logo
Project Fellow
 

 Fellow Weekly -  Issue 120

WHAT'S THE LAW

  

 

 
Encouraging intelligent and entertaining debate at your Shabbat table.
 
Fellow Weekly raises issues of business law and ethics through lively emails by featuring your real-life scenarios answered by our leading authorities and professionals.
 

 

 

 

 

 

  

      CLICK HERE FOR THIS ISSUE' S PDF

   

-

   

Dear Friends,

 

As we thank G-d publish our 120th issue, we thank you for following us and joining in our efforts towards reaching this milestone.

 

We thank all of those who graciously provide us with financial and technical support.

 

We thank our Halachic team of scholars and our Yesharim Research Center; the backbone of our movement. 

 

May we merit together to continue sharing the beauty and richness of our eternal Torah across the earth.

 

Please continue to help us by inviting others to join us as well.   

 

click here to donate to Project Fellow

 

   

Case # 227 Up Up & Away: Kiddy Litter or Kitty Litter

 

As the charming Jerusalem children cheerfully capered in the long awaited rain, Grandma Bertha Braun slowly made her way up the hill, while bracing herself against the powerfully wet winter winds. Suddenly, she observed two brimming grey 95 liter garbage bags dart down the drenched stairway of the adjacent building, bouncing upon the backs of the Berger boys.
 
The boys dashed towards the giant green dumpster, swung their bags over their shoulders and readied themselves for the twenty yard toss.

  

"Ah Ah" they yelled on the top of their lungs. Before they could release their hand ammo, a hungry litter of unruly kittens impudently poked their heads out of the dumpster, eyed the Berger boys and leaped forward. The Berger boys dropped their projectiles on the ground near the bin and ran.

 

Bertha did not see the cats. She did see the Berger Boys leave the trash on the ground and run though. Bertha became incensed. "Who raised these kids? How insensitive to litter the trash out on the sidewalk instead of placing it in the dumpster!"

 

As these aggravating thoughts began to overtake her mind; suddenly a mighty gust of wind shook her up and threatened to blow her umbrella inside out. Up Up and Away! As Bertha tried to hold on tightly and maneuver her umbrella so; the wind prevailed. Her umbrella blown inside out and across the street., Bertha reluctantly continued on, unshielded from the elements, leaving her umbrella shards as a lasting public evidence of Bertha's capitulation to a Greater Force.

.

May the Berger Boys leave the trash outside near the dumpster or should they bring it back home and wait for a more opportune time to discard their bags?

 

Must Bertha chase her shards and toss them in the public trash or may she have the wind "pick up the pieces"?

 

 

 

 

Please email us with your comments and answers at weekly@projectfellow.org 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

FROM OUR INBOX
Case # 226 
Withholding plans from an employer that one is contemplating leaving. 
Unless things change drastically, I will be leaving my company within one year. Yesterday my boss (who sits behind me in shul) discussed company paid for training over the next year.  Of course the company would be wasting money if I take courses and then leave. I have no desire to cause them a loss.  On the other hand, if I disclose my plans before the customary period, I could lose things like commissions, choice assignments, salary increase, pension credits and may be even terminated with little severance pay.  What do I do?

 

[Submitted by Mr. S. NY]

   

   

You have no obligation to reveal your plans unless the employer specifies that he ties paying for training to a commitment to the job. As long as there is no specific condition that you reveal your plans prior to the customary period, you are part of the crew.

 

 

[Dayan Chaim Kohn]

 

 

 Case # 224

 

Is there an issue of involving oneself with prohibitted mysticsm by engaging in acupuncture?

 

 

 

This has nothing to do with any mysticism or metaphysical. They simply understand holistic medicine.

 

 

 

 

   

 [Dayan Chaim Kohn] 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Case # 225 Organic Transplants: Of Hearts and Palms
 
With a score of experience in geriatric medicine, physician Roy Feldman M.D.'s Roy Center, a cutting edge and state-of- the- art geriatric center, earned prestige and renown throughout the Sunshine State. The local pensioners along the Fort Lauderdale waterfront enjoyed the professionalism, respectfulness and personal touch so indicative of the Roy Center.
 
Roy and his staff provided primary, geriatric care, counseling, and guidance in long-term planning.
 
Though still in the prime of her life, Lori Lehman continued to fight for her life ever since her tragic boating accident. Lori had previously discussed with Roy the possibility of donating her heart to his patient, her 63 year old mom should she pass away suddenly, as her mom was on line for a transplant.
 
Adjacent to the Roy Center; stood the doctor's stunning waterfront estate home. His residence boasted four large bedrooms, with a downstairs master suite, four luxury baths, formal living and dining rooms, a family room and a gourmet kitchen with custom cabinetry, stainless appliances, granite counters and center island.
 
The dramatic 16' ceilings, impact windows and doors offered wide water views. The private backyard lined with Sylvester date palms and a covered veranda overlooking the water offered a tranquil setting away from the pressures at work.
 
As the Feldman kids grew up and left home, Roy and his wife entertained the idea of enhancing their estate whereby clearing some palms to make way for a sparkling private pool.
 
May/should Lori donate her heart to her Mom?
May Roy clear away the Sylvesters to make room for the pool?

 

 

 

What's the Law? 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Answer

We present you here with a concise ruling. For a more intricate elucidation, please see the detailed explanation below.

 

As of yet, Lori may not donate her heart to her Mom.

 

Roy may not eliminate the Sylvester to make room for the pool unless he needs the pool for his health. Even so, many would be wary of doing so. If need be, he may effectively transplant the tree instead. (A competent Halachic authority might offer alternative options).

 

 

 

Detailed Explanation
 
 

Organic Transplants: Of Hearts and Palms  invokes the following eight laws. 

 

 1. The human body is sacred. Benefitting from a cadaver is almost always forbidden even with the prior consent of the individual [Yoreh De'ah 349:1].

 

 

2. To save a deathly ill patient, it is permissible to benefit from a cadaver [ibid. Pischei Teshuva 1].

 

3. It is forbidden to terminate the life of a terminally ill patient in order to save the life of another patient  [Rambam Hilchos Rotzeach 1: 9].

 

4. Do not destroy a fruit-bearing tree so long as it produces sufficient fruit from which one can benefit (Devarim 20: 19, 20, see Maseches Bava Kama 91b for minimum production quantity).

 

5. Man is an inverted tree. His/her roots; the conduits of his/her life source are in the heavens, his/her arms and legs are its branches[Maharal Netzach Yisrael 7]. Man is comparable to a fruit bearing tree, bearing eternal fruit  [Gur Aryeh Bereishis 9:21].

 

Rebbi Chanina testified that his righteous son Shivchis died young because he felled a palm tree while it was still productive  [Maseches Bava Kama ibid.].

 

6. If the tree is damaging other fruit, or if it is more profitable to market the wood than the fruit thereof, one may cut down the tree [e.g. hearts of palms] (Maseches Bava Kama ibid.)

 

7. Similarly, if one needs the area, one may eliminate the tree [Rosh 8: ].

 

 Needing the space means for necessity and not for luxurious consumption  [Chavos Yair 195].

 

8. When it is permissible to eliminate a productive fruit tree, need one concern him/herself with the mystical danger documented in the Talmud?

 

Though, Binyan Tzion (Aruch Laner, Rav Yaakov Ettlinger) says one need not worry; common custom is to be wary of such danger as per Yaavetz 1: 76, Taz, and Chasam Sofer.

 

 

Application:

      

       Of Hearts

In the late nineteen sixties and early seventies, most heart transplant recipients did not survive [Professor Shimon Glick Head of Dept. of Internal Medicine, Soroka Medical Center].
 
Even after medical advances increased success rates dramatically; as of yet, the heart must be harvested while the donor patient cannot definitively be proclaimed as halachically dead. As such, as of yet, it would be forbidden to allow the practitioner to transplant Lori's heart, even to benefit her mother [Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach].
 
And Palms
Roy may only fell the productive Sylvester tree if he needed the space. Even so, many are wary of potential mystical dangers associated with the untimely cutting down of fruit bearing trees. If Roy did not need the pool per se; rather, he merely wished to pamper himself with luxury and comfort, it would be in fact forbidden for him to cut down the tree. Instead, numerous approaches are available, one of which is to effectively transplant the tree to an alternative area, while not jeopardizing the longevity of the tree. 
 

 

 

 

 

 

Note:
 
Although we aim to present the correct ruling, varying details are always important and decisively influence every individual case. Our readers are thus encouraged to present their personal cases to a competent authority and not solely rely on the information provided.
 

Together...for a better world
 You can help build a better world. Just invite your friends and family to subscribe to
 

Fellow Weekly.

 

To join this mailing list, please click here 
or send an email to weekly@projectfellow.org with the word subscribe in the subject line

  

 

    

CLICK HERE to DONATE to PROJECT FELLOW TODAY!

   

 

A project of
Yesharim Foundation for Ethical LawView our profile on LinkedIn
 
105/21 Sanhedria Murchevet, Jerusalem
ISRAEL 02-581-6337
USA 845-335-5516

Join Our Mailing List


Fellow - Yesharim | 105/21 Sanhedria Murchevet | Jerusalem | Israel