Brief Summary of a recent paper on:
Political Pluralism in Tunisia
Summary of a paper presented by Dr. Radwan Masmoudi, President of CSID at the 'Pluralism and Democracy: Prospects for the Arab Middle East and North Africa', organized by the European Council on Foreign Relations and the Council for a Community of Democracies, on Thursday December 6 & Friday December 7, 2012 in Paris, France.
A few Introductory remarks:
1- Tunisians are finding out that building a real, genuine, and lasting democracy is much harder than removing a dictator. Before and during the revolution against Ben Ali, the opposition and all Tunisians were fed up with the old regime and were united in their desire to get rid of it. However, soon after the revolution, they became divided in how to move forward and what kind of political system, rights, constitution, and reforms they want to see implemented. These divisions have made it difficult to implement and achieve the desired reforms and results quickly enough for the people to believe and support the transition. This has also allowed those who supported the old regime and who had benefited from it to begin to coalesce in various forms and to begin plotting for the failure of the democratic transition.
2- These divisions are found especially along the Islamic-secular divide. Each side represent roughly 40-50% of the population, although Islamists are mostly a united front (most of them are affiliated with al-Nahdha) while secularists are divided among more than 10 or 15 political grouping and tendencies. Many of then are of course united against al-Nahdha and many of them want the coalition-government to fail (except of course Attakattol and CPR who are part of the ruling coalition), but they are also divided along strong ideological, economic, social, and political fault lines. Bitter inner fighting among the secularist groups and parties and between them and al-Nahdha has led to rising tensions in the country and the weakening of national unity and dialogue and consensus. Strong feelings of fear and sometimes even hatred between hardcore Islamists and hardcore secularists have been developed over the more than 30 years of mistrust, corruption, oppression, and a fear industry cultivated by Ben Ali to keep Tunisians divided and fearful of each other.
3- Unlike Turkey or Egypt, neither side can impose its views or will on the other. The secularists cannot impose secular laws and the Islamists cannot impose Islamic laws. This is why al-Nahdha announced early on (in March) that it will not insist on mentioning Shariah as one of the sources of legislation in the new constitution. Discussions in the National Constituent Assembly have led to building consensus on many issues (rights of women, freedom of expression, rights of minorities, respect for Islamic values and the Arab/Islamic identity, etc..) but this has been an arduous and difficult process. The only point of divergence remains what kind of political regime will be chosen for Tunisia (parliamentarian system or presidential system) and on this issue Tunisians and political parties are still divided. A recent announcement by the ruling Troika declared that they have agreed on choosing a "modified presidential system" and a popularly-elected president, but it is clear that they remain divided on the specific oversight role and functions that will be granted to the president and his or her relations with the parliament and with the government. This remains a very politicized debate and is currently delaying the final stages in the drafting and adoption of the new constitution.
4- We have two powerful movements and tendencies, in Tunisia and in the Arab world: A strong religious movement whereby religion has become an extremely strong force and part of the identity of most citizens, and a very strong democratic movement which has convinced Tunisians (and generally Arabs) that development, prosperity, and dignity cannot be achieved without freedom and democracy. If these two strong forces collide, we will have violence and possibly even civil war in Tunisia, but if we are successful in bridging the gap between these two popular political and social movements, then we can build the basis for a genuine and lasting democracy. This will require the "internalization" of the values of human rights and democracy within Islamic values and culture. Common citizens must believe that democracy is not only compatible with Islam (and with their Islamic culture and values), it is the only political system that IS compatible with Islam. On this front, there is still a huge effort that is needed in order to convince the majority of the citizens that values of freedom, democracy, and human rights are indeed compatible with Islam, but this effort is often derailed or weakened by calls for certain freedoms that are still a matter of huge debate and controversy even in the West (such as pornography, homosexuality, prostitution, nudity, and disrespect for religious values and symbols). In my opinion, these hotly contested and debated issues must be postponed to a later date after the basic pillars of the democratic house are built and solidified, and in this respect, we must remember that neither Rome nor democracy were built in one day. 5- Finally, Tunisia has accomplished quite a lot in the past two years, but a lot more remains to be done. The next two to three years remain crucial in order to: - finish drafting and ratification of the constitution (hopefully with a 2/3 majority, which will not be easy) to hold free and fair presidential and legislative elections, hopefully within the next year,
- adopt and implement a new law for the three permanent and independent High Councils (for election, for the judicial system, and for the media),
- adopt a new law for transitional justice,
- continue efforts to reform and clean up the security sector, the judicial system, and the media, which were the main pillars of the Ben Ali regime and which remain almost intact,
- build more consensus, dialogue, and national unity between all Tunisians on these critical and crucial steps, and on how to protect and respect Islamic and democratic values and principles,
- finally to try to provide some economic stability and growth, reduce poverty and unemployment, and give Tunisians, especially the youth, hope that a better future lies ahead so that they can be more patient towards these "democratic" instabilities and upheavals.
A very tall order indeed. I remain however optimistic that Tunisia will succeed, but this will more support from the United States and the European Union, who have a huge stake in the success of this democratic transition. They have not yet stepped up to the table and provided the necessary economic and financial support to help Tunisia along this very difficult path. I hope we will not all be sorry, two, three, or five years from now, that we missed a great historic moment to build peace, stability, democracy, and prosperity on the southern shores of the Mediterranean, in this vital and crucial region of the Middle East and North Africa. For democracy to grow in the Arab world, it must first succeed in Tunisia. This means that the secular-Islamist coalition must be maintained, and that much stronger economic support and assistance must be provided to help Tunisia in this difficult and challenging transition.
|
Democracy in the scope of religions
By Radwan Masmoudi
Summary of a paper presented at the International Conference on "Religion and Democracy in Europe and the Arab world" organized on 29-30 November 2012, at the Lebanese American University - Byblos- Lebanon, by Adyan.
Rise of Religion:
Forty or fifty years ago, most thinkers and scholars were predicting the death of religion or even the death of God. Religion had few followers and did not play any major role in life or in politics. I remember growing up in Tunisia in the seventies, mosques were mostly deserted, except by old people who had nothing to do but stay in the mosques and pray. It was rare to see young people going to the mosques or young women wearing the veil. Most of the students in the universities were communists, leftists, and many were openly atheists. In the mid to late seventies, this started to change and we started seeing young people going to the mosques in increasing numbers. We also started seeing women and girls wearing the veil. Both of these acts were considered acts of challenging the government and the ruling elite, which reacted by cracking down very harshly on anyone who was religiously observant. This crackdown in fact helped to make this movement even more popular as people have a tendency to sympathize with people who are oppressed, especially if they are oppressed for their religious beliefs. Since the early eighties, Islamic movements, tendencies, practices, and observance of Islamic values have increased tremendously, not only in the Arab world but throughout the world in general, and religion has become an important part of our life and our culture, both as individuals and as societies. Human beings are not only materialistic animals. We are also spiritual creatures, and belief in God and in spiritual values and principles (that are bigger than ourselves and our material and physical needs) is a very important part of our lives. This is why Islamic movements and Islamic political parties (i.e. political parties that advocate respect for religious values and practices) are on the rise and their popularity is rising across the Arab world.
Rise of Democracy:
Simultaneously, and in the past 30-40 years, we witnessed throughout the Arab world and the world in general the rise of the values of freedom and democracy, as an urgent need and requirement for dignity, decency and human rights. For many decades, people in the Arab world thought that the newly independent states or regimes - that were established after gaining independence from European colonizers - would be capable of providing economic development, social justice, dignity, and independence from foreign dominance without necessarily providing freedom or democracy. People were willing to give up (at least temporarily) their demands or aspirations for freedom or dignity, in exchange for economic development and stability. However, after 40 to 50 years of these newly-independent states and regimes, we all found out that these regimes became more and more oppressive and corrupt, as well as increasingly isolated from the legitimate demands and aspirations of the people. Over a period of time, the people realized that without freedom and democracy, not only is there no dignity and no human rights, but also there is no real sustainable economic or social development, and there is no way to stop or fight the endemic and spreading cancer of "corruption". So, the demands for freedom and democracy became louder and stronger, and the people who were willing to forgo their human and democratic rights for a while, were now demanding their human right to freedom and democracy, and were willing to die for it. This is why the Arab revolutions and Arab awakening occurred. Because for the first time, the demands for social and economic justice were closely tied to the demands for real, genuine, and sustainable freedom and democracy.
Marrying Democracy and Religion:
So at this critical juncture in the history of the Arab world and of the Islamic world, more generally, the main challenge that we all face is: how can we succeed in building a strong, thriving, and successful democracy that respects the freedom and the dignity of all the citizens (no matter what their religion, gender, age, color, or ethnic background is), while at the same time respecting the religious values and principles of the majority of the citizens, which are overwhelming Muslim. What does a democracy that respects Islamic values mean exactly (some people prefer to call it an Islamic or Muslim democracy, although that term is not yet clear or well defined)? How can we respect Islamic values without imposing them on the people, while also respecting the individual rights and freedoms of all citizens without forgetting or contradicting our Islamic values and culture? What is the role of religion in society, and what is the relationship between religious values, scholars, and institutions on one hand and political values, leaders, and institutions on the other?
These are the main questions and challenges that are facing the Arab world today, especially in Tunisia, Egypt, and Libya, the three countries of the Arab Awakening that are now building new political systems and structures and writing new constitutions.
From the outset, let me say that I am cautiously optimistic that we will succeed in providing the right answers and in building real democracies, but that this will not be easy, it will take time, and we will need the support of all our friends in the rest of the world who want to see democracy and freedom succeed in the Arab world.
The good news is that we do not have a clergy (or a church per se) in the Islamic/Sunni world, and therefore, no one really wants a religious state or a theocracy in the Arab world. People do not want a secular dictatorship that keeps religions and religious values at bay or at home, but they also do not want a religious dictatorship that imposes religious beliefs or practices on the people.
In order to succeed in this very difficult and historic transformation, we need to "internalize" the values of freedom and democracy into our cultural and religious values. It must become clear to the overwhelming majority of citizens that democratic values, principles, and institutions are not only compatible with Islam, but are part and parcel - or fully mandated and required - by Islamic values and principles. Democracy is not only compatible with Islam, it is the only political system that is compatible with Islam.
So, how do we "internalize" democracy within our Islamic values and principles? I believe this is a crucial component for the long term success of democracy in the Arab and Islamic worlds, and I believe this can be done through a rigorous and comprehensive "Ijtihad" (re-interpretation of Islamic texts based on the current needs and realities) focusing on the following core Islamic principles:
1. The principle of Shura (or consultation) which is mentioned and emphasized in the Qur'an as a requirement and characteristic of believers..... و أمرهم شورى بينهم. We can easily make the case that Shura is a value and principle that lacks specific tools and mechanisms, and that in fact democracy offers the best tools and mechanisms to conduct real shura in the 21st century and in the context of large nation states that includes millions of people, different cultures, ethnicities, and religions.
2. The principle of freedom (al-hurriya) which is fundamental in Islam and in every religion since without freedom, religion has no meaning. The Qur'an teaches us in many verses that human beings must have the choice to believe or not to believe (من شاء فليؤمن و من شاء فليكفر) and that without this freedom, religion becomes meaningless (لا إكراه في الدين).
3. The principle of Justice (عدل) which is also fundamental in Islam and this word is mentioned over 300 times in the Qur'an. True justice is of course a human value and aspiration throughout the centuries, and Islam strongly emphasizes the need to be just towards everyone - every human being without exception - and not to oppress or transgress against others (الظلم ظلمات يوم القيامة - أفضل الجهاد كلمة حقّ عند سلطان جائر). We can, I believe, easily make the case that democracy is the best system to provide real justice and to treat all citizens with justice, equality, and dignity.
4. The principle of Khilafa (خلافة الله في الأرض) and by that I do not mean the idea of Caliphate, as popularly believed, but the idea that we are all representatives or vice-gerants of God on earth... Not a particular individual or class of people, but all of us as human beings and as individuals. Neither God nor the prophet (pbuh) have appointed anybody to rule over us. Rather they left this task and this responsibility to all of us as "representatives of God on earth", so no one can claim to represent God on earth, and the only peaceful way to solve our differences of opinions about religion, politics, or culture, is through the democratic process. Peace after all is the ultimate goal of Islam and of all major religions, and democracy is the only peaceful way to resolve political differences or disputes.
I believe that these four core Islamic principles, if properly understood and developed, can help us internalize democracy in our culture and strengthen these principles in Arab/Islamic societies. I also believe that this "internalization" of democratic values and principles with Islamic values and traditions is going to be an essential requirement and prerequisite for the long term success of democracy in the Arab and Islamic world, starting of course with Tunisia, Libya, and Egypt.
Back to top
|
About CSID
By supporting CSID, you help to: - Create a better future for our children so they can have more opportunities for improving their lives and realizing their dreams.
- Educate and inform Americans about Islam's true values of tolerance, peace, and good will towards mankind, including peoples of other faiths.
- Improve U.S. relations with the Muslim world by supporting popular movements rather than oppressive tyrannies and corrupt regimes.
- Replace the feelings of hopelessness, despair, and anger in many parts of the Muslim world, especially among the youth, with a more positive and hopeful outlook for the future.
- Encourage young Muslim Americans, and Muslims everywhere, to participate in the political process and to reject calls for destructive violence and extremism.
- Build a network of Muslim democrats around the globe who can share knowledge and experience about how to build and strengthen democratic institutions and traditions in the Muslim countries.
Center for the Study of Islam & Democracy
Membership/Donation Form 2012/13
Name: ______________________________________________________________________________
Institution:___________________________________________________________________________
Address: ____________________________________________________________________________
City____________________________State______________Zip _______________________________
Tel.:________________________________________________________________________________
Fax.:_______________________________________________________________________________
E-mail:______________________________________________________________________________
I would like to join CSID as:
Student Member ❑ $20 Newsletter Subscription ❑ $20
Institutional Member ❑ $200 CSID 500 Club ❑ $500
Associate Member ❑ $50 Founding Member ❑ $1000
Member ❑ $100 Lifetime Member ❑ $2500
National Advisory Board ❑ $1,000 International Advisory Board ❑ $5,000
I would like to make a tax-deductible donation for: $__________
I would like to make a pledge to CSID for: ❑ $1000 ❑ $500 ❑ $200 ❑ $100 ❑ $50 Other________
Please mail, along with payment, to:
CSID 1625 Massachusetts Ave., NW, Suite 601,
Washington, D.C. 20036 Click here to read Brochure
Please donate generously. Your contribution to CSID is both tax-deductible, and zakat-eligible. Your contribution will make a world of difference.
"The struggle for democracy that we are living through in the Arab world in general and Egypt in particular owes much to the conscientious efforts of CSID over the past decade and we are grateful for that effort."
Amr Hamzawi Prof. of Political Science, Cairo University, former Research Director and Senior Associate at Carnegie Middle East and chairman of The Friends of Free Libya in Egypt
|
|