3rd Edition- A closer look at VPR |
September 2009 |
|
|
|
is a second Spring
where every leaf is a flower"
Albert Camus, French novelist
|
|
Featured Article:
Standard for Surge Protective Devices
'Voltage Protection Ratings (VPR)- Why the Change?'
|
In our last newsletter on 3rd Edition, we took a
closer look at Nominal Discharge Current
ratings. This time, our focus will be on the Voltage
|
In our last newsletter article on 3rd Edition, we took a closer look at Nominal Discharge Current Ratings. This time, we are going to focus on the Voltage Protection Rating (VPR).
Some of you are familiar with UL 1449 2nd Edition, as well as the surge protection products currently offered by many manufacturers. The ratings on the UL product label include the Suppressed Voltage Ratings (SVR). These ratings are based on the 6 kV/500 A combination waveform.
During the development of UL 1449 3rd Edition, several factors were considered prior to making the change to Voltage Protection Ratings. These included the primary reference to permanently connected devices as well as the impact of the new Nominal Discharge Current Test.
In the 2nd Edition, the measured limiting voltage test, using the 6 kV/500 A combination waveform, was applied before the Duty Cycle test, which was conducted using twenty pulses of the 6 kV/3 kA combination wave. After the Duty Cycle test, a second 6 kV/500 A combination waveform was applied. If the measured limiting voltage result from the second test was not more than 10% different from the first measured limiting voltage result, the final result was used to determine the Suppressed Voltage Rating.
The same basic principle applies to the 3rd Edition. However, in the 3rd Edition, the Voltage Protection Rating is based on the 6 kV/3 kA combination waveform and, for permanently connected devices (Type 1 and Type 2, typically) the duty cycle test is replaced by the Nominal Discharge Current Test discussed in the previous article (Link). For Type 3 devices (cord connected and plug in devices) the Voltage Protection Rating is the same (6 kV/3 kA) and the duty cycle test using the same waveform is conducted.
The higher measured limiting voltage test (6 kV/3 kA as opposed to the 2nd Edition 6 kV/500 A combination waveform) and the change from the Duty Cycle test to the significantly more stressful Nominal Discharge Current (In) test are designed to provide the end-user with a much higher level of confidence in the safety of the SPD. This is particularly true in the event of a catastrophic surge such as lightning.
When looking at the ratings on the 3rd Edition listed SPD compared to the previous 2nd Edition listed SPD, what is generally found is that the Voltage Protection Ratings are higher than the previous Suppressed Voltage Ratings. This makes perfect sense due to the difference in test waveforms.
|
| COMING SOON...
...In our next 3rd Edition newsletter, join us for a discussion of the difference in conducted Current Tests.
Need some clarification on 3rd Edition?
Click on link to inquire about anything related to 3rd Edition.
Submittals have a chance to be featured in a future newsletter!
|
| Link to Newsletter Archive |