Obama and Congress at Odds on Sick Leave Policy
On September 7, President Barack Obama signed an executive order that would require federal contractors to offer their workers up to seven days of paid sick leave per year (80 FR 54697). He also renewed previous calls for Congress to pass legislation to make similar leave available to private sector workers nationwide.
Republicans indicate the executive order and other paid leave mandates pending in Congress will only add another layer of bureaucracy for employers that could drive up costs and force them to cut jobs. Some said they continue to instead support legislation that would allow employers to offer paid time off in lieu of overtime wages.
Rep. John Kline (R-MN), who chairs the Committee on Education and the Workforce, believes a time-off-for-overtime measure would simply give private workers the same flexibility already afforded to federal government workers. He and other Republicans criticized the president for issuing the executive order instead of working through Congress to reach a solution.
Meanwhile, Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) continues to push legislation that she introduced earlier this year, which would require employers to offer workers up to seven days of annual paid sick leave. If there's a possibility for compromise on the issue, Sen. Angus King (I-ME) and Sen. Deb Fischer (R-NE) have a bill they introduced in the previous Congress that would have offered employers tax incentives in return for making paid sick leave available to their workers. The bill has not been introduced yet in this 114th Congress.
Proposed Overtime Rule Receives Large Response
The U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) received 247,068 public comments about its proposed white-collar overtime rule. Employee advocacy groups and others say the increase would help families and the economy, but many industry groups and other parties say it would cause layoffs and business failures. Click HERE to see HCAOA's comments that were submitted on the proposed rule.
The proposed rule, unveiled June 30, would more than double the salary workers must be paid before they can be considered exempt from the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) requirement that they be paid one and one-half times their normal pay rate for work hours exceeding 40 in a work week. The current threshold for overtime eligibility is $455 a week, or $23,660 per year.
The proposal would set the salary threshold at the 40th percentile of earnings for full-time salaried workers, as determined by DOL's Bureau of Labor Statistics. That amount is projected to be $970 per week, or $50,440 per year, in 2016, when the threshold increase likely would occur. The Obama administration estimated the proposal would make more than five million additional workers eligible for overtime pay.
Judge Allows U.S. House of Representatives to Sue Over Obamacare
On September 9, 2015, a federal judge ruled the U.S. House of Representatives had the right to sue the Obama administration over billions of dollars in health care spending, a decision that poses a new legal threat to the health care law and gave congressional Republicans a victory in their claims of executive overreach by the White House.
U.S. District Court Judge Rosemary M. Collyer found that the House had made a compelling case that suing the White House was the only way to preserve its constitutional power to control federal spending and stop the administration from distributing $136 billion in insurance company subsidies that Republicans say Congress never approved.
The judge dismissed another challenge to the law by the House, finding that the House's claim that the Obama administration had improperly moved the deadlines for new employer requirements without congressional action did not rise to a level that justified a court fight.
Articles of Interest Over the Past Quarter
NLRB Decision Has Broad Implications for Employers
On August 27, 2015, in a 3-2 decision involving Browning-Ferris Industries of California, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) refined its standard for determining joint-employer status.
In its decision, the NLRB found that Browning Ferris was a joint employer with Leadpoint, the company that supplied employees to Browning Ferris to perform various work functions for Browning Ferris, including cleaning and sorting of recycled products. In finding that Browning Ferris was a joint employer with Leadpoint, the NLRB relied on indirect and direct control that Browning Ferris possessed over essential terms and conditions of employment of the employees supplied by Leadpoint as well as Browning Ferris' reserved authority to control such terms and conditions.
For the last 30 years, under the NLRB, two separate business entities have been considered "joint employers" if both entities exercise direct and immediate control over the terms and conditions of employment of the same workers. This means that both entities share the ability to hire, fire, discipline, supervise and direct the workers in question. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce declared in a statement that the test announced in Browning Ferris discards this well-established standard in favor of one in which almost any economic or contractual relationship could trigger a finding of joint employer status.
The International Franchise Association (IFA) announced in a statement on the ruling that it has been working with the Coalition to Save Local Businesses (CSLB) to inform Members of Congress about the devastating economic impact of redefining the current joint employer standard would have on franchised businesses and the overall U.S. economy. As part of its involvement with the coalition, IFA will ask Members of Congress to support legislation that would codify the decades-long and widely-accepted definition of what constitutes a joint employer. HCAOA is a member of the CSLB, as well.
U.S. Labor Department and Kentucky Labor Cabinet Sign Agreement to Protect Workers On July 15, 2015, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) and the Kentucky Labor Cabinet signed a three-year Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the goal of protecting the rights of employees by preventing their misclassification as independent contractors or other non-employee statuses. Under the agreement, both agencies may share information and coordinate law enforcement. The MOU represents a new effort on the part of the agencies to work together to protect the rights of employees and level the playing field for responsible employers by reducing the practice of misclassification. Kentucky joins a growing list of states that are now partners in this effort with the U.S. Labor Department. Alabama, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, New Hampshire, New York, Rhode Island, Texas, Utah, Washington, Wisconsin and Wyoming agencies have signed similar agreements. More information is available on the DOL misclassification website HERE.
Supreme Court Upholds Health Care Law
On June 25, the Supreme Court saved Obamacare from another critical legal challenge, in a 6-3 decision that upholds health insurance subsidies for millions of low and middle-income residents. The ruling avoids a debate in Congress and the White House over how to fix the health care law. The court upheld an IRS rule that allowed the federal government to help pay for individual health insurance in the 34 states that didn't set up their own health care exchanges. Click HERE for more information.
|