over the past decade. Back in 2002, when I went "all-in" the precious metals sector, I knew I was on the side of a major global trend change. However, I could never have imagined how enmeshed the entire world was to the spreading cancer of fiat money - and certainly, that a mere 12 years later, it would be on the verge of all-out collapse. We have not a doubt that the end of history's largest Ponzi scheme is at hand; which is why, amidst its final, tortuous death throes, we warn 100% "financial defense," no matter how you define it. For me, it started with the sale of my last mining stock in Spring 2011, going 100% physical with the proceeds. Before then, the periodic Cartel attacks - and ongoing sector erosion, regardless of PM prices - caused me a significant lack of sleep, given that the horrific portfolio losses I experienced might be permanent. Instead, I now sleep the "sleep of the just"- aided by the exhaustion of minding my beloved Sylvie, who we adopted last summer; as no matter how hard the Cartel huffs and puffs they can't take my invaluable metal. But I must say, they are doing everything imaginable to make me miserable; not only in suppressing the prices of my savings and slowing the pace of my business (ironic, given record overseas demand), but doing so in such ignominious form. Watching "them" take stocks to unprecedented overvaluations amidst the worst economic environment and financial footing of my lifetime is bad enough; but when QE takes toxic, worthless bonds to record high prices as well, it makes one want to pull their hair out. Throw in the widening wealth inequality caused by such policies, in which Wal-Mart dramatically reduces expectations, yet Maserati reports a doubling of sales and you can see why anyone would be angry - much less, the writers of the Miles Franklin Blog, who have been as dead-on right about the unfolding economic calamity as anyone in the financial universe. However, as difficult as such manipulations have been to fathom the "good news" is that everything we write of is "self-correcting" by nature. In other words, the more TPTB suppress precious metals, support stocks and bonds or devalue their currencies, the more they accelerate their mathematically certain demise. Perhaps it will in fact be precious metals - i.e., the "Achilles Heel of the Financial World" - that supply the direct catalyst to the "big one." But if not, take heart that something else inevitably will; and when it does, if you haven't protected yourself already it will be too late. And given the unquestioned, near parabolic acceleration of the three "death trends" this article takes its namesake from, it's quite difficult to believe said "big one" is too far off. To that end, we have written endlessly of the catastrophic ramifications of collapsing oil, crashing currencies, and the competitive currency devaluations that are rapidly destroying the fragile smoke and mirrors-supported, fiat currency-fueled "world order." And right now, these "death trends" are reaching a fever pitch, yielding the potential for one or more to explode on any given day. Regarding oil prices, we recently wrote of the "unspeakable horrors" such a rapid plunge would portend - and this month's plunge to $76/bbl. will likely put the large majority of global production in the red; let alone, the socialist societies of countless oil exporters. Yesterday's news that Saudi Arabia is cutting prices for Western hemisphere exports is a loud and clear signal that it intends to "smoke out" the U.S. shale oil industry - which due to massive capital costs, depletion, and Wall-Street funded leverage could experience a production collapse as precipitous as what the Wall Street-starved gold and silver mining industry is about to experience. We warned of this in April 2013's "unending energy independence hype"; and fortunately for the Democrats, mid-term election day has arrived just beforehand - as unless oil prices explode higher in the coming months, their boasts of the "shale oil boom" will be memorialized with the likes of the "new paradigm" of internet prosperity circa 1999, or stocks reaching a "permanently higher plateau" in 1929. But more important than the economic cataclysm plunging oil prices will create for the world's numerous energy exporters is the expanding geopolitical tension that will arise from it - particularly in a world of hyper-monetary inflation causing the cost of living to rise despite plunging oil prices. And speaking of economic pain, the U.S. will ironically be impacted as negatively as some of the world's most backward emerging economies. Remember, the only real "recovery" America has seen in the past six years was in high-end real estate -which has since rolled over, despite record low mortgage rates; and shale oil drilling, which undoubtedly contributed a significant amount to recent years' GDP, as well as a (slightly) declining trade balance. Well, this morning it was reported that the trade deficit "unexpectedly" surged anew; and this, before the recent catastrophic oil price plunge. Moreover, even more ominously, the trade deficit excluding energy has never been higher - portending an utter explosion in the trade deficits in the coming months. Which, of course, will need to be funded with additional Federal Reserve printed debt. Throw in today's negative factory orders number - rounding out a trifecta of such negative numbers, following yesterday's construction spending and last week's durable goods orders disasters - and we have an economy likely running at negative nominal speed as we speak. Recall, Goldman Sachs reduced its 4Q GDP estimate from 3.0% to 2.2% this weekend; and following this data, I wouldn't be surprised if the "consensus" falls below 2.0% before next weekend. Of course, given that it's Election Day, the "Dow Jones Propaganda Average" was immediately goosed by a prototypical "dead ringer" algorithm (as it was yesterday). You know, the type that theoretically should no longer occur given the Fed's 10:00 AM EST "permanent open market operations" were suspended following last week's "end of QE (LOL)." And forgive me if I was off by 10 basis points, given the chaos of the October 15th "liquidity vacuum" when Treasury yields freefell to 1.9%; as clearly, on the topic of the Fed's new "line in the sand for the world's most important interest rate, not 2.2%, but "2.3% is the new 2.6%." Regarding the other two "death trends," they are as inexorably entwined as yin and yang. We have written for years of the collapse in global currencies following the world's "leading" economic powers going "all-in" in late 2011 with exponential money printing - yielding massive inflation exportation the world round. Well, at this very second, such currency collapses have never been deeper - which is probably why social unrest and geopolitical tension have never been more pervasive, nor the prospects for catastrophic trade and/or military confrontations. The " kamikaze attack" initiated by the Bank of Japan Friday may well prove the straw that broke the camel's back - particularly if it prompts a reprisal at Thursday's ECB meeting, on the heels of the ECB reducing its 2015 continent-wide GDP estimate this morning from 1.7% to 1.1%. We have long deemed the unprecedented currency volatility resulting from history's largest fiat Ponzi scheme the "single most bullish precious metals factor imaginable" - particularly when it accelerates the "final currency war"; in which the "race to debase" explodes to its horrific, currency-destroying conclusion. In my view, the aforementioned "final currency war" (January 2013) and "most damning proof yet of QE failure" (May 2014) are two of the most important articles I've written - which cumulatively, describe the Fed's conundrum of attempting to relentlessly debase the dollar whilst controlling interest rates. It cannot be done, which is why it inevitably, the Fed will be consumed by these "death trends." Of course, the Fed's "death" will ultimately be at the hands of real money, as all Central banks have experienced throughout history. So I'll simply follow up on what Bill Holter focused on today - of how the Cartel is on the verge of being blown away in the physical silver market. Yes, just as "inexplicably" as the 2% "Sunday Night Sentiment" raid on paper silver following Friday afternoon's news that the U.S. Mint had its best-ever non-January month of Silver Eagles sales, is today's paper raids following yesterday afternoon's news that the U.S. Mint sold a whopping 625,000 Silver Eagles on November's first business day. Or that "junk silver" premiums are starting to rise as are silver bullion delivery times. Or, per below, that COMEX open interest has not been this high relative to price since literally the price bottom of the equally orchestrated 2008 plunge! Today, we focused on three particularly virulent "death trends." However, countless others are emerging - from Thursday's ECB meeting, to Sunday's Catalonia secession vote (though not "binding"), to the November 30th Swiss gold referendum, for example. Never has the price of insuring one's assets been cheaper - but sadly, we don't expect this "window of opportunity" to last. And if you choose to act, we humbly ask you to call Miles Franklin at 800-822-8080 and give us a chance to earn your business.
|
 Interview with Kerry Lutz
|
Report on Greenspan's Legacy Tour
November 4, 2014
Bill Holter joins Kerry Lutz of the Financial Survival Network to discuss Fed Chief Alan Greenspan at the New Orleans Money Show and a debate between GATA's Chris Powell and Doug Casey about precious metals manipulation. To listen to the interview, please click below.
|
 Featured Articles
|
Ted Butler: The Silver Nightmare Will Be Over Soon - www.peakprosperity.com
The argument for a near-term monster rally
by Adam Taggart
Saturday, November 1, 2014, 1:20 PM
Hallowe'en couldn't have been more terrifying for silver investors. The gray metal cracked under $16/oz on Friday, a price not seen for nearly half a decade.
For years now, it has seemed like silver has been beaten down so badly its price couldn't go lower. But then it has.
Why has silver seen such a gut-wrenching price decline? (now down 2/3 compared to its high in late 2011). And will it ever see brighter days again?
This past weekend, Chris had a long discussion with silver expert Ted Butler on the real culprit behind the wild price slams that have plagued silver: unfairly concentrated positions within the derivatives market.
Continue reading on PeakProsperity.com.
________________________
Jim Rickards Exclusive Interview: The Fed Basically Still Uses LTCM's Financial Models - sprottglobal.com
Monday, November 3, 2014
By Henry Bonner
Hi Jim. You have recently published Currency Wars and now The Death of Money. Are you expecting a global collapse of every currency? And if so, a collapse relative to what?
I expect a collapse in the value of currencies relative to real goods, real assets and real services. This will happen to all currencies, not just the dollar. I don't expect a word where people lose confidence in the dollar and the euro does really well. On a relative basis, I've been bullish on the euro for some time. In the endgame, however, if people lose confidence in the dollar this will be inflationary in all countries around the word and I don't think that any currency will be able to withstand it. When I say 'the death of money' what I really mean is the loss of confidence in the purchasing power of money. That's very likely to be a global phenomenon not confined to any particular country.
Is a widespread loss of confidence in paper currencies the end result of a currency war that you see happening?
Currency wars are part of the picture because the way you fight a currency war is by cheapening the currency, cutting rates and quantitative easing. We saw that recently with the announcement of more quantitative easing from Japan, which took the markets by surprise and caused the Japanese Yen to fall by over 2 percent in a single morning. That is a huge move in the currency markets.
Another big factor in currency wars is the question of paying sovereign debts. It's the sovereign deficits that are really the problem and the question is how to deal with them. One way to deal with them is through inflation, which, of course, is the goal in a currency war. The problem is that not everybody can devalue against everybody else all at once. You have to take turns. So it goes back and forth and back and forth. That's what happened in the 1920's and 1930's and it's happening again today.
Is the purpose of the different factions in a 'currency war' to destroy other currencies? Or is the 'currency war' simply a byproduct of each country trying to get out from its debt obligations?
In a currency war, it's not that you want to destroy the other currencies, it's that you want to cheapen your own currency; that actually means you're strengthening the other currencies. You want to import inflation through higher import prices. You're right - it is a policy and not something that just happens randomly or because of other actions. Countries have policies with regards to interest rates and taxes, and they have policies with regards to exchange rates. It is very much a deliberate policy; it doesn't just happen.
You have said that China may secretly be selling the dollar and buying gold. If they're trying to devalue their own currency why do this? Shouldn't they buy the dollar and sell the yuan?
You're confusing two different things. You're mixing up currency war with financial war. I have discussed financial war, which is different from currency war. Currency war is an economic policy countries use to fight deflation and encourage inflation by cheapening the currency and creating inflation in the form of higher import prices. It's a way of creating monetary easing. It's an age-old economic policy, used most famously in the late 1920's and 1930's in what became known as 'beggar they neighbor.' Countries were stealing growth from each other by debasing their currencies, trying to import inflation and improve their trade balances by causing cheaper exports to foreign buyers and more expensive imports for domestic buyers. That combination was seen to bolster growth.
Financial war is different. Financial war involves countries that are traditional rivals or even enemies, for instance the US, Russia, and China, with competing interests everywhere from Eastern Europe to the South China Sea. Countries have fought wars in the past using traditional kinetic methods - armies, navies, air forces, missiles, submarines and so forth. We now live in an age where, thinking about warfare, you have to look at asymmetric forms of warfare - not just traditional forms - like chemical, biological, radiological weapons, guerilla warfare, terrorism, and financial warfare. So the scenario I was discussing that involves China buying gold and selling the dollar was not a currency war; it was a financial war. There you are trying to destroy the economy of your opponent, which is a very different situation.
Is it correct to say you were very involved with the bailout of Long Term Capital Management?
Yes. There is a book about it -When Genius Failed, by Roger Lowenstein -- that discusses my role, along with others', obviously. I was general counsel of Long Term Capital Management from start to finish, and I negotiated the bailout in 1998.
Alan Greenspan, the former Chairman of the Federal Reserve, has blamed the financial models used by the Fed for his missing the financial crisis. Does this remind you of what happened at LTCM? Do you think the Fed has gotten any better at predicting crashes since then?
No. I think you're exactly right. The models that LTCM was using the 1990's were the same models that Wall Street was still using in the early 2000's and, for that matter, the same models being used today. They are called 'dynamic stochastic general equilibrium models' and also risk management models like 'value at risk' or VaR models. They were the ones that we used in the 90's and have continued to use for the last 16 years. They're still being used now. They do not correspond with how markets actually work or to actual human behavior. They have failed in the past and they will fail again. If you have the wrong model, you will get the wrong policy and you will be negatively surprised by results every single time.
According to Greenspan, the Fed expanded its balance sheet not to boost the economy or to keep inflation moving higher. It was because the Federal government had such large expenditures that it would have 'crowded out' private borrowers if the Fed had not increased the size of its balance sheet. Do you think that's true? Is the Fed directing the economy? Or just reacting to the capital demands of the US government?
I think both things are true. I think Greenspan is right that we are seeing monetization of debt. This is what Frederick Mishkin, the former member of the Federal Reserve board of governors refers to as 'fiscal dominance.' Yes, I think Greenspan is right about that but it's also true that they're trying to fulfill the dual mandate of price stability and creating jobs. As between the two, the Fed is willing to tolerate higher inflation if they can create more jobs. They don't talk about 'fiscal dominance' and they don't explicitly say they're monetizing the debt. In fact they deny that they're monetizing the debts.
Greenspan's right. When the credit demands of the Federal government are that great, you either have to accommodate the demands or somebody is going to be crowded out. I think that the result would be deflationary. Governments cannot tolerate deflation. So rather than choose between stimulus from monetary ease and monetization of debt, I think that they are doing both.
When you look at the bank bailouts or LTCM bailout, do you think the Fed achieves economic stability by bailing out these institutions? Or do you think that they end up with a more fragile system after the bailouts?
Both. I think that in the short run, they did in fact prevent a bigger collapse. If LTCM had not been bailed out there would have been a worse collapse in 1998. If Goldman Sachs had not been bailed out there would have been a worse collapse in 2008. In the short run, Fed policies did prevent a worse collapse and a worse economic downturn, but it came at a very high cost. Probably the long run costs will be greater than the short-term gains. A lot of the short-term disruption might have produced a more stable system on a going-forward basis, with more of an emphasis on organic growth as opposed to financial engineering.
I think that the bailout worked but only in the short-run to prevent worse events at the time. In the long run they're just creating larger bubbles and large potential collapses that have not emerged yet but probably will in the next year or so.
You've said the 'stress tests' done by the Treasury on the big banks were junk. Does that tie into the idea the idea that the system is actually more unstable now?
The answer is yes. If you look at the balance sheets, bank capital is larger now; regulators would say that the system is more stable as a result. But that's not how I see things. I look at things in terms of the gross national value of derivatives, the inter-connectedness of major financial institutions, and the concentration of assets in the largest banks. Putting all those things together, the system is a lot more complex and more inter-connected on a much greater scale now; that's a recipe for larger financial collapse. Going back to what I said earlier, if you have the wrong model you're going to pursue the wrong policy and get the wrong results. The system is more unstable, but when the Fed regulators look at it, they would probably say the system is more sound.
One last question: Are you at all surprised or alarmed by Greenspan's comments that gold and interest rates would go higher?
No. If you look at Greenspan's record, before he became Chairman of the Federal Reserve he said many positive things about gold. Since leaving the chairmanship, he's said positive things about gold on numerous occasions - for instance at the Council on Foreign Relations this week. He has a history of looking on gold favorably but during the entire 20 years that he was Chairman of the Federal Reserve, he never had a good thing to say about gold. I think it says more about the constraints on central bankers; in other words, central bankers can't tell the truth or what they really think because the market impact would be too great. I think that Greenspan is reverting to saying things today that he was saying 40 years ago but could not say when he was Chairman of the Fed.
________________________
How The Petrodollar Quietly Died, And Nobody Noticed - www.zerohedge.com
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 11/03/2014 23:42 -0500
The Petrodollar, long serving as the US leverage to encourage and facilitate USD recycling, and a steady reinvestment in US-denominated assets by the Oil exporting nations, and thus a means to steadily increase the nominal price of all USD-priced assets, just drove itself into irrelevance.
A consequence of this year's dramatic drop in oil prices, the shift is likely to cause global market liquidity to fall.
This decline follows years of windfalls for oil exporters such as Russia, Angola, Saudi Arabia and Nigeria. Much of that money found its way into financial markets, helping to boost asset prices and keep the cost of borrowing down, through so-called petrodollar recycling. But no more: "this year the oil producers will effectively import capital amounting to $7.6 billion.
Continue reading on Zero Hedge.com.
***
Where Is Swiss Gold? - Location, Location, Location - www.zerohedge.com
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 11/03/2014 11:38 -0500
With the Swiss gold stored at the Bank of Canada, now having been transferred out of the Bank of Canada's Ottawa vault to an unknown location, the Swiss public would be wise to question the SNB on this move.
With the Swiss gold stored at the Bank of England in London seemingly being 'actively managed' one of the world's largest centres for unallocated gold trading, the Swiss public would also be wise to enquire on this issue. And with significant historical quantities of Swiss gold that were stored with the US Federal Reserve Bank in New York no longer there after the SNB seemingly brought their US vaulted gold holdings to zero, the Swiss public need to question why these particular holdings were targeted for sales from 2000-2005 and not domestically held gold.
Continue reading on Zero Hedge.com.
***
China's Gold Strategy- www.zerohedge.com
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 11/03/2014 19:33 -0500
China first delegated the management of gold policy to the People's Bank by regulations in 1983.
To my knowledge this subject has not been properly addressed by any private-sector analysts, which might explain why it is commonly thought that China's gold policy is a more recent development, and why even industry specialists show so little understanding of the true position. But in the thirty-one years since China's gold regulations were enacted, global mine production has increased above-ground stocks from an estimated 92,000 tonnes to 163,000 tonnes today, or 71,000 tonnes; and while the west was also reducing its stocks in a prolonged bear market all that gold was hoarded somewhere.
Continue reading on Zero Hedge.com.
***
Bill Gross Warns, "Global Economy & Financial Markets Are Insecurely Grounded" - www.zerohedge.com
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 11/03/2014 12:04 -0500
"Perhaps sooner rather than later, investors must recognize that modern day inflation, while a necessary condition for survival, is not a sufficient condition for increasing wealth at a rate necessary to satisfy future liabilities associated with education, health care, and a satisfactory retirement. The real economy needs money printing, yes, but money spending more so, and that must come from the fiscal side - from the dreaded government side - where deficits are anathema and balanced budgets are increasingly in vogue. Until then, deflation remains a growing possibility - not the kind that creates prosperity but the kind that's the trouble for prosperity."
Continue reading on Zero Hedge.com.
***
Saudi Arabia Raises Asia, Europe Prices; Cuts US Prices - www.zerohedge.com
Submitted by Tyler Durden on 11/03/2014 13:36 -0500
It appears, just as we warned two weeks ago, that the 'dumping strategy' designed to punish Obama's nemesis Putin could have morphed into a Saudi Arabian strategy to keep its foot on the neck of the US Shale Oil industry. In an awkward headline for mainstream media to explain, The Kingdom has raised prices of its Arab Light crude exports to Asia and Europe but cut prices to the USA significantly, potentially pressuring domestic suppliers with foreign 'cheap' imports. While not a primary course of US oil, we suspect the signaling of this move is more worrisome for Shale capex (especially as we noted Saudi Arabia can survive 7.9 years at lower prices) Forget currency wars, meet oil wars...
Continue reading on Zero Hedge.com.
________________________
The BOJ Jumps The Monetary Shark--Now The Machines, Madmen And Morons Are Raging - davidstockmanscontracorner.com
by David Stockman * November 2, 2014
This is just plain sick. Hardly a day after the greatest central bank fraudster of all time, Maestro Greenspan, confessed that QE has not helped the main street economy and jobs, the lunatics at the BOJ flat-out jumped the monetary shark. Even then, the madman Kuroda pulled off his incendiary maneuver by a bare 5-4 vote. Apparently the dissenters--Messrs. Morimoto, Ishida, Sato and Kiuchi--are only semi-mad.
Never mind that the BOJ will now escalate its bond purchase rate to $750 billion per year--a figure so astonishingly large that it would amount to nearly $3 trillion per year if applied to a US scale GDP. And that comes on top of a central bank balance sheet, which had previously exploded, to nearly 50% of Japan's national income or more than double the already mind-boggling US ratio of 25%.
In fact, this was just the beginning of a Ponzi scheme so vast that in a matter of seconds it's ignited the Japanese stock averages by 5%. And here's the reason: Japan Inc. is fixing to inject a massive bid into the stock market based on a monumental emission of central bank credit created out of thin air. So doing, it has generated the greatest front-running frenzy ever recorded.
The scheme is so insane that the surge of markets around the world in response to the BOJ's announcement is proof positive that the mother of all central bank bubbles now envelopes the entire globe. Specifically, in order to go on a stock-buying spree, Japan's state pension fund (the GPIF) intends to dump massive amounts of Japanese government bonds (JCB's). This will enable it to reduce its government bond holdings-built up over decades-- from about 60% to only 35% of its portfolio.
Needless to say, in an even quasi-honest capital market, the GPIF's announced plan would unleash a relentless wave of selling and price decline. Yet, instead, the Japanese bond market soared on this dumping announcement because the JCBs are intended to tumble right into the maws of the BOJ's endless bid. Charles Ponzi would have been truly envious!
Accordingly, the 10-year JGB is now trading at a microscopic 43 bps and the 5-year at a hardly recordable 11 bps. So, say again. The purpose of all this massive money printing is to drive the inflation rate to 2%. Nevertheless, Japanese government debt is heading deeper into the land of negative real returns because there are no rational buyers left in the market--just the BOJ and some robots trading for a few bps of spread on the carry.
Continue reading on David Stockman's Contra Corner.
________________________
GOLD BELOW $1,200/OZ FOR FOURTH TIME IN LAST 18 MONTHS. NOW WHAT? - www.goldstockanalyst.com
November 2, 2014 by John Doody
Gold and Gold stocks are volatile, as long time precious metal investors know and recent participants now know. You cannot expect outsize returns to the upside from any sector without seeing some big downside moves as well.
We continue to believe the excess money printing by the world's central banks will find its way into the inflation data as they finally achieve their universally stated 2% inflation goal... which should cause Gold to soar. To wit:
- The US Fed may have stopped buying debt, but it will continue to rollover and reinvest as its portfolio matures to maintain its current $4.5 trillion balance sheet, more than five times larger than when the financial crisis began in 2008.
- The European Central Bank begins its own Quantitative Easing 1 trillion (US$11.25 trillion) bond buying program to combat double-digit unemployment rates and an 0.3% inflation rate that appears headed to deflation. Deflation is the worst of all scenarios... just ask Japan.
- Japan's Central Bank in an October 31 surprise announcement said it will increase its annual bond buying program from �65 trillion to �80 trillion (from US$580 billion to US$715 billion/year).
- China's Central Bank is pumping 700 billion Yuan into its 25 largest banks to stimulate growth, as it will miss its 7.5% target for 2014.
All the while, China is soaking up Gold like a sponge from the rest of the World. There's disagreement on whether its accumulating at ~33 mil oz/yr, or double that at ~66 mil oz/yr. But the data shows the Chinese are willing buyers when the world is selling. China's Central Bank holdings have not been announced since 2009. But we know China wants the same reserve currency status for the Yuan that's held by the US Dollar as it allows a nation to pay its foreign debts with a printing press.
Gold is a cornerstone asset for any reserve currency. According to the World Gold Council, in October, 2014 Gold was 72% of US Reserve Assets and 28% of the ECB's. China's 34-mil oz is only 1% of its Reserve Assets, so it has a long way to grow. The potential for a Chinese surprise in its Gold holdings is significant.
Please re-read our recent commentary related to Gold price here:
November 1, GSA-Pro cover article: http://www.goldstockanalyst.com/sample/GSA-Pro_November_2014.pdf
October 5, GSA blog post:
http://www.goldstockanalyst.com/sub.lasso?f=blogDetail&blogids=49
No one has a crystal ball, but we have always profited by holding on and staying the course. If you don't have the needed courage, then sell half your Gold and Gold stock holdings. You are sure to be half right.
Answering many subscribers' question: What if Gold goes to $1000/oz and stays there for a year before recovering? How will the Top 10 be affected? We don't think this will happen...
To read the full article, please subscribe to Gold Stock Analyst.com.
|
 Market Recap
|
 About Miles Franklin
|
Miles Franklin was founded in January, 1990 by David MILES Schectman. David's son, Andy Schectman, our CEO, joined Miles Franklin in 1991. Miles Franklin's primary focus from 1990 through 1998 was the Swiss Annuity and we were one of the two top firms in the industry. In November, 2000, we decided to de-emphasize our focus on off-shore investing and moved primarily into gold and silver, which we felt were about to enter into a long-term bull market cycle. Our timing and our new direction proved to be the right thing to do. We are rated A+ by the BBB with zero complaints on our record. We are recommended by many prominent newsletter writers including Doug Casey, David Morgan, Future Money Trends and the SGT Report.
|
The views and opinions expressed in this e-mail are solely those of the original authors and other contributors. These views and opinions do not necessarily represent those of Miles Franklin Ltd., the Miles Franklin Ltd. staff, and/or any/all contributors to this site.
Readers are advised that the material contained herein is solely for informational purposes. The author and publisher of this letter are not qualified financial advisors and are not acting as such in this publication. The Miles Franklin Report is not a registered financial advisory and Miles Franklin, Ltd., a Minnesota corporation, is not a registered financial advisor. Readers should not view this publication as offering personalized legal, tax, accounting, or investment-related advice. All forecasts and recommendations are based on opinion. Markets change direction with consensus beliefs, which may change at any time and without notice. The information and data contained herein were obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but no representation, warranty or guarantee is made that it is complete, accurate, valid or suitable. Further, the author, publisher and Miles Franklin, Ltd. disclaims all warranties, express, implied or statutory, including, but not limited to, implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, accuracy and non-infringement, and warranties implied from a course of performance or course of dealing. The reader accepts information on the condition that errors or omissions shall not be made the basis for any claim, demand or cause for action. Past results are not necessarily indicative of future results. Any statements non-factual in nature constitute only current opinions, which are subject to change. The author, publisher, Miles Franklin, Ltd, and their respective officers, directors, owners, employees and agents are not responsible for errors or omissions or any damages arising from the display or use of such information. The author, publisher, Miles Franklin, Ltd, and their respective officers, directors, owners, employees and agents may or may not have a position in the commodities, securities and/or options relating thereto, and may make purchases and/or sales of these commodities and securities relating thereto from time to time in the open market or otherwise. Authors of articles or special reports contained herein may have been compensated for their services in preparing such articles. Miles Franklin, Ltd. and/or its officers, directors, owners, employees and agents do not receive compensation for information presented on mining shares or any other commodity, security or product described herein. Nothing contained herein constitutes a representation, nor a solicitation for the purchase or sale of commodities or securities and therefore no information, nor opinions expressed, shall be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell any commodities or securities mentioned herein. Investors are advised to obtain the advice of a qualified financial, legal and investment advisor before entering any financial transaction.
IN NO EVENT SHALL AUTHOR, PUBLISHER, MILES FRANKLIN, LTD, AND THEIR RESPECTIVE DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, EMPLOYEES AND AGENTS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, PUNITIVE, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, EXEMPLARY OR OTHER DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF OR IN ANY WAY CONNECTED WITH ANY INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN OR IN ANY LINK PROVIDED HEREIN, PRODUCTS AND SERVICES ADVERTISED IN OR OBTAINED HEREIN, OR OTHERWISE ARISING OUT OF THE USE OF SUCH INFORMATION, WHETHER BASED ON CONTRACT, TORT, NEGLIGENCE, STRICT LIABILITY OR OTHERWISE.
|
|