advantage logo
Issue: # 70August 15, 2011
 

tom brady

Greetings!  

 

Our last newsletter generated many questions regarding sexual harassment policies.    We thought it best to provide more information on the topic in this newsletter.  Please review the detailed information below and sample cases.

 

What do you really need to do? We suggest at a minimum, if you do not already have a written policy incorporated into your handbook, then let us provide you with the written document. In addition, it would be a good idea to have your managers and supervisors trained.  In the event you ever have an issue, it will work in your favor to have on record the training.

 

We hope you find these newsletters helpful, please forward to anyone who may find this of interest, by using the forward link at the bottom of this e-mail.   Thank you for your referrals.  To learn more about us, click here.  

 

If you have a question or want a a quote, send us an email Bill or Vanessa.   Less then one month, September 12th till Patriots opening day on Monday Night Football in Miami.


Bill Randell CLU,CHFC,        Vanessa Costa CLU,CHFC,

 

 

What is sexual harassment? 

 

Sexual harassment is a form of discrimination, in the United States, that violates Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.   Sexual harassment occurs when one employee makes continued, unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature, to another employee, against his or her wishes.

 

Examples of Sexual Harassment:

Sexual harassment can occur in a variety of situations. These are examples of sexual harassment, not intended to be all inclusive.

  • Unwanted jokes, gestures, offensive words on clothing, and unwelcome comments and repartee.
  • Touching and any other bodily contact such as scratching or patting a coworker's back, grabbing an employee around the waist, or interfering with an employee's ability to move.
  • Repeated requests for dates that are turned down or unwanted flirting.
  • Transmitting or posting emails or pictures of a sexual or other harassment-related nature.
  • Displaying sexually suggestive objects, pictures, or posters.
  • Playing sexually suggestive music.

When an employee complains to a supervisor, another employee, or the Human Resources office, about sexual harassment, an immediate investigation of the charge should occur. Supervisors should immediately involve Human Resources staff. Employees need to understand that they have an obligation to report sexual harassment concerns to their supervisor or the Human Resources office.

 

Why should an employer have a Sexual Harassment Policy?

It does not matter whether the alleged harasser intended the conduct to be harassing or complimentary. Rather, the conduct is evaluated from the perspective of the victim. Thus, in Ellison v. Brady (924 F.2d 872 (9th Cir. 1991)), the trial court found that there was no harassment, characterizing the defendant employer as an inept Don Juan rather than a wrongdoer. The Ninth Circuit rejected the "reasonable person" standard utilized by the trial court since it "tends to be male biased and systematically ignores the experiences of women." Rather, the circuit court found that if a "reasonable woman" would find the conduct severe and pervasive enough to alter the terms and conditions of employment such that an offensive environment was created, then sexual harassment can be found.

 

The Supreme Court on June 26, 1998, made employers more liable for incidents of sexual harassment. Ruling on two sexual harassment cases, Faragher v. City of Boca Raton, and Burlington Industries Inc. v. Ellerth, the Supreme Court basically stated that the employer is responsible for the actions of the supervisor, even when the employer is unaware of the supervisor's behavior. An employer can no longer claim that they did not know about the sexual harassment because the employee did not inform them, nor can they claim that they were unaware of the supervisor's behavior.

 

"ObamaCare" mandate defeated again

11th Circuit rules mandate unconstitutional

 
This editorial explains the reasoning of the 11th Circuit Court.  HealthCare reform without a mandate that penalizes a citizen, who does not buy health insurance, is like trying to enforce a speed limit without being able to write tickets to those who speed.    This will definitely get in front of the Supreme Court.   Here is a small section

 

Today's ruling by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals striking down the national health care law's individual mandate hinged on an issue that has consistently tripped up the Obama administration during oral arguments in several of the legal challenges to the law. The essential question is: if courts uphold the individual mandate, what is the constitutional principle that would limit the U.S. Congress's exercise of its Commerce Clause power?

This issue has often been framed by asking whether the power being claimed could allow future Congresses to force Americans to eat broccoli or join a gym. Obama's lawyers, while acknowledging that there's no Supreme Court case that directly grappled with the issue, have countered by making the "health care is unique" argument. That is, since virtually everybody will need health care at some point, it's a special case. Yet as I wrote in June, "simply saying the health care market is unique doesn't actually create a very clear or understandable limit to Congressional power.

 

 

Walgreens to sell health insurance

As companies like Walgreens sell more and more prescriptions and begin to have medical clinics in-house, it only makes sense.

 

Story here.