TopMortgage Compliance Update (1)
  June 25, 2010
                                                  RESPA: Interpretive Rule
                                                Home Warranty Companies  


Follow us on Twitter

Find us on Facebook

View our profile on LinkedIn

Mailing List Rainbow

WEBSITE

HOME

Mortgage Compliance

Service Presentations

CORE Compliance

About Us

Our Clientele

News & Views Posts

Archive

Library

Contact Us

Comments | Questions
Questions-3
Emails Archive
Archive Arrow-2

PRESENTATIONS

Mortgage Compliance

Due Diligence

Defaults and Claims

Forensic Mortgage Audit

FHA Examinations

Legal Reviews/Remedies

CORE Compliance Matrix

Loss Mitigation

Mortgage Fraud Audit

Quality Control

HMDA / CRA

Licensing

Business Development

Policy Guides/QC Plans

Information Security Plans

_______________

516-442-3456

Email Us
_________________
Overview
The National Association of Realtors asked the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for clarification on an unofficial staff interpretation HUD had issued on February 21, 2008. In that interpretation, HUD's Office of General Counsel opined that services performed by real estate brokers and agents on behalf of a home warranty company (HWC) are compensable as additional settlement services if the services are actual, necessary and distinct from the primary services provided by the real estate broker or agent [See 24 CFR 3500.14(g)(3)], and allowed that the real estate broker or agent may accept a portion of the charge for the homeowner warranty only if the broker or agent provides services that are not nominal and for which there is not a duplicative charge. [See 24 CFR 3500.14(c)]

In today's Federal Register, HUD's Office of General Counsel has published an Interpretive Rule which interprets Section 8 of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act (RESPA) and HUD's regulations as they apply to the compensation provided by home warranty companies to real estate brokers and agents. An interpretive rules is exempt from public comment under the Administrative Procedure Act; however, HUD is providing a public comment period, commencing today and continuing to July 26, 2010.

HUD's Interpretive Rule holds that an HWC's compensation of a real estate broker or agent for marketing services that are directed to particular homebuyers or sellers would be a payment that violates Section 8 of RESPA as an illegal kickback for a referral of settlement service business. This obviously upholds HUD's historic view that a referral is not a compensable service for which a broker or agent may receive compensation.

However, on a case-by-case basis, compensation may be permissible when the services provided are actual, necessary, and distinct from the primary services provided by the real estate broker or agent, and when those additional services are not nominal and for which there is a duplicative charge.

The amount of the compensation from an HWC that is permitted under Section 8 for such additional services must be reasonably related to the value of those services and not include compensation for referrals of business, pursuant to the guidelines offered in HUD's Statement of Policy 1999-1.  HUD provides several examples that would not constitute an illegal kickback.

Highlights
Interpretive Rule

(1) A payment by an HWC for marketing services performed by real estate brokers or agents on behalf of the HWC that are directed to particular homebuyers or sellers is an illegal kickback for a referral under Section 8 of RESPA.

(2) Depending upon the facts of a particular case, an HWC may compensate a real estate broker or agent for services when those services are actual, necessary and distinct from the primary services provided by the real estate broker or agent, and when those additional services are not nominal and are not services for which there is a duplicative charge.

(3) The amount of compensation from the HWC that is permitted under section 8 for such additional services must be reasonably related to the value of those services and not include compensation for referrals of business.
Examples of Permissible Compensation

To evaluate whether a payment from an HWC is an unlawful kickback for a referral, HUD may look in the first instance to whether, among other things:

  • The compensation for the HWC services provided by the real estate broker or agent is contingent on an arrangement that prohibits the real estate broker or agent from performing services for other HWC companies (i.e., if a real estate broker or agent is compensated for performing HWC services for only one company, this is evidence that the compensation may be contingent on such an arrangements).
  • Payments to real estate brokers or agents by the HWC are based on, or adjusted in future agreements according to, the number of transactions referred. If it is subsequently determined, however, that the payment at issue is for only compensable services, the existence of such arrangements and agreements would not be an indicator of an unlawful referral arrangement, and would be permissible.
Pricing the Compensation

In analyzing whether a particular payment or fee bears a "reasonable relationship to the value of the goods or facilities actually furnished or services actually performed," payments must be commensurate with that amount normally charged for similar services, goods or facilities.

If the payment or a portion thereof bears no reasonable relationship to the market value of the goods, facilities or services provided, the excess over the market rate may be used as evidence of a compensated referral or an unearned fee in violation of Section 8(a) or (b) of RESPA. [See 24 CFR 3500.14(g)(2)]

The market price used to determine whether a particular payment meets the reasonableness test may not include a referral fee or unearned fee, because such fees are prohibited by RESPA.

Visit Library for Issuance
  Law Library Image

Home Warranty Companies' Payments to Real Estate Brokers and Agents - Interpretive Rule

RESPA: 24 CFR Part 3500 FR: Vol. 75, No. 122, 36271-36273 (06/25/10)

Suite of Services and Specializations

Mortgage Compliance                 Compliance Administration


Defaults and Claims Reviews        Forensic Mortgage Audit


Mortgage Defaults Task Force       Mortgage Quality Control


FHA Examinations               State and Federal Examinations


Mortgage Due Diligence     FNMA|FHLMC|GNMA Applications


Legal Reviews & Remedies          Loss Mitigation Compliance


Sarbanes-Oxley Compliance           HMDA & CRA Processing


Mortgage Fraud Audit                   Disaster Recovery Plans


CORE Compliance Matrix                         Statutory Licensing


Business Development                Information Security Plans


IT & IS Compliance                                     RESPA-AfBAs

Lenders Compliance Group is the first full-service, mortgage risk management firm in the country, specializing exclusively in mortgage compliance and offering a full suite of hands-on and automated services in residential mortgage banking.

We are pioneers in outsourcing solutions for mortgage compliance.

This communication is sent to our valued clients and colleagues, who regularly receive our Advisory Bulletins, Mortgage Compliance Updates,  Compliance Alerts, and News and Views.

These publications are free to subscribers. Information contained herein is not intended to be and is not a source of legal advice.

2007-2010 Lenders Compliance Group, Inc. All Rights Reserved.