CGFA logo  
Conveyor Currents                           December 11, 2015     
In This Issue
Plans are Finalized for the 2016 Grain & Feed Industry Conference in Monterey
California Legislative Report
On-Farm Antibiotic Sales, Distribution Continue Upward Trend: FDA
WASDE Says More than Enough Corn, Beans, Price Forecasts Unchanged
House Votes to Reauthorize Surface Transportation Board, Bill Heads to President Obama
WTO Sets COOL Retaliatory Tariff Cap at $1 Billion; Roberts wants Repeal
Year-end Rush to Judgment: It's all about spending, taxes
Court Tells EPA to Decide on Chlorpyrifos' Fate by End of 2016
Upcoming Dates
 

2015

December 10, 2015
CGFA Member Outreach Meeting & Christmas Luncheon (click here)

2016

January 13-14, 2016: 

Grain & Feed Industry Conference

The Embassy Suites on Monterey Bay

April 27-30, 2016:

CGFA Annual Convention The Manchester Grand Hyatt San Diego 

 

May 4-5, 2016

 California Animal Nutrition Conference at the DoubleTree by Hilton Fresno Convention Center      

Fresno, CA 

 

Quick Links
  
Like us on Facebook

Follow us on Twitter

View our videos on YouTube 

California Grain & Feed Assn.
      www.cgfa.org
 
California Dept. of Food & Ag 
   www.cdfa.ca.gov
 
U.S. Dept. of Food & Ag
    www.usda.gov
 
Benefits of Belonging to CGFA
  • State & Federal Legislative Advocacy
  • Industry & Small Business Issues 
  • Business Advocacy
  • Weekly Updates on Current Issues
  • Networking Opportunities
  • Industry Specific Directories
  • Advertising Venues
  • Social Media Sites
  • Cost Saving Insurance Programs
  • Environmental and Safety Resource
  • Continuing Education and Training
  • Political Action Committee Administration
  • Annual Convention
  • Education Programs
  • District Meetings
2016 Grain & Feed Industry Conference

Don't be left out of the host hotel - call today and book your room at the Embassy Suites for the Grain & Feed Industry ConferenceCall the Embassy Suites Hotel (831) 393-1115 ASAP to reserve your room or click here for access to the personalized web page for our event (click here).     

 

The GFIC committee have finalized plans for the 2016 Grain & Feed Industry Conference.  The GFIC Conference is an annual two-day educational event that is planned and coordinated by the California Grain & Feed Association. The basic purpose of the conference is to provide mill managers and key employees of grain handling and feed manufacturing operations an educational program consisting of both managerial and technical information specific to the industry.

The GFIC committee believes the program topics are very timely and encompass subjects which address the concerns of many of our customers. The 2016 GFIC will be held 
January 13-14 at the Embassy Suites Hotel on Monterey Bay.
 
Program Highlights include:
  • Food Safety Modernization Act (FMSA) Final Rule for Animal Feed Session with Mike Taylor, FDA, Dan McChesney, Center for Veterinary Medicine, Rick Jensen, CDFA and Jenna Areias, CDFA
  • The Food Morality Movement by Kevin Murphy, Food-Chain Communications
  • Chew on This Part II Video Courtesy of NutraBlend
  • Veterinary Feed Directive (VFD) Overview by Kerry Keffaber, DVM, Elanco Animal Heath and Kaylen Henry, GlobalVetLINK, LC
  • Nutritionist Perspective on Ingredients by Peter Karnezos, Ph.D., PMI Nutritional Additives
  • Employee Training Video Series
  • Cal/OSHA Enforcement Requirements on Safety Devices by Jon Weiss, Cal/OSHA
  • 7 Steps for Successful Hazardous Monitoring by Brian Knapp, 4B Components
  • Air Compressors by John Certo, Kaeser Compressors
  • Maintenance Panel on Bearings & Predictive Maintenance by Manuel Martinez and Martin Newberry, SKF Bearing
  • California Labor Law Update
Please call the Embassy Suites Hotel (831) 393-1115 ASAP to reserve your room or click here for access to the personalized web page for our event (click here).  All program and registration materials are available on the CGFA website - www.cgfa.org/events.  Remember "Our Jobs Depend on Agriculture"  -- see you in Monterey!
 
Link to Registration Packet (click here)

California Legislative Report 
by: Dennis Albiani, Legislative Advocate
null
Assembly Member Henry Perea Resigns
In a surprise announcement, Assembly member Henry Perea resigned from the Assembly as of December 31, 2015.  He will be taking an undisclosed government affairs job.  In a statement Perea said "I wasn't necessarily looking for a job because I had another year left in my term. But, the opportunity came up and after a lot of soul searching and talking to my wife (Yahaira) and trying to decide if it was something I wanted to do, we made the decision to move on with my career and take this opportunity."  Perea is the current Assembly Agriculture Committee chair, so this leaves an opening that is sure to be filled in January as 2-year bills must move out of the house of origin by the end of the month.  There will be a special election to fill his seat, likely in March and June. 

Cooper and Salas will Lead Moderate Democrats
Moderate Democrats in the California Assembly chose Assemblymen Jim Cooper, D-Elk Grove, and Rudy Salas, D-Bakersfield, to lead their caucus.  The moderates held a retreat in San Diego to discuss a number of issues including who they will be supporting in key democrat caucus races and to select their new leaders.  This is the first time the caucus will be led by two assembly members.  The decision followed Assemblyman Henry Perea, D-Fresno, the current leader of the group, announcing last week that he would renounce his Assembly seat.

Legislature Holds Numerous Interim Water Hearings
The interim recess has been filled with numerous hearings on various topics impacting water policy including water conservation, groundwater, desalination, urban streams and waterways and other related issues.  Below is a list of those hearings pending and the ones that occurred. 

Scheduled Hearings:
  • Joint Hearing of the Senate Natural Resources Committee and the Assembly Water parks and Wildlife Committee: Oversight Hearing on State Implementation of the Sustainable Groundwater Management Act. February 9th, 9:30 a.m. - John L. Burton Hearing Room (4203)
  • Assembly Select Committee on water Consumption and Alternative Sources: Review of Desalination possibilities and pitfalls. December 11, 2015, 10:00 am -12:30 - Metropolitan Water District Hearing Room
Hearings Held:
  • Senate Natural Resources and Water held a hearing to discuss "California's Water Challenges in the 21st Century:  Assessing California's Chronically Underfunded Water Needs".
  • Assembly Select Committee on Water Consumption and Alternative Sources held an interim hearing at 1:00 on Tuesday, Nov. 17th at 1:00.  This was the first of three hearings to discuss desalination, recycled water, and alternate sources of water. 
  • A joint Informational and Oversight Hearing of Assembly Water, Parks and Wildlife and the Assembly Select Committee on Urban Rivers and Streams met at the Metropolitan Water District Boardroom in Los Angeles to discuss "Water Resource Management in the Los Angeles Watershed."
  • The California Senate and Assembly Agriculture Committees held a hearing December 3rd to discuss the impacts of the drought on California Agriculture.
Overall the hearings were very straightforward and intended to provide general information to the members to better inform next year's policy debates.  

On-Farm Antibiotic Sales, Distribution Continue Upward Trend: FDA
FDA reported this week that sales and distribution of antibiotics for use in food producing animals during 2014 continued an upward trend, according to its annual report on aggregated sales and distribution data for approved antimicrobials.

The report shows 2014 domestic sales grew 4% over 2013, and were up 22% from 2009. Antibiotics approved for use in humans, but with animal approvals, increased 3% in the same period, and increased 23% over 2009. The human antibiotics represent 62% of all antimicrobials used in agriculture, FDA reported.

The Animal Health Institute (AHI), which represents animal drug makers, said "sales data does represent actual use.  It is also important to note that significant progress continues in the effort to implement FDA's judicious use policy, designed to eliminate the use of medically important antibiotics for growth promotion and place all remaining drugs under veterinary oversight."

FDA said there are "inherent limitations" on interpreting data on so-called "increased use" when it comes to how that data is "appropriately interpreted and used." The sales and distribution data are not "indicative of how these antimicrobial drugs were actually used in animals."

WASDE Says More than Enough Corn, Beans, Price Forecasts Unchanged 
Corn prices should stay below $4 a bushel based on more corn-for-ethanol use, offset by lower exports, during the 2015-2016 marketing year, USDA said this week.  U.S. corn ending stocks are forecast at 1.8 billion bushels, 25 million more than a month ago. The projected corn price range is unchanged at $3.35-3.95 per bushel. 

Soybean supply and use forecasts are unchanged from a month ago, with ending stocks pegged at 465 million bushels, the highest since 2006-2007.  Soybean oil use in biodiesel is seen increasing about 200 million pounds in 2015-2016 based on EPA's increase in the biodiesel/renewable diesel Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) blending rate for 2016-2017.  The season-average price for soybeans is unchanged at $8.15-9.65 per bushel.  Soybean meal prices are pegged at $290-330 per short ton, down $10.

House Votes to Reauthorize Surface Transportation Board, Bill Heads to President Obama
The full House this week followed Senate action earlier this summer and approved reauthorization of the Surface Transportation Board (STB), the government's railroad regulatory agency.  The action also increases the STB's accountability to shippers and to Congress, and gives it a lease on life through 2020.

The STB oversees regulation of rail rates, mergers, line acquisitions, new line construction, line abandonment and other system issues.  The board was set up in 1996.  The new reauthorization sets new timetables and procedures for dispute resolution, allows the board to start its own rate investigations, broadens the board membership from three to five members, and allows the board members to talk to each other as long as they make appropriate public disclosure of the talks.

The new authorization strengthens the board "so it can carry out its statutory responsibilities and provide meaningful safeguards intended under existing law," said the National Grain & Feed Assn. (NGFA).  The Association of American Railroads (AAR) praised the reauthorization, saying the "legislation strikes the right balance of preserving market-based structure for shippers and railroads, while also providing commonsense process improvements that will allow the STB to work more efficiently."

WTO Sets COOL Retaliatory Tariff Cap at $1 Billion; Roberts wants Repeal
The clock on when Canada and Mexico will impose retaliatory tariffs on a wide range of U.S. products over U.S. country-of-origin labeling (COOL) rules keeps ticking, and the timeline for prospective action got shorter this week as the World Trade Organization (WTO) ruled the U.S. two North American neighbors and major trading partners can impose up to $1 billion in tariffs. 

Senate Agriculture Committee Chair Pat Roberts (R, KS) immediately issued a statement with the headline, "Retaliation is Becoming a Realization," calling for immediate repeal of COOL.  "As I've said time and again, whether you support or oppose COOL, the fact is retaliation is coming," Roberts said.  "How much longer are we going to keep pretending retaliation isn't happening?  I will continue to look for all legislative opportunities to repeal COOL."  One such opportunity is to attach repeal language to the pending FY2016 omnibus package, an option actively under consideration.

Blocking Roberts' in committee is Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D, MI), ranking member, who favors so-called "voluntary COOL."  She and Sen. John Hoeven (R, ND) introduced a bill earlier this year to repeal COOL and replace it with a voluntary labeling regime, saying the bill "is a bipartisan solution that would have prevented retaliation while also protecting the right of consumers to know where their food comes from."

However, the governments of both Canada and Mexico have publicly stated only repeal will cut off the possibility of retaliatory tariffs.  "If the U.S. Senate does not take immediate action to repeal COOL for beef and pork, Canada will quickly take steps to retaliate," Canadian Ministers Chrystia Freeland, international trade, and Lawrence MacAulay, agriculture and agri-food, said this week in a formal statement.  The Mexican government said, "The retaliatory measures will be implemented as soon as possible and will remain in effect until the U.S. complies with its international commitments...and repeals COOL in its entirety."

The U.S. Trade Representative's office was silent on what the U.S. government's next steps might be.  It said it "will continue to consult with members of Congress" as options are considered.  If Congress doesn't outright repeal COOL, USTR will have to convince Canada and Mexico to negotiate some other agreement to head off retaliation.  Secretary of Agriculture Tom Vilsack said Congress has to act to avoid unnecessary retaliation against fruit and produce growers, along with a host of consumer products.

The American Farm Bureau Federation (AFBF), the National Milk Producers Federation (NMPF), the U.S. Dairy Export Council (USDEC), National Cattlemen's Beef Assn. (NCBA), the National Pork Producers Council (NPPC), the North American Meat Institute (NAMI) and the National Chicken Council (NCC) all favor immediate COOL repeal.  The U.S. Cattlemen's Assn. (USCA), the National Farmers Union (NFU) and a host of consumer groups favor retention of COOL.  Groups like National Grain & Feed Assn. (NGFA), the American Feed Industry Assn. (AFIA), the National Corn Growers Assn. (NCGA) and U.S. Rice favor repairs or replacement of COOL as the ongoing tug-of-war threatens North American markets.

Year-end Rush to Judgment:  It's all about spending, taxes
As Congress rushes toward its target recess date of December 18, it's all about crafting a $1.1-trillion FY2016 omnibus spending package - and which policy riders will make the cut - and extending over 50 expired federal tax breaks, many of which are critical to agriculture/agribusiness.  Here's the lay of the political landscape:

FY2016 Omnibus: The current continuing resolution (CR) keeping the government operating expires December 11, with no hope that lawmakers will resolve their differences in time.  The House Appropriations Committee produced a five-day CR that will keep the federal machine cranking until December 16, giving negotiators more time and avoiding a threatened weekend session.  The Senate approved the short-term CR on December 10, and the House was expected to follow on December 11.  The White House said the President will sign the CR "only to give Congress enough time to pass a budget, but the GOP must drop ideological riders and compromise."  Appropriators hope to release the full 1,000-plus-page-spending bill early next week.

Spending is not holding up the omnibus - the October budget deal with the White House pumped another $80 billion into the discretionary spending pool - and deals on the 12 individual spending bills are cut and dried.  It's unrelated policy language, either attached to the bill already or in negotiation, that threatens to scuttle the package, leading some House conservatives to push for a six-week CR to take pressure off lawmakers, or as last year, Congress may resort to a "cromnibus," a long-term CR well into 2016.  This option drew an immediate White House veto threat.

There are 40-42 policy riders in play, according to Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D, MD), one of the Senate's lead negotiators, including campaign finance, labor regulations, and abortion.  Most are being negotiated between the two chambers' respective appropriations committees, but some are in the hands of House and Senate leadership.  Among the leadership issues are limits on and certification of Syrian and Iraqi refugees, language related to health care coverage for abortion services, and blocking EPA's controversial "waters of the U.S. (WOTUS)" rule.
 
Among agriculture groups, only the National Farmers Union (NFU) issued a statement calling on lawmakers to pass a clean CR - no policy riders - as issues including country-of-origin labeling (COOL), the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS), food labeling and other ag issues are of sufficient importance to be dealt with as stand-alone legislation. 

On the refugee issue, several conservative members are saying this is the make-or-break issue for them and their vote. This one may be avoided as part of the omnibus given strong language included in a bipartisan visa waiver bill passed this week in both chambers, but many conservatives aren't budging.

 A major priority for agriculture is congressionally forcing EPA towithdraw the WOTUS rule, which expands agency and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers authority under the Clean Water Act (CWA).  This rider has a chance as other language attempting to kill off EPA rules on carbon recapture and ozone standards is more difficult for Democrats to swallow, particularly since WOTUS has been halted indefinitely by federal court order.  Democrats also see that getting out of the way of WOTUS may give them bargaining leverage on other issues.

Still in negotiations is language preempting state laws requiring the labeling of foods containing genetically engineered (GE) ingredients. The broad ag/food industry coalition may wind up settling for simple two-year federal preemption to give Congress time to wrestle with a broader bill. The coalition doesn't seem to be able to overcome opposition by a number of Senators who want to see some kind of mandatory label disclosure of or access through scanning to product ingredient information.  While the House approved a broad bill preempting the states, setting up USDA labeling certification programs and other requirements, the food industry wants a fix on the labeling mess by year's end given Vermont's GE labeling law goes into effect in July, 2016 - if it survives a federal court challenge by four separate industry groups - and companies do not want to begin the process of label redesign, warehouse reconfigurations, etc.

With the World Trade Organization (WTO) having approved up to $1 billion in retaliatory tariffs to be levied by Canada and Mexico over U.S. COOL rules, there's a major Senate effort to get language into the omnibus repealing COOL - as the House has already approved its repeal bill - despite opposition from Senate Agriculture Committee ranking member Sen. Debbie Stabenow (D, MI) who believes "voluntary COOL" is the best way to go. 

Language in the House version of the omnibus would resurrect long-dead commodity certificates, a move opposed by Sen. Chuck Grassley (R, IA) in the final omnibus package.  Grassley said this week reinstating the certificate program would allow farmers to avoid payment limits on federal programs included in the 2014 Farm Bill. Some groups are pushing for it, one newsletter reported, but said a senior staffer warned commodity groups they can't oppose cuts in crop insurance and reopening the 2014 Farm Bill, and then turn around and urge appropriators to reopen the omnibus farm package to reinstate certificates.

The American Seed Trade Assn. (ASTA) opposes language in the omnibus that would allow extension of patent exclusivity for Marshall Ryegrass, a variety used in feeding. While the Plant Protection Act (PPA) gives a patent holder 20 years exclusive control of the variety, there's no provision for extending that protection. Marshall Ryegrass was given a 10-year extension of exclusivity in the 2004 appropriations bill. ASTA says to grant yet another extension shows "a total disregard for intellectual property law and legally binding contracts."

Dodd-Frank regulations are under attack as Republicans try and use the omnibus to exert greater congressional oversight of the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and exempt small banks from Dodd-Frank regulations. Coupled with the Dodd-Frank action is an attempt to overturn the Labor Department's fiduciary rule on retirement and investment advisors.  Democrats say a loud "no" to this GOP move.  House finance lawmakers, however, said late this week most Dodd-Frank language is not likely to make the omnibus cut.

There's also a push by some in the House to impose new limits on who can participate in the federal sugar support program.  In a "dear colleague" letter last month, Reps. Joe Pitts (R, PA) and Bob Goodlatte (R, VA) said giving the sugar program the same eligibility rules as other federal commodity programs makes sense. The lawmakers called the language a "simple extension of existing farm program rules."

Also contentious is language ending the U.S.'s ban on crude oil exports; a move by E-cigarette makers to get out from under FDA regulations and approvals, and a move by Republicans to nullify a National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) rule on joint employer status and union negotiations.

Tax Extenders:  A list of 55 federal tax breaks expired at the end of 2014, and as in year's past, Congress is wrestling with how to extend those breaks - retroactive to January 1, 2015 - without breaking the federal bank and while making some of the "temporary" tax breaks permanent.  The Senate passed a two-year extenders package earlier this year; the House, caught up in making some tax breaks permanent, continues to negotiate.

These negotiations, however, are inextricably linked and simultaneous with the FY2016 omnibus spending bill talks given some are pushing to attach any tax extenders package to the omnibus, and concessions on one set of numbers shifts leverage when negotiating the second package.

On the table now is a $108.6-billion two-year extension - covering all of 2015 retroactively and extending into 2016 - of existing list of tax breaks, introduced this week by Ways & Means Committee Chair Kevin Brady (R, TX).  The GOP has a list of several "temporary" tax breaks it wants to make permanent, and is actively horse trading with the Democrats over similar breaks they want to see permanent.  At its highest, the cost of this permanent package could hit $805 billion over 10 years, but negotiators say privately that cost is too high, and ultimately the price tag will be closer to $650-750 billion over a decade.  Still, fiscal conservatives on both sides of the aisle balk at the cost, especially in an election year.

However, as the cost of the package remains a bipartisan concern, discussions late this week shifted to placing some of the extended tax breaks on a five-year phaseout, particularly the wind energy tax credit and two foreign business breaks, including active financing for foreign business loans and a U.S. tax break that protects foreign corporations dividends and other income from immediate taxation.  Another action to control the package's price tag is to shrink some of the permanent tax break candidates or delaying the effective date of other shifts to permanent tax status.  These actions could lower the price tag to $600 million or so.

More than 50 agricultural groups this week sent House and Senate negotiators a letter saying a tax extenders package approved by the end of the year is imperative to restore certainty to business planning for farmers, ranchers and their suppliers.  In sharp focus for the ag groups is Sec. 179 depreciation, capped currently at $25,000, but under the extended tax break would be capped at $500,000 at is was in 2014.  Also in play for the ag groups is the 50% bonus depreciation tax benefit, a break allowing farmers and ranchers to immediately depreciate 50% of the cost of capital investment.  Both of these are also important for ag equipment manufacturers and other input suppliers.

Another section of the extenders package carries bioenergy tax breaks, including a $1-per-gallon blenders' tax credit for biodiesel and renewable diesel, which industry groups are hoping Congress will convert to a domestic producers' tax credit in 2016. The Senate bill carries the producer tax credit language on biodiesel, and Sens. Maria Cantwell (D, WA) and Charles Grassley (R, IA) introduced a bill last week further clarifying the biodiesel producers' credit, and the National Biodiesel Board (NBB) is pushing for the Cantwell-Grassley language in the final extenders package. 

Sen. Orrin Hatch (R, UT), chair of the Senate Finance Committee, is pleased the House is using a two-year bill as its basis for negotiations.  For the last couple of weeks, some in the House have hinted at a one-year bill, if only to control costs.  Hatch's committee earlier this year approved a $96-billion two-year extension, and Hatch sees the ultimate product of the House-Senate negotiation including some permanent tax breaks, while the majority remain "temporary." 

Some GOP priorities for permanence include the business research/development tax credit and Sec. 179 depreciation.  The Democrats - including the White House - have prioritized the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) and the Additional Child Care credit.  House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), identified as the epicenter of the negotiations gridlock, demanding the Child Care Credit be indexed over time, but both Republicans and Democrats have foreclosed that option.  Also in play are delays in implementing the medical device tax and some tax requirements of Obamacare. 
Court Tells EPA to Decide on Chlorpyrifos' Fate by End of 2016
A federal appeals court this week ordered EPA to decide on whether to ban the pesticide chlorpyrifos for agricultural uses by the end of 2016, or explain what unusual circumstances prevented it from doing so.  Effectively, the order issued by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals upheld action by a lower court in a case brought against EPA by Pesticide Action Network North America.

The lower court slammed the agency for what it called "egregious delay" in responding to a petition from environmental groups calling for a ban.  In addition to the December 30, 2016, deadline on a decision, the court ordered EPA to give an update of the issue's status by June 30, which "shall include a detailed explanation of extraordinary circumstances, if any exist that make EPA's compliance with the final action deadline...impracticable to meet."

The agency said in October it was proposing to revoke tolerances for the pesticide, but also asked for public input on uses where no human health risk was involved.  Comments are due by January 5, 2016.