L.A. Catholic Schools Move to 200-Day School Year
 Last week, the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Los Angeles announced that its elementary schools will move to an 11-month school calendar, effective at the outset of the 2011-2012 school year. The new policy makes the Archdiocesan Catholic schools the first school system in the state of California - either public or private - to embrace a 200-day school year. Some 52,000 students in Los Angeles, Ventura, and Santa Barbara counties currently attend elementary schools affiliated with the Archdiocesan Department of Catholic Schools. A press release announcing the watershed development can be viewed, here. The announcement of the groundbreaking policy followed closely on the heels of the State of the Union address, in which President Obama exhorted the nation's schools to respond to the critical challenge of renewing American scholarship, ingenuity, and initiative, in light of a rapidly changing, and ever more competitive global economic environment. Research suggests a positive relationship between additional days of instruction, and gains in student achievement. The move to an extended school year comes at a time when many public schools, including those associated with the Los Angeles Unified School District, are reducing days of instruction. "I think it's wonderful for the students," said LAUSD Superintendent Ramon C. Cortines, in a story reported by Los Angeles Times. Mr. Cortines added that he would lengthen the public school year 'in a minute' if resources permitted. The trailblazing plan comes with additional price tags both for schools and families. Teacher salaries will increase by ten percent, and families will face an additional month of tuition payments, which currently range from approximately $200 a month at schools situated in the poorest neighborhoods, to about $800 a month in more affluent areas. "A school year of 180 days is at the low end when you look at other countries around the world," said Dr. Kevin Baxter, Archdiocesan Superintendent of Elementary Schools, and a key backer of the new policy. Noting that some nations maintain school years consisting of up to 240 days of instruction, Dr. Baxter expressed optimism that a 200-day school year would better equip students to compete with peers in other nations.
As this Orange County Register story observes, "the shift to 200 instruction days from 180 is the equivalent of an extra school year over the nine years of K-8 education." Under the new calendar, classes would begin in mid-August and conclude at the end of the third week in June. Yesterday, the Archdiocese launched an enrollment campaign designated "Believe It!," with a kick-off event at Immaculate Conception school. At the event, Catholic Schools Chancellor Mary Elizabeth Galt indicated that the decision to adopt the new calendar was in the hands of individual schools. Archdiocesan officials anticipate, however, that the majority of schools will embrace the new plan. |
CAPSO Offers "Emerging Legal Issues" Workshop
CAPSO is pleased to present Emerging Legal Issues for Private Schools: Employees, a half-day workshop for private school administrators and business managers. The program, which will address a range of newly enacted or revised statutes, and examine recent court cases and current trends of interest to the private school community, is being offered in association with the Liebert Cassidy Whitmore law firm. The Workshop will take place March 23, 2011, from 8:30 a.m. to 12:00, noon, at Our Lady of Perpetual Help - Notre Dame Hall, in Clovis (adjacent to Fresno). Issues to be covered include:
- Background Checks
Obtaining and Releasing Information Use of Internet
- Fingerprinting Requirements
Applicants Contract Employees
- Mandated Reporting Obligations
- Employment Agreements
The Meaning of "At-Will Employment"
- Arbitration Clauses
- Wage and Hour Issues
Exempt and Non-Exempt Employees Special Rules for Teachers Partial-Day Deductions Employee/Parent Volunteers
- Layoffs/Terminations
- Severance Agreements
We are delighted that veteran attorneys Shelline Bennett and Brian Walter, partners in the firm of Liebert Cassidy Whitmore, will conduct the workshop.
Participants can look forward to an interactive presentation in which they are encouraged to ask questions and share perspectives with colleagues. CAPSO is subsidizing the program so as to make participation affordable to administrators serving member-affiliated schools. At a per-person registration fee of $25.00 (for CAPSO affiliates), this is a program you can't afford to miss.
Space will be limited, and registration will be conducted on a first-come, first-served basis. So, mark the date on your calendars, and register now! Additional information and registration instructions can be found on our website, here, and can be downloaded, here.
|
Quick Takes
Can Texas Hold 'Em?
Here's an online article published by Austin's examiner.com that speculates on the economic hardship faced by the Lonestar State's public schools, and possible implications for the state's private schools. Like California, Texas faces a looming budget deficit on the order of $25 billion. The article reports widespread public school closures, record numbers of teacher layoffs, and "enormous" class sizes, adding that "the cuts to education will have a devastating impact." The article goes on to surmise that the current crisis may produce "an exodus to private schools," noting that independent and religious schools in the Austin area have reported a recent uptick in applications, to such an extent that private schools "...are beginning to wonder how many of the public school refugees they can realistically accept. Union Gap
In the January 24, 2011 of the Education Intelligence Agency Communique, Mike Antonucci provides some truly mind-boggling figures. During the decade spanning 2000-2010 the total number of persons employed in the private U.S. workforce increased by 0.2 (two-tenths of one) percent, while the number of public sector employees jumped 9.2 percent. While private sector union membership fell by a staggering 23.1 percent during the same period, public sector union membership increased 7.1 percent. As Mr. Antonucci observes, "America has become an almost entirely non-union economy governed by a highly unionized political bureaucracy." Those numbers notwithstanding, the past couple of years have been challenging for unions, in general. As Mr. Antonucci reports: " There were 612,000 fewer union members in 2010 than there were in 2009 (which itself had a 770,000 member decline from 2008). To put that into some perspective, the entire economy lost only 417,000 jobs in 2010. Union market share of the total workforce fell below 12 percent, while its share of the private workforce fell below 7 percent." Good to his Word
In last week's E-Mailer, it was mentioned that a highly credible source indicated that newly installed Speaker of the House John Boehner's top priority in the education policy arena would be the reinitiation of the DC Opportunity Sholarships Program. Now, a bill introduced last week that's co-authored by Mr. Boehner (R-OH) and Senator Joe Lieberman (I-CT) makes good on that promise. The Scholarships for Opportunities and Results (SOAR) Act is described by Mr. Boehner as the "...only...program in America where the federal government allows parents from lower-income families to choose the schools that are the best for their children." You can read more about it, here. |
Half Full or Half Empty?
 Next to presidential inaugurations, the annual State of the Union address provides our nation's signature moment. It's a splendid occasion, upon which pomp and ceremony typically, if all too briefly, trump partisanship. Whatever the current balance of power between Democrats and Republicans, no matter the current state of the economy, and regardless of the press of world events, the State of the Union places America, its history, character, and aspirations front and center.
Because the event takes place in the evening, well after school hours, the State of the Union also affords parents an opportunity to seize upon a "teachable moment," particularly during the minutes leading up to the President's entry into the House of Representatives. Here is a chance to identify members of each branch of government, some of whom are distinguishable by their attire: Supreme Court justices in their flowing robes, and members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff in their impressive military uniforms. Most important of all, given the rancor and recriminations that have come to dominate our national political discourse, it is of vital importance that our kids see Democrats and Republics rise to their feet as one, and break into applause when the Seargent at Arms announces: "The President of the United States!" Once the President begins to speak, younger children can be excused, though it is important that they see their parents listening attentively, and discussing the content of the speech in its aftermath.
Last week's State of the Union experience was particularly poignant, coming as it did on the heels of the tragic shootings in Tucson. And, while watching David Dreier and Maxine Waters sitting next to each other (as did many other dyed-in-the-wool Republicans and Democrats) invited tinges of cynicism, it was a memorable gesture, nonetheless.
The event was no less memorable for President Obama having made education its centerpiece. I cannot remember a State of the Union address in which schools, teachers, and education policy received half the time and emphasis as was the case this year. While short on specifics, the president did an admirable job of linking the notion of investment in education to the sustenance of American creativity, ingenuity, and prosperity. Acknowledging new global realities and challenges, he proclaimed, "This is our Sputnik moment," as both an admonition and a homage to the nation's investment in education, after the Soviet Union bested the U.S. in the race to launch a satellite into space.
The President drew loud and lasting applause after exhorting the nation to show enhanced respect for teachers. "Let's also remember that after parents, the biggest impact on a child's success comes from the man or woman at the front of the classroom," he said. "In South Korea, teachers are known as 'nation builders'. Here in
America, it's time we treated the people who educate our children with the same level of respect."
Of course, it wasn't by accident that education came to be featured so prominently in the President's State of the Union remarks. Facing a divided Congress in the aftermath of the November elections, Mr. Obama is eager to identify significant legislation that stands a good chance of inviting visible bipartisan cooperation. And the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (AKA "No Child Left Behind") may prove to be just the ticket.
So far, so good. But now comes the "glass half empty" part. In referencing the re-writing of the federal education law, the President had the following to say: "And Race to the Top should be the approach we follow this year as we replace No Child Left Behind with a law that is more flexible and focused on what's best for our kids."
Clearly, my view of the Race to the Top Fund, is significantly different than that of Mr. Obama. As the President sees it, the $4.35 billion competitive grants program is, "the most meaningful reform of our public schools in a generation. For less than one percent of what we spend on education each year, it has led over 40 states to raise their standards for teaching and learning."
In Mr. Obama's view, the appeal of RTTF lies in its presumptive ability to leverage reform. In my view, the jury is still very much out on whether RTTF allocations will produce real and lasting change in the handful of states that actually ended up receiving grants, let alone in those that received not a dime for the considerable amount of effort, and political capital required by the application process. And let's not forget that there is virtually no real opportunity for private school teachers and students to benefit from the program.
Some may regard RTTF as an effective federal lever to induce change at the state and local level. Others may view the approach as a polite form of extortion, in which cash-strapped states staring huge education deficits in the eye have little choice but to play along, whether or not those ultimately responsible for implementing proposed reforms are committed to their realization. Saying "yes," to reform is the price of admission to the game, but talk is cheap, no matter how high the stakes.
We'll soon begin to see the extent to which members of congress are willing to adopt RTTF as a template for ESEA reauthorization. According to EdWeek's Politics K-12 blog, key Senators would like to see a reauthorization bill ready for mark up by the Easter recess. Stay tuned!
Ron Reynolds
|
Publication Note
The next issue of the CAPSO Midweek E-Mailer will be published February 16, 2011.
|
|