logo
Project Fellow
 

 Fellow Weekly -  Issue 145

WHAT'S THE LAW  

  

 

 

 

Encouraging intelligent and entertaining debate at your Shabbat table.
 
Fellow Weekly raises issues of business law and ethics through lively emails by featuring your real-life scenarios answered by our leading authorities and professionals.
  

 

 

INTRODUCING!

LIVE INTERACTIVE LUNCH n' LEARN

CONTEMPORARY CHOSHEN MISHPAT WEBINAR

 

featuring

 

RAV YOSEF KALMAN FRIEDMAN

rosh kollel of PROJECT FELLOW's YESHARIM WORLD RESEARCH CENTER

 

topic: THE VOIDED SALE

WEDNESDAY SEPT. 5th 2012 @ 12:45 PM - 1:05 PM EDT

 

followed by real-time question and answer session 

 

register here free to receive your log-in information 

 

for corporate sponsorship opportunities feel free to email info@projectfellow.org

 

Share Torah with others! Forward this email to another fellow Jew.

  

THIS WEEK'S PDF 

kindly click here to support Project Fellow

 

  

CASE 260: THE SCHNITZEL SHAM
                                   

"Celebrate with The Schnitzel Place: Homemade Gourmet Meals for Less. $30 a plate. Delivery to hall and setup for an additional $2 a plate."

As the out of town guests eagerly arrived, Hyman and the bar mitzvah boy Josh's palpable excitement turned sour when they discovered a bare hall devoid of schnitzels.

The Schnitzel Place delivered the meals to the wrong hall.

  • The Schnitzel Place failed to deliver the meals to the appropriate location. Must Hyman pay for the meals?

 

 

What's the Law?

  

Please email us with your comments, questions, and answers at weekly@projectfellow.org.

  

 

 

 

Last Week's Case 

  

CASE 259: THE LOAN SHARKS
                                   

Thousands of dollars regularly passed through his able fingers. Aaron Schmell managed a highly regarded Free Loan Society in the heart of northern Jerusalem. Schmell's integrity and responsibility earned him international trust and respect. Philanthropists and caring Jews across the globe, comfortably deposited significant funds under his jurisdiction for extended periods of time. In August 2012, sixty percent of his pool belonged to Josh Adler from Atlanta.

 

As a full line of potential borrowers streamed through his office nightly, Schmell held thousands of dollars in cash on hand; which he stored in a secure vault obscured in his home.

Tragically discovered by the underground; one night Aaron's apartment was looted. Destroying the vault, the thieves made away with fifty-thousand dollars cash.

  • Was Aaron responsible to repay his depositors?
  • To whom did the cash belong?
  • Do his depositors divide the loss proportionately?
  • Do we assume the cash belonged to Adler?

 

 

What's the Law?

  

Please email us with your comments, questions, and answers at weekly@projectfellow.org.

  

 

 

 

The Answer

 

We present you here with a concise ruling. For a more intricate elucidation, please see the detailed explanation below.  

 

1. Aaron was absolved from paying his depositors [See detailed explanation].

2. We assume the cash belonged to all of the depositors.

3. The depositors divide the loss proportionately based upon their share in the Fund.

  

  

  

Detailed Explanation    

 

 THE LOAN SHARKS invokes the following laws.  

 

Aaron

1. Aaron's depositors entrusted him with their money. While given jurisdiction to decide to whom to lend their money, he is required to ensure that the funds are returned. We view Aaron as a shomer, a trustee on the value of their deposits[1] [Dayan Chaim Kohn].

2. Though they did not pay Aaron to manage the Free Loan Fund, the prestige and public trust that Aaron earns as a result of his position, suffices Aaron to assume the responsibilities and liabilities of a shomer sachar, a paid trustee [Choshen Mishpat 72 Pischei Teshuva 10].

3. A paid trustee is liable for losses or theft which he/she could have prevented. Whereas, a paid trustee is absolved from losses due to circumstances beyond his/her control like armed robbers or circumstances of theft which he/she would have been unable to protect [Choshen Mishpat 303:2].

Adler and His Partners

4. Considering that funds generally lack definitive nature, the multiple depositors inevitably form a partnership in the Fund's assets. Losses therefore are to be divided proportionately [Choshen Mishpat 292: 10, Rema].

(In contrast; multiple depositors of definitive items retain their individual ownership over their respective belongings. They do not generally form partnerships with their co-depositors.

For example, Ari give three suits to a tailor to alter. The three suits remain Ari's even if David dropped off two suits that day - even if the suits were all the same model number, style, and size.

The question would thus arise; were armed thugs to run away with two suits; who absorbs the loss - Ari, David, Both?

Milk from a kosher cow is kosher. Milk from a non - kosher cow is non - kosher. How do we know if that the milk in the container in your refrigerator emanated from a cow that was Halachically healthy?

The Answer: Most cows are kosher. We assume the milk emanated from the majority and need not assume the milk came from the minority of cows halachically unfit for consumption. Halachic terminology refers to this principle is referred to as Kol deparish merubah parish.

In the same vein, Kol deparish merubah parish requires Ari, the depositor of three suits, to absorb the loss [ibid.].)



[1] The Torah however, absolves one who has been appointed to appropriate charity funds at his discretion. He is neither deemed a trustee for the contributors nor for the undefined recipients.

 

 

Application  

Aaron is absolved from paying for theft due to circumstances beyond his control. As Schmell is a 60% owner of the Free Loan Society's funds, sixty percent of the $50,000 stolen belongs to Schmell who consequently absorbs sixty percent of the loss. The remaining depositors divide the remaining forty percent proportionately.   

 

Note:
 
Although we aim to present the correct ruling, varying details are always important and decisively influence every individual case. Our readers are thus encouraged to present their personal cases to a competent authority and not solely rely on the information provided.
 

Together...for a better world
 You can help build a better world. Just invite your friends and family to subscribe to
 

Fellow Weekly.

 

To join this mailing list, please click here 
or send an email to weekly@projectfellow.org with the word subscribe in the subject line

  

 

    

CLICK HERE to DONATE to PROJECT FELLOW TODAY!

   

 

A project of
Yesharim Foundation for Ethical LawView our profile on LinkedIn
 
105/21 Sanhedria Murchevet, Jerusalem
ISRAEL 02-581-6337
USA 845-335-5516

Join Our Mailing List


Fellow - Yesharim | 105/21 Sanhedria Murchevet | Jerusalem | Israel