California Association of Private School Organizations 

CAPSO Midweek E-Mailer 

December 21, 2011Volume 5, Number 7 
In This Issue

-- Green Ribbon Schools

-- CPSAC Announces New Workshop

-- Quick Takes

-- The Fourth Time's the Charm...but for Whom?

-- Publication Note

Join Our Mailing List

 

 

Follow CAPSO

on Twitter

 

Follow us on Twitter

 

Quick Links...
 

General Resources

California Department of Education
Public School Districts
News & Information


Newsletters & Blogs


Organizations & Think Tanks



California Association
of
Private School Organizations
 
15500 Erwin St., #303
Van Nuys, CA  91411

818.781.4680
  
  
 
  
 CAPSO Logo GIF 









 
Green Ribbon Schools
CAPSO Logo GIFThis year, the U.S. Department of Education is rolling out a Green Ribbon Schools program designed to, "...recognize schools that save energy, reduce costs, feature environmentally sustainable learning spaces, protect health, foster wellness, and offer environmental education to boost academic achievement and community engagement."  A one-page Fact Sheet notes that the GRS designation will comprise part of "...the first comprehensive federal policy addressing the environmental impact, health and education of our schools. It lays out a thoughtful vision for schools, sets a high bar for success, and will raise the profile of individual green schools and the states that encourage them."
 
Public schools interested in receiving the GRS designation will submit applications to state departments of education.  Thus far, 33 states, including California, and the District of Columbia have agreed to participate in the program.  States may nominate up to four schools in this, the program's pilot year.  If a fourth school is nominated, it must be a private school
 
The Council for American Private Education (CAPE) administers the private school component of the Blue Ribbon Schools program (nationally) on behalf of the U.S. Department of Education.  The California Department of Education has asked CAPSO to facilitate the private school component of the Green Ribbon Schools application process.  A common online application for both public and private schools will soon be available on the CDE website tomorrow (12/22/11).
 
The application is comprehensive, and will require the collection of a substantial amount of exacting information.  Moreover, schools (both public and private) wishing to apply this year will have a limited amount of time in which to do so, as the "window" for submitting applications will close in mid-February.  Schools wishing to submit an application this year should keep in mind that states select nominees.  Thus, no more than one school will be selected as California's private school nominee for the current (pilot) year.  That school's application will then be submitted to the U.S. Department of Education, which awards the GRS designations.
 
If your school is thinking of applying this year, we'd like to receive your contact information, and we've created a simple online interface that will enable you to quickly and easily provide it when you click here.  We also encourage officials at all schools to look at the application once it becomes available.  Studying the document will help schools prepare to apply for the GRS designation in subsequent years.  More importantly, doing so will illuminate many of the ways in which schools can augment their stewardship of the environment while educating students to become more environmentally and sustainability oriented. 
CPSAC Announces New Workshop

 

  
Five Easy Steps to a Balanced Math Program
  
Presented by:
Jan Christinson

 

Download a Registration Form


Dates and Locations

Alameda (Bay Area)

March 12, 13 and April 26, 2012
Chinese Christian School
1801 North Loop Rd.
Alameda, CA  94502

Sacramento

March 14, 15 and April 25
Rancho Cordova City Hall
2729 Prospect Park Drive
Rancho Cordova, CA  95670

For Both Locations

Per-Person Registration:  $75.00  (Prior to 2/24/2012)

Registration fee includes workshop materials, continental breakfast, and lunch, each day of the program.

  

Program Hours:  8:30 a.m. to 3:00 p.m., each of the three days.

                          

Space is limited.  Registration will be accepted on a first-come, first-served basis! 

 

About the Program

 

This three-day workshop provides classroom math teachers with a proven 5-step model they can follow to bring "balance" to their mathematics instruction and assessment program. Today's math teachers face an added challenge in teaching math: They must ensure that students have both computational skills and the ability to write extended response answers to multiple step problems.

  

The workshop is based on the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics recommendations for ways to "build" mathematically powerful students.  The five steps address computation, mental math, conceptual understanding, problem solving, mastery of math facts, and math performance assessments evaluated with a rubric or scoring guide.  The model is applicable to grades K-8, is practical and easy to implement immediately, and works well with any district-adopted math program, supplemental materials, and assessment measures currently in use.  Participants will see the model illustrated with student work from upper elementary and middle school grades and be given time to collaborate in grade levels to plan for the implementation of this model in their own instructional program.

 

Participants will learn the elements of the following 5-step model:

 

Step One: Math Review emphasizes computational skills and mental math and helps students maintain previously learned skills. 

 

Step Two: Conceptual Understanding considers state math standards and district objectives, and aligns both instruction and assessment by means of an end-of-unit performance task scored with a student-generated rubric.

 

Step Three: Problem Solving provides both a structure for problem-solving activities related to the current conceptual unit focus and a generalized math rubric to assess work produced.

 

Step Four: Mastery of Math Facts establishes a program of accountability for mastering grade-level facts by the end of elementary school.

 

Step Five: "Big Idea" Performance Task identifies a grade-level focus that can be taught for depth of understanding and assessed across the school and/or administrative unit with a grade-level perormance task and accompanying scoring guide.

 

 

About the Presenter

 

Jan Christinson is a Professional Development Associate with The Leadership and Learning Center in Denver, Colorado.  He conducts seminars based on two publications he co-authored: Five Easy Steps to a Balanced Math Program, and Student Generated Rubrics: An Assessment Model to Help All Students Succeed.  Jan's primary goal is to improve classroom instruction and thereby improve student learning.  With 25 years of experience as an elementary and middle school classroom teacher, Jan brings a wide and varied range of educational experiences to his presentations.  He has assumed numerous leadership roles within school districts, serving as a mentor teacher and a beginning teacher support provider, acting as a K-12 math committee co-chair, and directing the implementation of a K-8 grade level "big idea" math instruction and assessment program.

 

Jan has presented workshops and led breakout sessions at regional conferences, most notably for the California Math Council and the National Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.  He has conducted training sessions for over 15 years to help prospective teachers prepare to successfully complete accountability measures to obtain their California Teaching Credential. 

Quick Takes 
Oral Hearing Set for Quarry v. Doe 1

After nearly two years on the docket, the California Supreme Court has set a date for oral argument in Quarry v. Doe 1.  The case will be heard on January 5, 2012, in San Francisco.  At issue is the ability of victims of sexual molestation to bring and advance claims against non-perpetrator defendants (including schools) after - even many years after - the relevant statute of limitations has expired.  In CAPSO's view, a lower court decision that made such claims permissible, disturbs the appropriate balance between the interests of plaintiffs in pursuing claims, and the rights of defendants to defend claims.  CAPSO has filed an amicus curiae brief addressing the issue, which can be found, here.

 


Two Online Seminars from Facing History and Ourselves

 

From Facing History and Ourselves

 

Holocaust and Human Behavior Online Seminar


(Feb. 2-March 29): The twentieth century - one of the most murderous centuries in history - will forever be marked by the Nazis' attempt to murder the Jews of Europe. In no other history are the steps that resulted in genocide so carefully documented, not only by the victims, but also by perpetrators and bystanders. The events that led to the Holocaust raise profound moral questions about the consequences of our actions and our beliefs, and how we make distinctions between right and wrong, good and evil. While the Holocaust was unique, the questions remain universal. This online seminar includes a conference call with a Holocaust survivor.
 More information can be found, here.

 

 

Choices in Little Rock Online Seminar
 

(Feb. 9-March 29): Facing History and Ourselves' newest online course, Choices in Little Rock, is a rich and engaging exploration of the 1957 desegregation of Central High School in Little Rock, Arkansas. The course traces the legal and personal struggles of African Americans from Jim Crow America through the landmark Supreme Court decision on Brown v. Board of Education, and ultimately, to the courageous actions of nine young men and women determined to make desegregation a reality. Their efforts would lead to a crisis that historian Taylor Branch once described as "the most severe test of the Constitution since the civil war."  More information can be found, here.

 

 

Budget Cuts Set to Take Effect in California

 

Governor Jerry Brown has announced that nearly $1 billion will be trimmed from the Golden State's current budget because revenues failed to meet an interim target figure established when the current budget was adopted.  Actual state revenue has fallen some $4 billion short of projections. "The good news is the economy of California is recovering ... but (it's) still not enough to close the deficit built up for years," remarked the Governor. "These cuts to universities, In-Home Supportive Services, schools, prosecutions - are not good, they are not the way we would like to run California, but we have to live within our means."  Among the reductions affecting public education are:

 

  • $327 million to K-12 schools;
  • $100 million each to the University of California and the California State University system;
  • $102 million to community colleges

 

 

 Duncan's NCLB Presiction Misses the Mark...by a Mile

 

Last March, while offering testimony before Congress, U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan warned lawmakers that if they failed to rewrite the No Child Left Behind Act, 82 percent of the nation's public schools would be labeled "failing" during the then-current school year.  The Secretary's dire forecast was regarded by some as a prod intended to quicken the long-overdue reauthorization of the law, while others saw it as an outright scare tactic. 

 

Now, with the law yet to be rewritten, actual figures show that Mr. Duncan's prediction was far off the mark.  According to figures provided by the Center for Education Policy, the estimated number of schools that failed to achieve "adequate yearly progress" during the preceding school year was 48 percent. In response, Mr. Duncan said, "Whether it's 50 percent, 80 percent, or 100 percent of schools being incorrectly labeled as failing, one thing is clear: No Child Left Behind is broken."  Cynical readers may find themselves wondering whether the disparity will serve to deflect attention from the fact that nearly half the nation's public schools are currently "failing" to make the grade. 

The Fourth Time's the Charm...but for Whom?
CAPSO Logo GIFThrice before, California has applied for a slice of the $4.35 billion "Race to the Top Fund" pie, and all three times the Golden State was shut out by those overseeing the federal competitive grants program.  The application process was no romp in the park.  Controversial legislation relating to charter schools, teacher evaluation and student achievement was passed in order to bolster the state's submittals.  The completed application filled 129 pages, including a references section surpassing in length the bibliographies found in certain doctoral dissertations I've had occasion to read.  (Did I mention the 461 page Appendix accompanying the application?)  Obviously, a formidable team of people spent a great deal of time, and worked very hard to place us in contention.

 

After acquiring the unhapppy status of a three-time loser, it was anything but certain that the state would opt to throw its hat in the ring when the U.S. Department of Education announced an early education version of Race to the Top, funded at the relatively paltry sum of $500 million.  But enter the fray we did, and California finally found its name in the win column when the results of the competition were announced, last week.  Of the 35 states that made application for grants estimated to range from $50 - $100 million, nine were deemed winners, with California placing ninth in the scoring system. 

Being last among the winners appears to have carried some rather significant financial consequences, as program funds were committed on a priority basis, with the top-scoring state (North Carolina) receiving first consideration, and so on, down the line.  By the time the 8th-place winner (Rhode Island) had been awarded its proposed cut, "only" $55 million remained in the pot, of which California stands to receive approximately $52.5 million.  Given that the state had hoped for a grant closer to the $100 million maximum, it hurts to know that tiny Rhode Island stands to receive $50 million.

 

Nevertheless, congratulations are in order for longtime friend of CAPSO Camille Maben, who heads the California Department of Education's Child Development Division, and her team.  The most- capable Ms. Maben had only seven weeks in which to prepare the state's proposal, working in concert with sixteen regional early learning consortia.

 

Now, hard questions remain to be asked about the use to which the federal funds will be directed.  According to this San Francisco Chronicle story, "California's portion will be used to create a scoring system for public and private prekindergarten providers to help parents identify the best early learning program for their children."
Apparently, local rating systems will be developed (by each of the sixteen regional consortia) that will judge child care and early education programs.  The ratings will then be made available to parents.  The local groups responsible for developing the evaluation instrumentation will include personnel from, "county government and offices of education as well as local taxpayer-funded First Five commissions."

 

One hopes that private early education providers will be well represented in the local consortia.  After all, the great majority of current early education programs operate under the aegis of private entities, many with religious orientations. According to the Chronicle article, the Race to the Top grant money will be used to develop evaluation systems designed to rate these schools on factors such as "the learning environment, teacher effectiveness and parent engagement."  Will they also examine the extent to which such programs introduce young children to religious symbols and elements of faith, as they are made to feel at home in a community of shared values?  Will the very existence of a state-administered ratings system produce a homogenizing effect that reduces the diversity of programs and settings currently available to parents?  Will the activities seeded by the federal grant really accrue to the benefit of parents and their children, or will they instead be used to leverage a downward expansion of the public education system?
 
While CAPSO is primarily concerned with private education spanning grades K-12, a great many of the schools affiliated with our member organizations are associated with early education programs.  We'll therefore be keeping abreast of unfolding developments with considerable interest.  And so should you.

Ron Reynolds
Publication Note
CAPSO Logo GIF


The next ediction of the CAPSO Midweek E-Mailer will be published January 11, 2012.  We wish all our readers a joyous holiday season and a wonderful new year!