CSID Bulletin Header in JPG

Egypt's evolving governance is no 'democratic transition'


By Michele Dunne and Thomas Carothers - The Washington Post 

 

In the half-year since the Egyptian military ousted President Mohamed Morsi, U.S. officials from President Obama on down have repeatedly said that the United States seeks to advance "Egypt's transition to democracy." Unfortunately, given Egypt's downward political spiral, what is probably intended to be a principled policy formulation sounds either dangerously naive or deeply cynical - and is pointing U.S. policy down the wrong path.

Supporting Egyptian democracy is certainly the right thing to do. Unlike in some countries where U.S. interests pull in conflicting directions, the achievement of democracy in Egypt would advance the critical U.S. security interest in longer-term stability as well as peace with Israel and would help to contain violent extremism.  

 

Only an inclusive, pluralistic political order that respects Egyptians' aspirations for a voice, accountability and justice would put an end to the repeated paroxysms of mass public protest and signs of incipient extremism. Supporting Egyptian democracy is not a pleasing idealistic extra; it is essential to an effective, hard-nosed policy for security and regional peace.

 

But there is a serious problem with the constant U.S. references to supporting Egypt's democratic transition: There is no democratic transition in Egypt.  

 

That formulation was appropriate after President Hosni Mubarak's fall in February 2011, when open political contestation took place despite undemocratic steps by various actors. It may have been plausible, briefly, after the military's ouster of Morsi last July. But in recent months the true colors of the military's political project have become clear. Through a bruising cascade of actions, laws and decrees that violate basic rights and freedoms, constrain political space and sharpen polarization, Egypt's security apparatus has defined the boundaries of a new semi-authoritarian system. Last week's referendum on a new constitution, marred by the exclusion of dissenting views, cemented in place a foundation stone for that project: The constitution gives extensive autonomy and immunity to the army, as well as the right to try civilians in military courts.

 

In this context, continued U.S. references to the "democratic transition" in Egypt are problematic, especially when accompanied, as they often are, by references to "progress on Egypt's road map" and the "shared goals" of the U.S. and Egyptian governments.

At a minimum, the administration sounds seriously out of touch. (Imagine if throughout the political gridlock and polarization in Washington last year, President Obama had repeatedly stated his support for Congress's "constructive bipartisanship.") Worse, these references, however well-intentioned, give the impression that Washington is doing the opposite of supporting democracy - that it is backing the Egyptian military's project and playing along by depicting it as a democratic path.

 

 

Getting the words right on Egypt has become all the more important in the past month - recent U.S. legislation says that nearly $1 billion in U.S. military and economic assistance can be released only if the secretary of state certifies that the Egyptian government "is taking steps to support a democratic transition."
The remaining allocated aid is half a billion dollars and can be spent only if the secretary makes a similar certification about a new Egyptian government after presidential and parliamentary elections, which are scheduled to take place over the next few months. Unlike with previous legislation, the administration may not waive those conditions on national security grounds. A hedge is still possible: the administration could choose to highlight a few strands of political progress while playing down major backward steps, such as the massive ongoing crackdown against Islamists and secular critics of the military in which hundreds have been killed and thousands imprisoned. But would that be wise, and would the relevant congressional committees accept such a certification?

 

 

Rather than continuing to describe Egypt's political conditions with words that have less and less to do with reality, the Obama administration and Congress ought to be forthright and accurate about what is happening. While continuing to look for concrete, meaningful ways to weigh in in favor of pluralism, openness and justice in Egypt, the administration should stop using aspirational language that can be misconstrued as supporting current Egyptian political realities. Clarifying our words would also help clarify our policy.

 

The administration is likely to feel compelled to maintain certain kinds of security cooperation with Egypt and to support the Egyptian people directly via educational or other assistance. But it should make clear that it does so despite strong disapproval of the political path the military is following and serious concern about that path's implications for the Egyptian people and for U.S. interests, which might well be threatened by reinvigorated Islamic extremism. Washington must not pretend that some empty imitations of democratic processes, such as the recent referendum and what are likely to be equally flawed parliamentary and presidential elections, constitute a meaningful return to the path toward "bread, freedom and social justice" that Egyptians rightfully demanded in 2011.

  



About CSID


By supporting CSID, you help to:
  • Create a better future for our children so they can have more opportunities for improving their lives and realizing their dreams.
  • Educate and inform Americans about Islam's true values of tolerance, peace, and good will towards mankind, including peoples of other faiths.
  • Improve U.S. relations with the Muslim world by supporting popular movements rather than oppressive tyrannies and corrupt regimes.
  • Replace the feelings of hopelessness, despair, and anger in many parts of the Muslim world, especially among the youth, with a more positive and hopeful outlook for the future.
  • Encourage young Muslim Americans, and Muslims everywhere, to participate in the political process and to reject calls for destructive violence and extremism.
  • Build a network of Muslim democrats around the globe who can share knowledge and experience about how to build and strengthen democratic institutions and traditions in the Muslim countries.


Center for the Study of Islam & Democracy

Membership/Donation Form 2014  
      
Name: ______________________________________________________________________________
 
Institution:___________________________________________________________________________
 
Address: ____________________________________________________________________________
 
City____________________________State______________Zip _______________________________
 
Tel.:________________________________________________________________________________
 
Fax.:_______________________________________________________________________________
 
E-mail:______________________________________________________________________________
 

I would like to join CSID as:
 
  Student Member            ❑ $20              Newsletter Subscription      ❑ $20
  Institutional Member      ❑ $200            CSID 500 Club                    ❑ $500
  Associate Member         ❑  $50             Founding Member               ❑ $1000
  Member                         ❑ $100             Lifetime Member                 ❑ $2500

  National Advisory Board          ❑ $1,000
  International Advisory Board   ❑ $5,000

I would like to make a tax-deductible donation for:   $__________

I would like to make a pledge to CSID for:
❑  $1000  ❑ $500  ❑ $200   ❑ $100  ❑ $50   Other________  


Please mail, along with payment, to:
 
Center for the Study of Islam & Democracy (CSID)

1050 Connecticut Ave. NW, Suite 1000

Washington, D.C. 20036


Donate Button

Become a Member button

CSID Brochure in English
Click here to read Brochure



Please donate generously. Your contribution to CSID is both tax-deductible, and zakat-eligible. Your contribution will make a world of difference.

The Center for the Study of Islam & Democracy is a non-profit think tank, based in Washington DC - dedicated to promoting a better understanding of democracy in the Muslim world, and a better understanding of Islam in America. To achieve its objectives, the Center organizes meetings, conferences, and publishes several reports and periodicals. CSID engages Muslim groups, parties, and governments - both secularist and moderate Islamist - in public debates on how to reconcile Muslims' interpretation of Islam and democracy.  CSID is committed to providing democracy education to ordinary citizens, civil society, religious and political leaders in the Muslim world, and has organized meetings, workshops, and conferences in over 25 countries, including Nigeria, Sudan, Saudi Arabia, Tunisia, Iran, Algeria, Morocco, Egypt, Jordan, Turkey, etc.

 
"In just a few years, CSID has done remarkable work in facilitating the vital discussion about Islam and democracy in the United States and beyond. In so doing it has made an invaluable contribution to breaking down prejudice and misunderstanding and to meeting the crucial challenge of advancing human rights and democracy in the Muslim world."

                               Neil Hicks, Director  
                               Human Rights Defenders Program
 
 

"The Center for the Study of Islam and Democracy (CSID) plays an absolutely vital role in creating a platform for the voices of democracy and reform throughout the Muslim World. Equally vital is the role they play in bringing a better understanding of the diversity within Islam to the people of America. CSID's advocacy of Islamic values coupled with democratic principles needs and merits our support."                       

                              John D. Sullivan, Executive Director                              
Center for International Private Enterprise
 

"CSID's role is crucial in Muslim societies and in the West. It is instrumental in contextualizing democracy in Muslim societies by underscoring the areas where Islam values and democratic principles meet. The CSID also bridges this arbitrary and unnecessary gap between the Muslim democrats and the secular democrats, an essential step for making the establishment of democracy and effective participatory systems a mainstream quest. Further, the CSID's role in the US is equally important in presenting the moderate, tolerant and pluralistic nature of Islam."


                              Emad El-Din Shahin, Professor 
                              University of Notre Dame
 




For more on What they Say about CSID please visit our website:  www.csidonline.org
 



      Back to topbottom