Project Fellow  

 

Project Fellow Weekly -  Issue 221   

 

WHAT'S THE LAW 

  

 

 

  

Encouraging intelligent and entertaining debate at your Shabbat table.
 
Fellow Weekly raises issues of business law and ethics through lively emails by featuring your real-life scenarios answered by our leading authorities and professionals.
  

About Project Fellow  

 

.Your Donation will help us publish our works and share this Torah with others.

 

Tax ID # 26-1963112

 

click here for this week's PDF

  

 

                 

 

Debts and Shmitta

"At the end of seven years (the end of the Shmitta year) you shall institute a 'release'. This is the matter of the 'release': Every creditor shall release his authority over what he has lent his fellow or his brother, for he has proclaimed a release for Hashem" [Deuteronomy 15:1,2].
 
 
In other words at the end of the Shmitta year, a creditor must absolve his/her debtors from repaying the loan.

Some questions:
  • Does this mandate include loans which are due after the end of Shmitta?
  • Are loans automatically annulled or is it necessary for the lender to do so?
  • Need a proprietor annul the debts of customers who purchased merchandise on credit?
  • What is the status of due rent money and/or delinquent bills for services rendered?
  • Does Shmitta interfere with a Halachic Warranted Investments  (see Issue 220 and below) whereby the invested could be absolved from returning to the investor a percentage of the investment he/she would otherwise be required to return?
 
What is the Law?

Please email us with your comments, questions, and answers at weekly@projectfellow.org

 

-

Halachically Warranted Investments

How an investor can earn dividends without encountering ribbis:

 

Unless otherwise stipulated, Chazal view an investment, where one party provides the funds (investor) and the second party (invested) actively runs the business as a 50% loan: 50% deposit [Y.D. 177: 2]. (Note: Although 50% is deemed a loan, nevertheless, the entire sum must be used for the investment purposes strictly in accordance with the contractual agreement [Y.D. 177: 30].)

 

Liability: This means that the invested is fully liable for 50% loan even if it is lost due to an unforeseen mishap. The degree of liability for the 50% deposit is shared between the investor and invested. That is, the invested assumes liability for losses due to negligence and the investor assumes liability for losses due to unforeseen mishap. [Y.D. 177: 2]

    

Returns: In terms of splitting the dividends; the invested keeps the money generated from the 50% loan and the investor keeps the money generated from the 50% deposit. As noted above, one may earn dividends off of a deposit [See below].

 

Service Charge: Although, one may earn dividends from a deposit, but a lender may not receive a free or discounted service from the debtor for having advanced the debtor a loan. For the invested to actively invest the 50% deposit on behalf of the investor without receiving compensation for his services, in return for receiving the 50% loan, constitutes ribbis.

Therefore, to ensure that the arrangement does not constitute ribbis, it is imperative for the investor to arrange to compensate the invested for providing the investing services.

Partnerships vs. Investments  

Daniel and Ben partnered to sell camera accessories online. Daniel invested $60,000 into the business while Ben invested $40,000 in to the business. Ben is the active partner.

 

In addition to dividing the returns 60/40, May Daniel demand that the first $5,000 of profits?  

Must Daniel compensate Ben for his services?

   

 

  

What's the Law?
Please email us with your comments, questions, and answers at weekly@projectfellow.org.
  
  
 PDF                                                                                   Thank you for your thoughtful donation 

The Answer
 
Daniel may demand the first 5,000 of profits.
Daniel need not compensate David for his services.
 
 

Detailed Explanation

Buick
or Photography invokes the following Halachos:  


When both parties invest their own money in a venture, no loan transpired and there is no need to compensate the active partner for the rendered services [Y.D. 177:3 Rema].

Additionally the two may divide the returns in any manner they wish and need not concern themselves with ribbis issues [Sha"ch 13]. 


 
 
 PDF 
 

Note:
 
Although we aim to present the correct ruling, varying details are always important and decisively influence every individual case. Our readers are thus encouraged to present their personal cases to a competent authority and not solely rely on the information provided.  

Together...for a better world
 You can help build a better world. Just invite your friends and family to subscribe to   

Fellow Weekly.

 

To join this mailing list, please click here 
or send an email to weekly@projectfellow.org with the word subscribe in the subject line

  

 

    

CLICK HERE to DONATE to PROJECT FELLOW TODAY!

   

 

A project of
Yesharim Foundation for Ethical LawView our profile on LinkedIn
 
105/21 Sanhedria Murchevet, Jerusalem
ISRAEL 02-581-6337
USA 845-335-5516

Join Our Mailing List


Fellow - Yesharim | 105/21 Sanhedria Murchevet | Jerusalem | Israel